Objective validity of the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification system for the differential diagnosis of colorectal polyps

Precision endoscopy in colorectal polyps' characterization and planning of endoscopic therapy

Precision endoscopy in the management of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer has emerged as the standard of care. It includes optical characterization of polyps and estimation of submucosal invasion depth of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps to select the appropriate endoscopic resection modality. Over time, several imaging modalities have been implemented in endoscopic practice to improve optical performance. Among these, image-enhanced endoscopy systems and magnification endoscopy represent now well-established tools. New advanced technologies, such as endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy, have recently shown promising results in predicting the histology of colorectal polyps. In recent years, artificial intelligence has continued to enhance endoscopic performance in the characterization of colorectal polyps, overcoming the limitations of other imaging modes. In this review we retrace the path of precision endoscopy, analyzing the yield of various endoscopic imaging techniques in personalizing management of colorectal polyps and early colorectal cancer.

Management of colorectal high-grade dysplasia or cancer resected by cold snare polypectomy: a multicenter exploratory study

BACKGROUND

The clinical course and surveillance strategy for patients who undergo cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer is unclear. We investigated the management of colorectal HGDs and cancers following CSP.

METHODS

This Japanese nationwide multicenter exploratory study was retrospectively conducted on patients who had undergone CSP for colorectal HGDs or cancers and follow-up colonoscopy at least once from 2014 to 2020. We investigated the detection rate of CSP scars, local recurrence rate (LRR), risk factors for local recurrence, and follow-up strategy. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000043670).

RESULTS

We included 155 patients with 156 lesions. CSP scars were identified in 22 (31.4%), 41 (54.7%), and 10 (90.9%) patients with curative, borderline, and non-curative resection, respectively. Among them, residual tumors were observed in one (4.5%), six (14.6%), and three (30.0%) cases, respectively. The total LRR was 13.7% (95% confidence interval: 6.8-23.8). R1 resection cases (either horizontal or vertical margins positive for tumors) were associated with local recurrence (p = 0.031). Salvage endoscopic and surgical resections were performed on 21 and 10 patients, respectively. Among them, the proportion of endoscopically suspected residual tumors was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the residual tumor-positive group (100%) than in the residual tumor-negative group (28.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

LRR after CSP for HGDs or cancers was 13.7% based on scar-identified cases. Salvage endoscopic or surgical resection should be performed according to the curability of the lesion and endoscopic findings during colonoscopic surveillance.

Conditional inference tree models to perceive depth of invasion in T1 colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Accurate diagnosis of invasion depth for T1 colorectal cancer is of critical importance as it decides optimal resection technique. Few reports have previously covered the effects of endoscopic morphology on depth assessment. We developed and validated a novel diagnostic algorithm that accurately predicts the depth of early colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We examined large pathological and endoscopic databases compiled between Jan 2015 and Dec 2018. Training and validation data cohorts were derived and real-world diagnostic performance of two conditional interference tree algorithms (Models 1 and 2) was evaluated against that of the Japan NBI-Expert Team (JNET) classification used by both expert and non-expert endoscopists.

RESULTS

Model 1 had higher sensitivity in deep submucosal invasion than that of JNET alone in both training (45.1% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.01) and validation sets (52.3% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.01). Model 2 demonstrated higher sensitivity than Model 1 (66.2% vs. 52.3%, p < 0.01) in excluding deeper invasion of suspected Tis/T1a lesions.

CONCLUSION

We discovered that machine-learning classifiers, including JNET and macroscopic features, provide the best non-invasive screen to exclude deeper invasion for suspected Tis/T1 lesions. Adding this algorithm improves depth diagnosis of T1 colorectal lesions for both expert and non-expert endoscopists.

Electronic chromo-endoscopy: technical details and a clinical perspective

Precise endoscopic assessment is necessary to detect neoplastic changes in an early stage. Electronic or virtual chromo-endoscopy (ECE) is an alternative to conventional dye-based chromo-endoscopy which markedly improves capillary pattern and hence can detect micro-vessel morphological changes of early neoplasia to target biopsies and aid in diagnosis. The clinical significance increased after the advent of endoscopic treatment modalities like ESD/EMR which requires precise delineation of extent and depth of lesion. Most of the studies have used narrow-band imaging (NBI) (Olympus Medical Systems Tokyo, Japan), although data from i-SCAN (PENTAX Endoscopy, Tokyo, Japan) and flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) (Fujinon, Fujifilm Medical Co, Saitama, Japan) are emerging. Electronic chromo-endoscopy is convenient compared to dye-based chromo-endoscopy in the sense that it is available at the push of a button in endoscope and reduces procedure time substantially with comparable efficacy. Scope of this review is to discuss available electronic chromo-endoscopy modalities and their role in the diagnosis, surveillance, and management of early GI neoplasia.

Development of multi-class computer-aided diagnostic systems using the NICE/JNET classifications for colorectal lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Diagnostic support using artificial intelligence may contribute to the equalization of endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal lesions. We developed computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) support system for diagnosing colorectal lesions using the NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification and the Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification.

METHODS

Using Residual Network as the classifier and NBI images as training images, we developed a CADx based on the NICE classification (CADx-N) and a CADx based on the JNET classification (CADx-J). For validation, 480 non-magnifying and magnifying NBI images were used for the CADx-N and 320 magnifying NBI images were used for the CADx-J. The diagnostic performance of the CADx-N was evaluated using the magnification rate.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the CADx-N for Types 1, 2, and 3 was 97.5%, 91.2%, and 93.8%, respectively. The diagnostic performance for each magnification level was good (no statistically significant difference). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the CADx-J were 100%, 96.3%, 82.8%, 100%, and 96.9% for Type 1; 80.3%, 93.7%, 94.1%, 79.2%, and 86.3% for Type 2A; 80.4%, 84.7%, 46.8%, 96.3%, and 84.1% for Type 2B; and 62.5%, 99.6%, 96.8%, 93.8%, and 94.1% for Type 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The multi-class CADx systems had good diagnostic performance with both the NICE and JNET classifications and may aid in educating non-expert endoscopists and assist in diagnosing colorectal lesions.

Diagnostic efficacy of the Japan NBI Expert Team classification with dual-focus magnification for colorectal tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification is the first unified classification criteria for colorectal tumors using magnifying narrow-band imaging (NBI) in Japan. However, the diagnostic stratification ability of the JNET classification with dual-focus magnifying NBI (DF-JNET) has remained obscure. The aim of this study was to validate the diagnostic stratification ability of DF-JNET for colorectal tumors in two Japanese referral centers.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective image evaluation study was conducted by three experienced endoscopists, including an original JNET member who was also involved in establishing the diagnostic criteria. A total of two images, namely, one representative non-magnified white light image and one representative DF-NBI image for each of the 557 consecutive lesions were used in the evaluation study. The diagnostic value of DF-JNET was calculated based on the evaluation data.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of DF-JNET Type 1 for differentiating between non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions were 78.1%, 98.6%, 89.1%, 96.8%, and 95.9%, respectively; of Type 2A lesions for differentiating low-grade dysplasia from others were 98.0%, 76.5%, 94.9%, 89.7%, and 94.1%, respectively; of Type 2B lesions for differentiating high-grade dysplasia and shallow submucosal invasive carcinoma from others were 43.5%, 99.1%, 66.7%, 97.6%, and 96.8%, respectively; and of Type 3 lesions for differentiating deep submucosal invasive carcinoma from others were 83.3%, 99.5%, 62.5%, 99.8%, and 99.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

All DF-JNET types had an over 90% diagnostic accuracy for the histological prediction of colorectal tumors. DF-JNET might contribute to appropriate treatment choices, such as endoscopic resection or surgery, not only in Japan but also in Western countries in which the use of optical zoom endoscopy is limited.

Value of Magnifying Chromoendoscopy and Magnifying Optical Enhancement Technology in Classifying Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Controlled Study

Background and Aims

Magnifying chromoendoscopy (ME-CE) through the observation of pit patterns is a productive way to distinguish between neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Magnifying optical enhancement technology (ME-OE) is an emerging virtual chromoendoscopy imaging technology and appeared to be a promising approach. However, this information is currently not available. This study is aimed at comparing the differential diagnostic value of ME-CE and OE for neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. Patients and Methods. Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized (1 : 1) into examination by ME-OE or ME-CE. Histopathological findings were utilized as the reference standard. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of two endoscopy methods were compared using ME-OE (were classified according to the JNET classification) and ME-CE (were classified according to the Kudo pit pattern classification), respectively, and the time to predict the histological polyp type was compared. And the agreements between the pathological and clinical diagnosis by ME-OE or ME-CE were analyzed.

Results

A total of 365 polyps were found in the 220 patients included (ME-OE: 185; ME-CE: 180.202 had nonneoplastic polyps, 163 had neoplastic polyps). The diagnostic accuracy of ME-OE was higher than that of ME-CE (93% vs. 92%, p > 0.05). The average diagnosis time was lower in ME-OE than ME-CE (83 ± 26.4 s vs. 194 ± 17.7 s, p < 0.001). The agreements between the pathological and clinical diagnosis were at least substantial in both groups.

Conclusion

ME-OE was superlative to ME-CE in predicting the histology of polyps. OE devoted classification would possibly similarly enhance the endoscopist performance. The trial is registered with ChiCT2000032075.

[Japan narrow-band imaging Expert Team type 2B colorectal cancer: consistency between endoscopic prediction and pathological diagnosis]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the potential factors that affect the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis for Japan narrow-band imaging (NBI) Expert Team (JNET) type 2B colorectal lesions.

OBJECTIVE

The clinical data were collected from 261 patients with JNET type 2B colorectal lesions diagnosed in Nanfang Hospital between July, 2018 and July, 2021. We analyzed the macroscopic type, size, location or pit pattern classification of the lesions for their potential influence of the diagnostic accuracy of JNET type 2B lesions.

OBJECTIVE

The 261 lesions included 91 low-grade intramucosal neoplasia lesions (34.9%), 132 high-grade intramucosal neoplasia lesions (50.6%), 13 submucosal invasive cancer lesions (5.0%), and 25 deep submucosal invasive cancer lesions (9.6%). The coincidence rate between endoscopic prediction and pathological diagnosis of these lesions was 55.6% (145/ 261). The macroscopic type and size of the lesions were significantly associated with the diagnostic accuracy of JNET type 2B lesions (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy among the lesions with different pit pattern types (P < 0.001).

OBJECTIVE

Both the macroscopic type and size affect the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis of JNET type 2B colorectal lesions. JNET classification combined with pit pattern types can have better accuracy in predicting the pathological diagnosis of these lesions.

Systematic Review on Optical Diagnosis of Early Gastrointestinal Neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Meticulous endoscopic characterization of gastrointestinal neoplasias (GN) is crucial to the clinical outcome. Hereby the indication and type of resection (endoscopically, en-bloc or piece-meal, or surgical resection) are determined. By means of established image-enhanced (IEE) and magnification endoscopy (ME) GN can be characterized in terms of malignancy and invasion depth. In this context, the statistical evidence and accuracy of these diagnostic procedures should be elucidated. Here, we present a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

21 Studies could be found which met the inclusion criteria. In clinical prospective trials and meta-analyses, the diagnostic accuracy of >90% for characterization of malignant neoplasms could be documented, if ME with IEE was used in squamous cell esophageal cancer, stomach, or colonic GN.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, by means of optical diagnosis, today's gastrointestinal endoscopy is capable of determining the histological subtype, exact lateral spread, and depth of invasion of a lesion. The prerequisites for this are an exact knowledge of the anatomical structures, the endoscopic classifications based on them, and a systematic learning process, which can be supported by training courses. More prospective clinical studies are required, especially in the field of Barrett's esophagus and duodenal neoplasia.

Effect of educational lecture on the diagnostic accuracy of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for colorectal lesions

BACKGROUND

An educational and training program is required for generalization of Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification. However, there is no detailed report on the learning curve of the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopists using JNET classification. We examined the effect of an educational lecture on beginners and less experienced endoscopists for improving their diagnostic accuracy of colorectal lesions by JNET classification.

METHODS

Seven beginners with no endoscopy experience (NEE group), 7 less experienced endoscopists (LEE group), and 3 highly experienced endoscopists (HEE group) performed diagnosis using JNET classification for randomized NBI images of colorectal lesions from 180 cases (Type 1: 22 cases, Type 2A: 105 cases, Type 2B: 33 cases, and Type 3: 20 cases). Next, the NEE and LEE groups received a lecture on JNET classification, and all 3 groups repeated the diagnostic process. We compared the correct diagnosis rate and interobserver agreement before and after the lecture comprehensively and for each JNET type.

RESULTS

In the HEE group, the correct diagnosis rate was more than 90% with good interobserver agreements (kappa value: 0.78-0.85). In the NEE and LEE groups, the correct diagnosis rate (NEE: 60.2 → 68.0%, P < 0.01; LEE: 66.4 → 86.7%, P < 0.01), high-confidence correct diagnosis rate (NEE: 19.6 → 37.2%, P < 0.01; LEE: 43.6 → 61.1%, P < 0.01), and interobserver agreement (kappa value, NEE: 0.32 → 0.43; LEE: 0.39 → 0.75) improved after the lecture. In the examination by each JNET type, the specificity and positive predictive value in the NEE and LEE groups generally improved after the lecture.

CONCLUSION

After conducting an appropriate lecture, the diagnostic ability using JNET classification was improved in beginners or endoscopists with less experience in NBI magnifying endoscopy.

Comparative Study of Narrow-Band Imaging and i-scan for Predicting the Histology of Intermediate-to-Large Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective, Randomized Pilot Study

Background/Aims

To date, no reports have compared the diagnostic efficacy of narrow-band imaging (NBI) and i-scan for the histologic prediction of intermediate-to-large colorectal polyps. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of NBI and i-scan in predicting histology, and their inter-/intra-observer agreement.

Methods

We performed a prospective, randomized study that included 66 patients (NBI, n=33 vs. i-scan, n=33) with colorectal polyps (size >10 mm but <50 mm) who underwent colonoscopic resection. During the procedure, three endoscopists documented their prediction using the Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification. Two months after study completion, the endoscopists reviewed still images and video clips for analysis.

Results

The overall diagnostic accuracies in the NBI and i-scan groups were 73.7% (73/99) and 75.8% (75/99), respectively, and there was no statistical significance between the two groups (p=0.744). The JNET classification as applied to NBI and i-scan showed substantial inter-observer agreement (NBI κ-value 0.612, p=0.001 vs. i-scan κ-value 0.662, p=0.002). Additionally, the κ-values of intra-observer agreement were in the range of 0.385–0.660 with NBI and 0.364–0.741 with i-scan.

Conclusions

NBI and i-scan have similar diagnostic accuracies for the histologic prediction of intermediate-to-large colorectal polyps. Furthermore, the inter-/intra-observer agreement was acceptable for both modalities when the JNET classification was applied.

Adding Narrow-Band Imaging to Chromoendoscopy for the Evaluation of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic assessment is crucial in diagnosing clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the benefits of adding narrow-band imaging endoscopy to conventional chromoendoscopy in predicting pathologic complete response in the surgical specimen.

DESIGN

This was a prospective nonrandomized study.

SETTINGS

This was an ad hoc study of a prospective phase II trial at a single comprehensive cancer center that evaluated oncologic outcomes of a neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS

Patients with high-risk stage II to III low rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab followed by chemoradiotherapy and surgery were included.

INTERVENTION

Tumor response after neoadjuvant therapy was evaluated using conventional white light endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy then followed by using narrow-band imaging based on a predefined diagnostic protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy for predicting pathologic complete response and inter-rater agreement between an expert and trainee endoscopists were compared between the assessments using conventional white light endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy and the assessment adding narrow-band imaging.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients were eligible for the study, and 19 had pathologic complete response (31.1%). Although the addition of narrow-band imaging correctly converted the diagnosis in 3 patients, overall diagnostic improvement in predicting pathologic complete response was limited (conventional chromoendoscopy vs adding narrow-band imaging: accuracy, 70.5% vs 75.4%; sensitivity, 63.2% vs 73.7%; specificity, 73.8% vs 76.2%; positive predictive value, 52.2% vs 58.3%; and negative predictive value, 81.6% vs 86.5%). A κ value for the inter-rater agreement improved from 0.599 to 0.756 by adding narrow-band imaging.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limited improvement in diagnostic accuracy, adding narrow-band imaging to chromoendoscopy improved inter-rater agreement between the expert and nonexpert endoscopists. Narrow-band imaging is a reliable and promising modality for universal standardization of the diagnosis of clinical complete response. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B275. ADICIÓN DE IMÁGENES DE BANDA ESTRECHA A LA CROMOENDOSCOPÍA PARA LA EVALUACIÓN DE LA RESPUESTA TUMORAL A LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE EN EL CÁNCER DE RECTO: La evaluación endoscópica es fundamental para valorar la respuesta clínica completa después de la terapia neoadyuvante en el cáncer de recto.Evaluar los beneficios de agregar endoscopia de imagen de banda estrecha a la cromoendoscopía convencional para predecir la respuesta patológica completa en la muestra quirúrgica.Estudio prospectivo no aleatorizado.Un estudio ad hoc de un ensayo prospectivo de fase II en un solo centro integral de cáncer que evaluó los resultados oncológicos de una terapia neoadyuvante para el cáncer rectal.Pacientes con cáncer rectal bajo de alto riesgo en estadio II-III que recibieron ácido folínico neoadyuvante modificado, fluorouracilo y oxaliplatino más bevacizumab seguido de quimiorradioterapia y cirugía.La respuesta tumoral después de la terapia neoadyuvante se evaluó mediante endoscopia de luz blanca convencional más cromoendoscopía, seguido de imágenes de banda estrecha basadas en un protocolo de diagnóstico predefinido.La precisión diagnóstica para predecir la respuesta patológica completa y el acuerdo entre evaluadores entre un experto y un endoscopista en entrenamiento se compararon entre las evaluaciones utilizando endoscopia de luz blanca convencional más cromoendoscopía y la evaluación agregando imágenes de banda estrecha.En total, 61 pacientes fueron elegibles para el estudio, y 19 tuvieron una respuesta patológica completa (31.1%). Aunque la adición de imágenes de banda estrecha convirtió correctamente el diagnóstico en 3 pacientes, la mejora diagnóstica general en la predicción de la respuesta patológica completa fue limitada (cromoendoscopía convencional versus adición de imágenes de banda estrecha: precisión, 70.5% versus 75.4%; sensibilidad, 63.2% versus 73.7%; especificidad, 73.8% versus 76.2%; valor predictivo positivo, 52.2% versus 58.3%; y valor predictivo negativo, 81.6% versus 86.5%). Un valor de kappa para el acuerdo entre evaluadores mejoró de 0.599 a 0.756 al agregar imágenes de banda estrecha.Un estudio de centro único con un tamaño de muestra relativamente pequeño.A pesar de la mejora limitada en la precisión diagnóstica, agregar imágenes de banda estrecha a la cromoendoscopía mejoró el acuerdo entre evaluadores entre los endoscopistas expertos y no expertos. La imagenología de banda estrecha es una modalidad confiable y prometedora para la estandarización universal del diagnóstico de respuesta clínica completa. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B275.

Controversies in EUS: Do we need miniprobes?

This is the fifth in a series of papers entitled "Controversies in EUS." In the current paper, we deal with high-resolution catheter probes, otherwise known as EUS miniprobes (EUS-MPs). The application of miniprobes for early carcinomas in the entire intestinal tract, for subepithelial lesions, and for findings in the bile duct and pancreatic duct as well as endobronchial use is critically discussed. Submucous lesions, especially in the colon, but also early carcinomas in special cases are considered the most important indications. The argument is illustrated by numerous examples.

Improving assessment and management of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in a Western center over 10 years: lessons learned and clinical impact

Background and study aims  Outcomes of endoscopic assessment and management of large colorectal (CR) non-pedunculated lesions (LNPLs) are still under evaluation, especially in Western settings. We analyzed the clinical impact of changes in LNPL management over the last decade in a European center. Patients and methods  All consecutive LNPLs ≥ 20 mm endoscopically assessed (2008-2019) were retrospectively included. Lesion, patient, and resection characteristics were compared among clinically relevant subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression (for predictors of submucosal invasion [SMI] and recurrence), Kaplan-Meier curves and ROC curves (for temporal cut-offs in trends analyses) were used. Results  A total of 395 LNPLs were included (30 mm [range 20-40]; SMI = 9.6 %; primary endoscopic resection [ER] = 88.4 %). Pseudo-depression and JNET classification independently predicted SMI beyond single morphologies/location. After complete ER, involvement of ileocecal valve/dentate line, piece-meal resection and high-grade dysplasia independently predicted recurrence. Rates of 5-year recurrence-free, surgery-free and cancer-free survival were 77.5 %, 98.6 % and 100 %, respectively, with 93.8 % recurrences endoscopically managed and no death attributable to ER or CR cancer (versus 3.4 % primary surgery mortality). ROC curves identified the period ≥ 2015 (following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [ESD] introduction and education on pre-resective lesion assessment) as associated with improved lesions' characterization, increased en-bloc resection of SMI lesions (87.5 % vs 37.5 %; p = 0.0455), reduced primary surgery (7.5 % vs 16.7 %; p = 0.0072), surgical referral of benign lesions (5.1 % vs 14.8 %; p = 0.0019), and recurrences. Conclusions  ESD introduction and educational interventions allowed ER of more complex lesions, offset by increased complementary surgery for complications or intrinsic histological risk. Nevertheless, overall, they have reduced surgery demand and increased appropriateness and safety of LNPL management in our center.

Curriculum for optical diagnosis training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

This manuscript represents an official Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) aiming to guide general gastroenterologists to develop and maintain skills in optical diagnosis during endoscopy. In general, this requires additional training beyond the core curriculum currently provided in each country. In this context, ESGE have developed a European core curriculum for optical diagnosis practice across Europe for high quality optical diagnosis training. 1:  ESGE suggests that every endoscopist should have achieved general competence in upper and/or lower gastrointestinal (UGI/LGI) endoscopy before commencing training in optical diagnosis of the UGI/LGI tract, meaning personal experience of at least 300 UGI and/or 300 LGI endoscopies and meeting the ESGE quality measures for UGI/LGI endoscopy. ESGE suggests that every endoscopist should be able and competent to perform UGI/LGI endoscopy with high definition white light combined with virtual and/or dye-based chromoendoscopy before commencing training in optical diagnosis. 2:  ESGE suggests competency in optical diagnosis can be learned by attending a validated optical diagnosis training course based on a validated classification, and self-learning with a minimum number of lesions. If no validated training course is available, optical diagnosis can only be learned by attending a non-validated onsite training course and self-learning with a minimum number of lesions. 3:  ESGE suggests endoscopists are competent in optical diagnosis after meeting the pre-adoption and learning criteria, and meeting competence thresholds by assessing a minimum number of lesions prospectively during real-time endoscopy. ESGE suggests ongoing in vivo practice by endoscopists to maintain competence in optical diagnosis. If a competent endoscopist does not perform in vivo optical diagnosis on a regular basis, ESGE suggests repeating the learning and competence phases to maintain competence.Key areas of interest were optical diagnosis training in Barrett's esophagus, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, diminutive colorectal lesions, early colorectal cancer, and neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Condition-specific recommendations are provided in the main document.

Magnification endoscopy in combination with acetic acid enhancement and narrow-band imaging for the accurate diagnosis of colonic neoplasms

Background and study aims  Magnification endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBIME) and NBIME with acetic acid enhancement (A-NBIME) enable visualization of the vascular and microstructural patterns of colorectal polyp. We compared the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of white light endoscopy (WLE), NBIME, and A-NBIME for predictive histologic diagnosis. Patients and methods  Consecutive colorectal polyps (N = 628; 38 hyperplasias, 488 adenomas, 72 M-SM1 cancers, and 30 SM2 cancers) were photographed with WLE, NBIME, and A-NBIME. Endoscopic images were independently reviewed by three experts, according to the traditional criteria for WLE, the Japan NBI Expert Team classification for NBIME, and pit pattern classification for A-NBIME to compare diagnostic accuracy and interobserver diagnostic agreement among modalities. Results  The specificity (95 % confidence interval) of hyperplasia and SM2 cancer with WLE were 98.2 % (96.8 %-99.1%) and 99.4 % (98.5 %-99.9 %), respectively, showing high accuracy for endoscopic resection without magnifying observation. Diagnostic accuracy of WLE, NBIME, and A-NBIME was 80.8 % (77.4 %-83.8 %), 79.3 % (75.9 %-82.4 %), and 86.1 % (83.2 %-88.7 %), respectively, showing the highest accuracy for A-NBIME among modalities ( P  < .05). NBIME showed a lower PPV for M-SM1 cancer ( P  < .05), as with WLE ( P  = .08) compared to A-NBIME. Fleiss's kappa values for WLE, NBIME, and A-NBIME diagnosis were 0.43 (0.39 - 0.46), 0.52 (0.49 - 0.56) and 0.65 (0.62 - 0.69), respectively, showing insufficient reproducibility of WLE and superiority of A-NBIME among modalities. Conclusion  WLE showed high accuracy for endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps in expert diagnosis. NBIME demonstrated a higher diagnostic reproducibility than WLE. A-NBIME showed possible superiority among modalities in both diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility.

Effective use of the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team classification based on diagnostic performance and confidence level

Five years have passed since the Japan Narrow Band Imaging Expert Team (JNET) classification was proposed in 2014. However, the diagnostic performance of this classification has not yet been established. We conducted a retrospective study and a systematic search of Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System On-Line. There were three retrospective single center studies about the diagnostic performance of this classification. In order to clarify this issue, we reviewed our study and three previous studies. This review revealed the diagnostic performance in regards to three important differentiations. (1) Neoplasia from non-neoplasia; (2) malignant neoplasia from benign neoplasia; and (3) deep submucosal invasive cancer (D-SMC) from other neoplasia. The sensitivity in differentiating neoplasia from non-neoplasia was 98.1%-99.8%. The specificity in differentiating malignant neoplasia from benign neoplasia was 84.7%-98.2% and the specificity in the differentiation D-SMC from other neoplasia was 99.8%-100.0%. This classification would enable endoscopists to identify almost all neoplasia, to appropriately determine whether to perform en bloc resection or not, and to avoid unnecessary surgery. This article is the first review about the diagnostic performance of the JNET classification. Previous reports about the diagnostic performance have all been retrospective single center studies. A large-scale prospective multicenter evaluation study is awaited for the validation.