Changes in waitlist and posttransplant outcomes in patients with adult congenital heart disease after the new heart transplant allocation system

Heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart diseases: A comprehensive meta-analysis on waiting times, operative, and survival outcomes

The rising prevalence of congenital heart disease (CHD) among adults has led to increased heart transplantation (HT) procedures in this population. However, CHD patients face significant challenges including longer waiting times, higher early mortality rates, and increased risks of complications such as renal dysfunction. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 50 studies to assess waiting times, postoperative outcomes, and survival rates in CHD patients undergoing HT compared to non-CHD patients. Results revealed that CHD patients experience longer HT waiting times (mean difference [MD]: 53.86 days, 95 % CI: [22.00, 85.72], P = 0.0009) and increased ischemic times (MD: 20.01 min, 95 % CI: [10.51, 29.51], P < 0.0001), which may increase waitlist and early postoperative mortality. Regarding complications, renal dysfunction is more prevalent in CHD patients than in non-CHD patients (RR: 2.05, 95 % CI: [1.61, 2.61], P < 0.00001). Despite these challenges, long-term survival rates for CHD patients are comparable to those of non-CHD recipients, with significant improvements noted in recent allocation systems. Our findings emphasize the need for ongoing refinements in HT allocation systems to improve outcomes for CHD patients, particularly in reducing waiting times and managing post-transplant complications.

Impact of new allocation policy on waitlist and transplant outcomes of adult congenital heart patients supported with ECMO

BACKGROUND

The use of ECMO as a bridge to heart transplantation has been growing rapidly in all heart transplant recipients since the implementation of the new UNOS allocation policy; however, the impact on adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is not known.

METHODS

We analyzed the UNOS data (2015-2021) for ACHD patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during the waitlist, before and after October 2018, to assess the impact on the waitlist and posttransplant outcomes. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of ACHD patients with or without ECMO use during the waitlist and pre- and postpolicy changes.

RESULTS

A total of 23 821 patients underwent heart transplantation, and only 918 (4%) had ACHD. Out of all ACHD patients undergoing heart transplants, 6% of patients in the prepolicy era and 7.6% in the postpolicy era were on ECMO at the time of listing. Those on ECMO were younger and sicker compared to the rest of the ACHD cohort. Those on ECMO had similar profiles pre- and postpolicy change; however, there was a very significant decrease in the waitlist time [136 days (IQR 29-384) vs. 38 days (IQR 11-108), p = 0.01]. There was no difference in waitlist mortality; however, competing risk analyses showed a higher likelihood of transplantation (51% vs. 29%) and a lower likelihood of death or deterioration (31% vs. 42%) postpolicy change. Long-term outcomes posttransplant for those supported with ECMO compared to the non-ECMO cohort are similar for ACHD patients, although there was higher attrition in the first year for the ECMO cohort.

CONCLUSION

The new allocation policy has resulted in shorter waitlist times and a higher likelihood of transplantation for ACHD patients supported by ECMO. However, the appropriate use of ECMO and the underuse of durable circulatory support devices in this population need further exploration.

Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Transplant: Challenges, Opportunities, and Policy

The rate of heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is rising, but the 1-year mortality posttransplantation remains higher than non-ACHD patients. A robust pretransplant assessment and operative and postoperative planning can mitigate much of the perioperative risk. Importantly, ACHD patients who survive the first year have significantly better 10-year survival compared with non-ACHD patients. The current allocation system gives ACHD patients a relatively high priority, but providers must use the prespecified exception requests for higher status, especially for patients with the Fontan circulation. It is vital that ACHD patients with end-stage heart failure are cared for at centers with ACHD subspecialty care.

Waitlist Outcomes in Candidates With Rare Causes of Heart Failure After Implementation of the 2018 French Heart Allocation Scheme

BACKGROUND

In 2018, an algorithm-based allocation system for heart transplantation (HT) was implemented in France. Its effect on access to HT of patients with rare causes of heart failure (HF) has not been assessed.

METHODS

In this national study, including adults listed for HT between 2018 and 2020, we analyzed waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of candidates with rare causes of HF (restrictive cardiomyopathy [RCM], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and congenital heart disease). The primary end point was death on the waitlist or delisting for clinical deterioration. Secondary end points included access to HT and posttransplant mortality. The cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality estimated with competing risk analysis and incidence of transplantation were compared between diagnosis groups. The association of HF cause with outcomes was determined by Fine-Gray or Cox models.

RESULTS

Overall, 1604 candidates were listed for HT. At 1 year postlisting, 175 patients met the primary end point and 1040 underwent HT. Candidates listed for rare causes of HF significantly differed in baseline characteristics and had more frequent score exceptions compared with other cardiomyopathies (31.3%, 32.0%, 36.4%, and 16.7% for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, RCM, congenital heart disease, and other cardiomyopathies). The cumulative incidence of death on the waitlist and probability of HT were similar between diagnosis groups (P=0.17 and 0.40, respectively). The adjusted risk of death or delisting for clinical deterioration did not significantly differ between candidates with rare and common causes of HF (subdistribution hazard ratio (HR): hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.19-1.38]; P=0.18; RCM, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.42-2.58]; P=0.94; congenital heart disease, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.78-4.26]; P=0.17). Similarly, the access to HT did not significantly differ between causes of HF (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92-1.51]; P=0.19; RCM: HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.90-1.58]; P=0.23; congenital heart disease: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.53-1.09]; P=0.14). RCM was an independent risk factor for 1-year posttransplant mortality (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.06-4.24]; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows equitable waitlist outcomes among HT candidates whatever the indication for transplantation with the new French allocation scheme.

Impact of 2016 UNOS pediatric heart allocation policy changes on VAD utilization, waitlist, and post-transplant survival outcomes in children with CHD versus Non-CHD

AIMS

We analyzed the impact of the revised pediatric heart allocation policy on types of ventricular assist device (VAD) utilization, and waitlist (WL) and post-heart transplant (HT) survival outcomes in congenital heart disease (CHD) versus non-CHD patients before (Era-1) and after (Era-2) pediatric heart allocation policy implementation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the UNOS database from December 16, 2011, through March 31, 2021, for patients < 18 years old and listed for primary HT. We compared the differences observed between Era-1 and Era-2.

RESULTS

5551 patients were listed for HT, of whom 2447(44%) were in Era-1 and 3104(56%) were in Era-2. CHD patients were listed as status 1A unchanged, but the number of patients listed as status 1B decreased in Era-2, whereas the number of non-CHD patients listed as status 1A decreased, but status 1B increased. In Era-2 compared to Era-1, both temporary (1% to 4%, p < .001) and durable VAD (13.6% to 17.8%, p < .001) utilization increased, and the transplantation rate per 100-patient years increased in both groups. The median WL period for CHD patients increased marginally from 70 to 71 days (p = .06), whereas for non-CHD patients it decreased from 61 to 54 days (p < .001). Adjusted 90-day WL survival increased from 84% to 88%, p = .016 in CHD, but there was no significant change in non-CHD patients (p = .57). There was no significant difference in 1-year post-HT survival in CHD and non-CHD patients between Era-1 and Era-2.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, after the revised heart allocation policy implementation, temporary and durable VAD support increased, HT rate increased, waitlist duration marginally increased in the CHD cohort and decreased in the non-CHD cohort, and 90-day WL survival probability improved in children with CHD without significant change in 1-year post-HT outcomes. Future studies are needed to identify changes to the policy that may further improve the listing criteria to improve WL duration and post-HT survival.

Predictors of one-year outcome after cardiac re-transplantation: Machine learning analysis

BACKGROUND

As cardiac re-transplantation is associated with inferior outcomes compared with primary transplantation, allocating scarce resources to appropriate re-transplant candidates is important. The aim of this study is to elucidate the factors associated with 1-year mortality in cardiac re-transplantation using the random forests algorithm for survival analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry and identified all adult (>17 years old) recipients who underwent cardiac re-transplantation between January 2000 and March 2020. The random forest algorithm on Cox modeling was used to calculate the variable importance (VIMP) of independent variables for contributing to one-year mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1294 patients underwent cardiac re-transplantation. Of these, 137 patients were re-transplanted within one year of their first transplant, while 1157 patients were re-transplanted more than one year after their first transplant. One-year mortality was significantly higher for patients receiving early transplantation compared with those receiving late transplantation (Early 40.6% vs. Late 13.6%, log-rank P<0.001). Machine learning analysis showed that total bilirubin (>2 mg/dl) (VIMP, 2.99%) was an independent predictor of one-year mortality after early re-transplant. High BMI (>30.0 kg/m2) (VIMP, 1.43%) and ventilator dependence (VIMP, 1.47%) were independent predictors of one-year mortality for the late re-transplantation group.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning showed that optimal one-year survival following cardiac re-transplantation was significantly related to liver function in early re-transplantation, and to obesity and preoperative ventilator dependence in late re-transplantation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Heart transplant indications, considerations and outcomes in Fontan patients: Age-related nuances, transplant listing and disease-specific indications

In the current era, 5-10% of Fontan patients die or need a transplant in childhood, and approximately 50% will experience the same fate by age 40 years. Heart transplant (HTx) can be successful for selected children and adults with Fontan circulatory failure (FCF) of any mechanism, with a 1-year post-transplant survival approaching 90% in children and 80% in the largest single-centre adult Fontan HTx experience. Protein losing enteropathy and plastic bronchitis can be expected to resolve post-transplant and limited data suggests patients with FALD who survive HTx can expect improvement in liver health. Early Fontan failure, within 12 months of Fontan completion, is not easily rescued by HTx and late referrals / failure to refer adult patients remains problematic. Very little is known about the numbers of patients not referred, turned down following assessment for HTx, or dying on the waiting list which are needed to understand the complete picture of HTx in the Fontan population and to identify where best to focus quality improvement efforts. Recent revisions to listing prioritization in Canada with considerations specific to the Fontan population aim to mitigate the fact that the status listing criteria are not tailored to the congenital heart population. Transplanting high-risk children prior to Fontan completion, developing ACHD transplant centres of expertise which can also offer combined heart-liver transplant when appropriate, and improving single ventricle mechanical support options and criteria for both adults and children may help mitigate the early post-listing mortality.