1
|
Bamforth RJ, Trachtenberg A, Ho J, Wiebe C, Ferguson TW, Rigatto C, Forget E, Dodd N, Tangri N. Expanding Access to High KDPI Kidney Transplant for Recipients Aged 60 y and Older: Cost Utility and Survival. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1629. [PMID: 38757046 PMCID: PMC11098249 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Modern organ allocation systems are tasked with equitably maximizing the utility of transplanted organs. Increasing the use of deceased donor organs at risk of discard may be a cost-effective strategy to improve overall transplant benefit. We determined the survival implications and cost utility of increasing the use of marginal kidneys in an older adult Canadian population of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Methods We constructed a cost-utility model with microsimulation from the perspective of the Canadian single-payer health system for incident transplant waitlisted patients aged 60 y and older. A kidney donor profile index score of ≥86 was considered a marginal kidney. Donor- and recipient-level characteristics encompassed in the kidney donor profile index and estimated posttransplant survival scores were used to derive survival posttransplant. Patients were followed up for 10 y from the date of waitlist initiation. Our analysis compared the routine use of marginal kidneys (marginal kidney scenario) with the current practice of limited use (status quo scenario). Results The 10-y mean cost and quality-adjusted life-years per patient in the marginal kidney scenario were estimated at $379 485.33 (SD: $156 872.49) and 4.77 (SD: 1.87). In the status quo scenario, the mean cost and quality-adjusted life-years per patient were $402 937.68 (SD: $168 508.85) and 4.37 (SD: 1.87); thus, the intervention was considered dominant. At 10 y, 62.8% and 57.0% of the respective cohorts in the marginal kidney and status quo scenarios remained alive. Conclusions Increasing the use of marginal kidneys in patients with end-stage kidney disease aged 60 y and older may offer cost savings, improved quality of life, and greater patient survival in comparison with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J. Bamforth
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Aaron Trachtenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Thomas W. Ferguson
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Claudio Rigatto
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Evelyn Forget
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Nancy Dodd
- Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McCracken EK, Jay CL, Garner M, Webb C, Farney AC, Orlando G, Reeves-Daniel A, Mena-Gutierrez A, Sakhovskaya N, Stratta RJ. The Kidney Not Taken: Single-Kidney Use in Deceased Donors. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:492-504. [PMID: 38224100 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The nonuse rate for kidneys recovered from deceased donors is increasing, rising to 27% in 2023. In 10% of these cases, 1 kidney is transplanted but the mate kidney is not. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study from December 2001 to May 2023 comparing single kidneys transplanted at our center (where the contralateral kidney was not used) to kidneys where both were transplanted separately, at least 1 of which was at our center. RESULTS We performed 395 single deceased-donor kidney transplants in which the mate kidney was not transplanted. Primary reasons for mate kidney nonuse were as follows: no recipient located or list exhausted (33.4%), kidney trauma or injury or anatomic abnormalities (18.7%), biopsy findings (16.7%), and poor renal function (13.7%). Mean donor and recipient ages were 51.5 ± 14.2 and 60 ± 12.6 years, respectively. Mean kidney donor profile index was 73% ± 22%, and 104 donors (26.3%) had kidney donor profile index >85%. Mean cold ischemia was 25.6 ± 7.4 hours, and 280 kidneys (70.7%) were imported. Compared with 2,303 concurrent control transplants performed at our center, primary nonfunction or thrombosis (5.1% single vs 2.8% control) and delayed graft function (35.4% single vs 30.1% control) were greater with single-kidney use (both p < 0.05). Median patient and death-censored graft survival were shorter in the single group (11.6 vs 13.5 years, p = 0.03 and 11.6 vs 19 years, p = 0.003), although the former was at least double median survival on the waiting list. In patients with functioning grafts in the single-kidney group, 1-year mean serum creatinine was 1.77 ± 0.8 mg/dL and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 44.8 ± 20 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that many mate kidneys are being inappropriately rejected, given the acceptable outcomes that can be achieved by transplanting the single kidney in appropriately selected recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Ke McCracken
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Colleen L Jay
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Matthew Garner
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Christopher Webb
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Alan C Farney
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Giuseppe Orlando
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology (Reeves-Daniel, Mena-Gutierrez, Sakhovskaya), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Alejandra Mena-Gutierrez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology (Reeves-Daniel, Mena-Gutierrez, Sakhovskaya), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Natalia Sakhovskaya
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology (Reeves-Daniel, Mena-Gutierrez, Sakhovskaya), Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Robert J Stratta
- From the Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation (McCracken, Jay, Garner, Webb, Farney, Orlando, Stratta)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cullinan DR, Ahmed O, Scalea JR, Chapman WC. An Evolution of Organ Allocation: Principles, Processes, and Innovations (Con). Transplantation 2023; 107:2302-2310. [PMID: 37644653 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Darren R Cullinan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ola Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Joseph R Scalea
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Medical University of South Carolina, SC
| | - William C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hart A, Patzer RE, Spear J, Hirose R, Tabatabai A, Wood NL, Schaffhausen CR, Axelrod DA, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Time to discard the term "discard". Am J Transplant 2023; 23:608-610. [PMID: 36740191 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The 2022 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Consensus Conference "People Driven Transplant Metrics" offered an opportunity for a diverse group of stakeholders in the solid organ transplant community to exchange ideas about what information and metrics are important to different stakeholders. Participating patients and family members called on the transplant community to cease using the term "discards" to refer to donated organs that are not transplanted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson Hart
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Rachel E Patzer
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Julie Spear
- Deceased Donor Family Member, Region 8 Representative, Patient Affairs Committee, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Ryutaro Hirose
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ameen Tabatabai
- Patient representative, Patient and Family Advisory Subcommittee, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas L Wood
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Cory R Schaffhausen
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - David A Axelrod
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Ajay K Israni
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jon J Snyder
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. The use of marginal kidneys in dual kidney transplantation to expand kidney graft utilization. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:75-85. [PMID: 34939967 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) and identify opportunities to improve utilization of marginal deceased donor (MDD) kidneys through DKT. RECENT FINDINGS The practice of DKT from adult MDDs dates back to the mid-1990s, at which time the primary indication was projected insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short- and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects: Identifying appropriate selection criteria/scoring systems based on pre- and postdonation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing longer-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. MDDs with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or nonrecovery. SUMMARY DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. New and innovative technologies targeting ex vivo organ assessment, repair, and regeneration may have a major impact on the decision whether or not to use recovered kidneys for single or DKT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Harriman
- The Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Komal Gurung
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- The Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors: Review and perspective. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14566. [PMID: 34936135 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The practice of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from adult marginal deceased donors (MDDs) dates back to the mid-1990s with initial pioneering experiences reported by the Stanford and Maryland groups, at which time the primary indication was estimated insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects of DKT: Identifying appropriate selection criteria and developing scoring systems based on pre- and post-donation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing mid-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. Deceased donors with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or non-recovery. However, DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. In an attempt to promote utilization of MDD kidneys, the United Network for Organ Sharing introduced new allocation guidelines pursuant to DKT in 2019. The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of DKT and identify opportunities to improve utilization of MDD kidneys through DKT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - David Harriman
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Komal Gurung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schwantes IR, Axelrod DA. Technology-Enabled Care and Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Transplantation. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021; 8:235-240. [PMID: 34341714 PMCID: PMC8317681 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00336-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and technology-enabled remote patient care have evolved rapidly and have now been incorporated into many aspects of medical care. Transplantation is fortunate to have large data sets upon which machine learning algorithms can be constructed. AI are now available to improve pretransplant management, donor selection, and post-operative management of transplant patients. Recent Findings Changes in patient and donor characteristics warrant new approaches to listing and organ acceptance practices. Machine learning has been employed to optimize donor selection to identify patients likely to benefit from transplantation of higher risk organs, increasing organ discard and reducing waitlist mortality. These models have greater precisions and predictive ability than currently employed metrics including the Kidney Donor Profile Index and the expected posttransplant survival models. After transplant, AI tools have been developed to optimize immunosuppression management, track patients adherence, and assess graft survival. Summary AI and technology-enabled management tools are now available throughout the transplant journey. Unfortunately, those are frequently not available at the point of decision (patient listing, organ acceptance, posttransplant clinic), limiting utilization. Incorporation of these tools into the EMR, the Donor Net® organ offer system, and mobile devices is vital to ensure widespread adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issac R Schwantes
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | - David A Axelrod
- Organ Transplant Center, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, LA 52240 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lentine KL, Pastan S, Mohan S, Reese PP, Leichtman A, Delmonico FL, Danovitch GM, Larsen CP, Harshman L, Wiseman A, Kramer HJ, Vassalotti J, Joseph J, Longino K, Cooper M, Axelrod DA. A Roadmap for Innovation to Advance Transplant Access and Outcomes: A Position Statement From the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 78:319-332. [PMID: 34330526 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 65 years, kidney transplantation has evolved into the optimal treatment for patients with kidney failure, dramatically reducing suffering through improved survival and quality of life. However, access to transplant is still limited by organ supply, opportunities for transplant are inequitably distributed, and lifelong transplant survival remains elusive. To address these persistent needs, the National Kidney Foundation convened an expert panel to define an agenda for future research. The key priorities identified by the panel center on the needs to develop and evaluate strategies to expand living donation, improve waitlist management and transplant readiness, maximize use of available deceased donor organs, and extend allograft longevity. Strategies targeting the critical goal of decreasing organ discard that warrant research investment include educating patients and clinicians about potential benefits of accepting nonstandard organs, use of novel organ assessment technologies and real-time decision support, and approaches to preserve and resuscitate allografts before implantation. The development of personalized strategies to reduce the burden of lifelong immunosuppression and support "one transplant for life" was also identified as a vital priority. The panel noted the specific goal of improving transplant access and graft survival for children with kidney failure. This ambitious agenda will focus research investment to promote greater equity and efficiency in access to transplantation, and help sustain long-term benefits of the gift of life for more patients in need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St Louis, MO.
| | - Stephen Pastan
- Department of Medicine, Emory Transplant Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alan Leichtman
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | - Lyndsay Harshman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Transplant Institute, Iowa City, IA
| | - Alexander Wiseman
- Department of Medicine, Centura Health-Porter Adventist Hospital, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Joseph Vassalotti
- National Kidney Foundation, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Matthew Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC
| | - David A Axelrod
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Transplant Institute, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|