The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: The clinical impact so far. Considerations from theory to practice

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardised reporting systems for non-gynaecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung and more. In February 2018, the first edition of the Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of non-neoplastic, benign and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published, confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarising the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing and updates in nomenclature.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardized reporting systems for nongynecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung, and more. In February 2018, the first edition Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of Non-Neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, and updates in nomenclature. CONCISE SENTENCE: The second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, updates in nomenclature, and a guide to the practical application of the latest ancillary markers for the diagnosis of selected salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cases.

Second edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Refining the role of salivary gland FNA

The use of standardized reporting systems for non-gynecologic cytopathology has made enormous gains in popularity during the past decade, including for thyroid fine-needle aspiration, urine cytology, serous effusions, pancreas, lymph nodes, lung, and more. In February 2018, the first edition Atlas of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published. The MSRSGC defines six diagnostic fine-needle aspiration categories encompassing the spectrum of non-neoplastic, benign, and malignant lesions of the salivary glands. The goal of the MSRSGC is to combine each diagnostic category with a defined risk of malignancy and a specific clinical and/or surgical management algorithm. Since its initial publication in 2018, more than 200 studies and commentaries have been published confirming the role of the MSRSGC. The second edition of the MSRSGC, published in July 2023, includes refined risks of malignancy based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, a new chapter summarizing the use of salivary gland imaging, new advances in ancillary testing, and updates in nomenclature.

Reclassification of salivary gland aspirates based on “The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology”: A five-year retrospective study

Introduction:

The Milan System for reporting salivary gland cytopathology helps standardize reporting systems across institutions, improve communication between clinicians and pathologists and guide the clinical management of patients.

Aims:

This study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of the Milan system classification in cytology reporting.

Settings and Design:

The present study is a retrospective study conducted over a period of five years in tertiary care centre.

Methods and Materials:

All the cases of salivary gland aspirates were reviewed and reclassified into six diagnostic categories according to the Milan system of reporting salivary gland cytology (MSRSGC). Cytological diagnosis was correlated with the histopathological diagnosis wherever available.

Results:

A total of 258 cases were classified using the Milan system as non-diagnostic (20.9%), non-neoplastic (26.3%), atypia of undetermined significance (4.7%), neoplasm benign (37.5%), neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (3.5%), suspicious for malignancy (0.4%), and malignancy (6.6%). Cytohistological discordance was noted among 8/76 cases (10.5%). The sensitivity and specificity of FNAC were 75% and 98.5%, respectively. The risk of malignancy was 14.2% for Category I, 9% for II, 50% for III, zero for IVA and IVB, and 83.3% for category VI.

Conclusions:

The new classification system helps pathologists to standardize reporting leading to better clinical and surgical management.

Analysis of the risk of malignancy associated with the basaloid and oncocytic subtypes of the salivary gland neoplasm of unknown malignant potential (SUMP) category in the Milan system

BACKGROUND

The salivary gland neoplasm of unknown malignant potential (SUMP) category reflects the cytomorphologic overlap and complexity of reporting salivary gland cytology in the Milan system. It includes neoplasms for which a diagnosis of a specific entity cannot be made and, more importantly, for which a carcinoma cannot be entirely excluded. For risk stratification, the subcategorization of SUMP based on the predominant cell type is recommended. This study was aimed at evaluating the risk of neoplasm (RON) and the risk of malignancy (ROM) of the basaloid and oncocytic subtypes of the SUMP category.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 482 salivary gland fine-needle aspirations from 2012 to 2019 resulted in 48 SUMP cases. The cytology of these cases was reviewed and reclassified as the basaloid or oncocytic subtype. Surgical follow-up was available for 36 cases. The RON and ROM for each subtype were calculated.

RESULTS

The RON and ROM were 100% and 23%, respectively, for monomorphic basaloid tumors and 88% and 58.8%, respectively, for monomorphic oncocytic tumors. The ROM for basaloid tumors was 8.3% without matrix/with minimal matrix and 60% with an nonfibrillary matrix. The ROM for oncocytic tumors was 50% without a cystic background and 60% with a cystic or mucinous background. The difference was not statistically significant for either of the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though statistically not significant in our study, the differential ROMs within the oncocytic and basaloid subgroups help in the risk stratification of SUMP cases. Further subcategorization based on the stroma and background helps in limiting the differential diagnosis but does not necessarily add to the value of the risk stratification.

Impact of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology on risk assessment when used in routine practice in a real-time setting

INTRODUCTION

Several retrospective studies across the world have validated the role of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology (MSRSGC) in improving communication between pathologists and clinicians. In this study, we evaluated the applications of MSRSGC in a real-time setting for 2 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All salivary gland lesions that underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) from January 2018 to December 2020 were categorized according to MSRSGC guidelines. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for each category and compared with the ROM proposed by MSRSGC and recent retrospective studies.

RESULTS

A total of 160 FNA of salivary gland lesions were categorized as: nondiagnostic (ND) 30 (18%), non-neoplastic (NN) 7 (10.6%), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) 5 (3.1%), benign neoplasm (BN) 59 (36.8%), salivary gland of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) 21 (13%), suspicious for malignancy (SM) 3 (1.84%), and malignant (M) 25 (15.6%). Histopathologic follow-up was available for 94 (57.5%) cases. The ROM for each category was ND 54%, NN 0%, AUS 66%, BN 0%, SUMP 37.56%, SM 100%, and M 100%.

CONCLUSION

With strict adherence to the diagnostic criteria and MSRSGC guidelines, a ROM of 100% in SM and M categories and a ROM of 0% in NN can be achieved in a real-time setting. The high ROM in the ND category in our study highlights the value of repeat FNA/biopsy for this category. High ROM for AUS indicates the tendency to classify high-grade tumors as AUS, calling for refinement in its criteria.