A systematic review of outcome reporting for interventions to treat people with diabetic foot ulceration

Dysbiosis and diabetic foot ulcers: A metabolic perspective of Staphylococcus aureus infection

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infection is the most prevalent and resistant bacterial infection, posing a worldwide health risk. Compared with healthy people, diabetes patients with weak immune function and abnormal metabolism are more vulnerable to bacterial infection, which aggravates the intensity of infection and causes a series of common and dangerous complications, such as diabetes foot ulcer (DFU). Due to metabolic abnormalities of diabetic patients, S. aureus on the skin surface of DFU transitions from a commensal to an invasive infection. During this process, S. aureus resists a series of unfavorable conditions for bacterial growth by altering energy utilization and metabolic patterns, and secretes various virulence factors, causing persistent infection. With the emergence of multiple super-resistant bacteria, antibiotic treatment is no longer the only treatment option, and developing new drugs and therapies is urgent. Regulating the metabolic signaling pathway of S. aureus plays a decisive role in regulating its virulence factors and impacts adjuvant therapy for DFU. This article focuses on studying the impact of regulating metabolic signals on the virulence of S. aureus from a metabolism perspective. It provides an outlook on the future direction of the novel development of antimicrobial therapy.

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified.

RESULTS

The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.

Effectiveness of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is critical that interventions used to enhance the healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes are backed by high-quality evidence and cost-effectiveness. In previous years, the systematic review accompanying guidelines published by the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot performed 4-yearly updates of previous searches, including trials of prospective, cross-sectional and case-control design.

AIMS

Due to a need to re-evaluate older studies against newer standards of reporting and assessment of risk of bias, we performed a whole new search from conception, but limiting studies to randomised control trials only.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this systematic review, we searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases for published studies on randomised control trials of interventions to enhance healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers. We only included trials comparing interventions to standard of care. Two independent reviewers selected articles for inclusion and assessed relevant outcomes as well as methodological quality.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 22,250 articles, of which 262 were selected for full text review across 10 categories of interventions. Overall, the certainty of evidence for a majority of wound healing interventions was low or very low, with moderate evidence existing for two interventions (sucrose-octasulfate and leucocyte, platelet and fibrin patch) and low quality evidence for a further four (hyperbaric oxygen, topical oxygen, placental derived products and negative pressure wound therapy). The majority of interventions had insufficient evidence.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the evidence to support any other intervention to enhance wound healing is lacking and further high-quality randomised control trials are encouraged.

Classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Classification and scoring systems can help both clinical management and audit the outcomes of routine care.

AIM

This study aimed to assess published systems used to characterise ulcers in people with diabetes to determine which should be recommended to (a) aid communication between health professionals, (b) predict clinical outcome of individual ulcers, (c) characterise people with infection and/or peripheral arterial disease, and (d) audit to compare outcomes in different populations. This systematic review is part of the process of developing the 2023 guidelines to classify foot ulcers from the International Working Group on Diabetic Foot.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for articles published up to December 2021 which evaluated the association, accuracy or reliability of systems used to classify ulcers in people with diabetes. Published classifications had to have been validated in populations of >80% of people with diabetes and a foot ulcer.

RESULTS

We found 28 systems addressed in 149 studies. Overall, the certainty of the evidence for each classification was low or very low, with 19 (68%) of the classifications being assessed by ≤ 3 studies. The most frequently validated system was the one from Meggitt-Wagner, but the articles validating this system focused mainly on the association between the different grades and amputation. Clinical outcomes were not standardized but included ulcer-free survival, ulcer healing, hospitalisation, limb amputation, mortality, and cost.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations, this systematic review provided sufficient evidence to support recommendations on the use of six particular systems in specific clinical scenarios.

Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Patients with Diabetic Foot and Its Reliability and Validity Test

Objective

To construct a self-reported outcome scale for diabetic foot patients, and to test its reliability and validity.

Methods

Through literature reading and interviews with 30 patients, a pool of scale items was formed. The items were classified and sorted out according to the expected scale structure framework. After two rounds of expert consultation and a small range of test dressing, the initial scale was formed. Through the investigation of 85 patients with diabetic foot, item differentiation analysis, correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to screen the items. Cronbach's α coefficient, retest reliability and content and structure validity analysis were used to determine the feasibility and validity of the scale.

Results

The final scale included 4 first-level items and 22 second-level items. The critical ratio method showed that the scores of each item in the high group and the low group were significantly different (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between each item and the total score was 0.431 to 0.829; The content validity index of the scale was 0.91, the exploratory factor analysis identified three common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 75.381%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.934 and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.926.

Conclusion

The self-reported outcome scale for diabetic foot patients has good reliability and validity, and can be used to investigate the health status of diabetic foot patients and evaluate the therapeutic effect.

A systematic review of reported outcomes in people with lower limb chronic venous insufficiency of the deep veins

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of lower limb chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) of the deep veins is increasing and presents a significant burden to patients and health care services. To improve the evaluation of interventions it is necessary to standardise their reporting. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the outcomes of interventions delivered to people with CVI of the deep veins as part of the development of a novel core outcome set (COS).

METHODS

Following the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) framework for COS development, a systematic review was conducted to PRISMA guidance. The protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD42021236795). MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched from January 2018 to January 2021. Clinical trials and observational studies involving more than 20 participants, reporting outcomes for patients with CVI of the deep veins were eligible. Outcomes were extracted verbatim, condensed into agreed outcome terms and coded into domains using standard COMET taxonomy. Outcome reporting consistency, where outcomes were fully reported throughout the methods and results of their respective articles was also assessed.

RESULTS

Some 103 studies were eligible. There were 1183 verbatim outcomes extracted, spanning 22 domains. No outcome was reported unanimously, with the most widely reported outcome of primary patency featuring in 51 articles (<50%). There was a predominant focus on reporting clinical outcomes (n = 963 [81%]), with treatment durability (n = 278 [23%]) and clinical severity (n = 108 [9%]) reported frequently. Life impact outcomes were relatively under-reported (n = 60 [5%]). Outcome reporting consistency was poor, with just 50% of outcomes reported fully.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome reporting in studies of people with CVI of the deep veins is currently heterogeneous. Life impact outcomes, which likely reflect patients' priorities are under-reported. This study provides the first step in the development of a COS for people with lower limb CVI of the deep veins.

A 12-Week Supervised Exercise Therapy Program for Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Program Development and Preliminary Feasibility

Exercise therapy helps improve glycaemic control and insulin sensitivity and may be relevant in treating patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). This study describes the development of a 12-week exercise therapy program for patients with DFUs and the preliminary feasibility of the program focusing on the program's inclusion, adherence, and safety. The development process is built on knowledge from a published systematic review on exercise for people with DFUs and a grounded theory study on the main concerns of people with DFUs regarding physical activity. The development involved doctors, wound care nurses, podiatrists, and feedback from patients and physical therapists using semi-structured interviews. The program was designed as a combination of aerobic and resistance training exercises. The aerobic exercise phase on the stationary bike of 30-minute duration was aimed at a moderate intensity. Resistance exercises were conducted with a 15-repetition maximum approach (four to five sets per trial) throughout the 12-week period. Three patients were included and received the exercise intervention. Except for recruitment and retention rates, acceptance levels were met for all other research progression criteria. Patients found the intervention relevant, wanted further guidance on continuing exercising, and would have liked the intervention closer to their home for example, a municipality setting. Although the exercise therapy program for patients with DFUs was developed in a thorough process with the inclusion of available evidence and the involvement of patients and other stakeholders conclusions on feasibility are limited due to the low recruitment rate. A reconsideration of the setting is needed in future exercise intervention studies.