Outcomes of definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer

Constructing individualized follow-up strategies for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients based on dynamic recurrence risk changes

The aim of this study was to explore the high-risk factors for recurrence in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy (dCRT or dRT). Conditional survival (CS) was used to evaluate the dynamic survival and recurrence risk of patients after treatment, and individualized monitoring strategies were developed for patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent recurrence risk factors. Calibration curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate nomogram models. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival rates in different groups and to calculate CS rate. A total of 677 patients were included. Multivariate logistic analyses demonstrated that chemotherapy cycles, tumor length, body mass index (BMI), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) were independent recurrence risk factors (p < 0.05). Subsequently, we constructed nomogram models to predict recurrence and risk stratification. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that conditional locoregional recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival of patients in different risk groups and clinical stages progressively increased with survival time, whereas local recurrence and distant metastasis annual recurrence rates decreased yearly with increasing survival time. Finally, we developed an individualized follow-up strategy based on CS at different frequencies. Individualized follow-up strategies developed on the basis of CS can better monitor the changes in patients' conditions and contribute to timely salvage treatment and rational allocation of healthcare resources.

Early detection and serial monitoring during chemotherapy-radiation therapy: Using T1 and T2 mapping cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose

To confirm the ability of native T1 and T2 values in detecting and monitoring early myocardial injuries of chest radiotherapy in neoplasm patients.

Materials and methods

Fifteen participants received non-anthracycline chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy, and 30 age/gender-matched controls were enrolled in this prospective study. Cardiac magnetic resonance scans were performed within 2 days, 3 months, and 6 months after chest radiotherapy. Myocardial native T1 and T2 values were measured in irradiated and nonirradiated areas. Meanwhile, the parameters of left ventricular function and left ventricular myocardial strain were obtained.

Results

There were no significant differences in left ventricular function, native T1, T2, and strain between patients and controls before chest radiotherapy. In 15 participants who were followed up for 6 months, there was a significant change only in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) among baseline and the first follow-up (P = 0.021), while the adjusted P-value was higher than 0.05 after Bonferroni correction, as well as other parameters. Native T1 values were elevated at 3 and 6 months in irradiated areas compared with baseline (1,288.72 ± 66.59 ms vs. 1,212.51 ± 45.41 ms; 1,348.01 ± 54.16 ms vs. 1,212.51 ± 45.41 ms; P &lt; 0.001 for both). However, T2 values only changed at 3 months in irradiated areas compared with baseline (44.21 ± 3.35 ms vs. 39.14 ± 1.44 ms; P = 0.006). Neither the native T1 nor T2 values changed in nonirradiated areas during the follow-up period (all P &gt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in strain changes during the follow-up period (all P &gt; 0.05).

Conclusion

Native T1 and T2 values elevated at 3 months after chest radiotherapy, whereas LVEF showed no significant change during the 6-month follow-up.

Effect and safety of anlotinib combined with S-1 for recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer patients who refused or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy

This study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of anlotinib combined with S-1 in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer patients who refused or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy.This study retrospectively reviewed 22 recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer patients who refused or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy between June 1, 2018 and February 28, 2019. All patients did not previously receive anlotinib or S-1.Of 22 patients, 20 patients had squamous cell cancer. Seventeen patients received at least 2 cycles of anlotinib plus S-1. The objective response rate (ORR) was 35.3%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 82.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 5.2 months. In the first-line treatment subgroup, the ORR was 50%, the DCR was 80%, the median PFS was 4.5 months, and the median OS was 5.8 months. In the second-line and above treatment subgroup, the ORR was 14.3%, the DCR was 85.7%, the median PFS was 3.0 months, and the median OS was 3.7 months. The main adverse events (AEs) of anlotinib combined with S-1 were fatigue (58.8%), hypertension (47.1%), hemoptysis (29.4%), anemia (29.4%), nausea (23.5%), liver function damage (23.5%), albuminuria (17.6%), abdominal pain (17.6%), leukopenia (17.6%), neutropenia (11.8%), fever (11.8%), and hand-foot syndrome (11.8%). Grade 3 AEs included nausea (5.9%) and hypertension (5.9%), and no grade 4 or more AEs were reported.Anlotinib combined with S-1 achieved promising disease control and satisfactory survival with tolerable safety in recurrent metastatic esophageal cancer who refused or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy.

Interrogating the immune-modulating roles of radiation therapy for a rational combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in treating pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy (RT) has the potential to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy, such as checkpoint inhibitors, which has dramatically altered the landscape of treatments for many cancers, but not yet for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Our prior studies demonstrated that PD ligand-1 and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) were induced on tumor epithelia of PDACs following neoadjuvant therapy including RT, suggesting RT may prime PDAC for PD-1 blockade antibody (αPD-1) or IDO1 inhibitor (IDO1i) treatments. In this study, we investigated the antitumor efficacy of the combination therapies with radiation and PD-1 blockade or IDO1 inhibition or both.

METHODS

We developed and used a mouse syngeneic orthotopic model of PDAC suitable for hypofractionated RT experiments.

RESULTS

The combination therapy of αPD-1 and RT improved survival. The dual combination of RT/IDO1i and triple combination of RT/αPD-1/IDO1i did not improve survival compared with RT/αPD-1, although all of these combinations offer similar local tumor control. RT/αPD-1 appeared to result in the best systemic interferon-γ response compared with other treatment groups and the highest local expression of immune-activation genes, including Cd28 and Icos.

CONCLUSION

Our RT model allows examining the immune-modulatory effects of RT alone and in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in the pancreas/local microenvironment. This study highlights the importance of choosing the appropriate immune-modulatory agents to be combined with RT to tip the balance toward antitumor adaptive immune responses.

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Trimodality Therapy for Resectable Oesophageal Carcinoma: Meta-analyses and Systematic Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Standard therapy for loco-regionally advanced, resectable oesophageal carcinoma is trimodality therapy (TMT) consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and oesophagectomy. Evidence of survival advantage of TMT over organ-preserving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is inconclusive. The aim of this study is to compare survival between TMT and dCRT.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies on resectable, curatively treated, oesophageal carcinoma patients above 18 years were included. Three online databases were searched for studies comparing TMT with dCRT. Primary outcomes were 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools for RCTs and cohort studies. Quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies described in 35 articles were included in this systematic review, and 33 were included in the meta-analyses. Two-, three- and five-year overall survival was significantly lower in dCRT compared to TMT, with relative risks (RRs) of 0.69 (95% CI 0.57-0.83), 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.92) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.47-0.71), respectively. When only analysing studies with equal patient groups at baseline, no significant differences for 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival were found with RRs of 0.83 (95% CI 0.62-1.10), 0.81 (95% CI 0.57-1.14) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.36-1.12).

CONCLUSION

These meta-analyses do not show clear survival advantage for TMT over dCRT. Only a non-significant trend towards better survival was seen, assuming comparable patient groups at baseline. Non-operative management of oesophageal carcinoma patients might be part of a personalised and tailored treatment approach in future. However, to date hard evidence proving its non-inferiority compared to operative management is lacking.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts lymph node responses to definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Purpose

To evaluate the capability of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) to predict the clinical response of metastatic lymph node (mLN) to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and guide personalized radiation dose in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

Patients and methods

One hundred and forty-three mLNs from 59 patients with ESCC treated with dCRT and who had undergone a pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT scan were included in the study. All defined mLNs were contoured by nuclear medicine radiologists. Response was evaluated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT.

Results

Sixty-nine mLNs showed complete response (CR), and 74 mLNs showed non-complete response. The 143 mLNs were divided into 4 groups (Groups 1–4) based on the quartiles of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax-G1, SUVmax-G2, SUVmax-G3, and SUVmax-G4) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV-G1, MTV-G2, MTV-G3, and MTV-G4). The CR rate of SUVmax-G2 was significantly higher than the other 3 groups. The escalated radiation dose improved the CR rate of lymph nodes in SUVmax-G3 (55 Gy) and SUVmax-G4 (61 Gy). The lowest CR rate was found in MTV-G4 (the group with the largest MTV). The escalated radiation dose (59.7 Gy) improved the CR rate of lymph node in MTV-Groups 3 and 4.

Conclusion

Pretreatment metabolic parameters can predict the response of mLNs to dCRT for patients with ESCC. The parameters could also be used to guide personalized dose to mLNs.