Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors: Japanese multicenter prospective study

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection for submucosal tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract, including predominantly extraluminal submucosal tumors (with video)

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for submucosal tumors (SMTs) has been technically challenging. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EFTR for upper gastrointestinal (GI) SMTs, including extraluminal lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 232 patients with SMTs who underwent EFTR from January 2014 to August 2023. Clinicopathologic characteristics, procedure-related parameters, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up outcomes were assessed in all patients.

RESULTS

The en-bloc resection and en-bloc with R0 resection rates were 98.7% and 96.1%, respectively. The average endoscopic tumor size measured 17.2 ± 8.7 mm, ranging from 6 to 50 mm. The resection time and suture time were 49.0 ± 19.4 min and 22.5 ± 11.6 min, respectively. In all, 39 lesions (16.8%) exhibited predominantly extraluminal growth. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) were the predominant pathology, accounting for 78.4% of the cases. Twenty-one patients (9.1%) encountered complications, including pneumothorax (1/232, 0.43%), hydrothorax (1/232, 0.43%), localized peritonitis (3/232, 1.29%), and fever (16/232, 6.9%). Although the incidence of postoperative fever was notably higher in the predominantly extraluminal group (7/39, 17.9%) compared to the predominantly intraluminal group (9/193, 4.7%, P = 0.008), there were no significant differences in outcomes of the EFTR procedure. No instances of recurrence were observed during the mean follow-up period of 3.7 ± 2.3 years.

CONCLUSION

EFTR was found to be feasible, safe, and effective for resecting upper GI SMTs, including lesions with predominantly extraluminal growth. Further validation in a prospective study is warranted.

Surgical tips and tricks for laparoscopic intragastric surgery for submucosal tumors relative to the esophagogastric junction

Recent reports have described the practicality of laparoscopic intragastric surgery (l-IGS) as an alternative for resecting submucosal tumors (SMTs) near the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), where excision using an exogastric approach would be difficult. However, even using IGS to perform a full-thickness resection of SMTs that are in or extremely close to the EGJ is very difficult to do safely and avoid disrupting or causing stenosis of the EGJ, without advanced experience. This study retrospectively examined the usefulness of l-IGS for gastric SMTs located in or extremely close to the EGJ. Fourteen patients with gastric SMTs < 2 cm of the EGJ and underwent l-IGS were eligible for this study. We examined the tumor location, operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, degree of deformation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, perioperative complications, and recurrence. Furthermore, we compared patients with tumors in the EGJ with those with tumors near the EGJ and patients in whom three-port l-IGS was performed with those who underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The average tumor size, operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, and postoperative hospitalization of the 14 patients were 30.9 ± 21.3 mm, 125.2 ± 31.1 min, 30.7 ± 103.3 mL, and 9.2 ± 3.1 d, respectively. No differences in these parameters according to the type of l-IGS or tumor location were observed. All patients underwent l-IGS without complications and were free from EGJ deformation or esophagitis. We believe that l-IGS is useful for gastric SMTs located < 2 cm of the EGJ as it can be safely performed for difficult tumor locations and does not cause deformation of the EGJ.

Closing the defect after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection with a novel closure device

Watch a video of this article.

Retrospective observational cohort study of laparoscopic surgical strategies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Laparoscopic surgery has been used to treat gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs). Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has been used when subtotal resection has been difficult, which enabled resection of these tumors. In this study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with gastric SMTs who underwent laparoscopic surgery in our hospital with the aim of reporting the surgical indications, procedures (especially for LECS), and outcomes of surgery. This study involved 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between April 2014 and March 2021. We classified the patients into two groups: laparoscopy-assisted surgery group (non-LECS group, n = 30) and LECS group (n = 25). LECS was performed in the upper stomach, in the greater curvature of the lower stomach, and in both intraluminal and intramural locations in the middle stomach. Non-LECS was selected for extraluminal and intramural tumors in the greater curvature of the upper stomach. There were no severe complications associated with the operation. There was one postoperative complication in the LECS group. The length of postoperative hospital stay did not significantly differ between the LECS and non-LECS groups. We reported the surgical procedures for gastric SMTs in our hospital. It is essential to make full use of the multiple techniques reported in this article and examine the location of the tumor to avoid excess or insufficient resection. Our review of the present case series allowed us to select the appropriate surgical approach for gastric SMTs based on the lesion location and type of development.