Structuring pathologic reports containing Japanese language for integration into an endoscopy database

Risk of colorectal cancer among fecal immunochemical test-positive individuals by timing of previous colonoscopy: A multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The risk of colorectal cancer among fecal immunochemistry test-positive individuals who had undergone previous colonoscopies remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the differences in the risk of colorectal cancer among fecal immunochemistry test-positive individuals according to the timing of their previous colonoscopies.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in Japan as a subgroup analysis of the J-SCOUT study (UMIN000040690), which integrated and analyzed a database comprising all colonoscopies performed at participating Japanese institutions between 2010 and 2020. This study used colonoscopy data of fecal immunochemistry test-positive individuals aged ≥ 20 years from three facilities that entered the timing of previous colonoscopies into the endoscopy database. Histologically confirmed advanced neoplasia was the study's primary outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for each variable.

RESULTS

In total, 11,143 fecal immunochemistry test-positive patients underwent colonoscopy during the study period. Of these, 10,160 patients were included in the analysis after excluding those who met the exclusion criteria. The overall advanced neoplasia detection rate was 9.38% (953/10,160; 95% confidence interval: 8.82-9.96%). Compared with the first colonoscopy, the odds ratios for advanced neoplasia in individuals who underwent colonoscopies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, > 5, and ≥ 10 years previously were 0.27, 0.15, 0.06, 0.10, 0.29, 0.31, and 0.31, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection rates of advanced neoplasia were low among the fecal immunochemistry test-positive individuals who had undergone colonoscopy, particularly in the past 5 years.

Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study

OBJECTIVES

Colonoscopy withdrawal times are associated with the adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, the relationship between ADR and cecal insertion time has been inadequately characterized. We aimed to evaluate endoscopist-related factors involved in the ADR, including the average individual colonoscopy insertion and withdrawal times.

METHODS

This observational study used a colonoscopy database with pathology data from routine clinical practice in Japanese institutions. The odds ratios (OR) of endoscopist-related factors related to ADRs were examined using a generalized linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Of the 186,293 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 47,705 colonoscopies by 189 endoscopists in four hospitals were analyzed for ADR. The overall ADR was 38.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.8, 38.7). Compared to endoscopists with mean cecal insertion times of <5 min, the OR of ADR for those with mean cecal insertion times of 5-9, 10-14, and ≥15 min were 0.84 (95% CI 0.71, 0.99), 0.68 (95% CI 0.52, 0.90), and 0.45 (95% CI 0.25, 0.78), respectively. Compared to endoscopists with mean withdrawal times of <6 min, the OR of ADR for those with mean withdrawal times of 6-9, 10-14, and ≥15 min were 1.38 (95% CI 1.03, 1.85), 1.48 (95% CI 1.09, 2.02), and 1.68 (95% CI 1.04, 2.61), respectively. There were no significant differences in ADRs by endoscopist specialty, gender, or the total number of examinations performed.

CONCLUSION

Individual mean colonoscopy insertion time was associated with ADR and might be considered as a colonoscopy quality indicator as well as withdrawal time.

"Endoscopic" adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator of colonoscopy: First report from the J-SCOUT study

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether reasonable detection rate of endoscopically diagnosed lesions as adenoma ("endoscopic" adenoma detection rate [ADR]) could be calculated with a database generated from colonoscopy reports and whether it could be used as a surrogate colonoscopy quality indicator of "pathological" ADR.

METHODS

A lesion-by-lesion database of colonoscopies performed between 2010 and 2020 at eight Japanese endoscopy centers and corresponding pathology database were integrated. Differences in numbers of detected polyps, "endoscopic" and "pathological" adenomas, and what these differences could be attributed to were examined. Polyp detection rate (PDR), "endoscopic" and "pathological" ADRs, and correlation coefficients between "pathological" ADR and PDR or "endoscopic" ADR by each endoscopist were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 129,065 colonoscopy reports were analyzed. Among a total of 146,854 polyps, more "endoscopic" adenomas (n = 117,359) were observed than "pathological" adenomas (n = 70,076), primarily because adenomas were not resected on site, rather than because of a misdiagnosis. In all patients analyzed, PDR, "endoscopic" and "pathological" ADRs were 56.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.2-56.7), 48.0% (95% CI 47.7-48.3), and 32.7% (95% CI 32.5-33.0), respectively. "Endoscopic" and "pathological" ADRs from each endoscopist showed a high correlation in hospitals where adenomas were usually resected at the time of examination.

CONCLUSIONS

By appropriately describing endoscopically diagnosed lesions as "adenomas" in endoscopy reports, "endoscopic" ADR might be used as a surrogate colonoscopy quality indicator of "pathological" ADR (UMIN000040690).