Direct recanalization of pancreaticogastrostomy obstruction with a forward-viewing echoendoscope

Forward viewing liner echoendoscopy for therapeutic interventions

Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures using the forward-viewing convex EUS (FV-EUS) have been reviewed based on the articles reported to date. The earliest reported procedure is the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using FV-EUS. However, the study on drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts focused on showing that drainage is possible with FV-EUS rather than leveraging its features. Subsequently, studies describing the characteristics of FV-EUS have been reported. By using FV-EUS in EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, double punctures in the gastrointestinal tract can be avoided. In postoperative modified anatomical cases, using the endoscopic function of FV-EUS, procedures such as bile duct drainage from anastomosis, pancreatic duct drainage from the afferent limb, and abscess drainage from the digestive tract have been reported. When a perpendicular puncture to the gastrointestinal tract is required or when there is a need to insert the endoscope deep into the gastrointestinal tract, FV-EUS is considered among the options.

EUS-guided transanastomotic drainage for severe biliopancreatic anastomotic stricture using a forward-viewing echoendoscope in patients with surgically altered anatomy

Background and Objectives:

Balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (BE-ERCP) has become the first-line therapy for biliopancreatic anastomotic strictures. However, it is not always successful, and salvage methods have not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of EUS-guided transanastomotic drainage using a forward-viewing (FV) echoendoscope.

Patients and Methods:

Of eight cases wherein BE-ERCP treatment failed due to severe or complete benign anastomotic stricture, seven cases underwent EUS-guided choledochojejunostomy, and EUS-guided pancreaticojejunostomy was applied in one case after intubating an FV echoendoscope into the anastomotic site.

Results:

The success rate of reaching the target site was 100% (8/8) for patients after modified Child resection. The median time to reach the anastomosis was 5 min (range: 3–17 min), and the technical success rate for drainage was 75% (6/8). The median total procedure time was 33.5 min (range: 22–45 min) for six successful cases. Cautery dilatation catheters were necessary to dilate the puncture site in all cases, and no early complications were observed. During the follow-up period (median: 13.3 months [range: 6.5–60.3]), recurrence of the stricture occurred in one case, and a stent-free status was achieved after 6–12 months of stent placement in five cases.

Conclusions:

EUS-guided transanastomotic drainage using an FV echoendoscope is a feasible and safe rescue technique for the management of benign severe biliopancreatic anastomotic strictures.

Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: Techniques and literature review

There are various reconstruction techniques that are used after upper gastrointestinal surgery. In recent years, opportunities for endoscopic diagnosis and treatment have been increasing in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. With the advent of interventional endoscopic ultrasound (IV-EUS), various procedures have been developed mainly for patients in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is difficult to carry out. Indications for such procedures are expanding. IV-EUS for surgically altered anatomy (SAA) includes EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration, biliary interventions (e.g. biliary drainage, treatment of bile duct stricture, removal of bile duct stones, and the rendezvous technique), and pancreatic interventions (e.g. rendezvous technique after Whipple surgery). In addition, there have been reports of various EUS-related procedures using a forward-viewing curved linear-array echoendoscope that are carried out for postoperative intestinal tract reconstruction. Although interventional EUS is a useful therapeutic procedure for SAA, there are still no dedicated devices, and standardization of the procedure is warranted.