A review of proximal inputs to the near response

Topical Review: Methodological Variables in Clinical and Laboratory Measurements of Fixation Disparity

SIGNIFICANCE

Fixation disparity is a small vergence error that does not disrupt fusion. Fixation disparity measures correlate with binocular symptoms. This article covers methodological differences between clinical fixation disparity measurement devices, findings when objective and subjective fixation disparities are compared, and the potential impact of binocular capture on fixation disparity measurements. Fixation disparity is a small vergence error that occurs in nonstrabismic individuals and does not disrupt fusion. This article reviews clinical fixation disparity variables and their clinical diagnostic value. Clinical devices that are used to measure these variables are described, as are studies in which the output from these devices has been compared. Methodological differences between the devices such as the location of the fusional stimulus, the rate at which judgments of dichoptic alignment are made, and the strength of the accommodative stimulus are all considered. In addition, the article covers theories of the neural origins of fixation disparity and control system models incorporating fixation disparity. Studies in which objective fixation disparities (oculomotor portion of fixation disparity assessed with an eye tracker) and subjective fixation disparities (sensory portion of fixation disparity assessed psychophysically with dichoptic Nonius lines) have been compared are also examined, and consideration is given to why some investigators find differences in these measures, whereas other investigators do not. The conclusion thus far is that there are likely complex interactions between vergence adaptation, accommodation, and the location of the fusional stimulus that lead to differences in objective and subjective fixation disparity measures. Finally, capture of the visual direction of monocular stimuli by adjacent fusional stimuli and the implications for fixation disparity measures are considered.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging activation for different vergence eye movement subtypes

INTRODUCTION

Maddox suggested that there were four convergence subtypes, each driven by a different stimulus. The purpose of this study was to assess the neural correlates for accommodative convergence, proximal convergence (convergence stimulus provided), disparity convergence and voluntary convergence (no specific convergence stimulus provided) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

METHODS

Ten subjects (mean age = 24.4 years) with normal binocular vision participated. The blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals of the brain from fMRI scans were measured when subjects made vergence eye movements while: (1) alternately viewing letters monocularly where one eye viewed through a -2.00 D lens, (2) alternately viewing Difference of Gaussian targets monocularly at distance and near, (3) viewing random dot stereograms with increasing disparity and (4) voluntarily converging the eyes with binocular viewing.

RESULTS

The accommodative convergence paradigm resulted in activation on the right side in the right fusiform cortex and the right middle occipital cortex. The proximal convergence stimulus mainly activated areas in the right occipital lobe. The disparity stimulus activated areas in the left occipital cortex and the left frontal cortex. Finally, the voluntary convergence paradigm resulted in activation primarily in the occipital lobe and mostly bilaterally.

CONCLUSION

The accommodative, proximal, disparity and voluntary convergence paradigms resulted in activation in unique areas in the brain with functional MRI. Activation was found in more areas in the proximal and voluntary conditions compared with the accommodative and disparity conditions.

Feasibility of measuring fusional vergence amplitudes objectively

Two tests to measure fusional vergence amplitudes objectively were developed and validated against the two conventional clinical tests. Forty-nine adults participated in the study. Participants' negative (BI, base in) and positive (BO, base out) fusional vergence amplitudes at near were measured objectively in an haploscopic set-up by recording eye movements with an EyeLink 1000 Plus (SR Research). Stimulus disparity changed in steps or smoothly mimicking a prim bar and a Risley prism, respectively. Break and recovery points were determined offline using a custom Matlab algorithm for the analysis of eye movements. Fusional vergence amplitudes were also measured with two clinical tests using a Risley prism and a prism bar. A better agreement between tests was found for the measurement of BI than for BO fusional vergence amplitudes. The means ± SD of the differences between the BI break and recovery points measured with the two objective tests were -1.74 ± 3.35 PD and -1.97 ± 2.60 PD, respectively, which were comparable to those obtained for the subjective tests. For the BO break and recovery points, although the means of the differences between the two objective tests were small, high variability between subjects was found (0.31 ± 6.44 PD and -2.84 ± 7.01 PD, respectively). This study showed the feasibility to measure fusional vergence amplitudes objectively and overcome limitations of the conventional subjective tests. However, these tests cannot be used interchangeably due to their poor agreement.

Estimating 3D spatiotemporal point of regard: a device evaluation

This paper presents and evaluates a system and method that record spatiotemporal scene information and location of the center of visual attention, i.e., spatiotemporal point of regard (PoR) in ecological environments. A primary research application of the proposed system and method is for enhancing current 2D visual attention models. Current eye-tracking approaches collapse a scene's depth structures to a 2D image, omitting visual cues that trigger important functions of the human visual system (e.g., accommodation and vergence). We combined head-mounted eye-tracking with a miniature time-of-flight camera to produce a system that could be used to estimate the spatiotemporal location of the PoR-the point of highest visual attention-within 3D scene layouts. Maintaining calibration accuracy is a primary challenge for gaze mapping; hence, we measured accuracy repeatedly by matching the PoR to fixated targets arranged within a range of working distances in depth. Accuracy was estimated as the deviation from estimated PoR relative to known locations of scene targets. We found that estimates of 3D PoR had an overall accuracy of approximately 2° omnidirectional mean average error (OMAE) with variation over a 1 h recording maintained within 3.6° OMAE. This method can be used to determine accommodation and vergence cues of the human visual system continuously within habitual environments, including everyday applications (e.g., use of hand-held devices).

Preliminary Evaluation of a Smartphone App for Refractive Error Measurement

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential feasibility of using a smartphone app in myopia screening.

Methods

The app estimates myopic refractive error by measuring the far point distance for reading three 20/20 Tumbling E letters. In total, 113 myopic subjects with astigmatism no greater than -1.75 diopters (D) were enrolled from 5 sites. The mean age was 22 ± 8.5 years. The app measurement was compared with noncycloplegic subjective refraction measurement or autorefractor if subjective refraction was not available. In addition, 22 subjects were tested with the app for repeatability.

Results

For 201 eyes included, the range of spherical equivalent refraction error was 0 to -10.2 D. The app measurement and clinical measurement was highly correlated (Pearson R = 0.91, P < 0.001). There was a small bias (0.17 D) in the app measurement overall, and it was significantly different across the 5 sites due to different age of subjects enrolled at those sites (P = 0.001) - young adults in their 20s were underestimated the most by 0.49 D, whereas children were overestimated by 0.29 D. The mean absolute deviation of the app measurement was 0.65 D. The repeatability of multiple testing in terms of 95% limit of agreement was ±0.61 D.

Conclusions

Overall, the app measurement is consistent with clinical measurement performed by vision care professionals. The repeatability is comparable with that of some autorefractors. Age-associated human factors may influence the app measurement.

Translational Relevance

The app could be potentially used as a mass screening tool for myopia.

Review: Head and Eye Movements and Gaze Tracking in Baseball Batting

SIGNIFICANCE

After a 30-year gap, several studies on head and eye movements and gaze tracking in baseball batting have been performed in the last decade. These baseball studies may lead to training protocols for batting. Here we review these studies and compare the tracking behaviors with those in other sports.Baseball batters are often instructed to "keep your eye on the ball." Until recently, the evidence regarding whether batters follow this instruction and if there are benefits to following this instruction was limited. Baseball batting studies demonstrate that batters tend to move the head more than the eyes in the direction of the ball at least until a saccade occurs. Foveal gaze tracking is often maintained on the ball through the early portion of the pitch, so it can be said that baseball batters do keep the eyes on the ball. While batters place gaze at or near the point of bat-ball contact, the way this is accomplished varies. In some studies, foveal gaze tracking continues late in the pitch trajectory, whereas in other studies, anticipatory saccades occur. The relative advantages of these discrepant gaze strategies on perceptual processing and motor planning speed and accuracy are discussed, and other variables that may influence anticipatory saccades including the predictability of the pitch and the level of batter expertise are described. Further studies involving larger groups with different levels of expertise under game conditions are required to determine which gaze tracking strategies are most beneficial for baseball batting.

The impact of high- and moderate-intensity exercise on near-point of convergence metrics

Background: Near point of convergence (NPC) assesses the vergence ability of the visuo-oculomotor system; however, little is known regarding: the extent and duration exercise impacts NPC and the between- and within-day reliability of NPC metrics.Methods: An accommodative ruler with a miniature Snellen chart was placed upon the philtrum (upper lip). Participants (n=9) focused upon a 'V' sized 20/20, while the chart was moved at ~1-2 cm/s toward and away from the eyes (twice in each direction). Testing commenced at 8:00am with NPC measures being collected at baseline before three randomized conditions with serial follow-ups occurring at six post-condition timepoints (0-8 hours following). The conditions consisted of 25-minutes high-intensity intervals (10, one-minute intervals at ~85-90% heart-rate reserve), 45-minutes of moderate-intensity exercise (at ~50-60% heart-rate reserve), and a control condition (30-minutes quiet rest).Results: NPC was not impacted across any of the three conditions (all p > .59). Additionally, NPC measures between baseline conditions and across the control condition displayed very high levels of within-day and between-day reliability (coefficient of variation <3.8%).Conclusions: Future NPC measures using an accommodative ruler can be taken immediately following exercise and may be pertinent as a complementary tool in the future sideline screening of concussion.