1
|
Wang X, Pang L, Zhang M, Zheng Z. Evaluation of the effect of comfort nursing intervention on patients' mental state and nursing satisfaction during painless digestive endoscopy. Minerva Med 2023; 114:558-560. [PMID: 34672170 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4806.21.07841-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofang Wang
- Endoscope Room, Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao, Jiaozhou, China
| | - Lihua Pang
- Department of Nursing, Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao, Jiaozhou, China
| | - Mei Zhang
- Endoscope Room, Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao, Jiaozhou, China
| | - Zhaoxia Zheng
- Operating Room, Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao, Jiaozhou, China -
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xin Y, Chu T, Wang J, Xu A. Sedative effect of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in colonoscopic polypectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:262. [PMID: 35974309 PMCID: PMC9380378 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01805-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Remimazolam is a newer benzodiazepine with properties of rapid onset, short duration of action, and fast recovery. Our study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in colonoscopic polypectomy. Methods One hundred twenty patients were randomly divided into four groups: alfentanil and propofol (AP) group, alfentanil and remimazolam 0.1 mg/kg (AR1 group), 0.15 mg/kg (AR2 group), or 0.2 mg/kg (AR3 group). Patients in the four groups received alfentanil 10 μg/kg, followed by propofol 2 mg/kg and three dosages of remimazolam. Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) scale, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), bispectral index (BIS) values and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were collected at intervals of 5 min and analyzed at different time points: before anesthesia (T0), 5 min (T1), 10 min (T2), 15 min after anesthesia (T3) and at the end of surgery (T4). The average MAP was calculated utilizing the average of all MAP values. The primary outcome was the success rate of sedation. Secondary outcomes included time to full alert and adverse events. Results The success rate of sedation was 100% among the four groups. The incidence of hypotension was significantly decreased (all P < 0.05) and the average MAP was higher in AR1-AR3 groups than AP group (all P < 0.001). None of the patients developed bradycardia or hypertension during surgery in all study groups. BIS values were higher (all P < 0.001) and the time to full alert was statistically shorter in AR1-AR3 groups (all P < 0.05) compared with the AP group. The MOAA/S score in AR1 was higher than AR2 (P < 0.05) and the AR3 group (P < 0.05) at T1 and BIS values in the AR1 group were significantly higher than AR3 group (P < 0.05) at T4. Conclusions Remimazolam combined with alfentanil have a non-inferior sedative effect than propofol during the colonoscopic polypectomy. Moreover, this combination of two short-acting drugs might be a safer alternative. Trial registration The clinical trial was registered on (16/05/2021, ChiCTR2100046492). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01805-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yueyang Xin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Tiantian Chu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Jinxu Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Aijun Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sui Y, Chen X, Ma T, Lu J, Xiao T, Wang Z, Wen Q, Wang G, Jia H, Cao F, Wu X, Zhang Y, Hao J, Wang N. Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:1603-1609. [PMID: 35618650 PMCID: PMC9543240 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE). METHODS Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same-day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy (Group A); sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated colonoscopy (Group B); and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated insertion colonoscopy (Group C). Patient discomfort, colonoscopy performance, doses of propofol, cardiovascular stress, anesthesia resuscitation, and sedation-related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 3200 participants were analyzed. Baseline demographics, patient discomfort, cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate and sedation-related adverse events were similar in the three groups. Propofol dose was the lowest in Group A (137.65 ± 36.865 mg) compared with Group B (177.71 ± 40.112 mg, P < 0.05) and Group C (161.63 ± 31.789 mg, P < 0.05). Decline in vital signs was most obvious in Group B during the procedure (P < 0.05). Recovery time was the shortest in Group A (5.01 ± 1.404 min) compared with Group B (9.51 ± 2.870 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (5.83 ± 2.594 min, P < 0.05); discharge time was the shortest in Group A (3.53 ± 1.685 min) compared with Group B (11.29 ± 5.172 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (6.47 ± 2.338 min, P < 0.05). Adenomas per positive patient of Group A (2.29 ± 1.055) and Group C (2.28 ± 0.931) were more than that in Group B (2.11 ± 0.946, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy is the superior model for same-day painless BDE with the benefits of satisfactory patient comfort, reduced sedation dose, less cardiovascular stress, faster recovery, shorter discharge time and high colonoscopy quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Sui
- Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina
| | - Xing Chen
- Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina,The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina
| | - Ting Ma
- Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina
| | - Junhui Lu
- Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina
| | - Tao Xiao
- Shanxi Cancer HospitalTaiyuanChina
| | | | - Qing Wen
- The Second People's Hospital of DatongDatongChina
| | | | - Hui Jia
- Erdos Kangning Physical Examination CenterErdosChina
| | - Fengzhen Cao
- Erdos Kangning Physical Examination CenterErdosChina
| | - Xiaopeng Wu
- Lvliang Traditional Chinese Medicine HospitalLvliangChina
| | - Yiping Zhang
- Datong Shoujia Digestive Disease HospitalDatongChina
| | - Junlian Hao
- Xiaoyi Traditional Chinese Medicine HospitalXiaoyiChina
| | - Naping Wang
- The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical UniversityYunchengChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Song N, Shan XS, Yang Y, Zheng Z, Shi WC, Yang XY, Li Y, Tan AP, Liu H, Peng K, Ji FH. Low-Dose Esketamine as an Adjuvant to Propofol Sedation for Same-Visit Bidirectional Endoscopy: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:4733-4740. [PMID: 35571286 PMCID: PMC9091685 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s365068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Same-visit bidirectional endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy) is widely performed under sedation. At present, the optimal sedation regimen remains unclear. This study aims to test the hypothesis that a low-dose esketamine added to propofol sedation reduces hemodynamic and respiratory adverse events in these procedures. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 660 adult patients scheduled for same-visit bidirectional endoscopy under sedation from 3 teaching hospitals in China will be recruited. Patients will be randomly allocated, in a 1:1 ratio, to an esketamine group or a normal saline group (n = 330 in each group), stratified by study center. All patients will receive intravenous propofol 0.5 mg/kg and sufentanil 0.1 μg/mL for induction of sedation, followed by intravenous esketamine 0.15 mg/kg or the same volume of normal saline. Propofol will be titrated to the target sedation levels during the procedures. The primary endpoint is a composite of desaturation (peripheral oxygen saturation < 90%) and hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg or decrease >30% of baseline). Secondary endpoints include desaturation, hypotension, total dose of propofol, pain scores and fatigue scores on the 0-10 numerical rating scale, dizziness or headache, hallucination or nightmare, nausea or vomiting, endoscopist satisfaction, and patient satisfaction. All analyses will be intention-to-treat. Discussion We expect that a low-dose esketamine adjunct to propofol-based sedation will improve cardiorespiratory stability in patients undergoing same-visit bidirectional endoscopy, providing reference for clinical sedation practice during these procedures. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: ChiCTR-ChiCTR2200055938).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Song
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xi-Sheng Shan
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhong Zheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taicang First People’s Hospital, Taicang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-Cheng Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taicang First People’s Hospital, Taicang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Yan Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, the People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ai-Ping Tan
- Department of Anesthesiology, the People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Ke Peng
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fu-Hai Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Long YQ, Feng CD, Ding YY, Feng XM, Liu H, Ji FH, Peng K. Esketamine as an Adjuvant to Ciprofol or Propofol Sedation for Same-Day Bidirectional Endoscopy: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial With Factorial Design. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:821691. [PMID: 35370640 PMCID: PMC8975265 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.821691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Same-day esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy procedures under sedation have been increasingly performed. This study aims to assess the effects of esketamine combined with ciprofol (a novel anesthetic/sedative agent) or propofol on respiratory and hemodynamic adverse events in patients undergoing same-day bidirectional endoscopy. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial. A total of 180 adult patients scheduled for same-day bidirectional endoscopy under sedation will be randomized, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive 1 of 4 sedation regimens: 1) ciprofol and esketamine, 2) propofol and esketamine, 3) ciprofol and normal saline placebo, or 4) propofol and normal saline placebo. The primary outcome is a composite of desaturation [peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 95%] and hypotension [mean blood pressure (MBP) < 65 mmHg or decrease in MBP ≥20% of baseline] during the sedation and in the recovery room. Secondary outcomes include episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in MBP ≥30% of baseline), bradycardia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness or headache, hallucination or nightmare, injection pain, pain scores and fatigue scores, endoscopist satisfaction, and patient satisfaction. Data will be analyzed on the modified intention-to-treat basis. Discussion: We hypothesize that esketamine as an adjuvant to ciprofol or propofol sedation would improve cardiorespiratory stability. In addition, the potential interactions between interventions will be explored using the factorial design. The results of this trial will provide evidence for daily practice of sedation regimens for same-day bidirectional endoscopy. Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, Identifier ChiCTR2100052523.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-qin Long
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chang-dong Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yun-ying Ding
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiao-mei Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Fu-hai Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Ke Peng, ; Fu-hai Ji,
| | - Ke Peng
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Institute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Ke Peng, ; Fu-hai Ji,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Comparison of Procedural Sequences in Sedated Same-Day Bidirectional Endoscopy with Water-Exchange Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11051365. [PMID: 35268456 PMCID: PMC8911281 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have favored esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) followed by colonoscopy as the optimal sequence in bidirectional endoscopy (BDE) with air insufflation. However, the optimal sequence in same-day BDE with WE colonoscopy is unclear. Methods: A total of 200 patients undergoing BDE with propofol sedation from May 2018 to January 2021 were randomized to either the EGD-first group (n = 100) or the colonoscopy-first group (n = 100). Results: The EGD-first group required a longer cecal-intubation time (median 16.0 min vs. 13.7 min, p < 0.001) and a lower Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (8.5 vs. 9, p = 0.030) compared with the colonoscopy-first group. However, the EGD-first group needed a significantly lower dose of propofol (200 mg vs. 250 mg, p < 0.001) and a shorter recovery time (7 min vs. 13.5 min, p < 0.001), resulting in a shorter turnover time of the endoscopy room (39.5 min vs. 42.6 min, p = 0.004). There were no differences in the sedation-related adverse events, patients’ satisfaction scores, adenoma-detection rates, or the outcomes of EGD between the two groups. Conclusions: During propofol-sedated BDE, EGD followed by WE colonoscopy was more efficient with a shorter turnover time despite a longer cecal-intubation time (NCT03638713).
Collapse
|
7
|
Laoveeravat P, Thavaraputta S, Suchartlikitwong S, Vutthikraivit W, Mingbunjerdsuk T, Motes A, Nugent K, Perisetti A, Tharian B, Islam S, Rakvit A. Optimal sequences of same-visit bidirectional endoscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2020; 32:706-714. [PMID: 31368170 DOI: 10.1111/den.13503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Same-visit colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) have become common. Recent studies showed conflicting results regarding the performance, safety, and efficacy of different sequences. We conducted this meta-analysis to determine the most favorable performance and discomfort between an EGD followed by colonoscopy (E-C) and colonoscopy followed by EGD (C-E). METHODS The authors searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Outcomes of interest were performance (including cecal intubation time, adenoma detection rate, and polyp detection rate), discomfort score (patients and endoscopists; Likert scale), and sedation uses. Pooled mean differences (MD) or odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Six randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The authors found that there was significantly lower sedative use including fentanyl (14.70; 95% Cl: 8.20-21.20) and propofol (15.58; 95% Cl: 3.27-27.89) in the E-C group compared with the C-E group. There was a significantly better discomfort score in patients and endoscopists after both procedures in the E-C group than in the C-E group with pooled MD of 0.64 points (95% Cl: 0.09-1.20) and 0.47 (95% Cl: 0.05-0.90), respectively. There were no differences in cecal intubation time, adenoma detection rate, or polyp detection rate between the two groups. CONCLUSION The present study found that the discomfort score was better in the E-C group. However, there was no difference in polyp and adenoma detection. Therefore, the E-C group is the optimal sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Passisd Laoveeravat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Subhanudh Thavaraputta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| | | | - Wasawat Vutthikraivit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| | | | - Arunee Motes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| | - Kenneth Nugent
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| | - Abhilash Perisetti
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| | - Benjamin Tharian
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| | - Sameer Islam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| | - Ariwan Rakvit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Choi GJ, Oh HC, Seong HK, Kim JW, Ko JS, Kang H. Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Intern Med 2020; 35:331-341. [PMID: 31875664 PMCID: PMC7061013 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2019.319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. METHODS We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. The sedative and analgesic doses required, discomfort and satisfaction scores, procedure time, recovery time, adenoma detection rate, and failed cecal intubation were evaluated. Adverse effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular complications, were also assessed. RESULTS We included six studies, with 1,848 patients in total. The requirement for sedative treatment was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.54 to -0.24; p = 0.12; I2 = 49%). Discomfort, scored by patients during the EGD procedure, was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.09; p = 0.02; I2 = 73%), while it was comparable during colonoscopy between the two sequences. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.30; p = 0.28; I2 = 21%). Total procedure duration, EGD, colonoscopy, cecal intubation time and incidence, incidences of pathologic findings, and adenoma detection were comparable between the two sequences. There was no significant difference in the incidences of desaturation, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia between the two sequences. CONCLUSION When conducting same-day bidirectional endoscopy, EGD followed by colonoscopy is the most beneficial sequence to be used because patients require lower sedative doses, recover faster, and report lesser discomfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geun Joo Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoung-Chul Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee-Kyeong Seong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Wook Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Soo Ko
- Department of Plastic Surgery, National Police Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hammami MB, Reddy KM, Pandit P, Chahla EJ, Koro N, Schuelke MJ, Hachem C. Sequence of same-day upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy does not affect total procedure' time or medication use: A randomized trial. JGH OPEN 2019; 3:488-493. [PMID: 31832549 PMCID: PMC6891031 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Revised: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim Same‐day double upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is frequently performed due to overlapping indications. However, it is unclear whether an upper–lower (U‐L) or lower–upper (L‐U) sequence is optimal. We analyzed the effect of sequence on total procedure time and sedation use. Methods A total of 100 patients scheduled for same‐day double endoscopy were randomized to the U‐L or L‐U sequence arm. Primary outcomes, mean total procedure time, and sedative dosages were compared using a t‐test. We also explored associations of the primary outcomes with patient‐related and procedure‐related factors. Results Comparing U‐L and L‐U sequences, mean total procedure time was 41.9 (16.2) versus 43.0 (14.5) min (P = 0.73), diphenhydramine dose 5.5 (15.4) versus 4.5 (14.0) mg (P = 0.74), fentanyl dose 71.5 (119.3) versus 77.6 (164.02) μg (P = 0.83), midazolam dose 1.6 (2.5) versus 1.4 (2.7) mg (P = 0.69), and propofol dose 437.4 (351.4) versus 444.5 (256.0) mg (P = 0.91), respectively. Total procedure and upper endoscopy times were significantly longer with trainee presence (P = 0.0002) and shorter with conscious sedation (P = 0.003). Upper endoscopy time was longer with higher body mass index (P = 0.001), and lower endoscopy time was longer in patients with cirrhosis or chronic kidney disease (P = 0.002 and 0.009, respectively). Time between procedures was significantly longer in the L‐U sequence (7.4 [2.9] vs 5.3 [1.1] min, [P < 0.001]). The study had 80% power to detect an 8 min difference in total procedure time. Conclusions The sequence of same‐day double gastrointestinal endoscopy does not affect total procedure time or medication use. Longer total procedure and upper endoscopy times were associated with trainee presence and use of conscious sedation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad B Hammami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA
| | - Kavya M Reddy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA
| | - Pratik Pandit
- Department of Internal Medicine Saint Louis University, School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA
| | - Elie J Chahla
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA
| | - Nabeel Koro
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA
| | - Matthew J Schuelke
- Research Strategy Group Saint Louis University, Office of the Vice President for Research St. Louis Missouri USA
| | - Christine Hachem
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jowhari F, Hookey L. Gastroscopy Should Come Before Colonoscopy Using CO 2 Insufflation in Same Day Bidirectional Endoscopies: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2019; 3:120-126. [PMID: 32395686 PMCID: PMC7204791 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Same day bidirectional endoscopies (esophagogastroduodenoscopies [EGD]s and colonoscopies) are routinely performed. However, the best sequence of procedures is unknown, as is whether the use of carbon dioxide (CO2) affects the preferred sequence of procedures. This study aims to determine the preferred sequence of procedures and choice of insufflation gas (air or CO2) in patients undergoing same day bidirectional endoscopies. Methods Two hundred adults with a clinical indication for same day bidirectional endoscopies were randomized equally into four groups: A1 (EGD first, CO2 as insufflator); A2 (EGD first, air as insufflator); B1 (colonoscopy first, CO2 as insufflator); and B2 (colonoscopy first, air as insufflator). All procedures were performed with conscious sedation (Midazolam/Fentanyl). The primary outcome was patients’ overall comfort/satisfaction with the procedures and sedation received, as assessed by questionnaires and validated scoring scales (Nurse-Assessed Patient Comfort Score [NAPCOMS], La Crosse [WI]) collected during the procedures, before discharge, and on day 7 postprocedure. Results Two hundred patients were randomized, with data available for 186. Mean Midazolam dose between groups was significantly less in the EGD first groups (P=0.01). During the procedures, no differences were found in patients’ comfort as per the nurse reported NAPCOMS scores (P=0.19) or the Lacrosse (WI) endoscopy scores (P=0.05). On postprocedure days 0 and 7, no differences were found in the patients’ reported Lacrosse (WI) scores, nausea, sore throat, dizziness, satisfaction with sedation or overall level of procedural satisfaction (P>0.05 for each). However, bloating and discomfort were significantly lower in the CO2 arms (P<0.001). Conclusions This randomized controlled trial using validated patient comfort scoring assessments for same day bidirectional endoscopies demonstrated that the sequence of procedures affects the sedation used but does not affect overall patient comfort or satisfaction. Lesser sedation is needed in the EGD first group, and less postprocedural abdominal pain/discomfort and bloating is seen with CO2 insufflation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahd Jowhari
- Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Hookey
- Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|