A retrospective analysis of the risk factors for allergic reactions induced by the administration of oxaliplatin

Safety Profile of Oxaliplatin in 3,687 Patients With Cancer in China: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

Background

Oxaliplatin (OXA), a third-generation platinum derivative, has become one of the main chemotherapeutic drugs for colorectal cancer and other cancers, but reports of adverse reactions are also increasing with the extensive application of OXA. In this study, post-marketing surveillance was carried out to investigate the safety profile of OXA in a real-world setting in Chinese cancer patients to provide a reference for the rational application of OXA.

Methods

All patients with cancer who received OXA-based chemotherapy in 10 tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province, China, between May 2016 and November 2016 were enrolled. A central registration method was used to document patients' demographics, clinical use, and any incidence of adverse reactions to OXA. All adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were collected and analyzed to assess causality, severity, treatment, and outcome.

Results

In total, 3687 patients were enrolled in this study. Approximately 64.6% of the patients were male, and 68.8% were aged 50-70 years, with a mean age of 55.3 years. The proportions of patients diagnosed with colorectal and gastric cancers were 59.3% and 31.6%, respectively. In this study, the overall incidence of ADRs and serious ADRs was 42.7% and 1.3%, respectively. The most common ADRs were gastrointestinal disorders (25.7%), blood disorders (21.1%), and peripheral nervous system disorders (8.0%). The serious ADRs identified were hypersensitivity reactions, thrombocytopenia, abnormal hepatic function, and leukopenia/neutropenia. The median onset of gastrointestinal toxicity, myelosuppression, peripheral neurotoxicity, and abnormal hepatic function was 1 d, 5 d, 1 d, and 14 d, respectively. The majority (84.7%) of hypersensitivity reactions were mild to moderate, and the median time to onset of these reactions was within the first 20 min of OXA infusion. Almost 88.0% of patients who experienced ADRs recovered or improved with treatment.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that OXA-induced ADRs are very common in Chinese patients with cancer; however, more attention should be paid to hypersensitivity reactions caused by OXA. This study provides a valuable reference regarding the safe application of OXA in a real-world setting.

Meta-analysis of risk factors associated with oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions in cancer patients

This study aimed to investigate risk factors associated with oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions in cancer patients through a meta-analysis. A comprehensive retrieve of Chinese databases China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Database and English databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase and Cochrane library was conducted. The studies that meet the requirements for meta-analysis according to inclusion and exclusion criteria were screened and assessed for eligibility. Odds ratio (OR) / Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) or calculable dichotomous and continuous raw data were extracted to perform meta-analysis using random effect model or fixed effect model on the basis of heterogeneity between studies through Review Manager 5.4 software. A total of 14 cross-sectional studies and 3367 cancer patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that platinum exposure history (OR value 3.13, 95% CI 2.19–4.48, heterogeneity P = 0.26), allergy history (OR value 1.76, 95% CI 1.09–2.85, heterogeneity P = 0.61), platinum free interval (OR value 3.75, 95% CI 2.00–7.06, heterogeneity P = 0.83), dexamethasone premedication dose (OR value 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.58, heterogeneity P = 0.21) were significantly correlated to oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions. Gender, age, metastasis, combination with bevacizumab, XELOX regimen and cancer types were detected to have no statistically significant effect on oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions. Platinum exposure history, allergy history and long platinum-free interval are risk factors of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions. High dexamethasone premedication dose is a protective factor of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity reactions.

Clinical Features of Oxaliplatin-induced Hypersensitivity Reactions in Chinese Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The characteristics of oxaliplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in Chinese patients were investigated to provide a reference for patients treated with oxaliplatin.

METHODS

The study reviewed the records of patients who developed oxaliplatin-induced HSRs in 17 hospitals from May 2016 to May 2017. We collected and analyzed the basic information, history of oxaliplatin administration and premedication treatments, chemotherapy cycles, HSR symptoms, and the management and outcomes of these patients.

RESULTS

Oxaliplatin-induced HSRs were recorded in 137 patients who had been treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens. Five different chemotherapy regimens were applied. The median infusion cycle when oxaliplatin-induced HSRs occurred was 7, and HSRs occurred during or shortly after oxaliplatin infusion. Most of the patients experienced grade 1 or grade 2 HSRs with mild symptoms of pruritis (49.64%), flushing (46.72%), chest discomfort (26.28%), and urticaria (25.55%). The majority of the patients completely recovered from HSRs following treatment with antihistamines and dexamethasone. Seven patients completed chemotherapy with oxaliplatin after the symptoms resolved with proper management.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that oxaliplatin-induced HSRs remain an important issue in safely and successfully fulfilling oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to analyze the risk factors and establish prophylaxis for such reactions.

Platinum Accumulation and Cancer-Related Fatigue, Correlation With IL-8, TNF-α and Hemocytes

Platinum-based chemotherapy drugs cause platinum accumulation and result in cancer-related fatigue (CRF), which is related to immune response through still ambiguous mechanisms. We aimed to explore the correlation between platinum and CRF from the perspective of platinum accumulation. After allowing for complete metabolism of the administered platinum drugs, we collected blood samples from 135 patients who had at least two platinum chemotherapy rounds, correlated the platinum concentration (C-Pt), pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-8 and TNF-α, hematological index with therapeutic effect, adverse reactions and fatigue. The median platinum concentration was higher in patients treated with cisplatin than oxaliplatin (424.0 vs 211.3 μg/L), and the occurrence of fatigue was 64.4% in all subjects. Separately, the incidence and degree of fatigue were 74.1% and 9.5 in the patients with higher platinum concentration compared to 57.1% and 2.0 in the lower group. C-Pt, IL-8 and TNF-α were positively correlated with the degree of CRF, while erythrocyte count and hemoglobin were negatively correlated with the degree of CRF. Mediating effect analysis showed that increased IL-8 concentration mediated 57.4%, while decreased erythrocyte count mediated 24.1% of the C-Pt effect on CRF. Platinum accumulation may involve increasing IL-8, cause inflammation or aggravate anemia, which in combination lead to CRF.

Neglected, Drug-Induced Platinum Accumulation Causes Immune Toxicity

Previous studies only focused on different adverse reactions caused by various platinum drugs, but not on common immunotoxicity caused by the accumulation of elemental platinum. Here, we determined the serum platinum concentrations of cancer patients after a metabolism period of platinum drug chemotherapy, in addition to hematological indices and subsequent immune-related adverse reactions, then analyzed the correlations between platinum accumulation, immune cell levels, and immune-toxicity. We chose the day before the next round of chemotherapy as the specified time point for blood sampling. Samples were collected at five time points, separately in oxaliplatin and cisplatin groups. The median serum platinum concentrations in all patients was 294.8 (205.6, 440.3) μg/L, and was approximately two-fold greater in the cisplatin group than in the oxaliplatin group (429.3 vs. 211.7 μg/L). The platinum level of both groups peaked at the third time point, with the average of females being higher than males (383.9 vs. 266.5 μg/L), and was positively correlated with leukocyte and platelet counts, but negatively correlated with erythrocyte counts and concentration of hemoglobin. The risks of anemia and adverse reactions were individually increased by 0.002- and 0.007-fold for every μg/L increase of platinum concentration. To our knowledge, this is the first study on the relationship between platinum accumulation, immune cell levels and toxicity, showing that drug-induced platinum accumulation may interfere with immune cells and thus increase the risk of toxicity.

Clinical Analysis of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Oxaliplatin Among Colorectal Cancer Patients

This study investigated the characteristics of oxaliplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) and evaluated the efficacy of premedication for controlling HSRs among colorectal cancer patients. A retrospective study was performed on the clinical records of 291 patients with colorectal cancer in The Tenth People’s Hospital of Shanghai from January 2008 to January 2016. Patients who experienced HSRs to oxaliplatin were compared with those who did not. A total of 291 colorectal cancer patients received oxaliplatin, with 39 (13.40%) experiencing HSRs. Oxaliplatin-free interval and premedication with dexamethasone and antihistamine were independent variables for oxaliplatin-related HSRs. Rechallenging patients with premedication was successful in 72.2% of the patients who successfully completed their treatment. Attention should be paid to patients with any prior exposure to oxaliplatin. Patients with grades 1 and 2 HSRs can successfully rechallenge with oxaliplatin and complete their treatment by premedication with dexamethasone and antihistamine.

Comparison between hypersensitivity reactions to cycles of modified FOLFOX6 and XELOX therapies in patients with colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Although hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to oxaliplatin (L-OHP) therapy are well-documented, few reports have compared different therapies in terms of HSR occurrence. In this study, we compared the frequency and pattern of HSRs to modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6; 5-fluorouracil, levofolinate calcium and L-OHP infusions) and XELOX (capecitabine and L-OHP) therapies, and sought to identify risk factors associated with HSRs.

METHODS

Patients who had received mFOLFOX6 or XELOX chemotherapeutic regimens for unresectable colon or rectal cancer or as adjuvant chemotherapy following colon cancer surgery between April 2012 and August 2015 were included. Potential correlation between treatment modalities (regimen, dosage and route of administration of L-OHP, and injection timing for dexamethasone administration) and HSRs was assessed.

RESULTS

Among the 240 patients included in the study, 136 had received mFOLFOX6 therapy and 104 had received XELOX therapy. Although the frequency of HSRs did not differ between the two groups, incidence of HSRs in the first cycle was higher in the XELOX therapy group. Treatment method or cumulative dosage was not identified as a risk factor for HSR; however, the incidence of ≥grade-2 HSR was higher in cases where the cumulative L-OHP dosage was ≥600 mg/m² and in patients in whom dexamethasone was not co-infused with L-OHP.

CONCLUSION

Although HSR rates were comparable among patients treated with mFOLFOX6 and XELOX, HSRs tended to occur more frequently during the first cycle of XELOX therapy as compared to that with mFOLFOX6 therapy. Our findings warrant careful assessment of ≥grade-2 HSRs in patients who are prescribed cumulative L-OHP dosages of ≥600 mg/m².