Clindamycin as unique antibiotic choice in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Improved clinical effectiveness of adalimumab when initiated with clindamycin and rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab monotherapy for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is often insufficient with a maximum clinical efficacy of 60% in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) and limited effect on draining tunnels. Data suggest that adalimumab therapy could be improved by concomitant antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab with clindamycin and rifampicin versus adalimumab monotherapy after 12 weeks.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who started adalimumab with additional clindamycin and rifampicin and patients treated with adalimumab monotherapy, matched on sex and refined Hurley score. The primary outcome measure was the difference in change in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In total, 62 patients were included in the combination therapy group (n = 31) and adalimumab monotherapy group (n = 31), showing comparable IHS4 scores; 32.5 versus 29, p = 0.87 at baseline respectively. The combination therapy demonstrated greater clinical effectiveness expressed in median IHS4 improvement (-20 vs. -9, p < 0.001), IHS4-55 (74% vs. 36%, p = 0.002), median draining tunnel reduction (-4 vs. -2, p < 0.001) and pain response (47% vs. 27%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab initiated with clindamycin and rifampicin shows greater clinical effectiveness than adalimumab monotherapy. An important difference in effect was observed in the decrease of draining tunnels, addressing a serious limitation of adalimumab monotherapy.

Clinical and Ultrasonographic Characterization of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Female Patients: Impact of Early Recognition of the Disease

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is considered a post-pubertal disease; however, earlier onset is not infrequent. The burden of HS on the female population is very relevant, and early identification might reduce the quality of life impairment and improve the therapeutic approach. In this study, we investigated clinical biomarkers of HS that could impact the management of patients affected by HS. Female patients affected by stable HS were prospectively included in this study. Anamnestic data, clinical and ultrasonographic features were collected and analyzed. Overall, 53 patients were included in this study. The median age of onset was 19 (IQR: 14-25). Early onset was reported by 22/53 patients (median age of onset: 14; IQR: 11-16). Four patients had pre-menstruation occurrence. Early-onset patients had an earlier first-menstrual-cycle age and more frequent genital localization of HS, and were more often treated with biologics. Patients with early-onset-HS and genital localization had more severe disease with a higher number of areas affected, Hurley, and IHS4 scores. Genital involvement might be prevalent in patients with early-onset HS, leading to a worse impact on the global severity of the disease and tailored treatment protocols, including multidisciplinary approaches, in order to improve the early recognition of hidden lesions.

Clindamycin Efficacy for Cutibacterium acnes Shoulder Device-Related Infections

Clindamycin is an antibiotic with high bioavailability and appropriate bone diffusion, often proposed as an alternative in guidelines for C. acnes prosthetic joint infections. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of clindamycin in the treatment of C. acnes shoulder implant joint infections (SIJI). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted at the University Hospital of Nice (France) between 2010 and 2019. We included patients with one shoulder implant surgical procedure and at least one C. acnes positive sample. We selected the C. acnes SIJI according to French and international recommendations. The primary endpoint was favorable outcome of C. acnes SIJI treatment after at least 1-year follow-up in the clindamycin group compared to another therapeutic group. Results: Forty-eight SIJI were identified and 33 were treated with clindamycin, among which 25 were treated with monotherapy. The median duration of clindamycin antibiotherapy was 6 weeks. The average follow-up was 45 months; one patient was lost to follow-up. Twenty-seven patients out of 33 (82%) were cured with clindamycin, compared to 9/12 (75%) with other antibiotics. The rate of favorable outcomes increased to 27/31 (87%) with clindamycin and to 9/10 (90%) for other antibiotics when no septic revision strategies were excluded (P = 1.00). Conclusions: The therapeutic strategy based on one- or two-stage revision associated with 6 weeks of clindamycin seems to be effective.

Medical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa with Non-Biologic Therapy: What's New?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a severe chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder of the hair follicle unit that can cause painful abscesses, nodules, tunnels, and tracts in intertriginous parts of the body. The disease can often result in disfigurement and adversely impact patient quality of life. The management of HS has expanded significantly over the past decade to include multiple modalities, including topical therapies, systemic therapies (non-biologics and biologics), surgical therapies, lifestyle changes, and management of comorbidities. Management can often be clinically challenging and may involve the combination of medical and surgical approaches for optimal results. The purpose of this review is to present an update on non-biologic and non-interventional modalities published in 2019-2021 in the clinical management of HS. With emerging therapies, ongoing clinical trials, and heightened awareness about HS, there is hope that new treatment options will revolutionize the management of patients suffering from HS.

Clindamycin Mono-Therapy of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background

A rifampicin (RF)-clindamycin (CL) combination therapy is recommended as the first-line treatment for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although the long-term use of RF requires caution due to the possibility of developing resistant bacteria, only a few studies have investigated alternatives for this combination therapy.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of systemic CL mono-therapy and assess the prevalence and CL resistance of bacterial growth in HS patients.

Methods

A total of 53 HS patients treated with CL mono-therapy were included. The efficacy was evaluated by identifying the rate of HS Clinical Response (Hi-SCR) achievers and comparing HS Physician’s Global Assessment (HS-PGA) before (W0) and after (W8) the treatment. Purulent material from HS skin lesions was collected on the W0. Bacterial flora and antibiotic sensitivity were determined by bacterial cultures.

Results

Of 53 HS patients, 34 were eligible for evaluation of the efficacy of the therapy. Twenty-one patients (61.76%) achieved Hi-SCR. The mean scoring of HS-PGA had significantly decreased from 3.24 to 2.15 (p=0.001). The prevalence of CL resistance was 15.00%. No significant differences in the efficacy of the therapy according to the presence of CL-resistant bacteria on the W0 were observed (p=0.906). Adverse events occurred in 26.42% of patients.

Conclusion

Systemic CL mono-therapy may be a safe and useful alternative to RF-CL combination therapy, and no significant difference in the efficacy of the therapy depending on the presence of CL-resistant bacteria was observed.

Systemic antibiotics in hidradenitis suppurativa: efficacy and effects of body mass index and smoking pack-year on the response to therapy

The combination of oral clindamycin with rifampicin is recommended by European guidelines as a first-line treatment in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Recent studies highlight that oral clindamycin in monotherapy (CM) may be a useful alternative treatment. We included 36 patients with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe HS. A total of 19 patients were treated with combination oral clindamycin plus rifampicin (C + R) and 17 with oral CM for 12 weeks. The efficacy of CM vs C + R was analyzed by multilinear regression models which showed a higher reduction in mSartorius (Δ = -13.2, P = .058) and AISI (Δ = -4.91, P = .034) in the C + R group. In the C + R group, smoking pack-year was positively correlated with AISI (Spearman's rho = 0.51, P = .036) and with DLQI (0.47, P = .061). In the CM group, a positive correlation was found between BMI and AISI (0.47, P = .041). The data on the efficacy of C + R combination therapy are in line with guidelines, evidence-based approaches, and recommendations from the HS ALLIANCE working group. The rationale for combining these two drugs is to increase bactericidal action and to reduce rifampicin resistance, as rifampicin is highly mutagenic. Our results suggest that the antibiotic combination of C + R is still the treatment of choice in moderate-to-severe HS with abscesses, draining fistulae and ≥ 5 inflammatory nodules. High BMI and smoking habits seem to be predictive factors of a poor response to antibiotics. Further multicenter studies and prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results. Potential alternative antibiotic therapies should also be investigated.