Letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk heart transplant recipients

Real-life use of letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus in heart transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the predominant opportunistic infection following solid organ transplantation (SOT). While valganciclovir is the drug of choice for CMV prophylaxis, its utility can be compromised due to the risk of cytopenia. Letermovir, a novel agent approved for CMV prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and high-risk kidney transplant recipients, exhibits reduced toxicity. This study aims to present the practical application of letermovir as both primary and secondary prophylaxis against CMV in heart transplant recipients (HTR).

METHODS

In this observational, retrospective, single-center study, we included all consecutive adult HTRs from June 2020 to January 2022 who were administered letermovir for CMV prophylaxis. We documented instances of CMV breakthrough infections, side effects related to letermovir, changes in neutropenia following the switch from valganciclovir to letermovir, and any drug interactions with the immunosuppressive regimen.

RESULTS

The study comprised 10 patients: two received primary prophylaxis with letermovir due to a high risk of CMV infection (donor-positive, recipient-negative serostatus), and eight received it as secondary prophylaxis following a CMV infection. The median duration of letermovir administration was 8 months (range 3-12 months). No CMV breakthrough infections were reported while on prophylaxis. However, three patients experienced CMV breakthrough infections after discontinuing letermovir prophylaxis (30%). No significant side effects were observed, although one patient reported digestive intolerance. Among the nine patients on tacrolimus, six needed reduced doses after switching to letermovir.

CONCLUSION

This real-life study appears to support the effectiveness of letermovir prophylaxis in HTR. Nonetheless, the risk of CMV infection post-treatment cessation is notable. Further drug monitoring and research on the efficacy of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in SOT patients is warranted.

A call for cytomegalovirus stewardship initiatives in cardiothoracic transplant

Despite the availability of potent antiviral therapy and increasingly long prophylaxis courses, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to negatively affect outcomes after cardiothoracic transplant (CT). CMV antiviral stewardship (AVS) represents an opportunity to implement organ-specific prophylaxis, treatment, and monitoring algorithms while optimizing care of the allograft and patient. Within the nuanced context of heart and lung transplant recipients, CMV prophylaxis, monitoring, and treatment strategies are reviewed for efficacy and safety. These insights highlight opportunities for CMV AVS programs to combine organ- and patient-specific data while implementing CMV guidelines, appropriately adopted to local context by local experts, with concurrent and retrospective evaluation for each patient and the transplant program. By applying concepts of CMV AVS currently practiced in abdominal transplant, CT programs can work to improve graft and patient outcomes related to CMV, including ongoing challenges such as atherosclerosis and impaired endothelial function in heart transplant recipients and chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. While implementation of CMV AVS is not without challenges, it also represents an opportunity for multidisciplinary teams to foster the development of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity and improve long-term outcomes.

Effect of letermovir initiation on tacrolimus concentrations among lung transplant recipients receiving concomitant azole antifungal prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

The antiviral letermovir has been increasingly used as off-label cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients. Observational studies have reported notable increases in tacrolimus (FK) exposure following letermovir; however, whether a significant interaction occurs in the setting of existing moderate-to-strong CYP3A4 inhibition is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate FK trough changes before and after letermovir among lung transplant recipients receiving azole antifungal prophylaxis.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included lung transplant recipients newly initiated on letermovir between 2019-2022 following valganciclovir intolerance. Tacrolimus doses and concentrations were collected up to 30 days before and after the letermovir start date. No pre-emptive FK dose adjustments occurred prior to letermovir initiation. Patients admitted to the hospital or lacking an appropriately timed trough in the pre- or post-period were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 78 lung transplant recipients receiving FK (1.5 mg median total daily dose) and itraconazole (56.4%), isavuconazole (25.6%) or posaconazole (17.9%) prophylaxis were included. Letermovir was started at a median of 8.4 months post-transplant. The pre-/post-letermovir median FK trough was 9.6/9.0 ng/mL (p = .151), median dose-corrected trough was 4.2/4.7 ng/mL/mg (+11.9%, p = .032), and median weight-based dose-corrected trough was 362/326 [ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day] (-9.9%, p = .036). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients within their goal trough range before and after letermovir initiation (62% vs. 72%, p = .229).

CONCLUSION

Empiric FK dose adjustments do not appear warranted before letermovir initiation in lung transplant recipients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with moderate-to-strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Cytomegalovirus infection is associated with impaired myocardial flow reserve after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) limits long-term survival after heart transplantation (HT). This study evaluates the relationship between clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (CS-CMVi) and CAV using cardiac positron emission tomography (PET).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated HT patients from 2005 to 2019 who underwent cardiac PET for CAV evaluation. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between CS-CMVi and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between CS-CMV, MFR, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (31.1%) of 103 HT patients developed CS-CMVi at a median 9 months after HT. Patients with CS-CMVi had a significantly lower MFR at year 1 and 3, driven by reduction in stress myocardial blood flow. Patients with CS-CMVi had a faster rate of decline in MFR compared to those without infection (-0.10 vs -0.06 per year, p < 0.001). CS-CMVi was an independent predictor of abnormal MFR (<2.0) (odds ratio: 3.8, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.4-10.7, p = 0.001) and a lower MFR (β = -0.39, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.16, p = 0.001) at year 3. In adjusted survival analyses, both abnormal MFR (log-rank p < 0.001; hazard ratio [HR]: 5.7, 95% CI: 4.2-7.2) and CS-CMVi (log-rank p = 0.028; HR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.8-4.8) were significant predictors of the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, retransplantation, heart failure hospitalization, and acute coronary syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

CS-CMVi is an independent predictor of reduced MFR following HT. These findings suggest that CMV infection is an important risk factor in the development and progression of CAV.

Current and Emerging Antiviral Agents in the Prevention and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus in Pediatric Transplant Recipients

Despite current prophylaxis regimens, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is common in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Newer antiviral medications are reshaping the landscape for prevention and treatment of CMV DNAemia, infection, and disease. Letermovir is approved for CMV prevention in adult HCT patients and is attractive due to the absence of marrow suppression seen with ganciclovir/valganciclovir. Letermovir should not be routinely used for CMV treatment due to its low threshold for resistance. Maribavir is approved for the treatment of refractory or resistant CMV disease in HCT and SOT recipients ≥12 years of age, though it has no current role in CMV prevention. More research is needed to fully elucidate the roles, efficacy, and safety of these newer agents in prevention and treatment of CMV in pediatric transplant recipients.

Current Perspectives on the Management of Herpesvirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high risk of human herpesvirus (HHV)-related morbidity and mortality due to the use of immunosuppressive therapy. We aim to increase awareness and understanding of HHV disease burden in SOTRs by providing an overview of current prevention and management strategies as described in the literature and guidelines. We discuss challenges in both prevention and treatment as well as future perspectives.