Multimodal imaging of suspicious choroidal neoplasms in a primary eye-care clinic

Measurement of Melanocytic Choroidal Lesions: Ultrasound Versus Ultrawide-Field Fundus Imaging System

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to establish the concordance between conventional 20 Mhz ultrasonography and an ultrawide-field (UWF) imaging system (Optos® California) in the measurement of basal diameters of melanocytic choroidal tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective study comparing diagnostic tests was conducted in patients with untreated melanocytic choroidal lesions (either nevus or melanoma) who had undergone both UWF imaging and ultrasonography. Only cases with a clear visualization of tumor borders in both imaging modalities were included. Longitudinal and transversal base diameters of the melanocytic tumors were measured by 20 MHz US (one observer) and UWF fundus photography (two observers). Interobserver agreement was assessed for UWF imaging first to validate the technique. Then, UWF imaging measurements were compared with 20 MHz US results.

RESULTS

In total, 106 patient images were reviewed, of which 61 were excluded due to unclear visualization of tumor margins. We found excellent concordance (from ICC and defined Bland-Altman plots) for interobserver and inter-technique agreement in estimating basal diameters when using pseudocolor composite and red laser images by comparing them with 20 MHz US results.

CONCLUSIONS

UWF fundus imaging, when complete visualization of the tumor margins is possible, could be as reliable as ultrasonography in the measurement of the basal diameters of choroidal melanocytic tumors.

Choroidal Nevus Features Associated with Subspecialty Referral

OBJECTIVE

To identify choroidal nevus features associated with referral to a retina or ocular oncology subspecialist.

DESIGN

Population-based retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Patients diagnosed with choroidal nevus.

METHODS

Population-based retrospective cohort study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, with an incident diagnosis of choroidal nevus from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015 using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a medical record linkage system. Tumor features and patient demographics associated with referral to a retina or ocular oncology subspecialist were assessed. Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Tumor features and patient demographics associated with referral to subspecialty care.

RESULTS

There were 826 incident diagnoses of choroidal nevus, of which 88 cases (11%) were referred, with highest level of referral being retina in 29 cases (33%) and ocular oncology in 59 cases (67%). None of the analyzed demographic features were associated with choroidal nevus referral to subspecialty care. Tumor features associated with referral (vs. not referred) included greater mean basal diameter (4.6 mm vs. 2.4 mm, P < 0.001), greater mean tumor thickness (0.7 mm vs. 0.1 mm, P < 0.001), greater distance to optic disc (6.9 mm vs. 3.4 mm, P = 0.02), halo around nevus (5.7% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001), and drusen on OCT (51% vs. 25%, P = 0.002). Presence of orange pigment (8% vs. 0%, P = 0.14), subretinal fluid (9% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.09), and low internal reflectivity on A-scan (7.7% vs. 0%, P = 1.00) were not found more frequently in the subspecialty referral group.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater basal diameter and mean tumor thickness of choroidal nevus were associated with referral to retina or ocular oncology. However, several features associated with increased risk of malignant transformation were not associated with subspecialty referral. These findings highlight the importance of educating eye care providers about high-risk tumor features associated with choroidal nevus transformation to melanoma. In the primary eye care setting where not all multimodal imaging may be available, we encourage color photography and OCT with referral for any features of basal diameter > 5 mm, presence of subretinal fluid, or thickness too large for capture by enhanced-depth imaging OCT.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

The advantages of intermediate-tier, inter-optometric referral of low risk pigmented lesions

Purpose

Pigmented ocular lesions are commonly encountered by eye‐care professionals, and range from benign to sight or life‐threatening. After identifying a lesion, the primary care professional must establish the likely diagnosis and decide either to reassure, to monitor or to refer. The increasing use of ocular imaging technologies has contributed to an increase in the detection rate of pigmented lesions and a higher number of referrals, which may challenge existing pathways of health‐care delivery. Specialist services may be over‐burdened by referring all patients with pigmented lesions for an opinion, while inter‐optometric referrals are underutilised. The aim of this study was to describe the referral patterns of pigmented lesions to an optometry led intermediate‐tier collaborative care clinic.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patient records using the list of patients examined at Centre for Eye Health (CFEH) for an initial or follow up pigmented lesion assessment between the 1/7/2013 and the 30/6/2016. Analysis was performed on: patient demographic characteristics, the referrer's tentative diagnosis, CFEH diagnosis and recommended management plan.

Results

Across 182 patient records, the primary lesion prompting referral was usually located in the posterior segment: choroidal naevus (105/182, 58%), congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE; 11/182, 6%), chorioretinal scarring (10/182, 5%) or not specified (52/182, 29%). Referrals described a specific request for ocular imaging in 25 instances (14%). The number of cases with a non‐specific diagnosis was reduced after intermediate‐tier care assessment (from 29% to 10%), while the number of diagnoses with less common conditions rose (from 2% to 21%). There was a 2% false positive referral rate to intermediate‐tier care and a first visit discharge rate of 35%. A minority required on‐referral to an ophthalmologist (22/182, 12%), either for unrelated incidental ocular findings, or suspicious choroidal naevi. Conditions most amenable to optometric follow up included: 1) chorioretinal scarring, 2) choroidal naevus, and 3) CHRPE.

Conclusions

Intermediate‐tier optometric eye‐care in pigmented lesions (following opportunistic primary care screening) has the potential to reduce the number of cases with non‐specific diagnoses and to increase those with less common diagnoses. The majority of cases seen under this intermediate‐tier model required only ongoing optometric surveillance.