Clinical significance of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients with esophageal motility disorders

A review of recent developments in the imaging of disorders of gut-brain interaction

A number of factors have been recently associated with the development of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), including genetic predisposition, early-life environment, intestinal microbiota, infection, microinflammation, and increased mucosal permeability. In addition, impaired gastrointestinal motility is important not only as a cause of DGBI but also as a consequent final phenotype. Gastrointestinal motor measurements are the predominant method for the assessment of and therapeutic intervention into motor abnormalities. As such, these measurements should be considered for DGBI patients who do not respond to first-line approaches such as behavioral therapy, dietary modifications, and pharmacotherapy. This comprehensive review focuses on the functional changes in the upper gastrointestinal tract caused by DGBI and describes ongoing attempts to develop imaging modalities to assess these dysfunctions in the esophageal and gastric regions. Recent advances in imaging techniques could help elucidate the pathophysiology of DGBI, with exciting potential for research and clinical practice.

Esophageal Dysphagia in Adults: When It Sticks

Esophageal dysphagia is a common yet difficult to diagnose condition. This article underscores the role of detailed patient history and physical examinations, including prompt endoscopic evaluation, for accurate differentiation between esophageal and oropharyngeal dysphagia. The authors discuss the heightened importance of early intervention in certain patient groups, such as elderly individuals and patients with head and neck cancer, to mitigate the risk of malnutrition and infection. The authors delve into etiologic factors highlighting the complexity of clinical presentations and the significance of tailored management strategies.

Enhancing the Quality of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Current Indicators and Future Trends

The quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) is crucial and carries significant consequences for patient outcomes, the employment of healthcare resources, and the future course of gastroenterology as a medical specialty. In this review, we navigate through the terrain of the Quality Indicators (QIs) for EGD, shedding light on their indispensable function in ensuring and augmenting the quality of patient care throughout the pre-procedural, intra-procedural, post-procedural, and outcome-oriented facets of the practice. We delve into the comprehensive scope of the QIs and the challenges impeding the delivery of high-quality EGD, from variability in practitioner training and patient compliance to the systemic limitations of current QIs and the barriers hindering the adoption of advanced techniques. Future directions for bolstering the quality of EGD are highlighted, encapsulating the integration of emergent endoscopic technologies, the evolution of patient-centered metrics, the refinement of endoscopist training and credentialing processes, and the promise held by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Particular emphasis is placed on the role of advanced endoscopic techniques and equipment in enhancing EGD quality. This article presents a cogent narrative, promoting the pursuit of excellence in EGD as an ever-evolving endeavor that necessitates the collective dedication of clinicians, researchers, educators, and policymakers.

Correlation between Lower Esophageal Sphincter Metrics on High-Resolution Manometry and the Clinical Presentation of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is characterized by aperistalsis with poor relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). We aimed to systematically assess whether LES metrics on high-resolution manometry (HRM) correlate with the symptomatic or endoscopic presentation of patients with achalasia.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed at two tertiary medical centers. All cases of newly diagnosed, untreated achalasia were reviewed for demographics, symptoms, and endoscopic findings. These were correlated with HRM metrics, including LES basal pressure (LESP), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), percent LES relaxation, and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology.

RESULTS

108 achalasia patients were included; 56 (51.9%) were men, with a mean overall age of 55.6 ± 17.9 years old. Achalasia subtypes included 23.1% with Type I, 65.7% Type II, and 11.1% Type III. Mean LESP was 40.9 ± 13.7 mmHg, IRP 26.8 ± 11.5 mmHg, with 36% ± 20% LES relaxation. On univariate analyses, a higher IRP was associated with age < 50 (p = 0.028), female sex (p = 0.030), Arab ethnicity (p < 0.001), weight loss (p = 0.016), a tortuous esophagus (p = 0.036), and resistance at the EGJ (p = 0.033). However, on multivariate regression analyses, only ethnicity remained significantly associated with IRP. No unique variables were associated with either LESP or percent LES relaxation. Achalasia subtype and Eckardt score were not associated with any LES metrics. Non-Type 1 EGJ morphology was associated with a lower LESP.

CONCLUSIONS

LES metrics on HRM do not appear to correlate with the clinical or endoscopic presentation of patients with untreated achalasia.

Usefulness of Endoscopy for the Detection and Diagnosis of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders and Diseases Relating to Abnormal Esophageal Motility

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is performed to rule out organic diseases in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders (EMDs). Abnormal endoscopic findings can be observed during EGD, which indicate the presence of EMDs. Several endoscopic findings at both the esophagogastric junction and esophageal body that are related to EMDs have been reported. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) could be detected during EGD, and these diseases are often associated with abnormal esophageal motility. Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) could improve the detection of these diseases during EGD. Although no report has been published previously on the potential usefulness of IEE in the endoscopic diagnosis of EMDs, IEE can be used to detect disorders that can be associated with abnormal esophageal motility.

Role of Endoscopy in Motility Disorders of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Gastrointestinal motility disorders have a wide range of symptoms and affect patients' quality of life. With the advancement of endoscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of endoscopy in motility disorders is becoming more significant. Endoscopy is necessary to rule out possible organic diseases in patients with suspected motility disorders and provide significant clues for their diagnosis. Moreover, interventional endoscopy may be a primary or alternative treatment option for selected patients with motility disorders, and it is becoming a promising field as new therapeutic applications are developed and utilized for various motility disorders. This review may provide suitable indications for the use of endoscopy in diagnosing and treating motility disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Ethnic Differences in Clinical Presentations and Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Findings in Patients with Achalasia

BACKGROUND

Ethnic differences in achalasia presentations have scarcely been described. The association between achalasia and immunologic HLA haplotypes suggests that there may be a genetic predisposition. We aimed to evaluate differences in demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and manometric findings between two distinct ethnic groups with achalasia-Israeli Arabs (IA) and Israeli Jews (IJ).

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed at two medical centers. High-resolution manometry (HRM) reports were reviewed for newly-diagnosed achalasia patients. Demographic data, clinical presentations, endoscopy reports, and HRM metrics including the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were all reviewed.

RESULTS

Overall, 94 achalasia patients were included (53.2% male; mean age 54.5 ± 18.0). 43 patients were IA (45.7%). Body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Compared to IJ, the IA patients had more esophageal dysphagia (100% vs. 88.2%; P = 0.022), chest pain (46.5% vs. 25.5%; P = 0.033), and a tortuous esophagus on endoscopy (23.3% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.005). IA patients were also diagnosed at a younger age than IJ patients (50.9 ± 17.5 vs. 57.5 ± 18.0; p = 0.039). Furthermore, IRP values were higher among IA patients than IJ patients (32.2 ± 13.8 vs. 23.3 ± 8.4; p < 0.001). A regression model analysis found that ethnicity significantly predicted IRP (β = - 10, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Ethnicity appears to affect achalasia clinical presentation and HRM findings. IA achalasia patients are diagnosed at a younger age, present with more severe esophageal symptoms, and have a higher IRP compared to IJ patients. Additional studies of diverse, multiethnic populations, especially with genetic evaluations, are required to further assess the role of ethnicity in achalasia.

Clinical characteristics and manometric findings of esophageal achalasia-a systematic review regarding differences among three subtypes

Esophageal achalasia is classified into three subtypes according to manometric findings. Since several factors, including clinical characteristics and treatment response, have been reported to differ among the subtypes, the underlying pathogenesis may also differ. However, a comprehensive understanding regarding the differences is still lacking. We therefore performed a systematic review of the differences among the three subtypes of achalasia to clarify the current level of comprehension. In terms of clinical features, type III, which is the least frequently diagnosed of the three subtypes, showed the oldest age and most severe symptoms, such as chest pain. In contrast, type I showed a higher prevalence of lung complications, and type II showed weight loss more frequently than the other types. Histopathologically, type I showed a high loss of ganglion cells in esophagus, and on a molecular basis, type III had elevated serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. In addition to peristalsis and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function, the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function of achalasia has attracted attention, as an impaired UES function is associated with severe aspiration pneumonia, a fatal complication of achalasia. Previous studies have indicated that type II shows a higher UES pressure than the other subtypes, while an earlier decline in the UES function has been confirmed in type I. Differences in the treatment response are also crucial for managing achalasia patients. A number of studies have reported better responses in type II cases and less favorable responses in type III cases to pneumatic dilatation. These differences help shed light on the pathogenesis of achalasia and support its clinical management according to the subtype.

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Are We Missing in Our Busy Endoscopy Practice?

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) form a significant part of a busy endoscopist's practice. Endoscopy plays an all-encompassing role in the diagnosis and management of EMDs including achalasia cardia. The focus on in-vogue third-space endoscopic procedures such as per-oral endoscopic myotomy often digresses the important role of endoscopy. Endoscopic evaluation forms the part of standard first-line evaluation of any dysphagia and serves to rule out a secondary cause such as an esophagogastric junction malignancy and eosinophilic esophagitis. Moreover, endoscopic evaluation may itself provide corroborative evidence that may contribute to the diagnosis of the motility disorder. Achalasia cardia may present with a wide spectrum of endoscopic findings from being entirely normal and the well-known and pathognomonic dilated sigmoid-shaped esophagus with food residue, to lesser-known ornate signs. The evidence on the role of endosonography in EMDs is conflicting and largely restricted to evaluation of pseudoachalasia. High-resolution manometry (HRM) remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of EMDs. Endoscopists must also keep abreast of the latest iteration of the Chicago classification version 4.0, which differs significantly from its predecessor in being more stringent in making diagnosis of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and disorders of peristalsis since these manometric findings may be seen in normal individuals and may be mimicked by opioid use and gastroesophageal reflux. The latest rendition also includes the use of provocative maneuvers and testing in both supine and sitting posture. Despite being the gold standard, there are certain lacunae in the use and interpretation of the Chicago classification of which the users should be well aware. Emerging technologies such as functional lumen imaging probe and planimetry, and timed barium esophagogram fill the lacuna in diagnosis of these motility disorders, which at times is beyond the resolution of HRM.

The Evaluation of Esophageal Endoscopic Findings in Patients with Functional Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction

Objective Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a diagnosis of unclear significance that has become increasingly common with recent advances in high-resolution manometry (HRM). EGJOO can be divided into mechanical or functional obstruction. Functional EGJOO is considered an incomplete phenotype or an early stage of achalasia. However, little is known about the endoscopic findings in patients with functional EGJOO. Thus, we aimed to elucidate the endoscopic findings in patients with functional EGJOO and to identify patients at high risk for achalasia. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 259 patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) along with HRM for upper gastrointestinal symptoms without any obstructive lesions or stricture between July 2013 and September 2019 in our institute. Among them, 31 patients were diagnosed with EGJOO. After excluding patients who had undergone previous endoscopic treatment, those who were diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis and those who had undergone EGD at other institutes, 23 patients were finally included with a diagnosis of functional EGJOO. The endoscopic findings were evaluated by three endoscopists. Results Five patients (21.7%) had an esophageal rosette sign (ERS). No patients had grade IV gastroesophageal flap valve, esophageal mucosal breaks, or abnormal retention of liquid or food in the esophagus. Manometric findings revealed that the median distal contractile integral value was significantly higher in patients with an ERS (n=5) than in those without it (n=18). Conclusion There were some patients with functional EGJOO who had an ERS, which is the characteristic endoscopic finding in achalasia.