Overall accuracy of cervical cytology and clinicopathological significance of LSIL cells in ASC-H cytology

The Accuracy of Cytology, Colposcopy and Pathology in Evaluating Precancerous Cervical Lesions

Introduction: Cervical cancer (CC) is the third most common cancer in the world, and Romania has the highest incidence of cervical cancer in Europe. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between cytology, colposcopy, and pathology for the early detection of premalignant cervical lesions in a group of Romanian patients. Methods: This observational type 2 cohort study included 128 women from our unit, “Bucur” Maternity, who were referred for cervical cancer screening. Age, clinical diagnosis, cytology results, colposcopy impression, and biopsy results were considered. Colposcopy was performed by two experienced examiners. The pathological examination was performed by an experienced pathologist. Results: The cytology found high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 60.9% of patients, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 28.1%, atypical squamous cells for which a high-grade lesion could not be excluded in 9.4%, and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, known as repeated LSIL, in 1.6%. The first evaluator identified low-grade lesions in 56.3%, high-grade lesions in 40.6%, and invasion in 3.1% of patients. The second evaluator identified low-grade lesions in 59.4%, high-grade lesions in 32.0%, and invasion in 8.6% of patients. The pathological exam identified low-grade lesions in 64.1%, high-grade lesions in 25%, and carcinoma in 14% of patients. The colposcopic accuracy was greater than the cytologic accuracy. Conclusions: Colposcopy remains an essential tool for the identification of cervical premalignant cancer cells. Standardization of the protocol provided an insignificant interobserver variability and can serve as support for further postgraduate teaching.

Performance of specific morphologic features in distinguishing low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions from high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in borderline cases: a College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee multiobserver study

INTRODUCTION

Distinguishing between low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) can be difficult on certain Papanicolaou (Pap) tests, hindering interobserver concordance. We investigated the variables influencing the interpretation of LSIL versus HSIL in Pap test slides rejected from the College of American Pathologists PAP education program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven cytologists, who were unaware of the reference interpretation, examined 21 Pap slides (11 submitted as LSIL and 10 as HSIL) rejected from the PAP education program and recorded the number of LSIL cells, HSIL cells, keratinized dysplastic cells, LSIL clusters with mixed HSIL cells, atypical squamous metaplasia, atypical glandular cells, the presence of inflammation or infectious organisms, and the overall interpretation (LSIL or HSIL). We evaluated the significance of these 11 variables using a nonlinear mixed model analysis.

RESULTS

LSIL had greater concordance (92 of 121 responses; 76.0% concordance) than HSIL (68 of 110 responses; 61.8% concordance; P < 0.001). The only predictors of misclassified cases were the number of atypical squamous metaplastic cells and the number of HSIL cells (P < 0.001). The more of these cells identified, the more likely the reviewers were to classify the slide as HSIL. The reproducibility of the diagnosis was fair (Gwet's agreement coefficient, 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Interobserver reproducibility is a challenge for a subset of cases with features intermediate between LSIL and HSIL. Atypical squamous metaplasia and dysplastic nuclei with a nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio greater than one half of the cell volume (HSIL) present on a Pap test influenced the likelihood that a reviewer would interpret the case as HSIL rather than LSIL.

The significance of ASC-H and LSIL dual interpretation with risk stratification: one institution experience

INTRODUCTION

The 2014 Bethesda System categorizes squamous lesions as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). It also includes intermediate morphologic terminology, such as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H). Consensus is lacking if when ASC-H is present in an unequivocal LSIL (LSIL + ASC-H) versus ASC-H alone predicts a neoplasm with a different biologic behavior and which is its association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the Columbia University Medical Center Pathology department patient's database from October 2012 through December 2014 and found 2498 cytology samples of LSIL, ASC-H, HSIL, and LSIL + ASC-H with both follow-up histologic samples and HPV tests by Roche cobas. Our objective was to identify, if any, differences in biologic behavior and HPV status present in LSIL + ASC-H compared with ASC-H and other lesions.

RESULTS

CIN2+ was documented in tissue examination in 102 from 311 LSIL + ASC-H (32.8%), 101 from 219 ASC-H (46.1%), 252 from 326 HSIL+ (77.3%), and 150 from 1642 LSIL (9.08%). HPV distribution shows significant differences between all diagnostic categories.

CONCLUSIONS

LSIL + ASC-H appears to have a distinctive HPV distribution pattern that clearly differs from ASC-H and LSIL and approaches HSIL; however, the predictive value for CIN2+ appears higher for ASC-H than LSIL + ASC-H. Our literature review identified conflicting findings, probably suggesting a lack of reproducibility in cytologic criteria and the need for consistent inclusion of ASC-H and LSIL when both are present.

Diagnostic Test Accuracy Review of Cytology for Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Uterine Cervix

BACKGROUND

Even though cervico-vaginal smears have been used as a primary screening test for cervical carcinoma, the diagnostic accuracy has been controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cytology for squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the uterine cervix through a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) review.

METHODS

A DTA review was performed using 38 eligible studies that showed concordance between cytology and histology. In the DTA review, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (OR), and the area under the curve (AUC) on the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated.

RESULTS

In the comparison between abnormal cytology and histology, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.7%-94.1%) and 77.6% (95% CI, 77.4-77.8%), respectively. The diagnostic OR and AUC on the SROC curve were 8.90 (95% CI, 5.57-14.23) and 0.8148, respectively. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology had a higher sensitivity (97.6%; 95% CI, 94.7%-97.8%) for predicting HSIL or worse histology. In the comparison between SqCC identified on cytology and on histological analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic OR, and AUC were 92.7% (95% CI, 87.3%-96.3%), 87.5% (95% CI, 87.2%-87.8%), 865.81 (95% CI, 68.61-10,925.12), and 0.9855, respectively. Geographic locations with well-organized screening programs had higher sensitivity than areas with insufficient screening programs.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that cytology had a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting SIL and SqCC of the uterine cervix during primary screening.