Intrapartum glycaemic control and neonatal hypoglycaemia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes: a systematic review

Practical Approach to Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Interpretation and Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) Use in Pregnancy: Considerations for Obstetric Providers

While automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have multiple well-established benefits outside of pregnancy and are widely used in non-pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D), none of the commercially available AID systems in North America are approved for use during pregnancy. Use of commercially available AID systems off-label in pregnancy is currently limited by: (1) glucose targets higher than the fasting glucose target range recommended during pregnancy and (2) algorithms which were not designed for the dynamic changes in insulin resistance which occur across gestation. However, as AID use in the general population expands, many individuals will opt to continue using these systems off-label during pregnancy, and thus, guidance for providers regarding AID use and optimization during pregnancy is of the utmost importance. A cornerstone to the effective use of AID systems is the systematic and accurate interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data. One obstacle to the use of both CGM and AID systems by obstetric providers is the lack of comfort with CGM interpretation. We therefore present here: (1) a systematic approach to CGM interpretation during pregnancy and (2) practical guidance regarding AID use during pregnancy for individuals who opt to use commercially available AID systems off-label during pregnancy after consideration of individualized risks and benefits.

Provider Perspective on Automated Insulin Devices in Pregnancy and Considerations for Implementation in Clinical Practice

Pregnancy in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) is well-known to be linked to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Although advancements in diabetes technology, especially hybrid closed-loop (HCL) and advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) systems, have greatly enhanced management for nonpregnant individuals with T1D, pregnant patients still represent a high-risk group that requires further research. Existing trials have shown mixed data in terms of clinically meaningful benefits in glycemic control, but these may be specific to the closed-loop system. Currently, there is one AHCL system approved and available for use in pregnancies complicated by diabetes in the United Kingdom, Europe, and Australia. However, there are no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved closed-loop systems for use during pregnancy in the United States. Existing HCL/AHCL system use is off-label for pregnancy in the United States and often requires assistive techniques to target the tighter glucose levels needed during pregnancy. For patients struggling on multiple daily injections (MDIs) or sensor-augmented pump therapy (SAPT), studies have shown that HCL/AHCLs can reduce the burden of care and enable some people to achieve tighter glucose levels. This review aims to provide an overview of the existing evidence of closed-loop systems in pregnancies complicated by T1D and to discuss their implications and considerations with system use.

Pregestational Diabetes and Adverse Pregnancy Results: A Mendelian Randomization Study

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia in pregnancy is believed to be associated with negative pregnancy outcomes. However, establishing a causal connection between diabetes mellitus (DM) and adverse pregnancy results is challenging due to the limitations inherent in traditional observational studies.

METHODS

Our study used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) technique to examine the possible influence of pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Summary-level data were obtained from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of European ancestry and FinnGen biobank. The primary analysis employed the random-effects multiplicative inverse variance weighted (IVW) technique to appraise causal relationships between PGDM and adverse outcomes. Heterogeneity and pleiotropy were assessed using Cochran's Q statistic, Rucker's Q statistic, and the I² statistic. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using MR-Egger and weighted median methods. Additionally, outlier detection techniques, including MR-PRESSO and RadialMR, were applied.

RESULTS

The results from the IVW method indicated no significant causal association between PGDM and stillbirth (SB) (OR (SE)=0.99 (0.001); P value=0.992), miscarriage (MIS) (OR (SE)=0.97 (0.016); P value=0.125), and preterm birth (PTB) (OR (SE)=1.072 (0.028); P value=0.014). Pleiotropy and heterogeneity tests revealed no evidence of pleiotropy for SB, MIS, and PTB (MR-Egger intercept P value=0.296, 0.525, and 0.532, respectively), with no observed heterogeneity for SB, MIS, and PTB (Q- P values of IVW were 0.929, 0.999, and 0.069, and MR-Egger were 0.931, 0.999, and 0.065, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that there is no direct causal link between PGDM and the likelihood of MIS, SB, and PTB.

Relationship between Intrapartum Continuous Glucose Monitoring Values and Neonatal Hypoglycemia in Individuals with Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

 We aimed to evaluate the relationship between intrapartum continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) in individuals with diabetes.

STUDY DESIGN

 a multicenter prospective study (November 2021-December 2022) of laboring individuals with pregestational or gestational diabetes at ≥34 weeks. Cohorts had a blinded CGM placed from admission through delivery and were monitored with fingerstick (FS) according to usual care. The primary outcome was NH. Secondary neonatal outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay, need for intravenous (IV) glucose therapy, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress, or respiratory distress syndrome. Time in the target range (TIR; range 70-110 mg/dL) and time above the target range (TAR; >110 mg/dL) were expressed as a percentage of all CGM readings, and mean glucose was obtained. Youden index was used to choose the cut point for TAR and prediction of NH.

RESULTS

 Of 9,479 deliveries during the study period, 202 (2.1%) met the inclusion criteria, and 112 (56%) participants were enrolled (n = 7 did not have available CGM data). Of the study participants, 45 (40%) had pregestational diabetes, and 67 (60%) had gestational diabetes. The mean glucose in labor using a CGM was 102.6 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR]:89.9, 113.5 mg/dL), and the average percentage of TIR was 62.1% (IQR, 36.9, 85.6). CGM and FS were poor predictors of NH, with no differences in area under the curve (AUC) of mean glucose as a predictor (0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.23 vs. 0.53, 95% CI: 0.4-0.6, respectively). The best cut-off for the prediction of NH was a TAR of 61%, with 23% (n = 24) being above the threshold. The rate of NH for TAR >61% versus ≤61% was 45.8 versus 25.9% (p = 0.06). Neonates born to individuals with TAR >61% were more likely to require continuous positive airway pressure after delivery and had a higher cord c-peptide level.

CONCLUSION

 In this prospective study of laboring individuals with diabetes, intrapartum CGM TAR was associated with a higher rate of NH.

KEY POINTS

· CGM use in labor is feasible with a complete glucose profile in the various stages of labor.. · Best cut-off for predicting NH was a time above range (≥110 mg/dl) of >61%.. · CGM and FS were poor predictors of NH..

Insulin Management for Gestational and Type 2 Diabetes in Pregnancy

Insulin is preferred as the first-line agent for glucose management of gestational diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy when nutritional and lifestyle modifications are unable to achieve pregnancy-specific glucose targets. Individual heterogeneity in defects of insulin secretion or sensitivity in liver and muscle, unique genetic influences on pregnancy glycemic regulation, and variable cultural and lifestyle behaviors that affect meal, activity, sleep, and occupational schedules necessitate a personalized approach to insulin regimens. Newer insulin preparations have been developed to mimic the physiologic release of endogenous insulin, maintaining appropriate basal levels to cover hepatic gluconeogenesis and simulate the rapid, meal-related, bolus rise of insulin. Such physiologic basal-bolus dosing of insulin can be administered safely, achieving tighter glycemic control while reducing episodes of hypoglycemia. Insulin initiation and titration require understanding the pharmacodynamics of different insulin preparations in addition to a patient's glycemic profiles, effect of variable nutritional intake and mealtimes, physical activity, stress, timing of sleep cycles, and cultural habits. Educating and empowering patients to learn how their glucose responds to insulin, portion and content of meals, and physical activity can increase personal engagement in therapy, flexibility in eating patterns, and improved glycemic control. This Clinical Expert Series article is focused on optimizing insulin management (initiation, dosing, and titration) of gestational and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy.

An automated insulin delivery system from pregestational care to postpartum in women with type 1 diabetes. Preliminary experience with telemedicine in 6 patients

INTRODUCTION

The use of most commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is off-label in pregnancy. However, an increasing number of women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) use such devices throughout pregnancy and delivery. We analysed the data of six women with T1D from a single centre (Diabetology Outpatient Clinic of District-63/Asl Salerno, Italy) who were able to start and maintain AID therapy with the MiniMed™ 780G (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) throughout the pregestational care period, pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from six patients with T1D who received training and initiation on use of the MiniMed™ 780G and attended follow-up visits throughout pregnancy (these visits were virtual because of the COVID-19 pandemic). All patients maintained their devices in the closed-loop setting throughout pregnancy and during labour and delivery. We analysed data from the pregestational phase to the first 30 days postpartum.

RESULTS

All patients achieved the recommended metabolic goals before conception [median time in range (TIR) of 88% for 70-180 mg/dL; median pregnancy-specific TIR 63-140 mg/dL (ps-TIR) of 66% and maintained the ps-TIR until delivery (median ps-TIR 83%). All patients had slightly better metrics during the night than during the day, with a very low time below range of < 63 mg/dL. Optimal glycaemic values were also maintained on the day of labour and delivery (median ps-TIR 92.5%) and in the first 30 days postpartum, with no severe hypoglycaemia. The only neonatal complications were jaundice in one child and an interatrial defect in another child.

CONCLUSION

In our well-selected and trained patients, use of the MiniMed™ 780G helped to achieve and maintain ps-metrics from the pregestational period to delivery despite the fact that the algorithm is not set to achieve the ambitious glycaemic values recommended for pregnancy.

Permissive intrapartum glucose control: an equivalence randomized control trial (PERMIT)

BACKGROUND

There is limited high-quality data on the best practices for maternal blood glucose management during labor.

OBJECTIVE

We compared permissive care (target maternal blood glucose 70-180 mg/dL) to usual care (blood glucose 70-110 mg/dL) among laboring individuals with diabetes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a two-site equivalence randomized control trial for individuals with diabetes (pregestational or gestational) at ≥34 weeks in labor. Individuals were randomly allocated to usual care or permissive care. Maternal blood glucose was evaluated by capillary blood glucose monitoring in latent and active labor every 4 and 2 hours. Insulin drip was initiated if maternal blood glucose exceeded the upper bounds of the allocated target. The primary outcome was the first neonatal heel stick glucose within 2 hours of birth before feeding. We assumed a mean first neonatal blood glucose of 50±10 mg/dL. To ensure that the use of permissive care did not increase or decrease the first neonatal blood glucose >10 mg/dL (2-tailed: a=0.05, b=0.1), 96 total participants were required. We calculated adjusted relative risk and 95% confidence intervals in an intention-to-treat analysis. A preplanned Bayesian analysis was used to estimate the probability of equivalence with a neutral informative prior.

RESULTS

Of deliveries with diabetes assessed for eligibility (from October 2022 to June 2023), 280 of 511 (54.8%) met eligibility criteria, and 96 of 280 (34.3%) agreed and were randomized. In the usual care group, 17% required an insulin drip compared with none in permissive care. There was equivalence in the primary outcome between usual and permissive care (57.9 vs 57.1 mg/dL; adjusted mean difference, -0.72 [95% confidence interval, -8.87 to 7.43]). Bayesian analysis indicated a 98% posterior probability of the mean difference not being >10 mg/dL. The rate of neonatal hypoglycemia was 25% in the usual care group and 29% in the permissive group (adjusted relative risk, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.17). There was no difference in other neonatal or maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this randomized control trial, although almost 1 in 6 individuals with diabetes required an insulin drip with usual intrapartum maternal blood glucose care, permissive care was associated with equivalent neonatal blood glucose.

Intrapartum maternal glycaemic control for the prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neonatal hypoglycaemia is the most common metabolic disorder in infants, and may be influenced by maternal glycaemic control. This systematic review evaluated the effect of intrapartum maternal glycaemic control on neonatal hypoglycaemia.

METHODS

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, non-randomised studies of interventions, and cohort or case-control studies that examined interventions affecting intrapartum maternal glycaemic control compared to no or less stringent control. We searched four databases and three trial registries to November 2023. Quality assessments used Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 or the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models analysed separately for women with or without diabetes. The review was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (CRD42022364876).

RESULTS

We included 46 studies of women with diabetes and five studies of women without diabetes: one RCT, 32 cohort and 18 case-control studies (11,273 participants). For women with diabetes, the RCT showed little to no difference in the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia between tight versus less tight intrapartum glycaemic control groups (76 infants, RR 1.00 (0.45, 2.24), p = 1.00, low certainty evidence). However, 11 cohort studies showed tight intrapartum glycaemic control may reduce neonatal hypoglycaemia (6,152 infants, OR 0.44 (0.31, 0.63), p < 0.00001, I2 = 58%, very low certainty evidence). For women without diabetes, there was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of tight intrapartum glycaemic control on neonatal hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Very uncertain evidence suggests that tight intrapartum glycaemic control may reduce neonatal hypoglycaemia in infants of women with diabetes. High-quality RCTs are required.

Impact of Antenatal Care Modifications on Gestational Diabetes Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Many of the adverse outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are linked to excessive fetal growth, which is strongly mediated by the adequacy of maternal glycemic management. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a rapid adoption of virtual care models. We aimed to compare glycemic management, fetal growth, and perinatal outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2017 and 2020. Singleton pregnancies complicated by GDM were included in the study. The cohort was stratified into "before" and "during" COVID-19 subgroups, using March 11, 2020, as the demarcation time point. Women who began their GDM follow-up starting March 11, 2020, and thereafter were allocated to the COVID-19 era, whereas women who delivered before the demarcation point served as the pre-COVID-19 era. The primary outcome was the rate of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) neonates. Secondary outcomes included select maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven hundred seventy-five women were included in the analysis, of which 187 (24.13%) were followed during the COVID-19 era and 588 (75.87%) before the COVID-19 era. One hundred seventy-one of the 187 women (91.44%) followed during COVID-19 had at least 1 virtual follow-up visit. No virtual follow-up visits occurred before the COVID-19 era. There was no difference in the rate of LGA neonates between groups on both univariate (5.90% vs 7.30%, p=0.5) and multivariate analyses, controlling for age, ethnicity, parity, body mass index, gestational weight gain, chronic hypertension, smoking, and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 2.51, p=0.80). In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in composite neonatal outcome between groups (GDM diet: aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.43, p=0.23; GDM medical treatment: aOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.43, p=0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for differences in baseline variables, the combined virtual mode of care was not associated with a higher rate of LGA neonates or other adverse perinatal outcomes in women with GDM. Larger studies are needed to better understand the specific impact of virtual care on less common outcomes in pregnancies with GDM.

Factors associated with maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia after antenatal betamethasone administration in women with diabetes in pregnancy

AIMS

Bespoke glycaemic control strategies following antenatal corticosteroids for women with diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) may mitigate hyperglycaemia. This study aims to identify predictive factors for the glycaemic response to betamethasone in a large cohort of women with DIP.

METHODS

Evaluation of a prospective cohort study of 347 consecutive DIP pregnancies receiving two doses of 11.4 mg betamethasone 24 h apart between 2017 and 2021 and treated with the Pregnancy-IVI intravenous insulin protocol. Regression modelling identified factors associated with maternal glycaemic time-in-range (TIR) and maternal insulin requirements following betamethasone. Factors associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia (glucose <2.6 mmol/L) in infants born within 48 h of betamethasone administration (n = 144) were investigated.

RESULTS

The mean maternal age was 31.9 ± 5.8 years, with gestational age at betamethasone of 33.5 ± 3.4 weeks. Gestational diabetes was present in 81% (12% type 1; 7% type 2). Pre-admission subcutaneous insulin was prescribed for 63%. On-infusion maternal glucose TIR (4.0-7.8 mmol/L) was 83% [IQR 77%-90%] and mean on-IVI glucose was 6.6 ± 0.5 mmol/L. Maternal hypoglycaemia (<3.8 mmol/L) was uncommon (0.47 h/100 on-IVI woman hours). Maternal glucose TIR was negatively associated with indicators of insulin resistance (type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome), late-pregnancy complications (pre-eclampsia, chorioamnionitis) and the 1-h OGTT result. Intravenous insulin requirements were associated with type of diabetes, pre-eclampsia and intrauterine infection, the 1-h OGTT result and the timing of betamethasone administration. Neonatal hypoglycaemia was associated with pre-existing diabetes but not with measures of glycaemic control.

CONCLUSION

An intravenous infusion protocol effectively controls maternal glucose after betamethasone. A risk-factor-based approach may allow individualisation of therapy.

Pre-labour Rupture of Membranes at Term in Women With Gestational Diabetes and the Risk of Neonatal Hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVES

The management for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) arriving at the delivery ward with pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM) has not been elucidated. We tested the hypothesis that prolonged PROM in women with GDM would result in higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled women with diet or insulin-controlled GDM who presented with spontaneous clear PROM. Each woman was allocated into one of two groups based on the PROM-delivery time: <18 hours (group 1) and ≥18 hours (group 2). The primary outcome was the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia, defined as glucose <40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L) within 24 hours of birth.

RESULTS

We ultimately analyzed 631 cases of GDM (6.7%), 371 with PROM-delivery <18 hours, and 260 with PROM-delivery ≥18 hours. The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia did not differ between the two groups, reaching 7.3%. Women in group 2 were at increased risk of both cesarean delivery (20% vs. 12.4%, P < 0.01) and maternal chorioamnionitis morbidity (6.5% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a sub-group of women with GDM, a PROM-delivery time ≥18 hours is not associated with higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia, but higher rates of chorioamnionitis and cesarean delivery were noted. Therefore, we suggest consideration for early delivery when managing women with GDM and PROM.

Intrapartum continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs intravenous insulin infusion among pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intrapartum glucose management is critical to reducing neonatal hypoglycemia shortly after birth. Although it is known that insulin is required for all pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus, the optimal mode of intrapartum glycemic control is not known.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effect of intrapartum use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with that of intravenous insulin infusion for glucose management among pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus on neonatal blood glucose levels.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial of pregnant participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus. After written informed consent, participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 intrapartum insulin administration strategies: continuation of their continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or intravenous insulin infusion. The primary outcome was the first neonatal blood glucose level.

RESULTS

Between March 2021 and April 2023, 76 participants were approached, and 70 participants were randomized (35 participants in the intravenous insulin infusion group and 35 participants in the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion group). The groups were similar in terms of age, race/ethnicity, pregravid body mass index, nulliparity, and gestational age at delivery. There was no statistically significant difference in the first neonatal glucose measurement between the 2 groups (50.1±23.4 vs 49.2±22.6; P=.86). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in any secondary neonatal outcomes. Approximately 57.1% of neonates in the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion group required either oral, intravenous, or both treatments for hypoglycemia, whereas 51.4% of neonates in the intravenous infusion group required treatment. In both groups, 28.6% of neonates required intravenous treatment for hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus using either intravenous insulin infusion or continuation of their continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for intrapartum insulin administration had no difference in the primary outcome of neonatal hypoglycemia. Patients should be given the option of both glycemic management strategies intrapartum.

Characteristics of pregnancy complicated with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes in pregnancy is a major risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes such as congenital anomalies, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and macrosomia. For the mechanism of onset of type 1 and type 2 diabetes are different, we focused on the difference in perinatal outcomes between the type 1 and type 2 diabetes groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 22 pregnancies with type 1 diabetes and 15 pregnancies with type 2 diabetes, who were managed in our single center, with regard to maternal diabetes conditions during pregnancy and neonatal birthweight and blood glucose level. Furthermore, we checked the effect of continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin injection in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes.

RESULTS

Type 1 diabetes in pregnancy was less controllable and increased neonatal birth weight and neonatal hypoglycemia within 2 h after birth after neonatal care unit admission. Continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin injection that are convenient to use, had a similar effect in the management of type 1 diabetes during pregnancy, compared with conventional diabetes treatment. In contrast, maternal BMI and HDP were increased in women with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSION

In the management of pregnancy with diabetes, we should pay attention to the difference in pregnancy prognosis between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Management of type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: a narrative review

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) at reproductive age is rising. Women with T2DM have a similarly high risk for pregnancy complications as pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. To reduce adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, such as preeclampsia and preterm delivery, a multi-target approach is necessary. Tight glycemic control together with appropriate gestational weight gain, lifestyle measures, and if necessary, antihypertensive treatment and low-dose aspirin is advised. This narrative review discusses the latest evidence on preconception care, management of diabetes-related complications, lifestyle counselling, recommendations on gestational weight gain, pharmacologic treatment and early postpartum management of T2DM.

The association between maternal diabetes and neonatal seizures: a nested case-Control study

Aim

We aimed to evaluate the association of pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with neonatal seizures during neonatal hospitalization.

Methods

In this nested case-control study, all data were collected from the data files of the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) 2016-2021. Considering the effect of confounders, we used the propensity-score matching (PSM; case:control = 1:4) method to select the study population. The outcome was considered the occurrence of neonatal seizures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were adopted to assess the association of PGDM and GDM with neonatal seizures. We also conducted stratified analyses according to gestational age, birthweight, 5 min Apgar score, and maternal age to explore the potential disparities.

Results

After using the PSM method, a total of 6,674 cases of neonatal seizures and 26,696 controls were included. After adjusting for covariates, PGDM was associated with an increased risk of neonatal seizures [odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.98], whereas the association between GDM and neonatal seizures is not statistically significant. In addition, the correlation between PGDM and increased risk of neonatal seizures was observed in neonates with a gestational age of 37-42 weeks and ≥42 weeks, with a 5 min Apgar score of ≥7, and with a maternal age of ≤40 years.

Conclusion

PGDM was found to be closely associated with an increased risk of neonatal seizures. The findings of our study indicated that neonatologists should consider monitoring the incidence of neonatal seizures in neonates born to mothers with PGDM.

Management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy: update on lifestyle, pharmacological treatment, and novel technologies for achieving glycaemic targets

Glucose concentrations within target, appropriate gestational weight gain, adequate lifestyle, and, if necessary, antihypertensive treatment and low-dose aspirin reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, and other adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes. Despite the increasing use of diabetes technology (ie, continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pumps), the target of more than 70% time in range in pregnancy (TIRp 3·5-7·8 mmol/L) is often reached only in the final weeks of pregnancy, which is too late for beneficial effects on pregnancy outcomes. Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems are emerging as promising treatment options in pregnancy. In this Review, we discuss the latest evidence on pre-pregnancy care, management of diabetes-related complications, lifestyle recommendations, gestational weight gain, antihypertensive treatment, aspirin prophylaxis, and the use of novel technologies for achieving and maintaining glycaemic targets during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes. In addition, the importance of effective clinical and psychosocial support for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes is also highlighted. We also discuss the contemporary studies examining HCL systems in type 1 diabetes during pregnancies.

Adjustment of Maternal Variable Rate Insulin Infusions Using Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in hospital holds promise; however, further evidence is required on its use to guide adjustment of variable rate intravenous insulin infusion (VRIII). We retrospectively analyzed data from 20 women with type 1 diabetes during the peripartum period who were commenced on VRIII. Data were analyzed for CGM accuracy (Dexcom G6) using point-of-care glucose-CGM matched pairs. The study was entirely observational, with no deviation from standard clinical care. Twenty women were included; median age 30 (26-35) years with first glycated hemoglobin in pregnancy of 57 (49-60) mmol/mol. Overall median absolute relative difference was 6.1 (1.6-17.3)%. The total simulated CGM-adjusted VRIII was 2.5 U per hour, compared with 2.4 U per hour with capillary blood glucose-adjusted VRIII. In this retrospective analysis of CGM adjustment of maternal VRIII, we demonstrate early feasibility and considerable accuracy. Further prospective studies are required to confirm the safety and potential efficacy of CGM-based insulin titration.

What's new in the management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy?

Type 1 diabetes in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of complications for both mother and fetus. However, managing glycaemia during pregnancy to reduce these risks is challenging, owing to changes in insulin resistance with advancing gestation, as well as increased daily variation in insulin pharmacokinetics. These factors can add significant psychological and daily self-care burden to mothers during what may already be an anxious time. Increasingly, diabetes technologies are being used during pregnancy to improve and facilitate diabetes self-care. While these can be empowering for people with type 1 diabetes, careful consideration is required in relation to how and when these can be continued safely in the inpatient setting (including acute antenatal admissions, labour and delivery) and when extra support is required from adequately trained healthcare professionals. This article describes current forms of diabetes technologies used and the latest national guidance relating to the care of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy.

Intrapartum and early postpartum glycemic profiles in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Data on the glycemic profile of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during the perinatal period are sparse. This study described the intrapartum and early postpartum glucose profiles among pregnant women with GDM, and analyzed factors potentially affecting glycemic parameters during the period.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study conducted from March 2020 to November 2021. Pregnant women with GDM receiving lifestyle interventions alone during pregnancy and matched women with non-diabetic pregnancies (NDPs) were enrolled from among patients admitted to the obstetrics department for childbirth. Glucose monitoring was performed via a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system on admission, and glucose readings during labor and early postpartum were analyzed. The clinical characteristics and FGM-based parameters of participants in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 124 participants (mean age: 29.5 ± 3.5 years, 92 [74.2%] primipara) were included in the final analysis. A total of 17,571 glucose readings were retrieved. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the GDM (n = 60) and NDP (n = 64) groups. The average glucose level was 92.2 mg/dL, and the level was higher in the GDM group (95.5 ± 12.1 mg/dL vs. 89.1 ± 13.4 mg/dL, P = 0.008) during the intrapartum and early postpartum periods. The data were split into the intrapartum period (from the start of labor to delivery of the placenta) and the early postpartum period (within 24 h after placental delivery) for analysis. During intrapartum, women with GDM exhibited glycemic profiles and fluctuations similar to those in the NDP group. However, women with GDM had higher postpartum glucose levels (97.7 ± 13.4 mg/dL vs. 90.8 ± 15.3 mg/dL, P = 0.009), a longer time spent >140 mg/dL (8.7 ± 9.3% vs. 5.9 ± 10.3%, P = 0.011), and greater glycemic fluctuations than those with NDP. Postpartum hyperglycemia in GDM might be associated with high parity and postprandial glucose abnormalities in GDM screening tests.

CONCLUSION

Compared to those with normoglycemia, pregnant women with GDM receiving lifestyle interventions alone had similar intrapartum glucose profiles but higher early postpartum glucose levels and greater glucose variability, providing evidence for modification of the current perinatal glucose monitoring strategy for GDM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR2000030972.

A Systematic Review to Compare Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Pregestational Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes

Pregestational type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated with increased rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Adverse outcomes are more common in women with pregestational diabetes compared to GDM; although, conflicting results have been reported. This systematic review aims to summarise and synthesise studies that have compared adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes and GDM. Three databases, Pubmed, EBSCOhost and Scopus were searched to identify studies that compared adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pregestational T1DM and T2DM, and GDM. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria and are included in this systematic review. Thirteen pregnancy outcomes including caesarean section, preterm birth, congenital anomalies, pre-eclampsia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, macrosomia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, stillbirth, Apgar score, large for gestational age, induction of labour, respiratory distress syndrome and miscarriages were compared. Findings from this review confirm that pregestational diabetes is associated with more frequent pregnancy complications than GDM. Taken together, this review highlights the risks posed by all types of maternal diabetes and the need to improve care and educate women on the importance of maintaining optimal glycaemic control to mitigate these risks.

Lifestyle intervention during pregnancy in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Neonatal hypoglycemia is a severe adverse consequence of infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which can lead to neonatal mortality, permanent neurological consequences, and epilepsy. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to explore the effect of lifestyle intervention during pregnancy in women with GDM on the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched by 1st April 2022. Data were pooled as the risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs of neonatal hypoglycemia. Random-effects, subgroup analyses, meta-regression analysis, and leave-one-out analysis were conducted, involving 18 RCTs.

Results

Prenatal lifestyle intervention could significantly reduce the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98, P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis further demonstrated that the reduced risk of neonatal hypoglycemia was observed only when subjects were younger than 30 years, initiated before the third trimester, and with dietary intervention. Meta-regression analysis revealed that the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia post lifestyle intervention was lower in mothers with lower fasting glucose levels at trial entry.

Conclusion

We found that prenatal lifestyle intervention in women with GDM significantly reduced the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. Only lifestyle intervention before the third trimester of pregnancy, or dietary intervention only could effectively reduce the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. Future studies are required to explore the best pattern of lifestyle intervention and to determine the proper diagnostic criteria of GDM in the first/second trimester of pregnancy.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero, PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021272985.

Managing hyperglycaemia during antenatal steroid administration, labour and birth in pregnant women with diabetes - an updated guideline from the Joint British Diabetes Society for Inpatient Care

This article summarises the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care guidelines on the management of glycaemia in pregnant women with diabetes on obstetric wards and delivery units, Joint British Diabetes Societies (JBDS) for Inpatient Care Group, ABCD (Diabetes Care) Ltd. The updated guideline offers two approaches - the traditional approach with tight glycaemic targets (4.0-7.0 mmol/L) and an updated pragmatic approach (5.0-8.0 mmol/L) to reduce the risk of maternal hypoglycaemia whilst maintaining safe glycaemia. This is particularly relevant for women with type 1 diabetes who are increasingly using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) during pregnancy. All women with diabetes should have a documented delivery plan agreed during antenatal clinic appointments. Hyperglycaemia following steroid administration can be managed either by increasing basal and prandial insulin doses, typically by 50% to 80%, or by adding a variable rate of intravenous insulin infusion (VRIII). Glucose levels, either capillary blood glucose or CGM glucose levels, should be measured at least hourly from the onset of established labour, artificial rupture of membranes or admission for elective caesarean section. If intrapartum glucose levels are higher than 7.0 or 8.0 mmol/L on two consecutive occasions, VRIII is recommended. Hourly capillary blood glucose rather than CGM glucose measurements should be used to adjust VRIII. The recommended substrate fluid to be administered alongside a VRIII is 0.9% sodium chloride solution with 5% glucose and 0.15% potassium chloride (KCl) (20 mmol/L) or 0.3% KCl (40 mmol/L) at 50 ml/hr. Both the VRIII and CSII rates should be reduced by at least 50% after delivery.

Reexamining intrapartum glucose control in patients with diabetes and risk of neonatal hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVE

Compare the incidence of hypoglycemia in neonates born to patients with diabetes, based on last maternal glucose before delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort of singleton births from individuals with pregestational and gestational diabetes (GDM) from 2017 to 2019.

RESULTS

We included 853 deliveries. Maternal hyperglycemia before delivery was associated with 1.8-fold greater risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (glucose < 45 mg/dL) in patients with GDM on medication (adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-2.7), compared with euglycemia. This association was not seen in diet-controlled GDM (0.5; 0.23-1.1), nor in Type 1 (1.1; 0.88-1.4), or Type 2 pregestational diabetes (1.1; 0.61-1.9). Further, pregestational diabetes, compared to GDM, regardless of intrapartum maternal glucose control, was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia and NICU admission.

CONCLUSION

Maternal hyperglycemia before delivery only carried a higher risk of neonatal hypoglycemia in those with GDM on medications. Other interventions to reduce neonatal hypoglycemia are needed.

Type 2 diabetes and neonatal hypoglycemia: role of route of delivery and insulin infusion

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rate of neonatal hypoglycemia among newborns delivered by individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in two clinical scenarios: who attempted vaginal delivery vs. had a planned cesarean delivery (CD); who had intrapartum insulin infusion vs. who did not.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with insulin-treated T2DM who had non-anomalous singleton pregnancy and delivered at a single tertiary center (March 2012 and May 2018). Individuals with chronic renal failure, proliferative retinopathy, or major congenital anomalies were excluded. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycemia (blood glucose < 40 mg/dl <24 h of age or < 50 mg/dl >24 h of age). Secondary outcomes included neonatal outcomes. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to examine the association between groups and the primary outcome. Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 233 individuals with T2DM, 215 (92.2%) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 95 (44%) attempted vaginal delivery and 120 (56%) had a planned CD. Individuals who labored had a higher gestational age at delivery (36.6 vs. 35.8 weeks, p = .005), and higher blood glucose levels upon admission (125 vs 103, p < .001) compared to those with a planned CD. After adjustment for potential confounders, there was no difference in risk of neonatal hypoglycemia between the groups (41.2 vs 44.1%, aRR 1.05, 95% CI = 0.75-1.45). Among those who attempted vaginal delivery, 34 (35.8%) required insulin infusion. There was no difference in the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (aRR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.45-1.37) between newborns delivered by individuals who required insulin infusion and those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Over 40% of newborns delivered by individuals with insulin-dependent T2DM had hypoglycemia; however, there was no significant difference in the risk of hypoglycemia, irrespective of the route of delivery and the use of insulin infusion.

Monitoring motherhood: Monitoring and optimizing glycaemia in women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy

Despite recent advances in care, women with diabetes in pregnancy are still at increased risk of multiple pregnancy complications. Offspring exposed to hyperglycaemia in utero also experience long-term health sequelae, affecting neurocognitive and cardiometabolic status. Many of these adverse consequences can be prevented or ameliorated with good medical care, specifically to optimize glycaemic control. The accurate assessment of glycaemia in pregnancy is therefore vital to safeguard the health of mother and child. However, there is no consensus about the best method of monitoring glycaemic control in pregnancy. Short-term changes in insulin dosage and lifestyle, with altered appetite, insulin sensitivity and red cell turnover create difficulties in interpretation of standard laboratory measures such as HbA_1c. The ideal marker would provide short-term feedback on daily or weekly glycaemic control, with additional capability to predict pregnancies at high risk of suboptimal outcomes. Several novel biochemical markers are available which allow assessment of dynamic changes in glycaemia over weeks rather than months. Continuous glucose monitoring devices have advanced in accuracy and provide new opportunities for robust assessment of glycaemia in pregnancy. Recent work from the continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes trial (CONCEPTT) has provided information about the ability of different markers of glycaemia to predict pregnancy outcomes.The aim of this review is to summarize the care for women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy and to highlight the important role of glycaemic monitoring in pregnancy.

Prescribing for pregnancy: managing diabetes

Topics for DTB review articles are selected by DTB's editorial board to provide concise overviews of medicines and other treatments to help patients get the best care. Articles include a summary of key points and a brief overview for patients. Articles may also have a series of multiple choice CME questions.

Maternal and neonatal glycaemic control after antenatal corticosteroid administration in women with diabetes in pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

To describe maternal and neonatal glycaemic control following antenatal corticosteroid administration to women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Design

Retrospective cohort study

Setting

A tertiary hospital in Auckland, New Zealand

Population

Women with diabetes in pregnancy who received antenatal corticosteroids from 2006–2016.

Methods

Corticosteroid administration, maternal and neonatal glycaemia data were retrieved from electronic patient records. Demographic data were downloaded from the hospital database. Relationships between variables were analysed using multivariate analysis.

Main outcome measures

Maternal hyperglycaemia and neonatal hypoglycaemia

Results

Corticosteroids were administered to 647 of 7317 of women with diabetes (8.8%) who gave birth to 715 babies. After an initial course of corticosteroids, 92% and 52% of women had blood glucose concentrations > 7 and > 10 mmol/L respectively. Median peak blood glucose concentration of approximately 10 mmol/L occurred 9 hours after corticosteroid administration and hyperglycaemia lasted approximately 72 hours. Thirty percent of women gave birth within 72 hours of the last dose of corticosteroids. Babies of women who were hyperglycaemic within 24 hours of birth were more likely to develop hypoglycaemia (< 2.6 mmol/L, OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.10–2.07], p = 0.01) and severe hypoglycaemia (≤ 2.0 mmol/L, OR 2.00 [95% CI 1.41–2.85], p < 0.0001) than babies of non-hyperglycaemic mothers. There was no association between maternal glycaemia within 7 days of the last dose of corticosteroids and neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Conclusions

Hyperglycaemia is common in women with diabetes in pregnancy following antenatal corticosteroid administration. Maternal hyperglycaemia in the 24 hours prior to birth is associated with increased risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Limitations included the retrospective study design, so that not all data were available for all women and babies and the glucose testing schedule was variable.

Evaluation of an Intrapartum Insulin Regimen for Women With Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether an insulin protocol for intrapartum glucose control among parturients with diabetes was associated with improved outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of women with pregestational or gestational diabetes delivering a liveborn neonate at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. Before 2011, women with diabetes were given intravenous (IV) insulin or glucose during labor at the discretion of the on-call endocrinologist. In 2011, a standardized protocol was designed to titrate insulin and glucose infusions. Outcomes were compared between two time periods: January 2005-December 2010 (before implementation) and January 2012-December 2017 (after implementation) with 2011 excluded to account for a phase-in period. Maternal outcomes included intrapartum hyperglycemia (blood glucose greater than 125 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 60 mg/dL). Neonatal outcomes included hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 50 mg/dL), intensive care admission, and IV dextrose therapy. t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and χ tests were used for bivariable analyses. Linear and logistic multivariable regression were used to account for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of 3,689 women, 928 (25.2%) delivered before 2011. After protocol implementation, frequencies of both maternal intrapartum hyperglycemia (51.3% vs 37.9%) and hypoglycemia decreased (6.1% vs 2.5%), both P<.001; respective adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.77 and 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.78. The frequency of neonatal hypoglycemia, however, increased (36.6% vs 49.2%, P<.001; aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.45-2.07). Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and need for IV dextrose therapy were similar across time periods.

CONCLUSION

A formal protocol to manage insulin and glucose infusions for parturients with diabetes was associated with improved intrapartum maternal glucose control, but an increased frequency of neonatal hypoglycemia.

ADIPS 2020 guideline for pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy

This is the full version of the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) 2020 guideline for pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy. The guideline encompasses the management of women with pre-existing type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in relation to pregnancy, including preconception, antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum care. The management of women with monogenic diabetes or cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in relation to pregnancy is also discussed.

The association between novel glucose indices in parturients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and clinically significant neonatal hypoglycemia

The aim of this study was to determine the association between glucose control indices of parturient with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), treated with an insulin pump and utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and clinically significant neonatal hypoglycemia. This was a retrospective cohort study which included 37 pregnant women with T1DM. All women were followed at a single tertiary center and had available CGM data. The association between maternal glucose indices before delivery and the risk for neonatal hypoglycemia requiring IV glucose (clinically significant hypoglycemia) was assessed using logistic regression. Mothers to neonates that experienced clinically significant hypoglycemia had a higher glucose standard deviation (SD) before delivery than did mothers to neonates who did not (25.5 ± 13 mg/dL vs. 14.7 ± 6.7 mg/dl respectively; p = .008). This association persisted after adjustment for maternal age, maternal pregestational body mass index (BMI), gestational age at delivery, neonatal birth weight, large for gestational age (LGA) and gender. This study demonstrates an association between high maternal glucose standard deviation before delivery and the risk for clinically significant neonatal hypoglycemia. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and further explore the role of intrapartum glucose variability in the prediction and prevention of significant neonatal hypoglycemia.

Severe neonatal hypoglycaemia and intrapartum glycaemic control in pregnancies complicated by type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes

AIMS

To determine if in-target intrapartum glucose control is associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia in women with type 1, type 2 or gestational diabetes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women with diabetes and their neonates. The primary exposure was in-target glucose control, defined as all capillary glucose values within the range 3.5-6.5 mmol/l during the intrapartum period. The primary outcome, neonatal hypoglycaemia, was defined as treatment with intravenous dextrose therapy. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between maternal intrapartum glycaemic control and neonatal hypoglycaemia, adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

Intrapartum glucose testing was available for 157 (86.3%), 267 (76.3%) and 3256 (52.4%) women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes, respectively. In the univariate analysis, in-target glycaemic control was significantly associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia in women with gestational diabetes, but not in women with type 1 or 2 diabetes. However, after adjustment for important neonatal factors (large for gestational age, preterm delivery and infant sex), intrapartum in-target glycaemic control was not significantly associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia in women regardless of diabetes type [adjusted odds ratios 0.4 (95% CI 0.1, 1.4), 0.7 (95% CI 0.3, 1.3) and 0.7 (95% CI 0.5, 1.0) for women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant association between in-target glycaemic control and neonatal hypoglycaemia after adjustment for neonatal factors. Given the high risk of maternal hypoglycaemia and the resources required, future trials should consider whether more relaxed intrapartum glycaemic targets may be safer and yield similar neonatal outcomes.

Maternal glycaemic control and risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes pregnancy: a secondary analysis of the CONCEPTT trial

AIMS

To examine the relationship between maternal glycaemic control and risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia using conventional and continuous glucose monitoring metrics in the Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT) participants.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of CONCEPTT involving 225 pregnant women and their liveborn infants. Antenatal glycaemia was assessed at 12, 24 and 34 weeks gestation. Intrapartum glycaemia was assessed by continuous glucose monitoring measures 24 hours prior to delivery. The primary outcome was neonatal hypoglycaemia defined as glucose concentration < 2.6 mmol/l and requiring intravenous dextrose.

RESULTS

Neonatal hypoglycaemia occurred in 57/225 (25.3%) infants, 21 (15%) term and 36 (40%) preterm neonates. During the second and third trimesters, mothers of infants with neonatal hypoglycaemia had higher HbA_1c [48 ± 7 (6.6 ± 0.6) vs. 45 ± 7 (6.2 ± 0.6); P = 0.0009 and 50 ± 7 (6.7 ± 0.6) vs. 46 ± 7 (6.3 ± 0.6); P = 0.0001] and lower continuous glucose monitoring time-in-range (46% vs. 53%; P = 0.004 and 60% vs. 66%; P = 0.03). Neonates with hypoglycaemia had higher cord blood C-peptide concentrations [1416 (834, 2757) vs. 662 (417, 1086) pmol/l; P < 0.00001], birthweight > 97.7th centile (63% vs. 34%; P < 0.0001) and skinfold thickness (P ≤ 0.02). Intrapartum continuous glucose monitoring was available for 33 participants, with no differences between mothers of neonates with and without hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Modest increments in continuous glucose monitoring time-in-target (5-7% increase) during the second and third trimesters are associated with reduced risk for neonatal hypoglycaemia. While more intrapartum continuous glucose monitoring data are needed, the higher birthweight and skinfold measures associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia suggest that risk is related to fetal hyperinsulinemia preceding the immediate intrapartum period.

A Feasibility Study of Paired Continuous Glucose Monitoring Intrapartum and in the Newborn in Pregnancies Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes

AIM

To describe the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) profiles of type 1 diabetes (T1D) offspring in the early neonatal period and its association with maternal intrapartum glucose control.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of T1D pregnant women and their neonatal offspring. Women had a CGM sensor inserted 2-3 days before delivery. Infants had a masked CGM sensor inserted as soon as possible after delivery. Maternal glycemic outcomes were time-in-target (70-140 mg/dL [3.9-7.8 mmol/L]), hyperglycemia >140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L), and mean CGM glucose during the 24 h preceding delivery. Neonatal outcomes included lowest recorded blood glucose concentration, and CGM measures (glucose <47 mg/dL [2.6 mmol/L], time-in-target (47-144 mg/dL [2.6-8.0 mmol/L]), glucose standard deviation [SD]) during the first 72 h of life.

RESULTS

Data were available for 16 mother-infant pairs. Mothers had a mean age (SD) 32.3 (4.3) years, T1D duration 17.6 (6.8) years, first antenatal glycated hemoglobin 7.4 (0.8)% (57 [8.5] mmol/mol). In the 24 h preceding delivery, mothers spent mean (SD) 72 (20)% time-in-target (70-140 mg/dL [3.9-7.8 mmol/L]), 19 (15)% time >140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L), and 9 (9)% time <70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) with mean (SD) CGM glucose 113 (9) mg/dL (6.3 [0.7] mmol/L). Fifteen infants (93.8%) had ≥1 blood glucose concentration <47 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L), and five had ≥1 blood glucose concentration <18 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L). The mean infant CGM glucose on days 1, 2, and 3 of life was 63 (14), 67 (13), 76 (11) mg/dL (3.5 [0.8], 3.7 [0.7], and 4.2 [0.6] mmol/L). Four infants (25%) spent >50% time with CGM glucose levels <47 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) on day 1.

CONCLUSIONS

CGM detected widespread neonatal hypoglycemia, even among mothers with good intrapartum glucose control.

Management of Diabetes in the Intrapartum and Postpartum Patient

Achieving maternal euglycemia in women with pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus is critical to decreasing the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia, as maternal blood glucose levels around the time of delivery are directly related to the risk of hypoglycemia in the neonate. Many institutions use continuous insulin and glucose infusions during the intrapartum period, although practices are widely variable. At Northwestern Memorial Hospital, the "Management of the Perinatal Patient with Diabetes" policy and protocol was developed to improve consistency of management while also allowing individualization appropriate for the patient's specific diabetic needs. This protocol introduced standardized algorithms based on maternal insulin requirements to drive real-time maternal glucose control during labor as well as provided guidelines for postpartum glycemic control. This manuscript describes the development and implementation of this protocol to encourage other institutions to adopt a standardized protocol that allows highly individualized intrapartum care to women with diabetes.

Adaptability of Closed Loop During Labor, Delivery, and Postpartum: A Secondary Analysis of Data from Two Randomized Crossover Trials in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy

Tight glucose control during labor and delivery is recommended for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. This can be challenging to achieve using the current treatment modalities. The automated nature of closed loop and its ability to adapt to real-time glucose levels make it well suited for use during labor, delivery, and the immediate postpartum period. We report observational data of participants from two randomized crossover trials who chose to continue using closed loop during labor, delivery, and postpartum. Labor was defined as the 24 h before delivery and postpartum as the 48 h after delivery. The glucose target range during pregnancy was 3.5-7.8 mmol/L (63-140 mg/dL) and 3.9-10 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) after delivery. Twenty-seven (84.4%) of the potential 32 trial participants used closed loop through labor, delivery, and postpartum. Use of closed loop was associated with 82.0% (interquartile range [IQR] 49.3, 93.0) time-in-target range during labor and delivery and a mean glucose of 6.9 ± 1.4 mmol/L (124 ± 25 mg/dL). Closed loop performed well throughout vaginal, elective, and emergency cesarean section deliveries. Postpartum, women spent 83.3% (IQR 75.2, 94.6) time-in-target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]), with a mean glucose of 7.2 ± 1.4 mmol/L (130 ± 25 mg/dL). There was no difference in maternal glucose concentration between mothers of infants with and without neonatal hypoglycemia (6.9 ± 1.6 mmol/L and 6.8 ± 1.1 mmol/L [124 ± 29 mg/dL and 122 ± 20 mg/dL] respectively; P = 0.84). Automated closed-loop insulin delivery is feasible during hospital admissions for labor, delivery, and postpartum. Larger scale studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy compared with current clinical approaches as well as understand how women and healthcare providers will adopt this technology.