Impact of temporary mechanical circulatory support for early graft failure on post–heart transplantation outcomes

European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on Machine Perfusion in Cardiothoracic Transplant

The machine perfusion (MP) of transplantable grafts has emerged as an upcoming field in Cardiothoracic (CT) transplantation during the last decade. This technology carries the potential to assess, preserve, and even recondition thoracic grafts before transplantation, so it is a possible game-changer in the field. This technology field has reached a critical turning point, with a growing number of publications coming predominantly from a few leading institutions, but still need solid scientific evidence. Due to the increasing need to expand the donor pool, especially in Europe, where the donor age is steeply increased, a consensus has been established to address the growing need and knowledge of machine perfusion in cardiothoracic transplantation, targeting the unmet scientific need in this growing field but also, priorities for development, and regional differences in utilization rates and organizational issues. To address MP in CT, the European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated Working group comprised of experts in CT to review literature about MP to develop guidelines that were subsequently discussed and voted on during the Consensus Conference that took place in person in Prague during the TLJ 3.0 in November 2022. The findings and recommendations of the Cardiothoracic Working Group on MP are presented in this article.

Ventricular assist device support following pediatric heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

VAD support for early graft failure after HTx is a rare event in pediatrics.

METHODS

We retrospectively describe our single-center experience with post-HTx VAD support in a cohort of patients transplanted between 01/05 and 12/20.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent VAD insertion in the early post-HTx period [median age 6.1 years (Range 0.3-20.3), median weight 17.6 kg (Range 3.5-65.0), and congenital heart disease (67%)]. Of the nine patients with early graft failure, almost half (44%) were implanted after 2015 and all of these patients had a pre-HTx plan for possible post-transplant VAD insertion. Time to VAD implant was a median of 0 day (Range 0-11). Total time on VAD support was a median of 12 days (Range 3.0-478.0). Two-thirds (n = 6; 67%) of the patients were weaned from support, retransplanted (11%) and two patients died (22%). In all of the patients where post-HTx VAD was anticipated there was 100% survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small patient series, post-HTx VAD was a useful measure in selected patients especially with pre-HTx planning. However, more shared experiences to verify these findings are needed.

Mechanical circulatory support in pre and postheart transplant period

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Progression of heart failure (HF) and its unpredictable and volatile nature, often requires advanced therapies including heart transplant. Mechanical circulatory support plays an integral part in the advanced treatment options. This technology can be deployed in several ways, particularly in the preparation and patient optimization for heart transplants. This article discusses the use of temporary and durable devices and their deployment strategies in the pre and posttransplant period.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently temporary mechanical support devices have allowed us to improve survival to transplant as well as posttransplant. Early implementation of temporary devices both for stabilization of advanced HF patients being considered for transplant as well as those with posttransplant primary graft dysfunction (although utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has repeatedly shown to be associated with worse outcomes compared to the other devices discussed), is reflective of the degree of disease progression in these patients. The outcomes of patients supported with durable devices have significantly improved with advancing technology. HeartMate 3 device has not only been shown to improve survival as well as the quality of life but in comparison to its predecessor, has been shown to decrease the morbidity associated with this technology.

SUMMARY

Both temporary and durable devices are now associated with improved survival and allow us to transplant patients in a more stable and safer manner with fewer adverse events. Based on the new United Network of Organ Sharing allocation system, it allows us to upgrade those who do not have the luxury of time to wait for a transplant. Primary graft dysfunction now also can be assisted with those devices, which is reflected in improved survival of posttransplant patients.

Effectiveness of short vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant recipients with donor positive respiratory cultures

Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for infection in the early postoperative phase, thus perioperative antibiotics are employed. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of short- vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant patients. Lung transplant patients with donor positive cultures between August 2013 and September 2019 were evaluated, excluding those with cystic fibrosis, death within 14 days and re-transplants. The primary outcome was 30-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection. A total of 147 patients were included (57 short vs 90 long-course). Median perioperative antibiotic duration was 6 days in the short-course vs 14 days in the long-course group (P < .0001). Thirty-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection was present in 56 (98%) patients in the short-course vs 85 (94%) patients in the long-course group (P = .41). There was no difference in development of Clostridioides difficile infections (P = .41), while cumulative ventilator time and time to post-op extubation were longer in the long-course group (P = .001 and .004, respectively). Among lung transplant recipients with positive donor respiratory cultures, short-course perioperative antibiotics were as effective as long-course antibiotics in preventing donor-derived bacterial respiratory infections.