Intranasal glucagon for hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients. An old dream is becoming reality?

6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Managing Severe Hypoglycaemia in Patients with Diabetes: Current Challenges and Emerging Therapies

Hypoglycaemia is common in patients with diabetes mellitus and is a limiting factor for achieving adequate glycaemic control. In the vast majority of cases, hypoglycaemia develops due to the imbalance between food intake and insulin injections. As recurrent hypoglycaemia leads to significant morbidity and mortality, the recognition and immediate treatment of hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients is thus important. In the last 20 years, the introduction of improved insulin analogues, insulin pump therapy, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and sensor-augmented pump therapy have all made significant improvements in helping to reduce and prevent hypoglycaemia. In terms of treatment, the American Diabetes Association recommends oral glucose as the first-line treatment option for all conscious patients with hypoglycaemia. The second line of treatment (or first line in unconscious patients) is the use of glucagon. Novel formulations of glucagon include the nasal form, the Gvoke HypoPen which is a ready-to-deliver auto-injector packaged formulation and finally a glucagon analogue, Dasiglucagon. The Dasiglucagon formulation has recently been approved for the treatment of severe hypoglycaemia. It is a ready-to-use, similar to endogenous glucagon and its potency is also the same as native glucagon. It does not require reconstitution before injection and therefore ensures better compliance. Thus, significant improvements including development of newer insulin analogues, insulin pump therapy, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), sensor-augmented pump therapy and novel formulations of glucagon have all contributed to reducing and preventing hypoglycaemia in diabetic individuals. However, considerable challenges remain as not all patients have access to diabetes technologies and to the newer glucagon formulations to help reduce and prevent hypoglycaemia.

Peptide loaded polymeric nanoparticles by non-aqueous nanoprecipitation

It is always a challenge to encapsulate water-soluble peptides in polymer nanoparticle (NP) systems. We establish and validate our newly developed non-aqueous nanoprecipitation method to encapsulate neuro-peptides drugs such as oxytocin and Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) in poly(sebacic anhydride) (PSA) NPs. NPs were prepared by a solvent-antisolvent process under a strict anhydrous environment to obtain high drug loading and to avoid premature PSA degradation and drug release. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) reveal the size for both drug loaded PSA NPs to ∼ 300 nm. The drug loaded NPs were dispersible and spherical in shape with uniform morphology. The in vitro release profile of oxytocin from PSA NPs occurs with the burst release of ∼ 50% within the first hour in the aqueous release medium, whereas LHRH release is comparatively slow. Thus, looking into the fast degrading properties of PSA and drug release behavior, the developed NPs can be used for direct delivery of the neuropeptides to the olfactory epithelium using a refillable nasal atomizer that deposits mist onto the olfactory neuro-epithelium. We also applied our developed method to prepare NPs of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polylactic acid (PLA), and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL). A Thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) was used as the sample neuropeptide drug to validate our non-aqueous method. The results reveal the formation of TRH loaded PLGA, PLA and PCL NPs with 100% drug loading. TEM analysis shows the formation of spherical NPs, having similar release properties as those of PSA NPs. Overall, we report that our developed method is suitable for co-encapsulating hydrophilic drugs in polymer NPs with high drug loading and release properties.

Emergency Glucagon: a Focused Review of Psychosocial Experiences of Rescue Drugs for Type 1 Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this paper is to describe rescue glucagon types, safety, efficacy, and preferences, as well as to review articles regarding emergency glucagon usage, severe hypoglycemia, and the emotions of both phenomena. We conducted a review of current literature on glucagon usage and the emotional impact of severe hypoglycemia on people with diabetes (PwD) and the caregivers of people with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

RECENT FINDINGS

Minimal research exists pertaining to glucagon and severe hypoglycemic experiences in PwD, which is troubling considering the severity of risks and possible side effects. Recent articles described negative emotions such as fear, anxiety, stress, helplessness, shame, embarrassment, loneliness, frustration, hopefulness, and uncertainty surrounding glucagon usage. There is scarce research regarding PwD's emotions surrounding severe hypoglycemia and rescue glucagon use. Additional research is needed to investigate the emotions and feelings people with T1D and their caregivers' experience pertaining to severe hypoglycemia and emergency glucagon use.

Pancreatic alpha cells and glucagon secretion: Novel functions and targets in glucose homeostasis

Diabetes is the result of dysregulation of both insulin and glucagon. Still, insulin has attracted much more attention than glucagon. Glucagon is released from alpha cells in the islets of Langerhans in response to low glucose and certain amino acids. Drugs with the primary aim of targeting glucagon signalling are scarce. However, glucagon is often administered to counteract severe hypoglycaemia, and commonly used diabetes medications such as GLP-1 analogues, sulfonylureas and SGLT2-inhibitors also affect alpha cells. Indeed, there are physiological and developmental similarities between the alpha cell and the insulin-secreting beta cell and new data confirm that alpha cells can be converted into insulin-secreting cells. These aspects and attributes, the need to find novel therapies targeting the alpha cell and more are considered in this review.

Development of a Measure to Assess Attitudes Towards Nasal versus Autoinjector Glucagon Delivery Devices for Treatment of Severe Hypoglycemia

BACKGROUND

For individuals managing diabetes, the administration of glucagon for severe hypoglycemia can be lifesaving, yet, until recently, there were no easy-to-use devices for these stressful emergencies. New products have emerged to meet this need, including nasal glucagon (NG) and auto-injector glucagon (AI). This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a new measure, the Glucagon Device Attitudes Questionnaire (GDAQ), in assessing attitudes toward NG and AI from the perspectives of persons with diabetes on insulin (PWDs), caregivers, and acquaintances.

METHODS

Developed based on qualitative research, the GDAQ consists of 38 rating items for each device and 16 direct-elicitation of attitudes of device relative to each other. It was administered to participants via a cross-sectional online survey. Twenty-six rating items were included in principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Items comprising each factor were averaged to form scales. Additionally, 12 direct elicitation items were averaged to form an overall "Attitudes" scale. Reliability and validity analyses were conducted. Descriptive statistics were provided for the rating items not included in the factor analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 405 PWDs, 313 caregivers, and 305 acquaintances participated. Three factors were identified: "Prepared and Protected" (7 items), "Hesitation" (12 items), and "Device Perceptions by Others" (7 items); factor loadings ranged from 0.13 to 0.92, 0.50 to 0.89, and 0.16 to 0.92, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for the four scales ranged from 0.76 to 0.96. Correlations of the scales with their global item ranged from 0.30 to 0.90. The items outside of the factor analysis showed good distribution in responses and differentiation between the two devices.

DISCUSSION

This study supports the validity and reliability of the GDAQ, which successfully conceptualizes attitudes towards devices for administering glucagon among different respondent groups. Use of the GDAQ can help guide the development and testing of new glucagon drug/device combinations.

Clinically Serious Hypoglycemia Is Rare and Not Associated With Time-in-range in Youth With New-onset Type 1 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Early initiation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is advocated for youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Data to guide CGM use on time-in-range (TIR), hypoglycemia, and the role of partial clinical remission (PCR) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

Our aims were to assess whether 1) an association between increased TIR and hypoglycemia exists, and 2) how time in hypoglycemia varies by PCR status.

METHODS

We analyzed 80 youth who were started on CGM shortly after T1D diagnosis and were followed for up to 1-year post diagnosis. TIR and hypoglycemia rates were determined by CGM data and retrospectively analyzed. PCR was defined as (visit glycated hemoglobin A1c) + (4*units/kg/day) less than 9.

RESULTS

Youth were started on CGM 8.0 (interquartile range, 6.0-13.0) days post diagnosis. Time spent at less than 70 mg/dL remained low despite changes in TIR (highest TIR 74.6 ± 16.7%, 2.4 ± 2.4% hypoglycemia at 1 month post diagnosis; lowest TIR 61.3 ± 20.3%, 2.1 ± 2.7% hypoglycemia at 12 months post diagnosis). No events of severe hypoglycemia occurred. Hypoglycemia was rare and there was minimal difference for PCR vs non-PCR youth (54-70 mg/dL: 1.8% vs 1.2%, P = .04; < 54mg/dL: 0.3% vs 0.3%, P = .55). Approximately 50% of the time spent in hypoglycemia was in the 65 to 70 mg/dL range.

CONCLUSION

As TIR gradually decreased over 12 months post diagnosis, hypoglycemia was limited with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia rates did not vary in a clinically meaningful manner by PCR status. With CGM being started earlier, consideration needs to be given to modifying CGM hypoglycemia education, including alarm settings. These data support a trial in the year post diagnosis to determine alarm thresholds for youth who wear CGM.

An Evaluation of Glucagon Injection Anxiety and Its Association with the Fear of Hypoglycemia among the Parents of Children with Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Hypoglycemia is a common acute complication of type 1 diabetes (T1D), which may cause seizure, loss of consciousness, and temporary motor or sensory impairment. Glucagon administration is an effective way of treating severe hypoglycemia, especially in a free-living setting. Nonetheless, families have difficulties in managing severe hypoglycemia due to their anxiety and challenges with current glucagon administration techniques. The aim of the current study was to explore the associations between parental fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) and their general anxiety level, and in particular, their attitudes towards and thoughts on glucagon administration.

METHODS

Parents of children with T1D completed questionnaires assessing background and clinical information, FoH, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and parental anxiety for glucagon administration (PAGA).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight parents participated. Positive correlations were found between parental GAD-7 score and both FoH and the number of night-time blood glucose measurements and there was a negative correlation with the child’s age. Parents mean self-evaluation score of their competence in glucagon administration was 6 (standard deviation±2.9) on a scale of 0 to 10. Unsurprisingly, this score was negatively correlated with the PAGA scores. There was no significant difference between children using continuous glucose monitoring system and self-monitoring of blood glucose in terms of parental FoH, anxiety and misconceptions about glucagon administration.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that parents of children with T1D had anxiety and fear connected with hypoglycemia and glucagon administration. Structured and practical training should be implemented to increase parents’ self-confidence including annual refresher training for home glucagon administration.

Transmucosal drug administration as an alternative route in palliative and end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a surge in need for alternative routes of administration of drugs for end of life and palliative care, particularly in community settings. Transmucosal routes include intranasal, buccal, sublingual and rectal. They are non-invasive routes for systemic drug delivery with the possibility of self-administration, or administration by family caregivers. In addition, their ability to offer rapid onset of action with reduced first-pass metabolism make them suitable for use in palliative and end-of-life care to provide fast relief of symptoms. This is particularly important in COVID-19, as patients can deteriorate rapidly. Despite the advantages, these routes of administration face challenges including a relatively small surface area for effective drug absorption, small volume of fluid for drug dissolution and the presence of a mucus barrier, thereby limiting the number of drugs that are suitable to be delivered through the transmucosal route. In this review, the merits, challenges and limitations of each of these transmucosal routes are discussed. The goals are to provide insights into using transmucosal drug delivery to bring about the best possible symptom management for patients at the end of life, and to inspire scientists to develop new delivery systems to provide effective symptom management for this group of patients.

Efficacy and Usability of Intranasal Glucagon for the Management of Hypoglycemia in Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Hypoglycemia is a common and sometimes life-threatening adverse event associated with insulin, sulfonylurea, and meglitinide therapies. In patients who are disoriented or unconscious, treatment with injectable glucagon is recommended, along with a call for emergency medical assistance. However, limitations of this formulation include difficulty with reconstitution and an unwillingness to administer an injection. In July 2019, intranasal glucagon was approved for use in the acute treatment of severe hypoglycemia in patients ≥4 years of age with diabetes. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe the efficacy, usability, and tolerability of intranasal glucagon 3 mg in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

To identify studies, the following databases were systematically searched: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane CENTRAL (EBSCO), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, from inception to March 3, 2020. Comparative studies included patients with diabetes and an active comparator. Usability studies enrolled participants who used a device for glucagon administration.

FINDINGS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. In 5 comparative studies in insulin-induced hypoglycemia (intranasal vs injectable glucagon), the criteria for successful treatment varied. In 3 studies, it was defined as an increase in blood glucose of ≥70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) or an increase of ≥20 mg/dL (1.1 mmol/L) within 30 min of glucagon administration. In 1 study, the criteria were stricter, with success defined as an increase in blood glucose of ≥27 mg/dL (≥1.5 mmol/L) within 15 min. In the pediatrics study, success was defined as an increase in blood glucose of ≥25 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) within 20 min. In 2 studies of intranasal glucagon monotherapy in clinical practice, the primary end point was the percentage of patients who awakened or returned to normal status within 30 min of intranasal glucagon administration. In these 7 studies, almost all of the participants met the criteria for success as defined in their respective studies. The mean time to treatment success was between 10 and 20 min with intranasal and injectable glucagon. Nausea and vomiting were common adverse events with both formulations; watery eyes and runny nose occurred more frequently with intranasal glucagon. In 3 simulation studies, caregivers and noncaregivers administered intranasal glucagon within 1 min versus 1.3-5 min with IM glucagon.

IMPLICATIONS

In patients who are disoriented or unconscious, treatment with injectable or ready-to-use intranasal glucagon increases blood glucose within 15-30 min. Intranasal glucagon was preferred by most caregivers and noncaregivers due to its ease of use. Additional studies of intranasal glucagon in younger patients (1-<3 years of age), pregnant women, and in comparison with SC glucagon are needed to further clarify bioavailability, efficacy, and tolerability.

Glucagon-based therapy: Past, present and future

Diabesity and its related cardio-hepato-renal complications are of absolute concern globally. Last decade has witnessed a growing interest in the scientific community in investigating novel pharmaco-therapies employing the pancreatic hormone, glucagon. Canonically, this polypeptide hormone is known for its use in rescue treatment for hypoglycaemic shocks owing to its involvement in the counter-regulatory feedback mechanism. However, substantial studies in the recent past elucidated the pleiotropic effects of glucagon in diabesity and related complications like non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Thus, the dual nature of this peptide has sparked the search for drugs that can modify glucagon signalling to combat hypoglycaemia or diabesity. Thus far, researchers have explored various pharmacological approaches to utilise this peptide in imminent modern therapies. The research endeavours in this segment led to explorations of stable glucagon formulations/analogues, glucagon receptor antagonism, glucagon receptor agonism, and incretin poly-agonism as new strategies for the management of hypoglycaemia or diabesity. This 'three-dimensional' research on glucagon resulted in the discovery of various drug candidates that proficiently modify glucagon signalling. Currently, several emerging glucagon-based therapies are under pre-clinical and clinical development. We sought to summarise the recent progress to comprehend glucagon-mediated pleiotropic effects, provide an overview of drug candidates currently being developed and future perspectives in this research domain.

Nasal Glucagon Versus Injectable Glucagon for Severe Hypoglycemia: A Cost-Offset and Budget Impact Analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs) in patients with diabetes are associated with substantial health care costs in the United States (US). Injectable glucagon (IG) is currently available for treatment of severe hypoglycemia but is associated with frequent handling errors. Nasal glucagon (NG) is a novel, easier-to-use treatment that is more often administered successfully. The economic impact of this usability advantage was explored in cost-offset and budget impact analyses for the US setting.

METHODS

A health economic model was developed to estimate mean costs per SHE for which treatment was attempted using NG or IG, which differed only in the probability of treatment success, based on a published usability study. The budget impact of NG was projected over 2 years for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes treated with basal-bolus insulin (T2D-BB). Epidemiologic and cost data were sourced from the literature and/or fee schedules.

RESULTS

Mean costs were $992 lower if NG was used compared with IG per SHE for which a user attempted treatment. NG was estimated to reduce SHE-related spending by $1.1 million and $230 000 over 2 years in 10 000 patients each with T1D and T2D-BB, respectively. Reduced spending resulted from reduced professional emergency services utilization as successful treatment was more likely with NG.

CONCLUSIONS

The usability advantage of NG over IG was projected to reduce SHE-related treatment costs in the US setting. NG has the potential to improve hypoglycemia emergency care and reduce SHE-related treatment costs.

New uses and formulations of glucagon for hypoglycaemia

Hypoglycaemia is the more frequent complication of insulin therapy and the main barrier to tight glycaemic control. Injectable glucagon and oral intake of carbohydrates are the recommended treatments for severe and non-severe hypoglycaemia episodes, respectively. Nasal glucagon is currently being developed as a ready-to-use device, to simplify severe hypoglycaemia rescue. Stable forms of liquid glucagon could open the field for different approaches for mild to moderate hypoglycaemia treatment, such as mini-doses of glucagon or continuous subcutaneous glucagon infusion as a part of dual-hormone closed-loop systems. Pharmaceutical companies are developing stable forms of native glucagon or glucagon analogues for that purpose.