Comparison of the safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy between octogenarians and non-octogenarians

Risk-scoring system predicting need for hospital-specific interventional care after peroral endoscopic myotomy

OBJECTIVES

Early identification of patients needing hospital-specific interventional care (HIC) following endoscopic treatment is valuable for optimizing postoperative hospital stays. We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for predicting HIC in patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

METHODS

This study included patients with esophageal motility disorders who underwent POEM at our hospital between April 2015 and March 2023. HIC was defined as any of the following situations: fasting for gastrointestinal rest to manage adverse events (AEs); intravenous administration of medications such as antibiotics and blood transfusion; endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical interventions; intensive care unit management; or other life-threatening events. A risk-scoring system for predicting HIC after postoperative day (POD) 1 was developed using multivariable logistic regression and was internally validated using bootstrapping and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 589 patients, 50 (8.5%) experienced HIC after POD1. Risk scores were assigned for four factors as follows: age (0 points for <70 years, 1 point for 70-79 years, 2 points for ≥80 years), preoperative prognostic nutritional index (0 points for >45, 1 point for 40-45, 4 points for <40), postoperative surgical site AEs on second-look endoscopy (7 points), and postoperative pneumonia on chest radiography (6 points). The discriminative ability (concordance statistics, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.91) and calibration (slope 1.00; 0.74-1.28) were satisfactory. The decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical usefulness.

CONCLUSION

This risk-scoring system can predict the HIC after POD1 and provide useful information for determining discharge.

Safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia in pediatric and geriatric patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As a less invasive technique, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has recently been widely accepted for treating achalasia with an excellent safety profile, durability, and efficacy in adults. In pediatric and geriatric patients, the treatment is more difficult.

AIM

To discuss the clinical outcomes of POEM in pediatric and geriatric patients with achalasia.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 2024. The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success. Secondary outcomes of interest included adverse events and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The pooled event rates were calculated by comprehensive meta-analysis software.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies with 547 pediatric patients and 810 geriatric patients were included in this study. The pooled event rates of technical success, clinical success, GERD and adverse events of POEM for treating achalasia in pediatric patients were 97.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 95.0%-98.3%; I² = 0%; P < 0.000], 93.2% (95%CI: 90.5%-95.2%; I² = 0%; P < 0.000), 22.3% (95%CI: 18.4%-26.7%; I² = 43.874%; P < 0.000) and 20.4% (95%CI: 16.6%-24.8%; I² = 67.217%; P < 0.000), respectively. Furthermore, in geriatric patients, the pooled event rates were 97.7% (95%CI: 95.8%-98.7%; I² = 15.200%; P < 0.000), 93.2% (95%CI: 90.3%-95.2%; I² = 0%; P < 0.000), 23.9% (95%CI: 19.4%-29.1%; I² = 75.697%; P < 0.000) and 10.8% (95%CI: 8.3%-14.0%; I² = 62.938%; P < 0.000], respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that POEM was an effective and safe technique for pediatric and geriatric patients with achalasia.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia in Older Adults: A Retrospective Analysis of 39 Cases with a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has demonstrated favorable short-term safety and efficacy in older adults, while a comprehensive understanding of the long-term outcomes were vague. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes in older adults' 5-year postop after undergoing POEM to treatment achalasia. Older adults from a single hospital who received POEM between January 2010 and January 2017 were analyzed. Older persons were reached to evaluate their symptoms at present and encouraged repeat examinations for objective follow-up. The clinical success, POEM-related indicators, POEM-related adverse events, and quality of life were assessed. Thirty-nine older adults with a mean age of 70.82 ± 4.72 who underwent POEM were studied at a mean 84.23 ± 25.06 month follow-up. The preoperative diagnosis was achalasia type I in 7 older adults, achalasia type II in 26 older adults, and achalasia type III in 2 older adults. Sixteen older adults had prior treatment and 21 older adults suffered from comorbidities. The median operative time was 50 (25-120) minutes, and perioperative adverse events were recorded in four older adults. The current Eckardt scores were significantly lower than that before POEM (2.08 ± 2.12 vs. 6.58 ± 1.78, P < 0.001). Besides, long-term clinical success was gained in 66.7% of older adults. Three older adults received postop treatment for symptom recurrence. Ultimately, 80.6% of old adults expressed satisfaction with POEM, while 27.8% of older adults suffered from symptomatic reflux. In conclusion, POEM can provide symptomatic improvement in a large proportion of older adults with achalasia at 5-year postop.

Geriatric patients with esophageal motility disorders benefit more from minimally invasive peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter study in Japan

Geriatric patients with existing studies on the safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia involve small sample sizes and single institutions. However, multi-center, large-scale data analyses are lacking. The study aimed to clarify the characteristics of geriatric patients with esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) and determine the procedure-related outcomes and clinical course following POEM. This cohort study included 2,735 patients with EMDs who were treated at seven Japanese facilities between 2010 and 2019. The patients' characteristics and post-POEM clinical courses were compared between the geriatric (age ≥ 75 years; n = 321) and non-geriatric (age < 75 years; n = 2,414) groups. Compared with the non-geriatric group, the geriatric group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores; more recurrent cases; lower incidence of chest pain; and higher incidence of type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm, and Jackhammer esophagus. Furthermore, the incidence of sigmoid esophagus was higher, although esophageal dilation was not severe in this group. POEM was safe and effective for geriatric patients with treatment-naïve and recurrent EMDs. Furthermore, compared with the non-geriatric group, the geriatric group had lower post-POEM Eckardt scores, fewer complaints of refractory chest pain, and a lower incidence rate of post-POEM reflux esophagitis. Geriatric patients are characterized by worse clinical conditions, more spastic disorders, and greater disease progression of EMDs, which are also the indications for minimally invasive POEM. POEM is more beneficial in geriatric patients as it has lowering symptom scores and incidence rates of reflux esophagitis.

Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in 100 older patients

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a standard treatment for achalasia. Several reports have described the efficacy and safety of POEM for elderly patients, but none has reported the efficacy and safety of POEM in a large number of elderly patients for > 3 years postoperatively. In this study, we examined the safety and outcome of POEM for 3 years postoperatively in 100 elderly patients.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients aged > 65 years who underwent POEM from September 2011 to March 2020 were included in this study. In analysis 1, we retrospectively investigated the safety and efficacy of POEM in all patients. In analysis 2, the efficacy and safety of POEM were statistically compared between two groups: the early elderly (65-74 years of age, 55 patients) and late elderly (≥ 75 years of age, 45 patients).

RESULTS

The technical success rate of POEM was 100%. In analysis 1, the 3-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year efficacies of POEM (Eckardt score of ≤ 3) were 100% (92/92 cases), 100% (91/91 cases), 97.8% (88/90 cases), and 100% (92/92 cases), respectively. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 11% of patients, but none was fatal. Two late elderly patients developed aspiration pneumonia due to delirium and underwent long-term hospitalization. In analysis 2, there were no significant differences in the efficacy and safety of POEM between the two age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

POEM is effective and safe for elderly patients. However, precautions are needed regarding the risk of adverse events associated with delirium when POEM is performed in elderly patients.

Characteristics of esophageal achalasia in geriatric patients over 75 years of age and outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy

AIM

As the population ages, the proportion aged ≥75 years is expected to increase. Many studies on peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) as treatment for esophageal achalasia have already been reported; however, few studies have been designed on patients aged ≥75 years. The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics of esophageal achalasia in patients >75 years and to evaluate the outcomes of POEM.

METHODS

This study included 121 patients who underwent POEM for esophageal achalasia, which was divided into the geriatric (n = 18) group aged ≥75 and the young (n = 103) group ≤74 years. The characteristics of esophageal achalasia and the short-term outcomes after POEM in the geriatric group compared with the young group were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

The median age of the geriatric group was 78 years, and two patients were initially diagnosed with refractory pneumonia, and esophageal achalasia was initially overlooked. The preoperative Eckardt score of the geriatric group was significantly lower than that of the young group (4 vs. 6, P = 0.007), particularly in the regurgitation score. The Eckardt score and integrated relaxation pressure of both groups were significantly improved after POEM (P < 0.001). There were no cases of perioperative complications in the geriatric group.

CONCLUSIONS

POEM for esophageal achalasia is a safe and effective treatment even in geriatric patients >75 years of age. In geriatric patients with recurrent or intractable pneumonia, it is important to rule out esophageal achalasia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 788-793.

Safety and efficacy of biodegradable stents in octogenarian patients with esophageal achalasia

Backgrounds and study aims  Treatment of octogenarian patients with achalasia with conventional treatments is effective but with compromised safety. Biodegradable stents (BS) are promising. We aimed to evaluate their safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes at early, mid and long-term in this population. Patients and methods  Naïve or previously-treated achalasic octogenarian patients underwent to BS placement (BSP) between December, 2010 and November, 2011, and were followed-up for 9-years. A strict follow-up was performed. Results  Thirty-two patients were included, (17 men [53.1 %]; median age 82 years [78-92]). BSP was performed in all patients. At 9y, 18/32 (56.2 %) completed protocol. Mean BSP time was 37.5±12.1 min and 34.4 % presented thoracic pain. At 1 m, six BS were migrated (18.7 %), requiring a second BSP fixed with hemoclips. At 3 m, twenty-three (72.8 %) completed degradation process. At 6 m, eighteen (56.2 %) presented clinical dysphagia, of whom 5/32 (15.6 %) presented stenotic-tissue hyperplasia, responding to balloon dilation in all cases. Pre-BSP Eckardt, Timed barium esophagram and integrated relaxation pressure improved post-BSP 6 m values (9 vs 2, p = 0.001; < 50 % = 93.8 % vs > 80 % = 81.5 %, p = 0.003 and 18.8 ± 3.2 vs 11.1 ± 2.6 mmHg, p = 0.001, respectively), and there were no significant changes up to 9y post-BSP. Esophagitis grade A or B was presented between 4.7 % to 11.2 % and controlled with PPI. After 9 years we had clinical success rates of 94.4 %, 72 %, and 65.4 % for time point evaluation, per protocol and intention to treat analysis, respectively. Conclusions  BSP represents a feasible alternative option in octogenarian patients with achalasia who are high risk with other treatments, presenting acceptable early, mid-, and long-term outcomes.