Surgical site infection in skin surgery-An observational study

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) has a significant impact on patients' morbidity and aesthetic results.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for SSI in dermatologic surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-centre, observational study was performed between August 2020 and May 2021. Patients that presented for dermatologic surgery were included and monitored for the occurrence of SSI. For statistical analysis, we used a mixed effects logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Overall, 767 patients with 1272 surgical wounds were included in the analysis. The incidence of SSI was 6.1%. Significant risk factors for wound infection were defect size over 10cm2 (OR 3.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-7.35), surgery of cutaneous malignancy (OR 2.96, CI 1.41-6.24), postoperative bleeding (OR 4.63, CI 1.58-13.53), delayed defect closure by local skin flap (OR 2.67, CI 1.13-6.34) and localisation of surgery to the ear (OR 7.75, CI 2.07-28.99). Wound localisation in the lower extremities showed a trend towards significance (OR 3.16, CI 0.90-11.09). Patient-related factors, such as gender, age, diabetes, or immunosuppression, did not show a statistically significant association with postoperative infection.

CONCLUSION

Large defects, surgery of cutaneous malignancy, postoperative bleeding, and delayed flap closure increase the risk for SSI. High-risk locations are the ears and lower extremities.

Outcomes of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction After Oncologic Resection: 14-Year Experience at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center

BACKGROUND

Outcomes studies for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in the setting of previous oncologic extirpation are lacking. We sought to evaluate long-term outcomes of AWR using acellular dermal matrix (ADM) after extirpative resection, compare them to primary herniorrhaphy, and report the rates and predictors of postoperative complications.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent AWR after oncologic resection from March 2005 to June 2019 at a tertiary cancer center. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence (HR). Secondary outcomes included surgical site occurrences (SSOs), surgical site infection (SSIs), length of hospital stay (LOS), reoperation, and 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

Of 720 consecutive patients who underwent AWR during the study period, 194 (26.9%) underwent AWR following resection of abdominal wall tumors. In adjusted analyses, patients who had AWR after extirpative resection were more likely to have longer LOS (β, 2.57; 95%CI, 1.27 to 3.86, p < 0.001) than those with primary herniorrhaphy, but the risk of HR, SSO, SSI, 30-day readmission, and reoperation did not differ significantly. In the extirpative cohort, obesity (Hazard ratio, 6.48; p = 0.003), and bridged repair (Hazard ratio, 3.50; p = 0.004) were predictors of HR. Radiotherapy (OR, 2.23; p = 0.017) and diabetes mellites (OR, 3.70; p = 0.005) were predictors of SSOs. Defect width (OR, 2.30; p < 0.001) and mesh length (OR, 3.32; p = 0.046) were predictors of SSIs. Concomitant intra-abdominal surgery for active disease was not associated with worse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

AWR with ADM following extirpative resection demonstrated outcomes comparable with primary herniorrhaphy. Preoperative risk assessment and optimization are imperative for improving outcomes.

Procedure-Related Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Dermatologic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Identifying risk factors is essential for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) in dermatologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether specific procedure-related factors are associated with SSI.

METHODS

This systematic review of the literature included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and trial registers. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for risk bias assessment. If suitable, the authors calculated risk factors and performed meta-analysis using random effects models. Otherwise, data were summarized narratively.

RESULTS

Fifteen observational studies assessing 25,928 surgical procedures were included. Seven showed good, 2 fair, and 6 poor study quality. Local flaps (risk ratio [RR] 3.26, 95% confidence intervall [CI] 1.92-5.53) and skin grafting (RR 2.95, 95% CI 1.37-6.34) were associated with higher SSI rates. Simple wound closure had a significantly lower infection risk (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.25-0.46). Second intention healing showed no association with SSI (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.40-8.35). Delayed wound closure may not affect the SSI rate. The risk for infection may increase with the degree of preoperative contamination. There is limited evidence whether excisions >20 mm or surgical drains are linked to SSI.

CONCLUSION

Local flaps, skin grafting, and severely contaminated surgical sites have a higher risk for SSI. Second intention healing and probably delayed wound closure are not associated with postoperative wound infection.

Risk Factors for Infection After Minor Dermatologic Procedures: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

There are limited published data regarding the incidence and risk factors for infection after minor dermatologic procedures, such as skin biopsy, shave, and curettage. Prior studies of infection risk after dermatologic procedures have often not specified the method of preparation of local anesthetic.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence and risk factors for infection after minor procedures performed in a general dermatology clinic using buffered lidocaine prepared in office.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, the medical record was searched for cases of infection after skin biopsies, shaves, conventional excisions, and destructions performed in a general dermatology clinic over a 4-year period. Patient and procedure characteristics were compared with uninfected controls.

RESULTS

Of 9,031 procedures performed during the study period, there were 34 infections (0.4%). The odds of infection for procedures on the arm and leg were 5.29 and 9.28 times higher, respectively, than those on the head/neck. There was no significant effect of age, sex, smoking, immunosuppression, diabetes, or anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of infection is low after minor dermatologic procedures performed with local anesthesia using buffered lidocaine prepared in office. There is a higher risk of infection on the arm and leg compared with the head and neck.

Preferences for Prophylactic Oral Antibiotic Use in Dermatologic Surgery: A Multicenter Discrete Choice Experiment

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are often prescribed after dermatologic surgery for infection prophylaxis, but patient preferences about prophylactic antibiotics are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To understand patient preferences about taking antibiotics to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) relative to antibiotic efficacy and antibiotic-associated adverse drug reactions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multi-center, prospective discrete choice experiment (DCE).

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-eight respondents completed the survey and DCE. 54.8% of respondents preferred to take an antibiotic if it reduced the SSI rate from 5% to 2.5% and if the risk of adverse drug reactions was low (1% risk gastrointestinal upset, 0.5% risk itchy skin rash, 0.01% risk emergency department visit). Even if an antibiotic could eliminate SSI risk (0% risk SSI) and had a low adverse drug reaction profile, 26.7% of respondents prefer not to take prophylactic oral antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Risk-benefit thresholds for taking antibiotics to prevent SSI vary widely. Clinical trials are needed to better characterize the effectiveness and risks of oral antibiotic SSI prophylaxis to guide decision-making. Future studies should also evaluate whether shared decision-making can improve the patient experience.

Preventing and managing complications in dermatologic surgery: Procedural and postsurgical concerns

The second article in this continuing medical education series reviews the evidence regarding the intraoperative and postoperative risks for patients and health care workers. We share the most up-to-date recommendations for risk management and postoperative complication management to ensure optimal surgical efficacy and patient safety.

A Review of the Use of Telemedicine in Dermatologic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine is an emerging field with numerous applications within medicine. Previous review articles describe its use within plastic surgery and otolaryngology but none, to the authors' knowledge, within dermatologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a review of the applications of telemedicine within dermatologic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search of articles published on teledermatology was conducted in July 2018. Articles were selected based on their relevance to dermatologic surgery and reviewed for their discussion of the applications of telemedicine in surgical and cosmetic dermatology.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 156 articles. Eleven ultimately met inclusion criteria: 2 in referral and consultation, 5 in telepathology, 2 in intraoperative uses, and 2 in postprocedural care.

CONCLUSION

For preoperative consultation, teledermatology enables the surgeon to plan ahead and increases access to care by reducing the number of clinic visits. Telepathology has the potential to allow intraoperative consultation with a dermatopathologist to achieve accurate tumor clearance without delay. Smartglasses represent a promising technology for greater care coordination and a teaching tool. Postprocedural monitoring via text messaging provides convenient access to expert advice and early detection of postoperative complications. With increasing technologic advancements, telemedicine holds great potential to augment the dermatologic surgeon's daily practice.

Postoperative complications in dermatological patients undergoing microscopically controlled surgery in inpatient setting (next-day surgery): A single-center epidemiological study

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSI), bleeding, and necrosis are possible complications of dermatological surgery, and their rates are well described for Mohs surgery (same-day surgery). However, there are only limited data on their occurrence in microscopically controlled surgery of the form in which it is practiced in German hospitals (next-day surgery).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patient records of patients hospitalized for microscopically controlled surgery during the year 2017 (12 months) in the Department of Dermatology and Allergology at the University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen (Aachen, Germany). The investigation addressed postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

319 patients underwent 528 dermatosurgical procedures in the defined period. Bleeding and necrosis occurred in 3.8 % (20/528) and 1.7 % (9/528) of the procedures, respectively. SSI occurred in 5.1 % (27/528) of the cases. The occurrence of bleeding was a statistically significant risk factor for SSI (p  =  0.01). Furthermore, bleeding, SSI, and wound closure with a full-thickness graft were statistically significant risk factors for the development of necrosis (p < 0.05). Diabetes or immunosuppression were not found to be statistically significant risk factors for the development of SSI or necrosis after dermatologic surgery (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Complication rates in microscopically controlled surgery (next-day surgery) are generally low and similar to those reported for Mohs surgery (same-day surgery). Therefore, it appears that some evidence-based perioperative recommendations that have been developed for Mohs surgery could be applied to German inpatient dermatosurgery. However, prospective studies with larger patient numbers are required to offer concrete recommendations specifically for microscopically controlled surgery (next-day surgery).

Appearance-related psychosocial distress following facial skin cancer surgery using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer

Over 2 million facial skin cancers occur globally each year. Facial skin cancer surgery can leave scars that may alter appearance and impact psychosocial functioning. The objective of this study is to assess patient-reported appearance-related psychosocial distress following facial skin cancer surgery, and to identify independent predictors of psychosocial impairment. This was a single-center, cross-sectional study at a tertiary care cancer center including patients who underwent dermatologic surgery on the face from March 1, 2016 to March 31, 2018. Patients completed the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Appearance-related Psychosocial Distress scale postoperatively between May 21, 2018 and October 1, 2018. Patient responses were rated on a 4-point Likert scale and converted on a scale from 0 to 100. In total, 359 patients completed the questionnaire (34.2% response rate). Overall, patients reported a low level of psychosocial distress. Patients most frequently reported items of self-consciousness, unhappiness, and insecurity < 3 months following surgery. Though psychosocial distress significantly improved over time, self-consciousness continued to be reported in the long-term postoperative period. Linear regression analysis determined that younger age, history of anxiety and/or depression, surgery on the nose, and repair by flap were independently predictive of psychosocial distress. Marginal predicted values for distress scores based on age demonstrated an indirect relationship. Patient-reported appearance-related psychosocial distress is low following facial skin cancer surgery, and report of distress decreases over time. The identified predictors of distress may be used as indicators for offering psycho-oncologic support and early interventions to improve scar appearance.

Common Dermatologic Procedures

Dermatologists perform a wide variety of procedures on a daily basis. The skin biopsy is a fundamental technique that can be performed by all physicians who manage cutaneous conditions. Specimens should always be sent for pathologic evaluation, regardless of whether the sampled lesion appears benign. Postoperative care and education are critical for minimizing complications.