Endoscopic findings of ipilimumab-induced colitis

Pharmacological Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Enterocolitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may develop ICI-associated enterocolitis, for which there is no approved treatment.

AIMS

We aimed to systematically review the efficacy and safety of medical interventions for the prevention and treatment of ICI-associated enterocolitis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort and case-control studies, and case series/reports, evaluating interventions (including corticosteroids, biologics, aminosalicylates, immunosuppressants, and fecal transplantation) for ICI-associated enterocolitis. Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic efficacy endpoints were evaluated. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria were used to assess overall quality of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 studies (n = 1514) were included (one RCT, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 156 case reports/case series). Very low quality evidence from one RCT suggests budesonide is not effective for prevention of ICI-associated enterocolitis in ipilimumab-treated patients (relative risk 0.93 [95% confidence interval 0.56, 1.56]). Very low quality evidence suggests that corticosteroids, infliximab, and vedolizumab may be effective for treatment of ICI-associated enterocolitis by inducing clinical response and remission. No validated indices for measuring disease activity were used. Biologic treatment was used in 42% (641/1528) of patients, as reported in 97 studies. ICIs were discontinued in 65% (457/702) of patients, as reported in 63 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Current treatment recommendations for ICI-associated enterocolitis are based on very low quality evidence, primarily from case reports and case series. Large-scale prospective cohort studies and RCTs are needed to develop prophylactic and therapeutic treatments to minimize interruption or discontinuation of oncological therapies.

Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Induced by Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

As immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are becoming standard therapies for malignant tumors, increasing attention has been paid to their associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The gastrointestinal tract is the major site of irAEs, and it has recently become evident that the large bowel is the most frequently affected region. The aim of this narrative review was to clarify the endoscopic and histopathologic findings of and treatments for ICI-induced colitis.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic findings of ICI-induced colitis include a reddish, edematous mucosa with increased mucous exudate, loss of normal vascularity, and a granular mucosa with or without mucosal breaks. Histopathologic findings of ICI-induced colitis are expansion of the lamina propria, intraepithelial infiltration of neutrophils, crypt architectural distortion, neutrophilic crypt abscess, and prominent apoptosis. The clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic severity of ICI-induced colitis is diverse, but colonoscopy together with biopsy is necessary for diagnosis. While a certain proportion of patients with ICI-induced colitis have an intractable clinical course, management guidelines are based on retrospective analyses. Prospective studies are needed to assess the efficacy of various medications, including immunosuppressive regimens. Key Messages: Colonoscopy with biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of ICI-induced colitis. Endoscopists should be aware of the clinical features and pathophysiology of ICI-induced colitis for prompt diagnosis and treatment planning.

Systematic review and case series: flexible sigmoidoscopy identifies most cases of checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are used in the treatment of multiple advanced stage cancers but can induce immune-mediated colitis necessitating treatment with immunosuppressive medications. Diagnostic colonoscopy is often performed but requires bowel preparation and may delay diagnosis and treatment. Sigmoidoscopy can be performed rapidly without oral bowel preparation or sedation.

AIMS

Characterize the colonic distribution of immune-mediated colitis to determine the most efficient endoscopic approach.

METHODS

A systematic review of checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis case reports and series was conducted in both PubMed and Embase through 3 January 2017. A single centre retrospective chart review of patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation for diarrhoea after treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor (ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab) between 1 January 2011 and 3 January 2017 was performed. Clinical, endoscopic and histologic data were collected.

RESULTS

A detailed systematic review resulted in 61 studies, in which 226 cases of colitis were diagnosed by lower endoscopy (125 colonoscopy, 101 sigmoidoscopy). Only four patients had isolated findings proximal to the left colon. In our centre, 31 patients had histologic features of checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis, for which 29 patients had complete data. The left colon was involved in all cases. Sigmoidoscopy would be sufficient to diagnose >98% of reported cases of checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis diagnosed by lower endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate to severe checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis involves the left colon in the majority of cases (>98%). Sigmoidoscopy should be the initial endoscopic procedure in the evaluation of this condition.