5
|
Fung MA, Vidal CI, Armbrecht EA, Andea AA, Cassarino DS, Comfere NI, Emanuel PO, Ferringer T, Hristov AC, Kim J, Lauer SR, Linos K, Missall TA, Motaparthi K, Novoa RA, Patel R, Shalin SC, Sundram U, Calame A, Bennett DD, Duncan LM, Elston DM, Hosler GA, Hurley YM, Lazar AJ, Lowe L, Messina J, Myles J, Plaza JA, Prieto VG, Reddy V, Schaffer A, Subtil A. Appropriate use criteria for ancillary diagnostic testing in dermatopathology: New recommendations for 11 tests and 220 clinical scenarios from the American Society of Dermatopathology Appropriate Use Criteria Committee. J Cutan Pathol 2022; 49:231-245. [PMID: 34536035 DOI: 10.1111/cup.14135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide patient-centered physician guidance in test selection. An initial set of AUC was reported by the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) in 2018. AUC reflect evidence collected at single timepoints and may be affected by evolving evidence and experience. The objective of this study was to update and expand AUC for selected tests. METHODS RAND/UCLA (RAND Corporation [Santa Monica, CA]/University of California Los Angeles) methodology used includes the following: (a) literature review; (b) review of previously rated tests and previously employed clinical scenarios; (c) selection of previously rated tests for new ratings; (d) development of new clinical scenarios; (e) selection of additional tests; (f) three rating rounds with feedback and group discussion after rounds 1 and 2. RESULTS For 220 clinical scenarios comprising lymphoproliferative (light chain clonality), melanocytic (comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter), vascular disorders (MYC), and inflammatory dermatoses (periodic acid-Schiff, Gömöri methenamine silver), consensus by panel raters was reached in 172 of 220 (78%) scenarios, with 103 of 148 (70%) rated "usually appropriate" or "rarely appropriate" and 45 of 148 (30%), "appropriateness uncertain." LIMITATIONS The study design only measures appropriateness. Cost, availability, test comparison, and additional clinical considerations are not measured. The possibility that the findings of this study may be influenced by the inherent biases of the dermatopathologists involved in the study cannot be excluded. CONCLUSIONS AUC are reported for selected diagnostic tests in clinical scenarios that occur in dermatopathology practice. Adhering to AUC may reduce inappropriate test utilization and improve healthcare delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell A Fung
- Department of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Claudia I Vidal
- Dermatology Center of Southern Indiana, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Eric A Armbrecht
- Center for Health Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Aleodor A Andea
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - David S Cassarino
- Department of Pathology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nneka I Comfere
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Tammie Ferringer
- Department of Dermatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexandra C Hristov
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jinah Kim
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Scott R Lauer
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Konstantinos Linos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Tricia A Missall
- Department of Dermatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kiran Motaparthi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Roberto A Novoa
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Rajiv Patel
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sara C Shalin
- Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Uma Sundram
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine and Beaumont Health Systems, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Daniel D Bennett
- Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lyn M Duncan
- Pathology Service and Dermatopathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dirk M Elston
- Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Gregory A Hosler
- ProPath, Department of Dermatology, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yadira M Hurley
- Department of Dermatology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lori Lowe
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jane Messina
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of South Florida, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jonathan Myles
- Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jose A Plaza
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vijaya Reddy
- Department of Pathology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - András Schaffer
- Division of Dermatology, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| | - Antonio Subtil
- Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nguyen CV, Gaddis KJ, Stephens MR, Seykora JT, Chu EY. An Intrapatient Concordance Study of Mismatch Repair Protein Immunohistochemical Staining Patterns in Patients With Muir-Torre Syndrome. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 156:676-680. [PMID: 32267475 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Appropriate use criteria for Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) screening suggest that mismatch repair protein (MMRP) immunohistochemical (IHC) testing is usually appropriate in patients with 2 or more sebaceous neoplasms (SNs). While MTS is known to be caused by a germline mutation in mismatch repair genes, data are limited as to whether individual sebaceous tumors in these patients with multiple lesions show identical MMRP IHC staining patterns. Objective To determine concordance of MMRP IHC staining patterns in lesions of patients with MTS who have multiple SNs. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective single-center case series evaluated 38 SNs in 11 patients with MTS confirmed by genetic testing for MMRP IHC staining patterns. Tumor sites were classified as either facial or extrafacial. Data were collected between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures In each patient, MMRP IHC staining patterns for SNs were compared with one another to evaluate intrapatient concordance between lesions, and to the patient's known germline mutation. Results A total of 11 patients (7 women and 4 men) with MTS, with a mean (SD) age of 59.3 (10.6) years at time of SN biopsy, were identified. There was high concordance between MMRP IHC staining results (2-4 lesions per patient) and the patient's mutation status, with 36 of 38 total lesions (95%) matching (sensitivity, 94.7%; 95% CI, 82.3%-99.4%). Extrafacial site tumors represented 16 of 38 total lesions (42%) and demonstrated 100% concordance of IHC results to germline mutation. Only 1 of 11 patients (9%) demonstrated discordant results, with both lesions in this patient occurring on a facial site. Conclusions and Relevance In patients with known MTS, SNs present with highly concordant MMRP IHC staining profiles across multiple lesions. There is also a strong association with underlying germline mutations. A diagnosis of MTS might be supported by MMRP IHC when the pretest probability is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuong V Nguyen
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kevin J Gaddis
- Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Michael R Stephens
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - John T Seykora
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Emily Y Chu
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ferreira I, Wiedemeyer K, Demetter P, Adams DJ, Arends MJ, Brenn T. Update on the pathology, genetics and somatic landscape of sebaceous tumours. Histopathology 2020; 76:640-649. [PMID: 31821583 DOI: 10.1111/his.14044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Cutaneous sebaceous neoplasms show a predilection for the head and neck area of adults and include tumours with benign behaviour, sebaceous adenoma and sebaceoma, and sebaceous carcinoma with potential for an aggressive disease course at the malignant end of the spectrum. The majority of tumours are solitary and sporadic, but a subset of tumours may be associated with Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) and previously referred to as Muir-Torre syndrome (now known to be part of Lynch syndrome). This review provides an overview of the clinical and histological features of cutaneous sebaceous neoplasia with an emphasis on differentiating features and differential diagnosis. It also offers insights into the recently described molecular pathways involved in the development of sebaceous tumours and their association with Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Ferreira
- Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Experimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katharina Wiedemeyer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, The Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Pieter Demetter
- Department of Pathology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David J Adams
- Experimental Cancer Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark J Arends
- Division of Pathology, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thomas Brenn
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, The Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Division of Pathology, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|