Risk and prognostic factors of invasive gastric cancer detection during surveillance endoscopy: Multi-institutional cross-sectional study

OLGA and OLGIM staging systems on the risk assessment of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of prospective cohorts

Background

The Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) are established classification systems used to evaluate atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, respectively.

Objectives

We evaluated the association of OLGA and OLGIM scores and the risk of gastric cancer (GC) in only prospective cohort studies.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

We systematically searched four databases for prospective cohorts that evaluated the use of OLGA and OLGIM staging systems in predicting the risk of GC. We primarily compared OLGA/OLGIM III-IV versus OLGA/OLGIM 0-II categories and GC events. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and absolute risk differences with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

Eight studies were included (n = 12,526). The mean age of the patients ranged from 48.2 to 64.9 years. OLGA III-IV and OLGIM III-IV were associated with the development of GC in comparison to their 0-II categories (RR 32.31, 95% CI 9.14-114.21 and RR 12.38, 95% CI 5.75-26.65, respectively). OLGA III-IV and OLGIM III-IV were associated with an increase in the absolute risk of GC of 4% and 5%, respectively. The risk remained significant if we only included countries with high incidence of GC, and was greater if we excluded one study that included mostly patients with autoimmune gastritis. OLGA II and OLGIM II were associated with higher risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and GC in comparison with OLGA 0-I and OLGIM 0-I, respectively.

Conclusion

Higher stages in OLGA and OLGIM systems are associated with a significantly increased risk of developing HGD and GC, validating these scoring systems for the assessment of GC risk and the design of endoscopic surveillance programs.

Trial PROSPERO registration

CRD42024565771.

Linked Color Imaging with Light-Emitting Diode Light Enhances the Visibility of Gastric Neoplasm: A Prospective, Multicenter, Comparative Trial

BACKGROUND

Early detection of gastric cancer can play a key role in improving prognosis. Recently, light-emitting diodes (LED) have been developed as novel endoscopic systems. However, the differences in the visibility of gastric neoplastic lesions between LED and laser endoscopy remains unclear. We conducted a prospective multicenter trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of LED endoscopy in the visibility of gastric neoplastic lesions undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in comparison to laser endoscopy.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in patients undergoing ESD for gastric neoplastic lesions at five hospitals throughout Japan. Seventy patients with 74 lesions were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the non-inferiority of the difference in the individual scores of linked color imaging (LCI) and white-light imaging (WLI) for LED and laser endoscopy for gastric neoplastic lesions.

RESULTS

The mean individual score was 2.66 ± 1.02, 3.17 ± 0.83, 2.75 ± 1.05, and 3.21 ± 0.84 in LED-WLI, LED-LCI, laser-WLI, and laser-LCI, respectively. The difference in individual scores of LCI and WLI was 0.51 ± 0.77 and 0.46 ± 0.80 in LED and laser endoscopy, respectively. The mean difference between LED and laser endoscopy was 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 0.05 to 0.13, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the non-inferiority of the differences in individual scores between LCI and WLI in the comparison of LED and laser endoscopy for gastric neoplastic lesions.

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at Helicobacter pylori eradication increases the risk of eradication failure and post-eradication gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Vonoprazan has been known to have a high Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rate since its launch in 2015. Yet, the risk factors for eradication failure and development of post-eradication gastric cancer (GC) using VPZ regimen remain unclear.

METHODS

This single-center cohort study included 934 consecutive patients who underwent H. pylori eradication using VPZ between February 2015 and June 2017 and were followed up for five years by the end of 2022. We examined several indicators of systemic immune, inflammatory, and nutritional status at the time of eradication to identify those indicators could predict eradication success, risk of post-eradication GC development, and long-term prognosis.

RESULTS

The successful eradication rates were 92.6% (intention-to-treat) and 98.7% (per-protocol). Multivariate analysis showed that only a high peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly associated with eradication failure. The 5-year GC incidence rate was 1.67%, and all GCs were stage IA. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time from eradication to diagnosis was 40.5 (6.1) months. Multivariate analysis showed that high NLR and history of GC and hypertension were significantly associated with GC development. Patients with elevated NLR post-eradication had a higher risk of newly developed GC. Twelve patients died during the study period, and a high NLR was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate.

CONCLUSIONS

NLR has the potential to be a biomarker that predicts the failure of eradication and development of post-eradication GC. High NLR was also associated with poor long-term prognosis after H. pylori eradication.

Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer

Endoscopic resection (ER)-a minimal invasive procedure, compared to surgical gastrectomy, with the advantage of preserving the entire stomach and maintaining the patient's quality of life-is a widely used curative treatment for early gastric cancers (EGCs). Despite its advantages, such as the preservation of the whole stomach, a large area of the gastric mucosa with histologic changes such as atrophy and intestinal metaplasia remains after ER, and so does the risk of metachronous gastric cancers (MGCs). Therefore, regular surveillance endoscopy after curative ER of EGCs is important so that MGCs are detected early and so minimally invasive ER remains a treatment option. To date, the optimal interval for surveillance endoscopy after curative ER of EGCs has not been established. Therefore, this review summarizes the results of the published studies on this topic with the aim of establishing the optimal surveillance interval for early identification of MGCs. Based on my review, the median timing of MGC occurrence is within 3 years, and reports suggest biannual endoscopy during the first 3 years; however, the evidence suggests that individual patient characteristics may influence the risk of MGCs. Therefore, stratified endoscopic strategies for surveillance based on patient characteristics, such as age, family history of gastric cancer, synchronous gastric lesions, and corpus intestinal metaplasia, should be applied.

Nature and Determinants of Fear of Cancer Recurrence After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study

Gastric cancer is one of the most prevalent tumors in China and other countries, with high morbidity and mortality. Fear of cancer recurrence is common among cancer survivors. Fear of cancer recurrence experiences and psychological interventions have been investigated in breast and other cancers. However, this phenomenon and associated factors have not been evaluated in early gastric cancer survivors in China. The objective of this study was to investigate the nature of fear of cancer recurrence and influencing factors in Chinese patients with early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection. This cross-sectional study in two centers included 312 early gastric cancer patients who answered self-report questionnaires and were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection between June 2022 and May 2023 to assess fear of cancer recurrence. Gender, family history of gastrointestinal tumor, tumor recurrence, Helicobacter pylori infection, disease perception, and self-perceived burden were significant factors influencing fear of cancer recurrence (p < .05). More than half of early gastric cancer patients have fear of cancer recurrence, and how to deal with it has become a key issue in the postoperative care of patients. Medical professionals should address these factors to reduce fear of cancer recurrence in at-risk patients.

Impact of endoscopy intervals on metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Comparison between 1 year and half-a-year

OBJECTIVES

Japanese guidelines recommend posttreatment endoscopy once or twice a year after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. However, the impact of endoscopy intervals on metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) remains unclear, especially the difference between 1-year and half-a-year intervals. We aimed to investigate this difference.

METHODS

This study retrospectively investigated 2429 patients who underwent gastric ESD between May 2001 and June 2019 at our hospital. Patients who developed MGC were classified based on those who underwent the previous endoscopy within at least 7 months (short-interval group) and within 8-13 months (regular-interval group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for possible confounders. The primary outcome was the proportion of MGC beyond curative ESD criteria established in the guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 216 eligible patients developed MGC. The short- and regular-interval groups included 43 and 173 patients, respectively. Overall, no patients in the short-interval group had MGC beyond curative ESD criteria, while 27 patients in the regular-interval group did. The proportion of MGC beyond curative ESD criteria was significantly lower in the short-interval group than in the regular-interval group before (P = 0.003) and after (P = 0.028) PSM. Although not significant, the short-interval group tended to have a higher stomach preservation rate than the regular-interval group (P = 0.093).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated a possible benefit of biannual surveillance endoscopy in the early post-ESD period.

Helicobacter pylori Eradication Does Not Adversely Affect the Clinical Course of Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study on Screening Endoscopic Examination in Japan

BACKGROUND

Since gastric cancers (GCs) detected after Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication present with different morphological characteristics from conventional HP-positive GCs, delayed detection of early-stage GCs may be observed. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of HP eradication on diagnosing GC during screening endoscopy.

METHODS

Eleven health checkup institutions in Japan participated in the present study. All GC cases newly diagnosed by screening endoscopy between January 2016 and December 2020 were included. After propensity score matching, multivariable regression analysis was performed to estimate the effect of HP eradication on deep tumor invasion among HP-eradicated and HP-positive GC cases.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients with GCs (134 HP-eradicated and 97 HP-positive cases) were enrolled. After propensity score matching, there were 81 cases in each group. The distribution of the depth of tumor invasion (pT1a, pT1b1, pT1b2, and pT2) between the HP-eradicated group and HP-positive group was similar (p = 0.82). In the propensity analysis, with HP-positive as the reference value, HP eradication was not significantly associated with T1b-T4-GCs and T1b2-T4-GCs, with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.16 (0.48-2.81) and 1.16 (0.42-3.19), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HP eradication does not adversely affect the clinical course of GCs, supporting the recommendation of HP eradication in screening programs to reduce the total number of GC cases without delaying diagnosis.