Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using novel blue light imaging classification among trainee endoscopists

Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold

An expanding range of advanced mucosal imaging technologies have been developed with the goal of improving the detection and characterization of lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Many technologies have targeted colorectal neoplasia given the potential for intervention prior to the development of invasive cancer in the setting of widespread surveillance programs. Improvement in adenoma detection reduces miss rates and prevents interval cancer development. Advanced imaging technologies aim to enhance detection without significantly increasing procedural time. Accurate polyp characterisation guides resection techniques for larger polyps, as well as providing the platform for the "resect and discard" and "do not resect" strategies for small and diminutive polyps. This review aims to collate and summarise the evidence regarding these technologies to guide colonoscopic practice in both interventional and non-interventional endoscopists.

Examining the effect of synthetic data augmentation in polyp detection and segmentation

PURPOSE

As with several medical image analysis tasks based on deep learning, gastrointestinal image analysis is plagued with data scarcity, privacy concerns and an insufficient number of pathology samples. This study examines the generation and utility of synthetic samples of colonoscopy images with polyps for data augmentation.

METHODS

We modify and train a pix2pix model to generate synthetic colonoscopy samples with polyps to augment the original dataset. Subsequently, we create a variety of datasets by varying the quantity of synthetic samples and traditional augmentation samples, to train a U-Net network and Faster R-CNN model for segmentation and detection of polyps, respectively. We compare the performance of the models when trained with the resulting datasets in terms of F₁ score, intersection over union, precision and recall. Further, we compare the performances of the models with unseen polyp datasets to assess their generalization ability.

RESULTS

The average F₁ coefficient and intersection over union are improved with increasing number of synthetic samples in U-Net over all test datasets. The performance of the Faster R-CNN model is also improved in terms of polyp detection, while decreasing the false-negative rate. Further, the experimental results for polyp detection outperform similar studies in the literature on the ETIS-PolypLaribDB dataset.

CONCLUSION

By varying the quantity of synthetic and traditional augmentation, there is the potential to control the sensitivity of deep learning models in polyp segmentation and detection. Further, GAN-based augmentation is a viable option for improving the performance of models for polyp segmentation and detection.