Risk factors and prophylaxis for nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: A nested case-control study

Impact of Sulfonamide Allergy Label on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

The presence of antibiotic allergy labels can have harmful impacts on clinical outcomes, particularly among immunosuppressed patients, in whom there have been associations with increased complications, readmission rates, and mortality. We explore the effects of a sulfonamide allergy label (SAL) on clinical outcomes in adult patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP).

METHODS

In this retrospective matched cohort study, we utilized TriNetX, a multicenter national database, to match 535 adult patients with PJP and SAL to an equal number of controls. We identified cases indexed between 01/01/2010 and 01/01/2023 utilizing ICD-10 codes for PJP and allergy status to sulfonamides and through detection of P. jirovecii antigen with immunofluorescence or PCR. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 fashion for demographics and comorbidities, and our analysis included clinical outcomes that occurred within 30 days after the occurrence of the index event.

RESULTS

While hospitalization risk tended to be lower among patients with SAL as compared to controls (RR: 0.90; 95% CI 0.81-1.01), there were no major differences in the risk of respiratory failure (RR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.84-1.05), prednisone use (RR: 1; 95% CI 0.91-1.10), intensive level of care requirement (RR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.69-1.06), intubation (RR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.61-1.19), or mortality (RR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.68-1.42). The presence of SAL did however impact antibiotic prescription patterns, with an underutilization of trimethoprim (RR: 0.50; 95% CI 0.43-0.59) and sulfamethoxazole (RR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.40-0.56) and overuse of alternative agents by patients with SAL as compared to controls. Yet, there was no difference in the occurrence of adverse outcomes such as hepatotoxicity (RR: 1.09; 95% CI 0.49-2.45) or acute kidney injury (RR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.78-1.14) between patients with SAL and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of SAL alters antibiotic prescription patterns among adults with Pneumocystis infection but has no clinically significant impact on outcomes.

Epidemiology, Timing, and Secondary Prophylaxis of Recurrent Nocardiosis

Background

Nocardia tends to cause infection in immunocompromised patients or those with chronic pulmonary disease. Nocardia is known to recur, prompting the practice of secondary prophylaxis in patients perceived at high risk. However, few data exist regarding the epidemiology of recurrent nocardiosis or the effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis.

Methods

We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with nocardiosis from November 2011 to April 2022, including patients who completed primary treatment and had at least 30 days of posttreatment follow-up. Propensity score matching was used to analyze the effect of secondary prophylaxis on Nocardia recurrence.

Results

Fifteen of 303 (5.0%) patients developed recurrent nocardiosis after primary treatment. Most recurrences were diagnosed either within 60 days (N = 6/15, 40.0%) or between 2 to 3 years (N = 4/15, 26.7%). Patients with primary disseminated infection tended to recur within 1 year, whereas later recurrences were often nondisseminated pulmonary infection. Seventy-eight (25.7%) patients were prescribed secondary prophylaxis, mostly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (N = 67/78). After propensity-matching, secondary prophylaxis was not associated with reduced risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, .24-3.83), including in multiple subgroups. Eight (53.3%) patients with recurrent nocardiosis required hospitalization and no patients died from recurrent infection.

Conclusions

Recurrent nocardiosis tends to occur either within months because of the same Nocardia species or after several years with a new species. Although we did not find evidence for the effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis, the confidence intervals were wide. However, outcomes of recurrent nocardiosis are generally favorable and may not justify long-term antibiotic prophylaxis for this indication alone.

Skin and soft tissue infections in solid organ transplants

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients may be a great challenge for clinicians caring for SOT due to the involvement of both common and opportunistic pathogens associated with a blunted immune response. The purpose of this review is to outline current literature and describe open issues on the management of SSTI in this special population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical presentation in SOT recipients can manifest as isolated skin lesions after primary inoculation or be the sign of a disseminated infection. Tissue samples for microscopy and histopathology are crucial to making an accurate diagnosis given the nonspecific and heterogeneous appearance of skin lesions. Multidisciplinary teams are required for a comprehensive diagnosis and management.

SUMMARY

SSTI are frequent contributors to morbidity and mortality in SOT. Specific research focused on the clinical presentation, risk factors and management in this special population is needed.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole significantly reduces the risk of nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis prevents nocardiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of TMP-SMX in the prevention of nocardiosis after SOT, its dose-response relationship, its effect on preventing disseminated nocardiosis, and the risk of TMP-SMX resistance in case of breakthrough infection.

METHODS

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus up to 19 September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

(a) Risk of nocardiosis between SOT recipients with and without TMP-SMX prophylaxis, or (b) sufficient details to determine the rate of TMP-SMX resistance in breakthrough nocardiosis.

PARTICIPANTS

SOT recipients.

INTERVENTION

TMP-SMX prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) for comparative studies; dedicated tool for non-comparative studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

For our primary outcome (i.e. to determine the effect of TMP-SMX on the risk of nocardiosis), a one-step mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate the association between the outcome and the exposure. Univariate and multivariable unconditional regression models were used to adjust for the potential confounding effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Individual data from three case-control studies were obtained (260 SOT recipients with nocardiosis and 519 uninfected controls). TMP-SMX prophylaxis was independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of nocardiosis (adjusted OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.18-0.52, moderate certainty of evidence). Variables independently associated with an increased risk of nocardiosis were older age, current use of corticosteroids, high calcineurin inhibitor concentration, recent acute rejection, lower lymphocyte count, and heart transplant. Breakthrough infections (66/260, 25%) were generally susceptible to TMP-SMX (pooled proportion 98%, 95% CI 92-100).

CONCLUSIONS

In SOT recipients, TMP-SMX prophylaxis likely reduces the risk of nocardiosis. Resistance appears uncommon in case of breakthrough infection.

Outcomes of transplant recipients with pretransplant Nocardia colonization or infection

BACKGROUND

Specific pretransplant infections have been associated with poor posttransplant outcomes. However, the impact of pretransplant Nocardia isolation has not been studied.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study from three centers in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota of patients with Nocardia infection or colonization who subsequently underwent solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from November 2011 through April 2022. Outcomes included posttransplant Nocardia infection and mortality.

RESULTS

Nine patients with pretransplant Nocardia were included. Two patients were deemed colonized with Nocardia, and the remaining seven had nocardiosis. These patients underwent bilateral lung (N = 5), heart (N = 1), heart-kidney (N = 1), liver-kidney (N = 1), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (N = 1) at a median of 283 (interquartile range [IQR] 152-283) days after Nocardia isolation. Two (22.2%) patients had disseminated infection, and two were receiving active Nocardia treatment at the time of transplantation. One Nocardia isolate was resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and all patients received TMP-SMX prophylaxis posttransplant, often for extended durations. No patients developed posttransplant nocardiosis during a median follow-up of 1.96 (IQR 0.90-6.33) years. Two patients died during follow-up, both without evidence of nocardiosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not identify any episodes of posttransplant nocardiosis among nine patients with pretransplant Nocardia isolation. As patients with the most severe infections may have been denied transplantation, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better analyze any impact of pretransplant Nocardia on posttransplant outcomes. However, among patients who receive posttransplant TMP-SMX prophylaxis, these data suggest pretransplant Nocardia isolation may not impart a heightened risk of posttransplant nocardiosis.