Interobserver agreement between pathologist, pulmonologist and molecular pathologist to estimate the tumour burden in rapid on-site evaluation smears from endosonography and guided bronchoscopy

The utility of WhatsApp-based off-site evaluation for rapid cytology of EBUS-TBNA samples

BACKGROUND

Whether off-site evaluation of slides by a cytologist viewing the images shared by WhatsApp improves the on-site evaluation by a pulmonologist (P-ROSE) remains unknown. This study's objective was to compare the sensitivity of P-ROSE and WHOSE for adequacy and diagnosis of cytology specimens obtained by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our bronchoscopy database to identify subjects who underwent EBUS-TBNA for lymph node sampling and had reports of P-ROSE and WHOSE. We collected data on the adequacy of samples as reported by the pulmonologist (P-ROSE), remotely by the cytologist (WHOSE), and finally after detailed cytologic evaluation. The study's primary outcome was to assess the increment in sensitivity for adequacy and diagnostic category (using the final cytology report as reference) by incorporating WHOSE.

RESULTS

We included 264 (P-ROSE, n = 184; WHOSE, n = 80) subjects. The sensitivity (95% CI) for sample adequacy by P-ROSE and WHOSE was 65.3% (57.9%-72%) and 92% (83.6%-96.2%), respectively. There was a 26.6% (95% CI, 16%-35.2%) increment in the sensitivity for adequacy. The sensitivity (95% CI) for diagnosis by P-ROSE and WHOSE was 53.9% (46%-61.1%) and 89.8% (79.5%-95.3%), respectively. There was a 35.9% (95% CI, 23.4%-45%) increment in the sensitivity for diagnosis with WHOSE. The agreement between P-ROSE and final cytology in adequacy was poor (κ = -0.023, p = 0.616). The agreement between WHOSE and final cytology was moderate for adequacy (κ = 0.491, p = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found WHOSE significantly improves the performance of P-ROSE for rapid assessment of cytology specimens obtained by EBUS-TBNA.

Validation of a Cytological Classification System for the Rapid On-Site Evaluation (Rose) of Pulmonary and Mediastinal Needle Aspirates

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a procedure that allows immediate assessment of adequacy of cytological specimens obtained by fine needle aspiration (FNA). The application of ROSE diagnostic categories has been applied in various organs, but not in thoracic pathology. We aimed to retrospectively assess the concordance with the final diagnosis of a categorization from C1 (inadequate) to C5 (neoplastic) during ROSE performed with bronchoscopic or percutaneous sampling procedures of thoracic lesions in a large series of consecutive cases. This retrospective single-center study evaluated 2282 consecutive ROSEs performed on 1827 patients from January 2016 to December 2020 in 994 cases of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in peripheral pulmonary lesions, in 898 transthoracic FNAs, in 318 ultrasound-guided TBNAs, in 50 conventional TBNAs and in 22 endobronchial TBNAs. False positive and false negative cases of ROSE were 43 (1.88%) and 73 (3.2%), respectively, when compared with the definitive diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity and the positive and negative prognostic values of ROSE were 94.84%, 95.05%, 96.89% and 91.87%, respectively. Overall concordance between ROSE and the final diagnosis was 0.8960 (Cohen's kappa). No significant differences were observed in terms of sampling procedures and type and location of the lesions. A tiered classification scheme of ROSE from C1 to C5 during bronchoscopic and percutaneous sampling procedures is helpful in effectively guiding clinical management of patients with thoracic lesions.

Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Superficial Metastasis of Lung Cancer with and without Rapid On-Site Evaluation: A Randomized Trial

Simple Summary

Pulmonologist-performed US-NAB of “superficial” metastatic lesions is safe and has an excellent diagnostic yield for both tissue diagnosis and molecular profiling regardless of the use of rapid on-site evaluation. These findings have important implications for costs, hospital resource allocation, and the globally widespread utilization of US-NAB.

Abstract

Background and Objective: Studies which evaluated the role of an ultrasound-guided needle aspiration biopsy (US-NAB) of metastases from lung cancer located in “superficial” organs/tissues are scant, and none of them assessed the possible impact of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on diagnostic accuracy and safety outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected superficial metastases from lung cancer were randomized 1:1 to US-NAB without (US-NAB group) or with ROSE (ROSE group). The diagnostic yield for a tissue diagnosis was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the diagnostic yield for cancer genotyping, the diagnostic yield for PD-L1 testing, and safety. Results: During the study period, 136 patients were randomized to receive an US-NAB with (n = 68) or without ROSE (n = 68). We found no significant differences between the ROSE group and the US-NAB group in terms of the diagnostic yields for tissue diagnosis (94.1% vs. 97%, respectively; p = 0.68), cancer genotyping (88% vs. 91.8%, respectively; p = 0.56), and PD-L1 testing (93.5% vs. 90.6%, respectively; p = 0.60). Compared to the diagnostic US-NAB procedures, the non-diagnostic procedures were characterized by less common use of a cutting needle (66.6% vs. 96.9%, respectively; p = 0.0004) and less common retrieval of a tissue core (37.5% vs. 98.5%; p = 0.0001). Only one adverse event (vasovagal syncope) was recorded. Conclusion: US-NAB of superficial metastases is safe and has an excellent diagnostic success regardless of the availability of ROSE. These findings provide a strong rationale for using US-NAB as the first-step method for tissue acquisition whenever a suspected superficial metastatic lesion is identified in patients with suspected lung cancer.

Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical Utility of Rapid On-Site Evaluation of Touch Imprint Cytology during Cryobiopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Simple Summary

With increasing interest in precision medicine for lung cancer, cryobiopsy is expected to improve the success rate not only for histological diagnosis, but also for next-generation sequencing. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is an immediate cytological evaluation performed during bronchoscopy. However, little is known about its clinical utility during cryobiopsy. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 63 consecutive patients who underwent cryobiopsy with ROSE of touch imprint cytology (ROSE-TIC) for solid peripheral pulmonary lesions. When the results of ROSE-TIC of each patient were compared directly with the histological findings of the corresponding specimen, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 69.8%, 90.0%, 93.8%, and 58.1%, respectively. The concordance rate was 76.2%. Therefore, we believe that ROSE-TIC, due to its high specificity and positive predictive value, may be a potential tool in deciding whether cryobiopsy sampling could be finished during bronchoscopy.

Abstract

Cryobiopsy enables us to obtain larger specimens than conventional forceps biopsy despite the caution regarding complications. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of rapid on-site evaluation of touch imprint cytology (ROSE-TIC) during cryobiopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients who underwent cryobiopsy for solid PPLs between June 2020 and December 2021. ROSE-TIC was performed on the first specimen obtained via cryobiopsy and assessed using Diff-Quik staining. The results of ROSE-TIC for each patient were compared with the histological findings of the first cryobiopsy specimen. Sixty-three patients were enrolled in this study. Overall, 57 (90.5%) lesions were ≤30 mm in size and 37 (58.7%) had positive bronchus signs. The radial endobronchial ultrasound findings were located within and adjacent to the lesion in 46.0% and 54.0% of the cases, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the ROSE results for histological findings of the corresponding specimens were 69.8%, 90.0%, 93.8%, and 58.1%, respectively. The concordance rate was 76.2%. In conclusion, ROSE-TIC, due to its high specificity and positive predictive value, may be a potential tool in deciding whether cryobiopsy sampling could be finished during bronchoscopy.

The role of rapid on site evaluation on touch imprint cytology and brushing during conventional bronchoscopy

BACKGROUND

The increase in immunohistochemical and molecular predictive tests in lung cancer requires new strategies for managing small samples taken during bronchoscopic procedures. The value of Rapid On Site Evaluation (ROSE) during conventional bronchoscopic procedures on endobronchial neoplasms in optimizing small biopsies and cytologlogical tissue specimens for diagnostic testing, and ancillary studies was evaluated.

METHOD

ROSE on touch imprint cytology (TIC) and brushing was performed on 690 consecutive cases of patients undergoing biopsies, using fiber optic bronchoscopy. Immunohistochemical assay for PD-L1, ALK, and ROS1 and molecular testing, via next generation technique for EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF, were performed.

RESULTS

The concordance between ROSE and final diagnoses was almost perfect for brushing (sensitivity: 0.84; specificity: 0.96), and less so for touch preparations (sensitivity: 0.77; specificity: 0.89). Immunohistochemical assay for PD-L1 was evaluated on 256 bioptic cases with only six unsuitable samples. Material available for immunohistochemistry for ALK was sufficient in 151 biopsies with no inadequate cases. ROS1 was evaluated in 132 biopsies, with only two unsuitable samples. Molecular analysis was performed on 128 biopsies, 29 TIC, and 17 brushing. Out of these, only ten were considered to be unsuitable.

CONCLUSIONS

ROSE is an effective procedure for monitoring the quality and quantity of material taken during conventional bronchoscopic procedures for evaluating the suitability of small samples that must undergo immunohistochemical and molecular assay.