1
|
Maria H, Valentino PL, Healey PJ, Kwon YK. Small-for-size syndrome in a 9.7 kg pediatric recipient with a whole liver graft. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14716. [PMID: 38420659 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) in pediatric liver transplant recipients, particularly those weighing less than 10 kg, is rare. This report describes a case of a 15-month-old whole liver transplant recipient who suffered SFSS, and systematic literature review was performed to identify outcomes of such cases and potential risk factors for SFSS. CASE PRESENTATION A 15-month-old toddler with a history of biliary atresia underwent a deceased donor whole liver transplant. The graft weighed 160 g, resulting in a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of 1.6%. The post-operative course was complicated by SFSS, characterized by massive ascites causing hemodynamic instability and compromised hepatic artery flow. Pharmacological intervention with octreotide was initiated, and the patient eventually recovered. CONCLUSION In small pediatric recipients, especially those weighing less than 10 kg, the native liver body weight ratio (LBWR) is significantly higher. When selecting an appropriately sized graft for these recipients, this higher ratio should be taken into consideration. The literature review suggests that a GRWR of less than 2% is associated with a higher incidence of small-for-size syndrome in small pediatric recipients weighing less than 10 kg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haytham Maria
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Pamela L Valentino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Patrick J Healey
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Transplantation, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yong K Kwon
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Transplantation, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cullen JM, Conzen KD, Pomfret EA. Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Left Lobe or Right Lobe. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:89-102. [PMID: 37953043 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Living Donor Liver Transplantation (LDLT) has seen great advancements since its inception in 1988. Herein, the nuances of LDLT are discussed spanning from donor evaluation to the recipient operation. Special attention is given to donor anatomy and graft optimization techniques in the recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Michael Cullen
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and Education (CCTCARE), University of Colorado Anschutz, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1635 Aurora Ct, AOP 7th Fl, C-318, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Kendra D Conzen
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and Education (CCTCARE), University of Colorado Anschutz, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1635 Aurora Ct, AOP 7th Fl, C-318, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Igal Kam, MD Endowed Chair in Transplantation Surgery, Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and Education (CCTCARE), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1635 Aurora Ct, AOP 7th Fl, C-318, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anouti A, Patel MS, VanWagner LB, Lee WM, Asrani SK, Mufti AR, Rich NE, Vagefi PA, Shah JA, Kerr TA, Pedersen M, Hanish S, Singal AG, Cotter TG. Increasing practice and acceptable outcomes of high-MELD living donor liver transplantation in the USA. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:72-82. [PMID: 37490432 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Recent deceased-donor allocation changes in the United States may have increased high-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, outcomes in these patients remain poorly defined. We aimed to examine the impact of the MELD score on LDLT outcomes. Using UNOS data (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2021), LDLT recipients were identified and stratified into low-MELD (<15), intermediate-MELD (15-24), and high-MELD (≥25) groups. We compared outcomes between MELD-stratified LDLT groups and between MELD-stratified LDLT and donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare graft survival rates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft outcomes. Of 3558 LDLTs, 1605 (45.1%) were low-MELD, 1616 (45.4%) intermediate-MELD, and 337 (9.5%) high-MELD. Over the study period, the annual number of LDLTs increased from 282 to 569, and the proportion of high-MELD LDLTs increased from 3.9% to 7.7%. Graft survival was significantly higher in low-MELD versus high-MELD LDLT recipients (adjusted HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.03-1.79); however, 5-year survival exceeded 70.0% in both groups. We observed no significant difference in graft survival between high-MELD LDLT and high-MELD donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients (adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI:0.99-1.58), with a 5-year survival of 71.5% and 77.3%, respectively. Low LDLT center volume (<3 LDLTs/year) and recipient life support requirement were both associated with inferior graft outcomes among high-MELD LDLT recipients. While higher MELD scores confer graft failure risk in LDLT, high-MELD LDLT outcomes are acceptable with similar outcomes to MELD-stratified donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. Future practice guidance should consider the expansion of LDLT recommendations to high-MELD recipients in centers with expertise to help reduce donor shortage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Anouti
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lisa B VanWagner
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - William M Lee
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Arjmand R Mufti
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole E Rich
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Parsia A Vagefi
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jigesh A Shah
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas A Kerr
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Mark Pedersen
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Steven Hanish
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas G Cotter
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eguchi S, Umeshita K, Soejima Y, Eguchi H, Egawa H, Fukumoto T, Haga H, Hasegawa K, Kasahara M, Nagano H, Takada Y, Tokushige K, Ueda Y, Mochida S, Matsushima H, Adachi T, Ohdan H. An Analysis of 10,000 Cases of Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Japan: Special Reference to the Graft-Versus-Recipient Weight Ratio and Donor Age. Ann Surg 2024; 279:94-103. [PMID: 38112092 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze 10,000 cases of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipient data to elucidate outcomes with special reference to the graft-versus-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), based on the Japanese Liver Transplantation Society (JLTS) registry. BACKGROUND The JLTS registry has been accurate and complete in characterizing and following trends in patient characteristics and survival of all patients with LDLT. METHODS Between November 1989 and August 2021, 10,000 patients underwent LDLT in Japan. The procedures performed during the study period included pediatric liver transplantation (age <18 years, n = 3572) and adult liver transplantation (age ≥18 years, n=6428). Factors related to patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) were also analyzed. RESULTS The GRWR was <0.7, 0.7 to <0.8, 0.8 to <3, 3 to <5, and ≥5 in 0.2%, 2.0%, 61.8%, 31.8%, and 2.6% of pediatric patients and <0.6, 0.6 to <0.7, 0.7 to <0.8, and ≥0.8 in 8.0%, 12.7%, 17.7%, and 61.5% of adult patients, respectively. Among pediatric recipients, the PS rate up to 5 years was significantly better in cases with a GRWR ≤5 than in those with a GRWR >5. When the GRWR and donor age were combined, among adult recipients 50 to 60 years old, the early PS and GS up to 5 years were significantly better in cases with a GRWR ≥0.7, than in those with a GRWR <0.7. (P = 0.02). In adults, a multivariate analysis showed that GRWR <0.6, transplant era (<2011), donor age (>60 years), recipient age (>60 years), model for end-stage liver disease score (≥20), and center volume (<10) were significant prognostic factors for long-term PS. CONCLUSION Although a satisfactory long-term PS and GS, especially in the recent era (2011-2021), was achieved in the JLTS series, a GRWR ≥5 in pediatric cases and relatively old donors with a GRWR <0.7 in adult cases should be managed with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Koji Umeshita
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Transplantation Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Soejima
- Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroto Egawa
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical, University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takumi Fukumoto
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hironori Haga
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mureo Kasahara
- Organ Transplantation Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Yasutsugu Takada
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Katsutoshi Tokushige
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihide Ueda
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Satoshi Mochida
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hajime Matsushima
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chadha R, Sakai T, Rajakumar A, Shingina A, Yoon U, Patel D, Spiro M, Bhangui P, Sun LY, Humar A, Bezinover D, Findlay J, Saigal S, Singh S, Yi NJ, Rodriguez-Davalos M, Kumar L, Kumaran V, Agarwal S, Berlakovich G, Egawa H, Lerut J, Clemens Broering D, Berenguer M, Cattral M, Clavien PA, Chen CL, Shah S, Zhu ZJ, Ascher N, Bhangui P, Rammohan A, Emond J, Rela M. Anesthesia and Critical Care for the Prediction and Prevention for Small-for-size Syndrome: Guidelines from the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference. Transplantation 2023; 107:2216-2225. [PMID: 37749811 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation, anesthesiologists and intensivists may encounter patients in receipt of small grafts that puts them at risk of developing small for size syndrome (SFSS). METHODS A scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on aspects of SFSS with proposed recommendations. Recommendations underwent a blinded review by an independent expert panel and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at a consensus conference organized by the International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplantation Society of India. RESULTS It was determined that centers with experience in living donor liver transplantation should utilize potential small for size grafts. Higher risk recipients with sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary, and renal dysfunction should receive small for size grafts with caution. In the intraoperative phase, a restrictive fluid strategy should be considered along with routine use of cardiac output monitoring, as well as use of pharmacologic portal flow modulation when appropriate. Postoperatively, these patients can be considered for enhanced recovery and should receive proactive monitoring for SFSS, nutrition optimization, infection prevention, and consideration for early renal replacement therapy for avoidance of graft congestion. CONCLUSIONS Our recommendations provide a framework for the optimal anesthetic and critical care management in the perioperative period for patients with grafts that put them at risk of developing SFSS. There is a significant limitation in the level of evidence for most recommendations. This statement aims to provide guidance for future research in the perioperative management of SFSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Chadha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Tetsuro Sakai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Akila Rajakumar
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Alexandra Shingina
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Uzung Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dhupal Patel
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Devon and Exeter and Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pooja Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - Li-Ying Sun
- Department of Critical Liver Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Dmitri Bezinover
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Findlay
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Centre of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Centre of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Shweta Singh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Manuel Rodriguez-Davalos
- Division of Transplantation and Advanced Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Utah, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Lakshmi Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amrita Hospital, Kochi, India
| | - Vinay Kumaran
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, VCU Medical Center, Richmond, VA
| | - Shaleen Agarwal
- Centre of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Centre of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Hiroto Egawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jan Lerut
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dieter Clemens Broering
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Unit, La Fe University Hospital and IISLaFe and Ciberehd, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mark Cattral
- Ajmera Transplant Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Chao-Long Chen
- Liver Transplantation Centre, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Samir Shah
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver Disease, HPB Surgery and Transplant, Global Hospitals, Mumbai, India
| | - Zhi-Jun Zhu
- Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Nancy Ascher
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Prashant Bhangui
- Medanta Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Medanta-The Medicity, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - Ashwin Rammohan
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Jean Emond
- Liver and Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pollok JM, Tinguely P, Berenguer M, Niemann CU, Raptis DA, Spiro M, Dominguez B, Muller E, Rando K, Enoch MA, Tamir N, Healy P, Manser T, Briggs T, Chaudhary A, Humar A, Jafarian A, Soin AS, Eghtesad B, Miller C, Cherqui D, Samuel D, Broering D, Pomfret E, Villamil F, Durand F, Berlakovich G, McCaughan G, Auzinger G, Testa G, Klintmalm G, Belghiti J, Findlay J, Lai J, Fung J, Klinck J, Roberts J, Liu L, Cattral M, Ghobrial M, Selzner M, Ramsay M, Rela M, Ascher N, Man NK, Selzner N, Burra P, Friend P, Busuttil R, Hwang S, McCluskey S, Mas V, Vohra V, Vij V, Merritt W, Tokat Y, Kang Y, Chan A, Mazzola A, Hessheimer A, Rammohan A, Hogan B, Vinaixa C, Nasralla D, Victor D, De Martin E, Alconchel F, Roll G, Kabacam G, Sapisochin G, Campos-Varela I, Liu J, Patel MS, Izzy M, Kalisvaart M, Adams M, Goldaracena N, Tinguely P, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Chadha R, Shaker TM, Klair TS, Pan T, Tanaka T, Yoon U, Kirchner V, Hannon V, Cheah YL, Frola C, Morkane C, Milliken D, Lurje G, Potts J, Fernandez T, Badenoch A, Mukhtar A, Zanetto A, Montano-Loza A, Chieh AKW, Shetty A, DeWolf A, Olmos A, Mrzljak A, Blasi A, Berzigotti A, Malik A, Rajakumar A, Davidson B, O'Farrell B, Kotton C, Imber C, Kwon CHD, Wray C, Ahn CS, Morkane C, Krenn C, Quintini C, Maluf D, Mina DS, Sellers D, Balci D, Patel D, Rudow DL, Monbaliu D, Bezinover D, Krzanicki D, Milliken D, Kim DS, Brombosz E, Blumberg E, Weiss E, Wey E, Kaldas F, Saliba F, Pittau G, Wagener G, Song GW, Biancofiore G, Testa G, Crespo G, Rodríguez G, Palli GM, McKenna G, Petrowsky H, Egawa H, Montasser I, Pirenne J, Eason J, Guarrera J, Pomposelli J, Lerut J, Emond J, Boehly J, Towey J, Hillingsø JG, de Jonge J, Potts J, Caicedo J, Heimbach J, Emamaullee JA, Bartoszko J, Ma KW, Kronish K, Forkin KT, Chok KSH, Olthoff K, Reyntjens K, Lee KW, Suh KS, Denehy L, van der Laan LJ, McCormack L, Gorvin L, Ruffolo L, Bhat M, Ramírez MAM, Londoño MC, Gitman M, Levstik M, Selzner M, de Santibañes M, Lindsay M, Parotto M, Armstrong M, Kasahara M, Schofield N, Rizkalla N, Akamatsu N, Scatton O, Keskin O, Imventarza O, Andacoglu O, Muiesan P, Giorgio P, Northup P, Matins P, Abt P, Newsome PN, Dutkowski P, Bhangui P, Bhangui P, Tandon P, Brustia R, Planinsic R, Brown R, Porte R, Barth R, Ciria R, Florman S, Dharancy S, Pai SL, Yagi S, Nadalin S, Chinnakotla S, Forbes SJ, Rahman S, Hong SK, Liying S, Orloff S, Rubman S, Eguchi S, Ikegami T, Reichman T, Settmacher U, Aluvihare V, Xia V, Yoon YI, Soejima Y, Genyk Y, Jalal A, Borakati A, Gustar A, Mohamed A, Ramirez A, Rothnie A, Scott A, Sharma A, Munro A, Mahay A, Liew B, Hidalgo C, Crouch C, Yan CT, Tschuor C, Shaw C, Schizas D, Fritche D, Huda FF, Wells G, Farrer G, Kwok HT, Kostakis I, Mestre-Costa J, Fan KH, Fan KS, Fraser K, Jeilani L, Pang L, Lenti L, Kathirvel M, Zachiotis M, Vailas M, Milan MM, Elnagar M, Alradhawi M, Dimitrokallis N, Machairas N, Morare N, Yeung O, Khanal P, Satish P, Ghani SA, Makhdoom S, Arulrajan S, Bogan S, Pericleous S, Blakemore T, Otti V, Lam W, Jackson W, Abdi Z. Enhanced recovery for liver transplantation: recommendations from the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society consensus conference. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:81-94. [PMID: 36495912 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00268-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There is much controversy regarding enhanced recovery for recipients of liver transplants from deceased and living donors. The objectives of this Review were to summarise current knowledge on individual enhanced recovery elements on short-term outcomes, identify key components for comprehensive pathways, and create internationally accepted guidelines on enhanced recovery for liver-transplant recipients. The ERAS4OLT.org collaborative partnered by the International Liver Transplantation Society performed systematic literature reviews on the effect of 32 relevant enhanced perioperative recovery elements on short-term outcomes, and global specialists prepared expert statements on deceased and living donor liver transplantation. The Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach was used for rating of quality of evidence and grading of recommendations. A virtual international consensus conference was held in January, 2022, in which results were presented, voted on by the audience, and discussed by an independent international jury of eight members, applying the Danish model of consensus. 273 liver transplantation specialists from 30 countries prepared expert statements on elements of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation based on the systematic literature reviews. The consensus conference yielded 80 final recommendations, covering aspects of enhanced recovery for preoperative assessment and optimisation, intraoperative surgical and anaesthetic conduct, and postoperative management for the recipients of liver transplants from both deceased and living donors, and for the living donor. The recommendations represent a comprehensive overview of the relevant elements and areas of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation. These internationally established guidelines could direct the development of enhanced recovery programmes worldwide, allowing adjustments according to local resources and practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joerg M Pollok
- Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pascale Tinguely
- Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Unit, CIBERehd, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe-Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Claus U Niemann
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dimitri A Raptis
- Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Royal Free Perioperative Research Group, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ivanics T, Wallace D, Claasen MPAW, Patel MS, Brahmbhatt R, Shwaartz C, Prachalias A, Srinivasan P, Jassem W, Heaton N, Cattral MS, Selzner N, Ghanekar A, Morgenshtern G, Mehta N, Massie AB, van der Meulen J, Segev DL, Sapisochin G. Low utilization of adult-to-adult LDLT in Western countries despite excellent outcomes: International multicenter analysis of the US, the UK, and Canada. J Hepatol 2022; 77:1607-1618. [PMID: 36170900 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers an opportunity to decrease the liver transplant waitlist and reduce waitlist mortality. We sought to compare donor and recipient characteristics and post-transplant outcomes after LDLT in the US, the UK, and Canada. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter cohort-study of adults (≥18-years) who underwent primary LDLT between Jan-2008 and Dec-2018 from three national liver transplantation registries: United Network for Organ Sharing (US), National Health Service Blood and Transplantation (UK), and the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry (Canada). Patients undergoing retransplantation or multi-organ transplantation were excluded. Post-transplant survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable adjustments were performed using Cox proportional-hazards models with mixed-effect modeling. RESULTS A total of 2,954 living donor liver transplants were performed (US: n = 2,328; Canada: n = 529; UK: n = 97). Canada has maintained the highest proportion of LDLT utilization over time (proportion of LDLT in 2008 - US: 3.3%; Canada: 19.5%; UK: 1.7%; p <0.001 - in 2018 - US: 5.0%; Canada: 13.6%; UK: 0.4%; p <0.001). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival was 92.6%, 82.8%, and 70.0% in the US vs. 96.1%, 89.9%, and 82.2% in Canada vs. 91.4%, 85.4%, and 66.7% in the UK. After adjustment for characteristics of donors, recipients, transplant year, and treating transplant center as a random effect, all countries had a non-statistically significantly different mortality hazard post-LDLT (Ref US: Canada hazard ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.01, p = 0.05; UK hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.59-2.02, p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS The use of LDLT has remained low in the US, the UK and Canada. Despite this, long-term survival is excellent. Continued efforts to increase LDLT utilization in these countries may be warranted due to the growing waitlist and differences in allocation that may disadvantage patients currently awaiting liver transplantation. LAY SUMMARY This multicenter international comparative analysis of living donor liver transplantation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada demonstrates that despite low use of the procedure, the long-term outcomes are excellent. In addition, the mortality risk is not statistically significantly different between the evaluated countries. However, the incidence and risk of retransplantation differs between the countries, being the highest in the United Kingdom and lowest in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA; Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Deparment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Wallace
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Rushin Brahmbhatt
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chaya Shwaartz
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Parthi Srinivasan
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Wayel Jassem
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Mark S Cattral
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gabriela Morgenshtern
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Allan B Massie
- Deparment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Deparment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|