Outcomes after simultaneous kidney‐pancreas versus pancreas after kidney transplantation in the current era

When pancreata fly: Outcomes and lessons learned from the development of a Pancreas Transplant Import Program

BACKGROUND

To address long waitlist times and increase pancreas transplantation, our center has implemented a protocol for long-distance importation of pancreata.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of pancreas transplantation at our institution from January 1, 2014, the start of our importation program, through September 30, 2021. Outcomes were compared between locally procured grafts and imported grafts, defined as grafts procured greater than 250 nautical miles (NM) from our center.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients underwent pancreas transplantation during the study time period; 19 (23.5%) received imported grafts. There were no significant differences in recipient demographics or type of transplant received. Mean distance of import was 644.2 ± 234.0 NM. Imported grafts were more likely to be from pediatric donors <18 years old (p = .02) and a significantly higher proportion of imported grafts came from donors weighing <30 kg (26.3 vs. 3.2%, p = .007). Cold ischemic time was longer for imported grafts than for local grafts (13.4 ± 2.3 h vs. 9.8 ± 2.2 h, p < .01). There was no significant difference in deaths or graft losses within 90 days or at 1 year between groups.

CONCLUSION

Centers should consider expanding criteria for acceptance of imported pancreata to increase the number of transplants and combat organ nonutilization.

An Initial Analysis of the Baseline Levels of Dd-cfDNA After Pancreas Transplantation: A Prospective Study From High-volume Centers in the United States

Pancreas transplantation offers patients with diabetes an opportunity for glucose homeostasis. Current blood tests to surveil for rejection have poor sensitivity and specificity for identifying rejection, and pancreas biopsies are challenging and associated with morbidity and graft loss. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is shed from transplanted organs and detectable in peripheral blood. Thus, a potential dd-cfDNA blood test assessing rejection would be clinically advantageous.

Methods

One hundred eighty-one dd-cfDNA samples (n) were collected from 77 patients (N) up to 132 mo posttransplant.

Results

The median dd-cfDNA level among all subjects was 0.28% (0.13%, 0.71%). In simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients, the median dd-cfDNA level was 0.29% (0.13%, 0.71%), and it was 0.23% (0.08%, 0.71%) in pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients. When isolating for when without infection or rejection, the median dd-cfDNA level was 0.28% (0.13%, 0.64%) for SPK and 0.20% (0.00%, 0.32%) for PTA. Both transplant types approached 1.0% ≤1 mo posttransplant followed by a decrease in median dd-cfDNA. During episodes of rejection or infection, median dd-cfDNA levels were greater among all transplant types.

Conclusions

The mean dd-cfDNA level for all pancreas transplant recipients is <1.0%, consistent with the published kidney transplant rejection threshold (>1.0%), regardless of SPK or PTA. Early posttransplant dd-cfDNA levels are transiently higher than later measurements. Dd-cfDNA elevation also correlates with rejection and infection and thus is a promising biomarker for surveilling pancreas transplant dysfunction.

Higher Fasting Pretransplant C-peptide Levels in Type 2 Diabetics Undergoing Simultaneous Pancreas-kidney Transplantation Are Associated With Posttransplant Pancreatic Graft Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Among selected patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplants can be an effective option. However, data are limited about outcomes in T2DM SPK recipients based on the pretransplant C-peptide levels.

METHODS

In this study, we reviewed all T2DM SPK recipients and categorized them based on the pretransplant fasting C-peptide levels into 3 groups: low (≤2 ng/mL), medium (>2-8 ng/mL), and high (>8 ng/mL). Several measures of graft failures (GFs), graft dysfunction, and composite outcomes were of interest.

RESULTS

There were a total of 76 SPK recipients (low, n = 14; medium, n = 47; high, n = 15). At the last follow-up, the low group did not reach any outcome; in contrast, 11 (23%) in the medium group and 5 (33%) in the high group reached the uncensored composite outcome; 6 (13%) in the medium group and 2 (13%) in the high group had GF; and 8 (17%) in the medium group and 4 (26.7%) in the high group reached the death-censored composite outcomes. In a fully adjusted model, each pretransplant C-peptide unit was not associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome, GF, or death-censored composite outcomes. However, in multivariate analysis with limited adjustment, pretransplant C-peptide was associated with the composite outcome (hazard ratio: 1.18, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.38; P = 0.03) and death-censored composite outcome (hazard ratio: 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.42; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by the small sample size, we found excellent outcomes among T2DM SPK recipients overall. However, higher levels of pretransplant C-peptide may be associated with inferior posttransplant outcomes that include graft dysfunction.

Effect of donor pancreas extraction time on pancreas transplantation-a Swiss tertiary center experience

We aimed to assess the effect of donor pancreas extraction time (ET) on postoperative complications and graft function after pancreas transplantation (PT). We analyzed all consecutive donor pancreas procurements for the simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) and the associated PT in a Swiss transplant center over a 20-year period. Pancreas ET was defined as the time from cold flush to static storage of the pancreas on ice. The primary endpoint was the effect of extraction time on surgical complications. Secondary endpoints comprised the effect of ET on graft function (insulin-free survival) and graft pancreatitis. Of 115 procured pancreas grafts the median donor pancreas ET was 65 min (IQR: 48-78 min). In multivariable analysis, ET did not negatively affect major complications (OR 1.41 [95% CI: .59-3.36]; p = .438) and insulin-free survival (HR 1.42 [95% CI: .55-3.63]; p = .459). The median CIT was 522 (441-608) min. CIT was associated with major complications (OR 2.51 [95% CI: 1.11-5.68]; p = .027), but without impact on insulin-free survival (HR 1.94 [95% CI: .84-4.48]; p = .119). Patients with and without graft pancreatitis had no statistically significant differences in ET and CIT (p = .164 and p = .47, respectively). In multivariable analysis, Amylase levels > 270 U/L on postoperative day 1 were significantly associated with major complications (OR 3.61 [95% CI: 1.06-12.32]; p = .040). Our results suggest that although no effect of ET on complications and graft function after PT was found, shorter CIT and less graft pancreatitis can have a positive impact on surgical complications. Results could possibly be influenced by the exceptional quality of the pancreas donors, with short travel distances and preservation times in Switzerland.

The Presence of Donor-specific Antibodies Around the Time of Pancreas Graft Biopsy With Rejection Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Graft Failure

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against HLA are an important biomarker predicting graft injury, rejection (Rej), and failure in various solid-organ transplant recipients. However, the impact of DSA with or without histopathological evidence of rejection among pancreas transplant recipients (PTRs) is unknown.

METHODS

In this study, we included all PTRs at our center between 2005 and 2020, with pancreas allograft biopsy before March 31, 2021, and with DSA checked within 15 d of the biopsy. PTRs were divided into 4 groups based on the biopsy findings on the index biopsy and DSA status as Rej-/DSA-, Rej+/DSA-, Rej-/DSA+, and Rej+/DSA+.

RESULTS

Two hundred two PTRs had a pancreas allograft biopsy during the study period. Thirty-nine were in Rej-/DSA-, 84 Rej+/DSA-, 24 Rej-/DSA+, and 55 Rej+/DSA+. The mean interval from transplant to index biopsy was not statistically different between the 4 groups. The most common type of rejection was T cell-mediated rejection; however, antibody-mediated rejection was more prevalent in the Rej+/DSA+ group. At 5 y postbiopsy, the rate of death-censored graft failure (DCGF) for Rej-/DSA- was 18%, 24% in Rej+/DSA-; 17% in Rej-/DSA+ and 36% in Rej+/DSA+ (P = 0.14). In univariate analysis, mixed rejection (hazard ratio [HR], 3.0; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.22-7.39; P = 0.02) along with solitary pancreas transplantation and Rej+/DSA+ were associated with DCGF. In multivariate analysis, compared with Rej-/DSA-, Rej+/DSA+ was significantly associated with DCGF (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.03-5.20; P = 0.04); however, Rej+/DSA- was not (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.32-3.56; P = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

PTRs with pancreas allograft rejection and concomitant DSA have an increased risk of DCGF.

Inferior survival outcomes of pancreas transplant alone in uremic patients

Theoretically, pancreas transplant alone in uremic (PTAU) patients could also be one of the options for those waiting for both pancreas and kidney grafts, but it has never been reported. There were 160 cases of pancreas transplant in this study, including 16% PTAU. The 5-year patient survival was 66.2% after PTAU, 94.5% after SPK, 95.8% after PAK, and 95.4% after PTA. Rejection of pancreas graft was significantly lower in PTAU group (3.8%), followed by 16.7% in pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), 29.8% in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK) and 37.0% in pancreas transplant alone (PTA). Fasting blood sugar and serum HbA1c levels after PTAU were not significantly different from those by other subgroups. The 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival was 100% after PTAU and PAK, and 97.0% after SPK and 77.9% after PTA. However, the 5-year death-uncensored pancreas graft survival was 67.0% after PTAU, 100% after PAK, 91.3% after SPK, and 74.0% after PTA. The superior graft survival in the PTAU group was achieved only if deaths with a functioning graft were censored. In conclusion, given the inferior patient survival outcome, PTAU is still not recommended unless SPK and PAK is not available. Although PTAU could be a treatment option for patients with diabetes complicated by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in terms of surgical risks, endocrine function, and immunological and graft survival outcomes, modification of the organ allocation policies to prioritize SPK transplant in eligible patients should be the prime goal.

Association of human leukocyte antigen mismatches between donor-recipient and donor-donor in pancreas after kidney transplant recipients

The effects of HLA mismatching on pancreas outcomes among pancreas after kidney (PAK) recipients are undefined. Outcomes might potentially differ depending on whether there is a mismatch between pancreas donor and recipient (PD-R) or pancreas donor and kidney donor(PD-KD). All primary PAK at our centre were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the degree of HLA mismatching: low (L-MM) as 0-4 and high (H-MM) as 5-6. We analysed all (N = 73) PAK for PD-R mismatch and the subset of PAK for PD-KD mismatch (N = 71). Comparing PD-R L-MM (n = 39) and H-MM (n = 34) PAKs, we observed no difference in the rate of pancreas graft failure. There was also no difference in the rate of rejection (L-MM 33% vs. H-MM 41%) or the severity of rejection. However, we observed a significantly (P < 0.01) shorter time to acute pancreas rejection in the H-MM group (6.8 ± 8.7 mo) versus the L-MM cohort (29.0 ± 36.2 mo) (P < 0.001). Similar to the PD-R mismatched cohort, we did not observe a detrimental effect of HLA mismatching on graft outcomes in the PD-KD cohort; time to rejection was again shorter in the H-MM subset. In this study, we found no impact of HLA mismatch on either pancreas graft survival or rejection rates, though rejection occurred earlier in high mismatched PAK transplants.

Transplant Options for Patients With Diabetes and Advanced Kidney Disease: A Review

Optimal glycemic control in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes is associated with improved morbidity and better patient and allograft survival. Transplant options for patients with diabetes requiring insulin therapy and chronic kidney disease who are suitable candidates for kidney transplantation should include consideration of β-cell replacement therapy: pancreas or islet transplantation. International variation related to national regulatory policies exists in offering one or both options to suitable candidates and is further affected by pancreas/islet allocation policies and transplant waiting list dynamics. The selection of appropriate candidates depends on patient age, coexistent morbidities, the timing of referral to the transplant center (predialysis versus on dialysis) and availability of living kidney donors. Therefore, early referral (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²) is of the utmost importance to ensure adequate time for informed decision making and thorough pretransplant evaluation. Obesity, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, smoking, and frailty are some of the conditions that need to be addressed before acceptance on the transplant list, and ideally before dialysis becoming imminent. This review offers insights into selection of pancreas/islet transplant candidates by transplant centers and an update on posttransplant outcomes, which may have practice implications for referring nephrologists.

Risk factors for intra-abdominal fungal infection after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: A single-center retrospective experience

BACKGROUND

Data on the risk factors and outcome of intra-abdominal fungal infections (IAFI) following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) are scarce.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective monocentric study was conducted on all patients who underwent simultaneous PKT from January 2007 to December 2016. Deep sites positive cultures for fungi during the first post-transplantation year were collected. Clinical, radiological, and microbiological data of proven and probable invasive fungal infections were analysed.

RESULTS

Among sixteen PKT patients, 15 were included. Seven patients (47%) developed an invasive fungal infection, exclusively IAFI (six proven, one probable). The proven IAFI included four peritonitis, one pancreatic necrosis with infected hematoma, and one patient with positive preservation fluid only (PF). Candida albicans (n = 4) was the most prevalent species (associated with Galactomyces candidus in one case), C glabrata, C dubliniensis, and C krusei were found in one case each. Three patients had either a positive direct examination and/or culture for renal or pancreatic PF and the culture of PF was positive for the same species that caused IAFI. IAFIs were significantly associated with pancreatic graft arterial thrombosis (5/7 vs 0/8, P = .007) and fungal contamination of PF (3/7 vs 0/8, P = .008). Among patients with IAFI, all required an early surgical revision post-transplantation [1-18 days] and six had early or delayed pancreatic graft removal. One patient died in the first post-transplant year.

CONCLUSION

IAFI is a common complication in PKT, associated with pancreatic graft thrombosis or fungal contamination of the graft PF, and can sometimes lead to pancreatic detransplantation.