Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with tandem auto-allogeneic stem cell transplant have better overall survival with similar outcomes at time of relapse compared to patients who received autologous transplant only

A Pilot Study of UM171-Expanded Cord Blood Grafts for Tandem Auto/Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in High and Ultra-High-Risk Myeloma Patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains associated with a poor outcome, particularly in patients with advanced disease and high-risk (HR) cytogenetics. To date, the only curative treatment is allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but high incidences of graft versus host disease (GVHD), nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and disease progression remain important obstacles. Cord blood (CB) transplantation has been associated with low rates of relapse and chronic (c) GVHD, but its use has declined because of high incidences of infections, severe acute GVHD and high NRM. In other hematologic malignancies, UM171-expanded CB transplants have led to improved outcomes, allowing for the selection of smaller, better HLA-matched units. We aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of single UM171-expanded single CB unit transplantation in frontline tandem auto/allo HCT for HR/ultra-HR MM patients. Newly diagnosed MM patients ≤ 65 years with an ISS stage II/III and del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del(1p) or +1q, R-ISS 3, ≥ 2 cytogenetic abnormalities, or plasma cell leukemia without a sibling donor and availability of a 5-7/8 matched CB graft with ≥ 0.5 x 105 CD34+/kg and ≥ 1.5 x 107 TNCs/kg were eligible to this phase I/II prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03441958). After induction and autologous HCT, patients received a reduced intensity conditioning regimen and were infused with 7-day UM171-expanded CD34+ cells, along with the lymphocytes contained in the CD34-negative fraction. The primary endpoints were feasibility of UM171 expansion, safety, kinetics of engraftment, incidences and maximum grades of acute and cGVHD at 1 and 2 years, assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) and quality of life (QoL). Between 05/2018 and 11/2021, 20 patients were enrolled. One patient had an unsuccessful CB expansion with UM171, leaving 19 patients with a median age of 56 years. Median CD34+ cell dose infused after expansion was 4.62 x 106/kg (range: 0.79 to 5.76). Median times to achieve absolute neutrophil counts of 0.1 and 0.5 x 109/L were D+6 and D+10.5; median time to reach ≥ 20 x 109/L platelets was D+36. Full donor chimerism was achieved in all cell lineages by D+120 in recipients of reduced intensity conditioning. Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV, grade III-IV acute GVHD and moderate/severe cGVHD at 12 months were 68.4% (95% CI: 46 to 90), 5.3% (95% CI: 0% to 16%), and 10.5% (95% CI: 0% to 25%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 2.9 years (range: 0.46 to 5.3), cumulative incidences of relapse, PFS, OS and NRM at 3 years were 36.8% (95% CI: 14 to 59), 47.4% (95% CI: 29 to 76), 68.4% (95% CI: 50 to 93) and 15.8% (95%CI: 0 to 33), respectively. Median time to complete immunosuppression discontinuation was D+238. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Only one of 7 patients alive at 2 years with negative MRD at transplant has relapsed. Non-relapsing patients had a QoL after transplant similar to the general population. UM171-expanded CB transplant in HR/ultra-HR myeloma patients is feasible and allows the use of single CB units with a low risk of cGVHD. Patients with negative pretransplant MRD might benefit most from a UM171-expanded CB transplant.

Historical Perspective of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Advances in novel therapies have improved outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients and the use of allo-SCT has decreased. Current guidelines no longer support allo-SCT as consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed MM, even in high-risk cases.

SUMMARY

Allo-SCT is now typically considered only within clinical trials for young, high-risk patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). It has not proven favorable despite its historical use. CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies have shown promise in treating triple- and penta-exposed/refractory MM, yet relapse remains common with poor survival rates. The efficacy of allo-SCT following BCMA-directed therapy and other new T-cell-directed therapies is unclear. Allo-SCT might be a viable option for eligible patients who relapse after these therapies, or where such options are unavailable. Advancements in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have led to lower toxicity and transplant-related (TR) morbidity, lower graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and TR mortality. Expanded use of alternative donors, like haploidentical donors, has yielded comparable outcomes. Better post-transplant GvHD regimens and maintenance strategies to prevent relapse have been developed.

KEY MESSAGES

This review analyzes available literature to better understand the safety, efficacy, and current role of allo-SCT in managing MM. Newer regimens are needed as routine use of allo-SCT cannot be recommended.

A Phase II, Open-Label Study of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Followed by Donor Lymphocyte Infusions in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Following Upfront Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

BACKGROUND

To date, the only potential curative treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) remains allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), although, most patients will eventually relapse. In relapsed patients, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) have been reported to control disease, but the optimal strategy prior to and doses of DLIs remain unclear. With this study (NCT03413800), we aimed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide and dexamethasome (Len/Dex) followed by escalating pre-determined doses of DLIs in MM patients who relapsed after allo HCT.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-65 years with relapsed MM following upfront tandem autologous (auto)/allo HCT were eligible. Treatment consisted of six cycles of Len/Dex followed by three standardized doses of DLIs: 5 × 106 CD3+/kg, 1 × 107/kg and 5 × 107/kg every 6 weeks. Bone marrow minimal measurable disease (MRD) using flow cytometry (10-5) was performed at enrolment, then every 3 months for 2 years or until disease progression, in a subset of patients. The primary endpoint was efficacy as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years following Len/Dex/DLIs. Secondary objectives were safety including GVHD, response including MRD status and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients participated in this study, including 62% with high-risk cytogenetics. With a median follow-up of 5.3 years (range: 4.1-6.1), PFS and OS were 26.5% (95% CI: 10.4-45.9%) and 69.2% (95% CI: 43.3-85.1%), respectively. Overall, the best responses achieved post-Len/Dex + DLIs were complete remission in 9.1%, very good partial response in 50%, and progressive disease in 40.9%. Among the nine patients tested for MRD, only two achieved a negative status after receiving DLIs. Six patients died, all due to disease progression. No acute GVHD was observed after DLIs. We report a very low incidence of moderate/severe chronic GVHD of 18.2% with no need for systemic immunosuppressants one year after diagnosis. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Interestingly, a positive correlation between response to Len/Dex re-induction and response to DLIs was found (p = 0.0032).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that Len/Dex/DLIs in second line treatment after upfront tandem auto/allo HCT in relapsed MM patients remains feasible and safe. With a potential correlation between induction chemotherapy and DLI responses, more potent induction regimens together with higher doses of DLIs should be considered in the future.

Efficacy and survival outcome of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: meta-analysis in the recent 10 years

Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) possessed direct cytotoxicity and graft-versus-multiple myeloma effect (GvMM). Growing trials have shown survival benefits of performing alloHCT in both newly diagnosed and relapsed MM.

Methods

We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis in the recent 10 years to verify the efficacy and survival outcome of alloHCT in MM patients. A total of 61 studies which provide data between 14/04/2013 and 14/04/2023 and a total of 15,294 data from MM patients who had undergone alloSCT were included in our study. The best response rates (CR, VGPR, PR) and survival outcomes (1-, 2-, 3-,5-, and 10-year OS, PFS, NRM) were assessed. We further conducted meta-analysis in the NDMM/frontline setting and RRMM/salvage setting independently.

Results

The pooled estimate CR, VGPR, and PR rates were 0.45, 0.21, and 0.24, respectively. The pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 0.69, 0.57, 0.45, 0.45, and 0.36, respectively; the pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS were 0.47, 0.35, 0.24, 0.25, and 0.28, respectively; and the pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year NRM were 0.16, 0.21, 0.16, 0.20, and 0.15, respectively. In the NDMM/upfront setting, the pooled estimate CR rate was 0.54, and those for 5-year OS, PFS, and NRM were 0.69, 0.40, and 0.11, respectively. In a relapsed setting, the pooled estimate CR rate was 0.31, and those for 5-year OS, PFS, and NRM were 0.24, 0.10, and 0.15, respectively.

Discussion

Our results showed constant OS, PFS, and NRM from the third year onwards till the 10th year, suggesting that alloSCT has sustained survival benefits. Good response rate and promising survival outcome were observed in the NDMM/ frontline setting.

Conclusion

Although comparing with other treatments, alloSCT had a lower response rate and poorer short-term survival outcome, long-term follow-up could reveal survival benefits of alloSCT in MM patients.

Bortezomib Maintenance After Allogeneic Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients Results in Decreased Incidence and Severity of Chronic GVHD

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has curative potential in myeloma but remains hampered by high rates of relapse and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We hypothesized that bortezomib (BTZ) as maintenance therapy after allo HCT could not only decrease the incidence of relapse but also the incidence and severity of chronic GVHD. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine whether BTZ maintenance decreases the incidence and severity of chronic GVHD using National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria. The secondary endpoints were to determine the immunosuppression burden, organ involvement and survival (overall survival, progression-free survival) in patients either receiving or not receiving BTZ. In this retrospective study, we compared the outcome of 46 myeloma patients who received BTZ after upfront tandem auto-allo HCT between 2008 and 2020 to 61 patients without maintenance. We explored the impact of BTZ maintenance on incidence and severity of chronic GVHD using the 2014 NIH criteria. At 2 years, incidences of overall (61.2% versus 83.6%; P = .001), and moderate/severe chronic GVHD (44.5% versus 77.0%; P = .001) were significantly lower in BTZ recipients who had less mouth (43% versus 67%; P = .018) and eyes (9% versus 41%; P = .001) involvement at initial diagnosis. We report a lower use of systemic steroids (45.1% versus 76.4%; P < .001), mycophenolate mofetil (15.5% versus 28.2%; P = .031) and tacrolimus (34.5% versus 70.6%; P < .001) in BTZ recipients. Probability of being alive and off systemic immunosuppressants at 3 years was 77% in BTZ recipients and 56% in controls (P = .046). To date, there is no difference in survival between both groups. In summary, BTZ maintenance improved incidence and severity of chronic GVHD and should be considered as a valid option in myeloma patients receiving upfront tandem auto-allo HCT.

Current Role of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Major progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma has been made in the last several years. However, myeloma remains incurable and patients with high-risk cytogenetics or advanced stage disease have an even worsen survival. Only allogeneic transplantation may have curative potential in some patients. However, the high non-relapse mortality and incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease have raised controversy regarding this procedure. In this review, we will address the role of upfront and delayed allogeneic transplant.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

The development of new inhibitory and immunological agents and combination therapies significantly improved response rates and survival of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, but the disease is still considered to be incurable by current standards and the prognosis is dismal especially in high-risk groups and in relapsed and/or refractory patients. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) may enable long-term survival and even cure for individual patients via an immune-mediated graft-versus-myeloma (GvM) effect, but remains controversial due to relevant transplant-related risks, particularly immunosuppression and graft-versus-host disease, and a substantial non-relapse mortality. The decreased risk of disease progression may outweigh this treatment-related toxicity for young, fit patients in high-risk constellations with otherwise often poor long-term prognosis. Here, allo-SCT should be considered within clinical trials in first-line as part of a tandem approach to separate myeloablation achieved by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous SCT, and following allo-SCT with a reduced-intensity conditioning to minimize treatment-related organ toxicities but allow GvM effect. Our review aims to better define the role of allo-SCT in myeloma treatment particularly in the context of new immunomodulatory approaches.

Outcomes in newly diagnosed young or high-risk myeloma patients receiving tandem autologous/allogeneic transplant followed by bortezomib maintenance: a phase II study

Despite novel drugs and autologous HCT, MM remains incurable, with short survival in patients with poor biological characteristics. Allo HCT may be curative in some patients but is hampered by high rates of toxicity and relapse. We hypothesized that bortezomib (BTZ), with its anti-myeloma and immunologic properties, could improve PFS and cGVHD after allo HCT in newly diagnosed MM patients. In this prospective phase II study, we included 39 young (≤50 years) and high-risk patients who received a tandem auto-allo HCT followed by BTZ. Patients had prospective minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluations using Next-Generation Flow cytometry prior to allo HCT, prior BTZ and every 3 months for 2 years. With a median follow-up of 48 months, we report PFS and OS at 5 years of 41% and 80%, with a non-relapse mortality of 12%. Incidences of grade II-IV aGVHD at 12 months and moderate/severe cGVHD at 2 years were 26% and 57%. In a multivariate analysis model including cytogenetics, ISS and MRD status, MRD positivity prior to allo HCT (HR 3.75, p = 0.037), prior BTZ (HR 11.3, p = 0.018) and 3 months post-BTZ initiation (HR 9.7, p = 0.001) was highly predictive of progression. Peritransplant MRD assessment thus strongly predicts disease progression.