1
|
Agnew S, Crawford M, MacPherson I, Shiramizu V, Fleming L. The impact of symptom clusters on endocrine therapy adherence in patients with breast cancer. Breast 2024; 75:103731. [PMID: 38599048 PMCID: PMC11017041 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When taken as prescribed, endocrine therapy is effective in reducing risk of recurrence and mortality in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. However, treatment side effects can act as a barrier to medication adherence. Existing research has not identified any specific side effects as consistent predictors of nonadherence. Our aim was to explore the influence of symptom clusters on self-reported adherence in patients with breast cancer. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was conducted, including patients with breast cancer currently or previously prescribed endocrine therapy (N = 1051). This included measures of self-reported endocrine therapy adherence and common symptoms among this population (insomnia, depression, anxiety, fatigue, musculoskeletal, and vasomotor symptoms). RESULTS Unintentional nonadherence was higher than intentional nonadherence (50.8 % vs 31.01 %). The most troublesome symptom was insomnia (73.83 % displayed probable insomnia disorder). K-means cluster analysis identified 2 symptom clusters: overall High symptoms, and overall Low symptoms. Participants in the Low symptoms cluster were significantly more likely to be classed as adherent based on unintentional and intentional items. CONCLUSIONS Nonadherence was high in the current sample, and significantly more likely in participants reporting overall severe symptoms. Clinicians should be aware of the scale of common side effects and facilitate open conversation about potential barriers to adherence. Follow-up care should include assessment of common symptoms and signpost patients to appropriate support or treatment when required. Future research should explore potential for a central symptom to act as a target for intervention, to relieve overall side effect burden and facilitate better medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sommer Agnew
- University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
| | - Megan Crawford
- University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
| | | | - Victor Shiramizu
- University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
| | - Leanne Fleming
- University of Strathclyde, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Green SMC, Smith SG, Collins LM, Strayhorn JC. Decision-making in the multiphase optimization strategy: Applying decision analysis for intervention value efficiency to optimize an information leaflet to promote key antecedents of medication adherence. Transl Behav Med 2024:ibae029. [PMID: 38795061 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) have suggested a new approach, decision analysis for intervention value efficiency (DAIVE), for selecting an optimized intervention based on the results of a factorial optimization trial. The new approach opens possibilities to select optimized interventions based on multiple valued outcomes. We applied DAIVE to identify an optimized information leaflet intended to support eventual adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with breast cancer. We used empirical performance data for five candidate leaflet components on three hypothesized antecedents of adherence: beliefs about the medication, objective knowledge about AET, and satisfaction with medication information. Using data from a 25 factorial trial (n = 1603), we applied the following steps: (i) We used Bayesian factorial analysis of variance to estimate main and interaction effects for the five factors on the three outcomes. (ii) We used posterior distributions for main and interaction effects to estimate expected outcomes for each leaflet version (32 total). (iii) We scaled and combined outcomes using a linear value function with predetermined weights indicating the relative importance of outcomes. (iv) We identified the leaflet that maximized the value function as the optimized leaflet, and we systematically varied outcome weights to explore robustness. The optimized leaflet included two candidate components, side-effects, and patient input, set to their higher levels. Selection was generally robust to weight variations consistent with the initial preferences for three outcomes. DAIVE enables selection of optimized interventions with the best-expected performance on multiple outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M C Green
- Behavioural Oncology Research Group, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Samuel G Smith
- Behavioural Oncology Research Group, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Linda M Collins
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jillian C Strayhorn
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Turja T, Rosenlund M, Kuusisto H. Subjective Rationalities of Nonadherence to Treatment and Vaccination in Healthcare Decision-Making. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:821-826. [PMID: 38623311 PMCID: PMC11017982 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s454661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective In this short report contributing to the literature on treatment and vaccination adherence, nonadherence was examined from the perspective of decision-making (DM) practice in healthcare. The objective of this study was to survey the rationalities given for treatment nonadherence and their association with DM practice. Methods The Ottawa decision Support Framework was used as a theoretical background for the study. Multiple choice and open-text responses indicating nonadherence were drawn from vignette survey data. The results have been analyzed and reported as descriptive statistics and findings of data-driven content analysis. The number of observatory units was 1032 in the within-subject study design. Results DM practice was predominantly associated with nonadherence to vaccination, whereas nonadherence to treatment was consistently associated with attitudinal reasons independent of DM practice. Nonadherence to vaccination was most often rationalized by prior negative experiences in simple DM scenarios. After other DM practices, nonadherence was rationalized by uncertainty and criticism about the benefits of the recommended vaccine. Mistrust toward healthcare providers stood out, first in treatment nonadherence generally and, second, in vaccination nonadherence after simple DM where the final decision was left to the patient. Conclusion In medical DM, adherence to treatment and vaccination may be achieved through a recognition of patients' previous healthcare encounters and potential trust-related concerns, which could pose a risk for nonadherence. To be able to observe these risks, patient engagement and mutual trust should be priorities in decision support in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuuli Turja
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Milla Rosenlund
- Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Hanna Kuusisto
- Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Neurology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rattsev I, Stearns V, Blackford AL, Hertz DL, Smith KL, Rae JM, Taylor CO. Incorporation of emergent symptoms and genetic covariates improves prediction of aromatase inhibitor therapy discontinuation. JAMIA Open 2024; 7:ooae006. [PMID: 38250582 PMCID: PMC10799747 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Early discontinuation is common among breast cancer patients taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Although several predictors have been identified, it is unclear how to simultaneously consider multiple risk factors for an individual. We sought to develop a tool for prediction of AI discontinuation and to explore how predictive value of risk factors changes with time. Materials and Methods Survival machine learning was used to predict time-to-discontinuation of AIs in 181 women who enrolled in a prospective cohort. Models were evaluated via time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), c-index, and integrated Brier score. Feature importance was analysis was conducted via Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and time-dependence of their predictive value was analyzed by time-dependent AUC. Personalized survival curves were constructed for risk communication. Results The best-performing model incorporated genetic risk factors and changes in patient-reported outcomes, achieving mean time-dependent AUC of 0.66, and AUC of 0.72 and 0.67 at 6- and 12-month cutoffs, respectively. The most significant features included variants in ESR1 and emergent symptoms. Predictive value of genetic risk factors was highest in the first year of treatment. Decrease in physical function was the strongest independent predictor at follow-up. Discussion and Conclusion Incorporation of genomic and 3-month follow-up data improved the ability of the models to identify the individuals at risk of AI discontinuation. Genetic risk factors were particularly important for predicting early discontinuers. This study provides insight into the complex nature of AI discontinuation and highlights the importance of incorporating genetic risk factors and emergent symptoms into prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilia Rattsev
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States
| | - Vered Stearns
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States
| | - Daniel L Hertz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
| | - Karen L Smith
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, United States
| | - James M Rae
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States
| | - Casey Overby Taylor
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Okroša AD, Silovski T, Plavetić ND, Silovski H, Kovačić A, Mucalo I. Beliefs about medicines' association with endocrine therapy adherence in early breast cancer survivors in Croatia. ACTA PHARMACEUTICA (ZAGREB, CROATIA) 2023; 73:673-689. [PMID: 38147479 DOI: 10.2478/acph-2023-0043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
This observational, cross-sectional study conducted at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb (UHC Zagreb) aimed to explore patients' beliefs about adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) as well as their association with non-adherence and sociodemographic and clinical factors. Out of 420 early breast cancer (BC) patients included in the study, 79.5 % perceived AET necessary and important for their health, as measured by the Belief About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), with the mean necessity score (20.4 ± 3.68) significantly higher than the mean concerns score (13 ± 4.81) (p < 0.001). Based on the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5), 44.4 % (n = 182) of the participants were non-adherers, out of which 63.2 % (n = 115) were unintentional and 36.8 % (n = 67) intentional non-adherers. Significantly higher concern beliefs were found among patients that were younger (p < 0.001), employed (p < 0.001), intentionally non-adherent to AET (p = 0.006), had a lower body-mass index (p = 0.005) and a higher level of education (p < 0.001), were premenopausal at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), taking tamoxifen treatment (p = 0.05) and receiving ovarian suppression (p < 0.001). Younger patients should be recognized as being at risk of non-adherence as they hold greater concern beliefs about medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Dugonjić Okroša
- 1Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia, Zagreb Croatia
| | - Tajana Silovski
- 2Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- 3University of Zagreb, Medical School Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Natalija Dedić Plavetić
- 2Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- 3University of Zagreb, Medical School Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Hrvoje Silovski
- 3University of Zagreb, Medical School Zagreb, Croatia
- 4Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Kovačić
- 5University of Zagreb Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, Zagreb Croatia
| | - Iva Mucalo
- 6University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Zagreb Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith KL, Tsai HL, Lim D, Wang C, Nunes R, Wilkinson MJ, Sheng JY, Couzi R, Fetting J, Riley C, Wolff AC, Santa-Maria CA, Papathakis K, Collins-Chase L, Hilton C, Thorner E, Montanari A, Ikejiani D, Snyder C, Stearns V. Feasibility of Symptom Monitoring During the First Year of Endocrine Therapy for Early Breast Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Collected via Smartphone App. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:981-989. [PMID: 37733984 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment-associated symptoms drive early discontinuation of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for breast cancer. We hypothesized that symptom monitoring with electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) during adjuvant ET will enhance symptom detection, symptom management, and persistence. METHODS Eligible patients were initiating ET for stage 0-III breast cancer. Participants completed ePRO surveys via smartphone at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Measures included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, and Vaginal Discomfort; plus Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events items assessing joint pain, hot flashes, vaginal dryness, concentration problems, and memory problems. Scores surpassing prespecified thresholds triggered alerts, and recommended symptom management pathways were provided to clinicians. The primary objective was to evaluate feasibility, assessed by survey completion rates, with targets of >65% for the baseline survey and ≥1 follow-up survey during the first 6 months. Secondary objectives included 12-month ET discontinuation rate (target: ≤15%), describing symptoms and evaluating pathway implementation. RESULTS Among 250 participants, 73.2% completed the baseline survey and 69.6% completed ≥1 follow-up survey during the first 6 months. Thirty-one percent of participants had ≥1 symptom alert at baseline and 74% had ≥1 symptom alert during follow-up. The proportions of participants for whom pathway-concordant symptom management was documented at each time point ranged from 12.8% to 36.6%. Twenty-eight participants (11.2%) discontinued ET by 12 months. CONCLUSION Symptom monitoring with ePROs during adjuvant ET is feasible. Despite infrequent documentation of pathway-concordant symptom management after symptom alerts, ePROs were associated with favorable short-term ET persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lisa Smith
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
| | - Hua-Ling Tsai
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
- Division of Statistics Collaborative Inc, WCG, Washington, DC
| | - Chenguang Wang
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY
| | - Raquel Nunes
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
| | - Mary J Wilkinson
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rima Couzi
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - John Fetting
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Carol Riley
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cesar A Santa-Maria
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Katie Papathakis
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Christie Hilton
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Elissa Thorner
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amanda Montanari
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vered Stearns
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Signorelli J, Tran T, Sirek ME, Díaz-Rohena Y, Taraba JL, Muluneh B, Basu N, Lilly J, Darling J. Development of oral oncolytic nonadherence estimator (ORACLE): A pretreatment nonadherence risk assessment for oral oncolytics. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023:10781552231208442. [PMID: 37899586 DOI: 10.1177/10781552231208442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, there is no adherence estimator to identify risk of nonadherence prior to initiating oral oncolytics. METHODS A workgroup was assembled through the National Community Oncology Dispensing Association and tasked with creating a tool to meet this need. Tool constructs were defined after a review of the literature identifying top barriers to adherence. A second literature search was conducted to identify questions targeting specific barriers from validated adherence questionnaires. Once a finalized draft was complete, the risk assessment tool was built into an electronic survey where a risk category can be automatically calculated for the patient. RESULTS The six most impactful factors affecting compliance to oral oncolytics were identified as patient's confidence, health literacy, perception of treatment, quality of life, social support, and complexity of chemotherapy regimen. A six-item questionnaire was created with five patient-directed questions and one clinician-directed question. Examples and descriptions were provided for clinicians to consider when categorizing complexity of a regimen. The tool was designed for responses to each question to be indexed into categories through a 10-point system. Results will be stratified into low, moderate, or high risk for nonadherence. CONCLUSION The creation of a tool to predict nonadherence prior to starting therapy is an unmet need for patients initiating oral oncolytics. The aim of this tool is to meet those needs and better guide clinicians to provide patients with strategies to better manage nonadherence. Next steps include tool validation and piloting in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thuy Tran
- Specialty Pharmacy Services, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | - Yarelis Díaz-Rohena
- NCODA University, National Community Oncology Dispensing Association, Cazenovia, NY, USA
| | - Jodi L Taraba
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Benyam Muluneh
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nayanika Basu
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Breast Care Center, Charlottesville VA, USA
| | - Jennifer Lilly
- Department of Pharmacy, Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fort Wayne, IN, USA
| | - Julianne Darling
- NCODA University, National Community Oncology Dispensing Association, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Green SMC, Hall LH, French DP, Rousseau N, Parbutt C, Walwyn R, Smith SG. Optimization of an Information Leaflet to Influence Medication Beliefs in Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Factorial Experiment. Ann Behav Med 2023; 57:988-1000. [PMID: 37494669 PMCID: PMC10578395 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaad037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is low in women with breast cancer. Negative beliefs about the necessity of AET and high concerns are barriers to adherence. PURPOSE To use the multiphase optimization strategy to optimize the content of an information leaflet intervention, to change AET beliefs. METHODS We conducted an online screening experiment using a 25 factorial design to optimize the leaflet. The leaflet had five components, each with two levels: (i) diagrams about AET mechanisms (on/off); (ii) infographics displaying AET benefits (enhanced/basic); (iii) AET side effects (enhanced/basic); (iv) answers to AET concerns (on/off); (v) breast cancer survivor (patient) input: quotes and photographs (on/off). Healthy adult women (n = 1,604), recruited via a market research company, were randomized to 1 of 32 experimental conditions, which determined the levels of components received. Participants completed the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire before and after viewing the leaflet. RESULTS There was a significant main effect of patient input on beliefs about medication (β = 0.063, p < .001). There was one significant synergistic two-way interaction between diagrams and benefits (β = 0.047, p = .006), and one antagonistic two-way interaction between diagrams and side effects (β = -0.029, p = .093). There was a synergistic three-way interaction between diagrams, concerns, and patient input (β = 0.029, p = .085), and an antagonistic four-way interaction between diagrams, benefits, side effects, and concerns (β = -0.038, p = .024). In a stepped approach, we screened in four components and screened out the side effects component. CONCLUSIONS The optimized leaflet did not contain enhanced AET side effect information. Factorial experiments are efficient and effective for refining the content of information leaflet interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M C Green
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise H Hall
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- Medicines Management and Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Walwyn
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Samuel G Smith
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ivory J, Wheeler SB, Drier S, Gunn H, Zahrieh D, Paskett E, Naughton M, Wills R, Swetel K, Chow S, Reeder-Hayes K. Randomized phase III trial evaluating motivational interviewing and text interventions to optimize adherence to breast cancer endocrine therapy (Alliance A191901): the GETSET protocol. Trials 2023; 24:664. [PMID: 37828596 PMCID: PMC10568920 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07672-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer is the most common type of breast cancer in the USA but has excellent long-term outcomes in recent decades, in part due to effective oral endocrine therapy (ET). ET medications are typically prescribed for 5 to 10 years, depending on the risk of recurrence, and must be taken daily. One limiting factor to ET efficacy is nonadherence, with high-risk groups for nonadherence including younger women and Black women. METHODS The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A191901 is an ongoing, four-arm (text message reminder (TMR), motivational interviewing (MI), TMR plus MI, or enhanced usual care) randomized clinical trial that tests the efficacy and effect of two interventions (TMR and/or MI) on improved ET adherence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and resource use requirements among HR + breast cancer survivors. Participants are randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the four arms. With an assumed loss to follow-up of approximately 11%, we plan to recruit 1180 participants. Randomization is stratified based on age and race to ensure balance between the arms, and we oversample younger and Black women, with each group representing 30% of the study population. Participants randomized to an intervention will actively participate in the intervention for 9 months, and all participants will be followed for adherence data and PRO endpoints, through the use of the Pillsy cap medication event monitoring system and Alliance ePRO survey app (i.e., Patient Cloud). The primary analysis will compare Pillsy-measured ET adherence among study arms at 12 months. DISCUSSION This multisite study will not only define strategies to improve adherence to breast cancer oral therapies, but it will also potentially support strategies in large cooperative research groups that can increase delivery and tolerability of ET, involve diverse patient populations in clinical research, and engage patients effectively in interventional studies, using remote and cost-effective delivery methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04379570 . Registered on 7 May 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joannie Ivory
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- , Chapel Hill, USA.
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- , Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Sarah Drier
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- , Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Heather Gunn
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- , Rochester, USA
| | - David Zahrieh
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- , Rochester, USA
| | | | | | - Rachel Wills
- University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- , Chicago, USA
| | - Kayla Swetel
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- , Columbus, USA
| | - Selina Chow
- , Chicago, USA
- Alliance Operations Office, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang S, Park SW, Bae SJ, Ahn SG, Jeong J, Park K. Investigation of Factors Affecting Adherence to Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:309-333. [PMID: 37272247 PMCID: PMC10475712 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adherence and persistence to adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) are seldom maintained among early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) survivors, despite the significant clinical benefits of long-term AHT. As the factors influencing adherence to AHT remain unclear, this study aimed to comprehensively identify such factors and classify them into specific dimensions. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for qualified articles. The search mainly focused on three components: early-stage (0-III) BC, oral AHT administration, and adherence to AHT, with keywords derived from MeSH and entry terms. The factors identified were then classified into six categories based on a modified WHO multidimensional model. RESULTS Overall, 146 studies were included; the median sample size was 651 (range, 31-40,009), and the mean age of the population was 61.5 years (standard deviation, 8.3 years). Patient- and therapy-related factors were the most frequently investigated factors. Necessity/concern beliefs and self-efficacy among patient-related factors were consistently related to better adherence than depression. Although drug side effects and medication use cannot be modified easily, a refined prescription strategy for the initiation and switching of AHT is likely to increase adherence levels. CONCLUSION An effective psychological program that encourages positive views and beliefs about medication and management strategies for each therapy may be necessary to improve adherence to AHT. Social support and a sense of belonging can be enhanced through community participation and social media for better adherence to AHT. Patient-centered communication and appropriate recommendations by physicians may be attributable to better adherence outcomes. Findings from systematically organized factors that influence adherence to AHT may contribute to the establishment of intervention strategies to benefit patients with early-stage BC to achieve optimal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongwoo Yang
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Won Park
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soong June Bae
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Gwe Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyounghoon Park
- HERINGS, The Institute of Advanced Clinical & Biomedical Research, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Park SK, Min YH. Fear of cancer recurrence in South Korean survivors of breast cancer who have received adjuvant endocrine therapy: a cross-sectional study. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1170077. [PMID: 37575431 PMCID: PMC10414191 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1170077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most-prevalent psychological problems among cancer survivors, and younger females who have received endocrine therapy are particularly at risk of high FCR. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between high FCR and factors related to it in South Korean patients with breast cancer who receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 326 patients with breast cancer who had received AET. All participants were asked to complete a personal information sheet, the short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire, and the Menopause Rating Scale. The factors associated with high FCR were analyzed using association-rule analysis. Results The mean FCR score was 32.24 (SD = 10.22), and 137 of the 326 (42.0%) patients had high scores (≥34). Hot flushes and sweating (moderate to extremely severe), depressed mood (moderate to extremely severe), irritability (moderate to extremely severe), invasive stage, taking tamoxifen, and being married were associated with high FCR. Conclusion Since FCR was common in patients with breast cancer who received AET, patients at a greater risk of experiencing FCR must be screened and supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seul Ki Park
- Department of Nursing, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yul Ha Min
- College of Nursing, Kangwon National University, Kangwon-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marston MT, Berben L, Dobbels F, Russell CL, de Geest S. Prevalence and Patient-Level Correlates of Intentional Non-Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication After Heart-Transplantation-Findings From the International BRIGHT Study. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11308. [PMID: 37492859 PMCID: PMC10363605 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
After heart transplantation (HTx), non-adherence to immunosuppressants (IS) is associated with poor outcomes; however, intentional non-adherence (INA) is poorly understood regarding its international variability in prevalence, contributing factors and impact on outcomes. We investigated (1) the prevalence and international variability of INA, (2) patient-level correlates of INA, and (3) relation of INA with clinical outcomes. Secondary analysis of data from the BRIGHT study-an international multi-center, cross-sectional survey examining multi-level factors of adherence in 1,397 adult HTx recipients. INA during the implementation phase, i.e., drug holiday and dose alteration, was measured using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale© (BAASIS©). Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed with data retrieved through patient interview, patient self-report and in clinical records. INA prevalence was 3.3% (n = 46/1,397)-drug holidays: 1.7% (n = 24); dose alteration: 1.4% (n = 20); both: 0.1% (n = 2). University-level education (OR = 2.46, CI = 1.04-5.83), insurance not covering IS costs (OR = 2.21, CI = 1.01-4.87) and barriers (OR = 4.90, CI = 2.73-8.80) were significantly associated with INA; however, clinical outcomes were not. Compared to other single-center studies, this sample's INA prevalence was low. More than accessibility or financial concerns, our analyses identified patient-level barriers as INA drivers. Addressing patients' IS-related barriers, should decrease INA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T. Marston
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Children’s Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lut Berben
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Children’s Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Fabienne Dobbels
- Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cynthia L. Russell
- School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States
| | - Sabina de Geest
- Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Uhelski ACR, Blackford AL, Sheng JY, Snyder C, Lehman J, Visvanathan K, Lim D, Stearns V, Smith KL. Factors associated with weight gain in pre- and post-menopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01408-y. [PMID: 37261654 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01408-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Weight gain after breast cancer poses health risks. We aimed to identify factors associated with weight gain during adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). METHODS Women initiating AET enrolled in a prospective cohort. Participants completed FACT-ES plus PROMIS pain interference, depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance and physical function measures at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Treatment-emergent symptoms were defined as changes in scores in the direction indicative of worsening symptoms that exceeded the minimal important difference at 3 and/or 6 months compared to baseline. We used logistic regression to evaluate associations of clinicodemographic features and treatment-emergent symptoms with clinically significant weight gain over 60 months (defined as ≥ 5% compared to baseline) in pre- and post-menopausal participants. RESULTS Of 309 participants, 99 (32%) were pre-menopausal. The 60 months cumulative incidence of clinically significant weight gain was greater in pre- than post-menopausal participants (67% vs 43%, p < 0.001). Among pre-menopausal participants, treatment-emergent pain interference (OR 2.49), aromatase inhibitor receipt (OR 2.8), mastectomy, (OR 2.06) and White race (OR 7.13) were associated with weight gain. Among post-menopausal participants, treatment-emergent endocrine symptoms (OR 2.86), higher stage (OR 2.25) and White race (OR 2.29) were associated with weight gain while treatment-emergent physical function decline (OR 0.30) was associated with lower likelihood of weight gain. CONCLUSIONS Weight gain during AET is common, especially for pre-menopausal women. Clinicodemographic features and early treatment-emergent symptoms may identify at risk individuals. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Patients at risk for weight gain can be identified early during AET. CLINICAL TRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01937052, registered September 3, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Carson Rimer Uhelski
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Lehman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Statistics, Collaborative Inc., WCG, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Under Armour Breast Health Innovation Center, The Skip Viragh Outpatient Cancer, Building 201 North Broadway Viragh 10th floor, Room 10291, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Karen Lisa Smith
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wreyford L, Gururajan R, Zhou X. When can cancer patient treatment nonadherence be considered intentional or unintentional? A scoping review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282180. [PMID: 37134109 PMCID: PMC10155980 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment nonadherence in cancer patients remains high with most interventions having had limited success. Most studies omit the multi-factorial aspects of treatment adherence and refer to medication adherence. The behaviour is rarely defined as intentional or unintentional. AIM The aim of this Scoping Review is to increase understanding of modifiable factors in treatment nonadherence through the relationships that physicians have with their patients. This knowledge can help define when treatment nonadherence is intentional or unintentional and can assist in predicting cancer patients at risk of nonadherence and in intervention design. The scoping review provides the basis for method triangulation in two subsequent qualitative studies: 1. Sentiment analysis of online cancer support groups in relation to treatment nonadherence; 2. A qualitative validation survey to refute / or validate claims from this scoping review. Thereafter, framework development for a future (cancer patient) online peer support intervention. METHODS A Scoping Review was performed to identify peer reviewed studies that concern treatment / medication nonadherence in cancer patients-published between 2000 to 2021 (and partial 2022). The review was registered in the Prospero database CRD42020210340 and follows the PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Searches. The principles of meta-ethnography are used in a synthesis of qualitative findings that preserve the context of primary data. An aim of meta-ethnography is to identify common and refuted themes across studies. This is not a mixed methods study, but due to a limited qualitativevidence base and to broaden findings, the qualitative elements (author interpretations) found within relevant quantitative studies have been included. RESULTS Of 7510 articles identified, 240 full texts were reviewed with 35 included. These comprise 15 qualitative and 20 quantitative studies. One major theme, that embraces 6 sub themes has emerged: 'Physician factors can influence patient factors in treatment nonadherence'. The six (6) subthemes are: 1. Suboptimal Communication; 2. The concept of Information differs between Patient and Physician; 3.Inadequate time. 4. The need for Treatment Concordance is vague or missing from concepts; 5. The importance of Trust in the physician / patient relationship is understated in papers; 6. Treatment concordance as a concept is rarely defined and largely missing from studies. LINE OF ARGUMENT WAS DRAWN Treatment (or medication) nonadherence that is intentional or unintentional is often attributed to patient factors-with far less attention to the potential influence of physician communication factors. The differentation between intentional or unintentional nonadherence is missing from most qualitative and quantitative studies. The holistic inter-dimensional / multi-factorial concept of 'treatment adherence' receives scant attention. The main focus is on medication adherence / nonadherence in the singular context. Nonadherence that is unintentional is not necessarily passive behaviour and may overlap with intentional nonadherence. The absence of treatment concordance is a barrier to treatment adherence and is rarely articulated or defined in studies. CONCLUSION This review demonstrates how cancer patient treatment nonadherence is often a shared outcome. An equal focus on physican and patient factors can increase understanding of the two main types of nonadherence (intentional or unintentional). This differentation should help improve the fundamentals of intervention design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Wreyford
- University of Southern Queensland (USQ), Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
| | - Raj Gururajan
- University of Southern Queensland (USQ), Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
| | - Xujuan Zhou
- University of Southern Queensland (USQ), Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Meattini I, de Oliveira Franco R, Salvestrini V, Hijal T. Special issue. De-escalation of loco-regional treatment in breast cancer: Time to find the balance? Partial breast irradiation. Breast 2023; 69:401-409. [PMID: 37116401 PMCID: PMC10163674 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Over the past few decades, remarkable progress has been made in understanding the biology and pathology of breast cancer. A personalized conservative approach has been currently adopted addressing the patient's individual risk of relapse. After postoperative whole breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer, a rate of recurrences outside the initial tumour bed lower than 4% was observed. Thus, the highest benefits of breast irradiation seem to result from the dose delivered to the tissue neighbouring the tumour bed. Nonetheless, reducing treatment morbidity while maintaining radiation therapy's ability to decrease local recurrences is an important challenge in treating patients with radiation therapy. In this regard, strategies such as partial-breast irradiation have been developed to reduce toxicity without compromising oncologic outcomes. According to the national and international published guidelines, clinical oncologists can refer to specific dose/fractionation schedules and eligible criteria. However, there are still some areas of open questions. Breast cancer represents a multidisciplinary paradigm; it should be considered a heterogeneous disease where a "one-treatment-fits-all" approach cannot be considered an appropriate option. This is a wide overview on the main partial breast irradiation advantages, risks, timings, techniques, and available recommendations. We aim to provide practical findings to support clinical decision-making, exploring future perspectives, towards a balance for optimisation of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| | - Rejane de Oliveira Franco
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Tarek Hijal
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Green SM, Hall LH, Rousseau N, French DP, Graham CD, Collinson M, Mason E, Wilkes H, Howdon D, Foy R, Walwyn R, Clark J, Parbutt C, Raine E, Ellison R, Buxton J, Moore SJL, Velikova G, Farrin A, Smith SG. Acceptability, fidelity and trial experience of four intervention components to support medication adherence in women with breast cancer: A process evaluation protocol for a pilot fractional factorial trial. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:3. [PMID: 37881449 PMCID: PMC10593334 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13337.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background The Refining and Optimising a behavioural intervention to Support Endocrine Therapy Adherence (ROSETA) programme has developed four intervention components aiming to improve medication adherence in women with early-stage breast cancer. These are (a) text messages, (b) information leaflet, (c) Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based guided self-help (ACT), (d) side-effect management website. Guided by the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy, our pilot trial will use a fractional factorial design to evaluate the feasibility of undertaking a larger optimisation trial. The pilot will include a process evaluation to maximise learning regarding the fidelity and acceptability of the intervention components before proceeding with a larger trial. The trial process evaluation has three aims: to assess the (1) fidelity and (2) acceptability of the intervention components; and (3) to understand participant's trial experience, and barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention. Methods The process evaluation will use multiple methods. Fidelity of the intervention components will be assessed using self-reported questionnaire data, trial data on intervention component adherence, and observations of the ACT sessions. Acceptability of the intervention components and trial experience will be explored using an acceptability questionnaire and interviews with patients and trial therapists. Trial experience will be assessed using a questionnaire and interviews with participants, while barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention will be assessed using a questionnaire completed by research nurses and participant interviews. The pilot trial opened for recruitment on 20th May 2022 and was open at the time of submission. Conclusions This process evaluation will provide information regarding whether the intervention components can be delivered with fidelity within a national healthcare setting and are acceptable to participants. We will also better understand participant experience in a pilot trial with a fractional factorial design, and any barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention. Registration ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN10487576, 16/12/2021).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M.C. Green
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Louise H. Hall
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - David P. French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | | | - Michelle Collinson
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Ellen Mason
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Hollie Wilkes
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Daniel Howdon
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Rebecca Walwyn
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Jane Clark
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- Medicines Management and Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Erin Raine
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Rachel Ellison
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | | | | | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| | - Samuel G. Smith
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS29NL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Roberson PNE, Tasman J, Cortez G, Lenger KA, Lloyd J. I am feeling stressed, are you?: Breast cancer patients and caregivers' inter-psychophysiological symptoms during the first year of breast cancer treatment. J Psychosom Res 2023; 168:111213. [PMID: 36947922 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Breast cancer treatment can be a stressful time for both the patient and their caregiver. Both patients and caregivers can experience increases psychophysiological distress (e.g., pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, depressive symptoms, perceived health); however, it is not clear how psychophysiological distress before treatment is linked to distress during the first year of treatment both interpersonally and intrapersonally. METHODS The present study recruited 54 patient-caregiver dyads during diagnosis before breast cancer treatment started. Both patients and caregivers complete self-reported surveys at baseline (before treatment), then 6-weeks, 6-months, and 12-months after the start of treatment. Specifically, we examine trajectories of psychophysiological change using Actor-Partner Interdependence Models (APIMs) Growth Curve Models and clinically specific times of psychophysiological influence using APIM path analyses. RESULTS Results indicate that patient and caregiver psychophysiological distress before treatment is linked to psychophysiological distress during the first year of treatment both intrapersonally and interpersonally but somewhat differently depending on the symptom. For example, for perceived health there are no interpersonal effects and for fatigue caregivers appear to experience the majority of psychophysiological distress effects. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that medical practitioners could evaluate patients and their caregivers for psychophysiological distress prior to breast cancer treatment and consider referrals to therapy or psychoeducation to help with symptom management throughout the first year of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jordan Tasman
- The University of Tennessee, College of Nursing, United States of America
| | - Gina Cortez
- The University of Tennessee, College of Nursing, United States of America
| | - Kathrine A Lenger
- The University of Tennessee, College of Nursing, United States of America
| | - Jillian Lloyd
- The University of Tennessee, College of Nursing, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Smith SG, Green SMC, Ellison R, Foy R, Graham CD, Mason E, French DP, Hall LH, Wilkes H, McNaught E, Raine E, Walwyn R, Howdon D, Clark J, Rousseau N, Buxton J, Moore SJL, Parbutt C, Velikova G, Farrin A, Collinson M. Refining and optimising a behavioural intervention to support endocrine therapy adherence (ROSETA) in UK women with breast cancer: protocol for a pilot fractional factorial trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069971. [PMID: 36737093 PMCID: PMC9900066 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with breast cancer who do not adhere to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) have increased risks of mortality and recurrence. There are multiple barriers to AET adherence, including medication side-effects, beliefs about medication, memory and psychological distress. We developed four intervention components, each targeting a different barrier. This pilot trial is part of the preparation phase of the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy, and aims to establish key trial parameters, establish intervention component adherence, establish availability and feasibility of outcome and process data, estimate variability in planned outcome measures and estimate cost of developing and delivering each intervention component. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The four intervention components are as follows: short message service text reminders (target: memory); a written information leaflet (target: medication beliefs); a guided self-help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy programme (target: psychological flexibility to reduce distress) and a self-management website (target: side-effect management). To evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of the intervention components and the availability of outcome data, we will conduct a multisite, exploratory pilot trial using a 24-1 fractional factorial design, with a nested process evaluation. We will randomise 80 women with early-stage breast cancer who have been prescribed AET to one of eight experimental conditions. This will determine the combination of intervention components they receive, ranging from zero to four, with all conditions receiving usual care. Key outcomes of interest include medication adherence and quality of life. Progression to the optimisation phase will be based on predefined criteria for consent rates, patient adherence to intervention components and availability of medication adherence data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was reviewed by the Wales Research Authority Research Ethics Committee 3 (21/WA/0322). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before randomisation. The results of this trial will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRTCN10487576.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G Smith
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sophie M C Green
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachel Ellison
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Ellen Mason
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David P French
- School of Psychological Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise H Hall
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hollie Wilkes
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Emma McNaught
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Erin Raine
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Walwyn
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel Howdon
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jane Clark
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Surgical, Diagnostic and Devices Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jacqueline Buxton
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally J L Moore
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- Medicines Management and Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michelle Collinson
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rosso R, D’Alonzo M, Bounous VE, Actis S, Cipullo I, Salerno E, Biglia N. Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1461-1472. [PMID: 36826073 PMCID: PMC9955792 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces breast cancer recurrence and mortality of women with hormone-receptor-positive tumors, but poor adherence remains a significant problem. The aim of this study was to analyze AET side effects and their impact on adherence to treatment. METHODS A total of 373 breast cancer patients treated with AET filled out a specific questionnaire during their follow up visits at the Breast Unit of our Centre. RESULTS Side effects were reported by 81% of patients, 84% of those taking tamoxifen and 80% of those taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The most common side effect in the tamoxifen group was hot flashes (55.6%), while in the AI group it was arthralgia (60.6%). The addition of GnRH agonists to both tamoxifen and AI significantly worsened all menopausal symptoms. Overall, 12% of patients definitively discontinued AET due to side effects, 6.4% during the first 5 years and 24% during extended therapy. Patients who had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy reported a significantly lower discontinuation rate. CONCLUSIONS AET side effects represent a significant problem in breast cancer survivors leading to irregular assumption and discontinuation of therapy. Adherence to AET may be improved by trustful patient-physician communication and a good-quality care network.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cabling ML, Drago F, Turner J, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Sheppard VB. Revisiting agency and medical health technology: actor network theory and breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on an adherence tool. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY 2022; 12:1071-1084. [PMID: 36406185 PMCID: PMC9660207 DOI: 10.1007/s12553-022-00707-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Optimal treatment adherence is critical in the management of breast cancer patients/survivors taking hormonal therapy. However, lack of adherence is common. Many technologies have been developed to encourage medication intake, such as reminders on phones or digital pills, with varying degrees of success. Methods To explore the role of technology in medical adherence requires a framework that considers all complexities of technology, from software to the end user’s beliefs. Actor Network Theory (ANT) defines technology based on its technical, social, and abstract components. We conducted three focus groups, which we analyzed using a thematic analysis to determine topics in breast cancer survivors’ discussions of these technologies. We also conducted a deductive content analysis using ANT concepts as codes. Results In discussing the use of technology to improve medical adherence, participants had an empowering view of technology (48.8%) a neutral one (41.5%) or a disempowering view (9.8%). When it comes to their medication adherence, breast cancer survivors taking hormonal therapy perceived technology as something on which they could assert agency while their own agency dictated their adherence behaviors. Conclusions In line with a non-technologically deterministic view of medical technologies, this finding shows that technology can be both constraining and enabling, depending on the specific context of human use. This networked understanding of technology in terms of social dynamics has relevant implications in designing interventions that use technology to improve adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark L. Cabling
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Ste. 4100, 20007 Washington DC, USA
| | - Fabrizio Drago
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
| | - Jeanine Turner
- Communication, Culture & Technology Program, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Georgetown University Car Barn, Suite 311, 3520 Prospect Street, Washington DC , N.W. 20057 USA
| | - Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Ste. 4100, 20007 Washington DC, USA
| | - Vanessa B. Sheppard
- Massey Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 College Street, Box 980037, Richmond, VA 23298-0037 USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Janssen AM, Dam J, Prins J, Buffart LM, de Bruin M. Systematic adaptation of the adherence improving self-management strategy to support breast cancer survivors' adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy: An intervention mapping approach. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13721. [PMID: 36263723 PMCID: PMC9787620 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for breast cancer leads to increased recurrence and mortality risk and healthcare costs. Evidence on feasible, effective AET adherence interventions is scarce. This paper describes the systematic adaptation of the cost-effective adherence improving self-management strategy (AIMS) for patients with HIV to AET for women after breast cancer treatment. METHODS We followed the intervention mapping protocol for adapting interventions by conducting a needs assessment, reviewing target behaviours and determinants, reassessing behaviour change methods and adapting programme content. Therefore, we performed a literature review, consulted behavioural theory and organised nine advisory board meetings with patients and healthcare professionals. RESULTS Non-adherence occurs frequently among AET users. Compared to HIV treatment, AET is less effective, and AET side effects are more burdensome. This drives AET treatment discontinuation. However, the key determinants of non-adherence are largely similar to HIV treatment (e.g. motivation, self-regulation and patient-provider relationship); therefore, most strategies in AIMS-HIV also seem suitable for AIMS-AET. Modifications were required, however, regarding supporting patients with coping with side effects and sustaining treatment motivation. CONCLUSION AIMS seems to be a suitable framework for adherence self-management across conditions and treatments. Intervention mapping offered a transparent, systematic approach to adapting AIMS-HIV to AET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M. Janssen
- Department of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Joëlle Dam
- Department of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Judith Prins
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Laurien M. Buffart
- Department of Physiology, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Marijn de Bruin
- Department of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health SciencesRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Walsh EA, Chabria R, Vranceanu AM, Park ER, Post K, Peppercorn J, Temel JS, Greer JA, Jacobs JM. Understanding pain related to adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer: A qualitative report. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13723. [PMID: 36196499 PMCID: PMC9701169 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Most patients report pain while taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for the treatment of breast cancer. While studies have examined patients' experiences with side effects, none solely capture patients' experiences with AET-related pain, a troubling symptom that reduces quality of life and impairs treatment adherence. This study explored themes of AET-related pain to inform future intervention development. METHODS Between November 2017 and November 2018, female patients (n = 30) with early-stage breast cancer enrolled between 3 and 36 months post-initiation of AET. Purposeful sampling was stratified by adherence level, age, distress level and time taking AET. Study staff conducted, transcribed and coded semi-structured interviews via inductive thematic coding to identify pain-related themes and achieved high inter-coded reliability (Kappa = 0.96). RESULTS Several pain-related themes were observed. Attitudes around pain are generally negative, and management needs are largely unmet. Patients reported preferences for non-pharmacological management strategies and cited AET pain as a reason for medication breaks but not discontinuation. Patients within 19 months of starting AET and low adherers reported more intense and disruptive pain. CONCLUSIONS Patients' experiences varied by patient attributes and revealed modifiable factors that may be targeted through behavioural interventions. AET-related pain is a complex side effect for which psychosocial support may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elyse R. Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer S. Temel
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph A. Greer
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jamie M. Jacobs
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
McGuinness S, Hughes L, Moss‐Morris R, Hunter M, Norton S, Moon Z. Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among White British and ethnic minority breast cancer survivors in the United Kingdom. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13722. [PMID: 36255032 PMCID: PMC9787781 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Around half of women do not take adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) as prescribed. Research suggests that adherence rates vary across ethnic groups. This study compared AET adherences rates in White British women and women from minority ethnic groups in the United Kingdom. METHODS This is an observational study with 2001 breast cancer survivors recruited from outpatient clinics. Eligible women were diagnosed with primary breast cancer and prescribed AET within the last 3 years. Adherence was measured using the Medication Adherence Rating Scale. Eligible women were asked to complete a questionnaire pack that collected sociodemographic data such as age, relationship status and ethnicity. Independent samples t tests and χ2 tests were used to compare White British women and women from minority ethnic groups on self-reported adherence to AET. RESULTS Of White British women, 27.8% were classed as non-adherent, compared to 44.4% of women from minority ethnic groups. A logistic regression controlling for relevant demographics indicated that women from minority ethnic groups had a significantly higher risk of non-adherence than women who were White British (odds ratio = 1.50, p = 0.03) CONCLUSION: Rates of non-adherence to AET are higher in women from minority ethnic groups, which may contribute towards racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Research with larger and more diverse samples is needed to explore this further and to investigate the psychosocial factors driving differences in adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena McGuinness
- Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative CareKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Lyndsay Hughes
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London, Guy's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Rona Moss‐Morris
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London, Guy's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Myra Hunter
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London, Guy's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Sam Norton
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London, Guy's HospitalLondonUK,Centre for Rheumatic DiseasesKing's College London, Weston Education CentreLondonUK
| | - Zoe Moon
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, School of PharmacyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Green SMC, French DP, Graham CD, Hall LH, Rousseau N, Foy R, Clark J, Parbutt C, Raine E, Gardner B, Velikova G, Moore SJL, Buxton J, Smith SG. Supporting adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence in women with breast cancer: the development of a complex behavioural intervention using Intervention Mapping guided by the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1081. [PMID: 36002831 PMCID: PMC9404670 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08243-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence and mortality. However, up to three-quarters of women with breast cancer do not take AET as prescribed. Existing interventions to support adherence to AET have largely been unsuccessful, and have not focused on the most salient barriers to adherence. This paper describes the process of developing four theory-based intervention components to support adherence to AET. Our aim is to provide an exemplar of intervention development using Intervention Mapping (IM) with guidance from the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST). METHODS Iterative development followed the six-stage IM framework with stakeholder involvement. Stage 1 involved a literature review of barriers to adherence and existing interventions, which informed the intervention objectives outlined in Stage 2. Stage 3 identified relevant theoretical considerations and practical strategies for supporting adherence. Stage 4 used information from Stages 1-3 to develop the intervention components. Stages 1-4 informed a conceptual model for the intervention package. Stages 5 and 6 detailed implementation considerations and evaluation plans for the intervention package, respectively. RESULTS The final intervention package comprised four individual intervention components: Short Message Service to encourage habitual behaviours surrounding medication taking; an information leaflet to target unhelpful beliefs about AET; remotely delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based guided self-help to reduce psychological distress; and a website to support self-management of AET side-effects. Considerations for implementation within the NHS, including cost, timing and mode of delivery were outlined, with explanation as to how using MOST can aid this. We detail our plans for the final stage of IM which involve feasibility testing. This involved planning an external exploratory pilot trial using a 24-1 fractional factorial design, and a process evaluation to assess acceptability and fidelity of intervention components. CONCLUSIONS We have described a systematic and logical approach for developing a theoretically informed intervention package to support medication adherence in women with breast cancer using AET. Further research to optimise the intervention package, guided by MOST, has the potential to lead to more effective, efficient and scalable interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M. C. Green
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher D. Graham
- grid.4777.30000 0004 0374 7521Department of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Louise H. Hall
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Jane Clark
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Erin Raine
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Benjamin Gardner
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK ,grid.443984.60000 0000 8813 7132Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally J. L. Moore
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | - Jacqueline Buxton
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| | | | - Samuel G. Smith
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sung S, Min YH, Park SK, Lee SB. Hot flushes and sweating, sleep problems, joint and muscular discomfort, and physical and mental exhaustion in breast cancer survivors during the first 24 months of tamoxifen therapy: a prospective observational study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:844926. [PMID: 35982968 PMCID: PMC9380584 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.844926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to explore symptom trajectories over 24 months for hot flushes and sweating, sleep problems, joint and muscular discomfort, and physical and mental exhaustion experienced by premenopausal women diagnosed with tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. Methods A total of 104 patients participated in the study. The menopausal symptoms were examined using the Menopausal Rating Scale at baseline, 3–6, 12, and 18–24 months after initiating tamoxifen. The changes over four time points were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The chi-square test was used to examine the differences between “no symptom-to-mild” and “moderate-to-extremely severe” 3–6 months after initiating tamoxifen according to the patients’ chemotherapy treatment experiences. Results All menopausal symptoms occurred in > 70% of patients with breast cancer and persisted until 24 months. More than 50% of patients experienced four menopausal symptoms, with at least two at a serious severity level after initiating tamoxifen. Hot flushes and sweating occurred in the highest number of patients, recording high scores. Sleep problems and physical and mental exhaustion exhibited relatively high scores, even before tamoxifen initiation. There were significant changes over four time points in all symptoms. Young patients aged < 40 years experienced more severe sleep problems, and patients who had previously received chemotherapy experienced more severe joint and muscular discomfort. Conclusions This study’s findings may assist in alerting healthcare providers to menopausal symptoms that develop during tamoxifen therapy and the need for early and active intervention to minimize symptom occurrence and distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumi Sung
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yul Ha Min
- College of Nursing, Kangwon National University, Kangwon-do, South Korea
- *Correspondence: Yul Ha Min,
| | - Seul Ki Park
- Department of Nursing, Daejeon University, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Sae Byul Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fleming L, Agnew S, Peddie N, Crawford M, Dixon D, MacPherson I. The impact of medication side effects on adherence and persistence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors: A quantitative systematic review. Breast 2022; 64:63-84. [PMID: 35609380 PMCID: PMC9130570 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hormone Therapy (HT) is recommended for most women with HR-positive primary breast cancer. When taken as intended, HT reduces breast cancer recurrence by 40% and mortality by one-third. The recommended duration of treatment ranges from 5 to 10 years depending on risk of recurrence and the specific HT regimen. However, recent data indicates that rates of HT non-adherence are high and research suggests this may be due to the impact of HT side effects. The contribution of side effects to non-adherence and non-persistence behaviours has rarely been systematically explored, thereby hindering the implementation of targeted intervention strategies. Our aim is to identify, evaluate and summarise the relationship between HT side effects and patterns of adherence and persistence. METHODS Electronic searches were conducted from inception and were completed by September 2021, utilising Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases. Searches included a combination of terms related to breast cancer, adherence, hormone therapy and side effects. RESULTS Sixty-two eligible papers were identified and study quality varied by study type. Most observational and cross-sectional studies were rated good quality, whereas most controlled intervention studies were rated fair quality. Three studies were rated poor quality. The most frequently measured side effects were pain, low mood, hot flashes, insomnia, anxiety, fatigue, weight gain, concentration/memory problems. CONCLUSIONS This review identified a lack of consistency in the measurement of adherence and the definition of persistence across studies. The instruments used to measure side effects also varied significantly. This variation and lack of consistency makes it difficult to evaluate and summarise the role of HT side effects in HT adherence and persistence behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sommer Agnew
- University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola Peddie
- University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Diane Dixon
- University of Aberdeen, Kings College, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
The Mediating Role of Spiritual Health in Adherence to Treatment in Patients with Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm-127820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Adherence to the treatment regimen is among the behaviors, which predict the successful control of the disease and decrease its intensity and negative consequences, which is influenced by several factors. The patient's beliefs and attitudes toward the disease are effective factors in disease management and adherence to treatment, and spiritual health is one of these influential variables. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the mediating role of spiritual health in adherence to treatment in patients with cancer. Methods: In this descriptive correlational study, the participants were 234 Iranian patients with cancer, who were selected through convenience sampling, admitted to the oncology wards of 9 selected teaching hospitals in the northern, southern, eastern, and western provinces of the country, as well as the capital in 2021. The research instruments included the Demographic and Clinical Information Questionnaire, Spiritual Well-Being Scale, and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8. The path analysis was done to determine the factors related to the degree of adherence to treatment, taking into account the mediating role of spiritual health. Results: The mean age of the participants in the study was 47.27 ± 15.36. The mean scores for spiritual health and adherence to treatment were 76.70 ± 13.75 and 6.47 ± 2.1, respectively. A positive and significant relationship was found between spiritual health and adherence to treatment (P-value < 0.05). The variables of marital status, the time of diagnosis, and being a religious person had a direct effect on spiritual health, and the time of diagnosis indirectly affected treatment adherence. Conclusions: According to the results, the level of spiritual health and adherence to the treatment in patients with cancer was moderate. In addition, the variable of diagnostic time affected adherence to treatment indirectly. Besides, in examining the factors affecting spiritual health, the findings indicated the effect of the variables “being religious”, “marital status”, and “the time of diagnosis”. In addition to strengthening spiritual health, it is necessary to highlight the need to follow therapeutic diets in these patients. Therefore, it is suggested to consider a program to meet the patients with cancer spiritual needs along with the physical care program.
Collapse
|
28
|
Cathcart-Rake EJ, Sanft T, Tevaarwerk AJ. Weight gain after breast cancer diagnosis: It's complicated…. Cancer 2022; 128:3152-3154. [PMID: 35781699 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tara Sanft
- Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Optimising patient-initiated follow-up care – A qualitative analysis of women with breast cancer in the UK. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2022; 60:102183. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
30
|
Gori S, Modena A, Foglietta J, Verzè M, Inno A, Casarin A, Russo A, Nicolis F. Adherence to oral hormonal anticancer agents in breast cancer. TUMORI JOURNAL 2022:3008916221096183. [PMID: 35603579 DOI: 10.1177/03008916221096183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
There is an increasing trend towards using oral antitumoral agents in oncological patients. Compared to parenteral therapy, oral treatment offers convenience for both the patient and the healthcare system, with similar efficacy. However, the benefit deriving from oral drugs will be obtained only if patients adhere strictly to the treatment. Medical oncologists must therefore seek to optimize patient adherence. Breast cancer patients, particularly, are often treated with oral hormonal anticancer agents. In this review, we summarized evidence about adherence of breast cancer patients to oral hormonal anticancer agents and the consequences of poor compliance, the barriers to oral treatment and strategies to overcome them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Gori
- Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Modena
- Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Verzè
- Health Direction, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Inno
- Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Casarin
- Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological & Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Nicolis
- Health Direction, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Smith KL, Verma N, Blackford AL, Lehman J, Westbrook K, Lim D, Fetting J, Wolff AC, Jelovac D, Miller RS, Connolly R, Armstrong DK, Nunes R, Visvanathan K, Riley C, Papathakis K, Zafman N, Sheng JY, Snyder C, Stearns V. Association of treatment-emergent symptoms identified by patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant endocrine therapy discontinuation. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:53. [PMID: 35449210 PMCID: PMC9023490 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00414-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Many patients discontinue endocrine therapy for breast cancer due to intolerance. Identification of patients at risk for discontinuation is challenging. The minimal important difference (MID) is the smallest change in a score on a patient-reported outcome (PRO) that is clinically significant. We evaluated the association between treatment-emergent symptoms detected by worsening PRO scores in units equal to the MID with discontinuation. We enrolled females with stage 0-III breast cancer initiating endocrine therapy in a prospective cohort. Participants completed PROs at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Measures included PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, physical function, and sleep disturbance; Endocrine Subscale of the FACT-ES; and MOS-Sexual Problems (MOS-SP). We evaluated associations between continuous PRO scores in units corresponding to MIDs (PROMIS: 4-points; FACT-ES: 5-points; MOS-SP: 8-points) with time to endocrine therapy discontinuation using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 321 participants, 140 (43.6%) initiated tamoxifen and 181 (56.4%) initiated aromatase inhibitor (AI). The cumulative probability of discontinuation was 23% (95% CI 18-27%) at 48 months. For every 5- and 4-point worsening in endocrine symptoms and sleep disturbance respectively, participants were 13 and 14% more likely to discontinue endocrine therapy respectively (endocrine symptoms HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, p = 0.02; sleep disturbance HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29, p = 0.03). AI treatment was associated with greater likelihood of discontinuation than tamoxifen. Treatment-emergent endocrine symptoms and sleep disturbance are associated with endocrine therapy discontinuation. Monitoring for worsening scores meeting or exceeding the MID on PROs may identify patients at risk for discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Lisa Smith
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Neha Verma
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amanda L Blackford
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Lehman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly Westbrook
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David Lim
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Fetting
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniela Jelovac
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert S Miller
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- CancerLinQ, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Roisin Connolly
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Deborah K Armstrong
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Raquel Nunes
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kala Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carol Riley
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Katie Papathakis
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nelli Zafman
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Sheng
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claire Snyder
- Johns Hopkins Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vered Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Women's Malignancies Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Singleton A, Raeside R, Partridge SR, Hayes M, Maka K, Hyun KK, Thiagalingam A, Chow CK, Sherman KA, Elder E, Redfern J. Co-designing a Lifestyle-Focused Text Message Intervention for Women After Breast Cancer Treatment: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e27076. [PMID: 34125072 PMCID: PMC8240797 DOI: 10.2196/27076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally. Recovery from breast cancer treatment can be mentally and physically challenging. SMS text message programs offer a novel way to provide health information and support, but few programs are co-designed with consumer representatives. Objective This study aims to report the procedures and outcomes of a co-design process of a lifestyle-focused SMS text message program to support women’s mental and physical health after breast cancer treatment. Methods We followed an iterative mixed methods two-step process: (1) co-design workshop with consumers and health professionals and researchers to draft text messages and (2) evaluation of message content, which was scored (5-point Likert scale; 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) for ease of understanding, usefulness, and appropriateness, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid score). Additional free-text responses and semistructured interviews were coded into themes. Messages were edited or deleted based on the evaluations, with consumers’ evaluations prioritized. Results In step 1, co-designed text messages (N=189) were semipersonalized, and the main content themes were (1) physical activity and healthy eating, (2) medications and side effects, (3) mental health, and (4) general breast cancer information. In step 2, consumers (n=14) and health professionals and researchers (n=14) provided 870 reviews of 189 messages and found that most messages were easy to understand (799/870, 91.8%), useful (746/870, 85.7%), and appropriate (732/870, 84.1%). However, consumers rated 50 messages differently from health professionals and researchers. On the basis of evaluations, 37.6% (71/189) of messages were deleted, 36.5% (69/189) were edited, and 12 new messages related to fatigue, self-care, and cognition were created. The final 130 text messages had a mean 7.12 (SD 2.8) Flesch-Kincaid grade level and 68.9 (SD 15.5) ease-of-reading score, which represents standard reading ease. Conclusions Co-designing and evaluating a bank of evidence-based mental and physical health-themed text messages with breast cancer survivors, health professionals, and researchers was feasible and resulted in a bank of 130 text messages evaluated highly by participants. Some consumer evaluations differed from health professionals and researchers, supporting the importance of co-design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Singleton
- Consumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebecca Raeside
- Consumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephanie R Partridge
- Consumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Molly Hayes
- Consumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katherine Maka
- Department of Physiotherapy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karice K Hyun
- Consumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aravinda Thiagalingam
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Clara K Chow
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kerry A Sherman
- Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Elder
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Julie Redfern
- Consumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Research Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kim E, Jang SH, Andersen MR, Standish LJ. "I Made All Decisions Myself": Breast Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Receivers and Decliners. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2021; 8:322-329. [PMID: 33850966 PMCID: PMC8030591 DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon-211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Many women with breast cancer refuse adjuvant treatments. How they arrive at their respective decisions and whether they are passively or actively involved in making decisions is less known. We explored the different decision-making behaviors of women who received treatments (receivers) after being diagnosed with breast cancer and those who refused (decliners). Methods: Seven women (four receivers and three decliners) were recruited from the Breast Cancer Integrative Oncology Study. We conducted an inductive content analysis based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions. Results: Receivers reported that doctors and family members influenced their decision-making. Decliners perceived their doctors as supportive of their decisions and reported that the experience of adjuvant therapy of family and friends, the results of Oncotest, and concerns about side effects influenced their decision-making. Receivers expressed discomfort about their decisions, relied on books, whereas decliners used various sources to find information. Both receivers and decliners believed that they had made the decisions themselves. However, receivers were somewhat negative about doctors' advice. Receivers also reported that, sometimes, the decision-making process was lacking and reported discomfort with the treatment process. Conclusions: Women with breast cancer need support in understanding the care they are prescribed and getting essential care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunjung Kim
- Department of Family and Child Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Sou Hyun Jang
- Department of Sociology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - M Robyn Andersen
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Translational Sciences Program, Seattle, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Salvestrini V, Mariotti M, Banini M, Becherini C, Visani L, Scotti V, Desideri I, Livi L, Meattini I. Is there a worthwhile value in personalizing radiation therapy for breast cancer patients? Time for a new paradigm in the older adult population. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2021.1897463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Mariotti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Banini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Vieri Scotti
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit – Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Saiful Bahri A, Tuan Mahmood TM, Abdul-Aziz SA, Makmor-Bakry M, Mohamed Shah N. Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Among Post-Menopausal Breast Cancer Patients in Malaysia. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:227-235. [PMID: 33568899 PMCID: PMC7868301 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s293029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Globally, breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women, and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is part of its treatment modality, which improves patients' outcome. However, there are concerns on side effects related to its use, which may affect treatment adherence. PURPOSE This study was conducted to explore attitude and practice on using AET among breast cancer patients in Malaysia. PATIENTS AND METHODS Postmenopausal breast cancer patients on at least 3 months of AET attending the outpatient oncology clinic at a tertiary care hospital were interviewed. Patients underwent in-depth interviews exploring their attitude and practices while on AET using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS There were four main themes for attitude toward the use of AET: 1) benefits of using AET, 2) concerns on taking AET, 3) beliefs on alternative treatment, and 4) beliefs toward the doctor. For practice, six themes were obtained: 1) correct use of AET, 2) appointment adherence, 3) information-seeking behavior, 4) counseling services obtained, 5) experienced side effects of AET, and 6) usage of complementary and alternative medicines. CONCLUSION Several themes concerning attitude and practice of breast cancer patients receiving AET were identified, which may be addressed during treatment consultations in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athirah Saiful Bahri
- Centre of Quality Management of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Tuan Mazlelaa Tuan Mahmood
- Centre of Quality Management of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Siti Azdiah Abdul-Aziz
- Centre of Quality Management of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Makmor-Bakry
- Centre of Quality Management of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Noraida Mohamed Shah
- Centre of Quality Management of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Correspondence: Noraida Mohamed Shah Centre of Quality Management of Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, MalaysiaTel +60 3 9289 8038 Email
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Potentially Modifiable Factors Associated with Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:cancers13010107. [PMID: 33561076 PMCID: PMC7794693 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces risk of breast cancer recurrence. However, suboptimal adherence and persistence to AET remain important clinical issues. Understanding factors associated with adherence may help inform efforts to improve use of AET as prescribed. The present systematic review examined potentially modifiable factors associated with adherence to AET in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42019124200). All studies were included, whether factors were significantly associated with adherence or results were null. This review also accounted for the frequency with which a potentially modifiable factor was examined and whether univariate or multivariate models were used. This review also examined whether methodological or sample characteristics were associated with the likelihood of a factor being associated with AET adherence. A total of 68 articles were included. Potentially modifiable factors were grouped into six categories: side effects, attitudes toward AET, psychological factors, healthcare provider-related factors, sociocultural factors, and general/quality of life factors. Side effects were less likely to be associated with adherence in studies with retrospective or cross-sectional than prospective designs. Self-efficacy (psychological factor) and positive decisional balance (attitude toward AET) were the only potentially modifiable factors examined ≥10 times and associated with adherence or persistence ≥75% of the time in both univariate and multivariate models. Self-efficacy and decisional balance (i.e., weight of pros vs. cons) were the potentially modifiable factors most consistently associated with adherence, and hence may be worth focusing on as targets for interventions to improve AET adherence among breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
37
|
Yusufov M, Nathan M, Wiley A, Russell J, Partridge A, Joffe H. Predictors of increased risk for early treatment non-adherence to oral anti-estrogen therapies in early-stage breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 185:53-62. [PMID: 32918659 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05920-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-adherence to the oral anti-estrogen therapies (AET) tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is associated with numerous negative clinical outcomes. Prior studies have identified that non-adherence is associated with psychological and menopause-related factors which are present during AET, but the presence of these characteristics prior to AET initiation has not been investigated. METHODS Psychological and menopause symptoms (depression, generalized anxiety, insomnia, somatosensory amplification, hot flash frequency, and hot flash-related interference) were assessed pre-AET initiation as predictors of subsequent non-adherence in 73 participants (Mage = 55.0, SD = 10.1 years). Participants self-reported treatment adherence after three and 6 weeks on AET. Participants who did not initiate treatment were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS Discriminant function analyses revealed that the hypothesized set of psychological and menopause symptoms at baseline (pre-AET) together statistically distinguished between those who were non-adherent (n = 19; 26.0%) from adherent (n = 54; 74.0%) at 6 weeks. Model classification accuracy was statistically significant (Wilks' ƛ = 0.782, χ2(6) = 15.50, p = 0.017) at the 6-week timepoint. Results were consistent at 3 weeks. Pre-AET psychological and menopause symptoms correctly classified 6-week treatment adherence 77.9% of the time. Depression contributed most to distinguishing between adherers and non-adherers. CONCLUSIONS The presence of a composite profile of psychological and menopause symptoms prior to AET initiation may help to identify early treatment non-adherence. Results can be used to identify patients at risk for non-adherence and to guide psychological and symptom management interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miryam Yusufov
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology & Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Thorn 1111, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Margo Nathan
- Women's Hormones and Aging Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Thorn 1111, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Aleta Wiley
- Women's Hormones and Aging Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Julia Russell
- Women's Hormones and Aging Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ann Partridge
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Hadine Joffe
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology & Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Women's Hormones and Aging Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Thorn 1111, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sutton AL, Salgado TM, He J, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Sheppard VB. Sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial, and healthcare-related factors associated with beliefs about adjuvant endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:4147-4154. [PMID: 31897782 PMCID: PMC7329595 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05247-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces the risk of recurrence and mortality in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, adherence to AET remains suboptimal. Women's beliefs about medication have been associated with medication adherence. The purpose of this study was to identify multilevel factors associated with women's beliefs about AET. METHODS Beliefs about AET, measured using the Belief about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), sociodemographic (e.g., age), psychosocial (e.g., religiosity), and healthcare factors (e.g., patient-provider communication), were collected via survey. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Two stepwise regression analyses models were performed to assess relationships between variables and necessity and concern beliefs. RESULTS In our sample of 572 women, mean BMQ concern score was 11.19 and mean necessity score was 13.85 (range 5-20). In the regression models, higher ratings of patient-provider communication were associated with lower concern and higher necessity beliefs. Higher concern beliefs were related to more AET-related symptoms (Β = 0.08; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.10; p < 0.001), lower patient satisfaction (Β = - 0.07; 95% CI - 0.09 to - 0.04; p < 0.001), and higher religiosity (Β = 0.05; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.08; p = 0.007). Higher necessity beliefs were associated with prior chemotherapy use (Β = 0.11; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.16; p < 0.005) and less education (Β = 1.00; 95% CI 0.27 to 1.73; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Modifiable factors are related to women's AET beliefs. Healthcare interactions may play a key role with regard to shaping women's beliefs about their AET medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth, University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 980149, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
| | - Teresa M Salgado
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth, University School of Pharmacy, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jun He
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth, University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 980149, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA
- Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Huiskes VJB, van den Ende CHM, van Dijk L, Burger DM, van den Bemt BJF. Association between healthcare practitioners' beliefs about statins and patients' beliefs and adherence. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 87:1082-1088. [PMID: 32652589 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Adherence to statins ranges from 32% to 79%. Patients' beliefs about medication are associated with adherence. There is lack of insight into the possible association between beliefs of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) about statins and patients' beliefs and adherence. This study aims to examine whether HCPs' beliefs about statins are associated with patients' beliefs and adherence about/to statins. METHODS Cross-sectional study in 48 pharmacies and affiliated physicians' practices between 3 September 2014 and 20 March 2015. HCPs' (prescribers and pharmacy staff) and patients' beliefs about statins were assessed with the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) specific. Adherence to statins was assessed with the MARS-5 questionnaire. Multilevel regression analysis was performed to assess the association between HCPs' beliefs and patients' beliefs and adherence. RESULTS 1504 patients (mean age 66.8 [s.d. ± 9.9] years, 46.5% female) and 734 HCPs (209 physicians, 118 pharmacists and 366 pharmacy technicians) participated in this study. Patients have higher BMQ necessity (16.9 [s.d. ± 4.3]) and BMQ concern (12.3 [s.d. ± 3.9]) scores than HCPs (15.0 [s.d. ± 3.0] and 11.5 [s.d. ± 2.9], P < 0.001). No associations were found between any of the HCPs' BMQ and patients' BMQ scores and adherence to statins. Patients' BMQ necessity, concern and necessity-concerns (NC)-differential scores were associated with patients' adherence (MARS-5) scores. B (95% CI) coefficients were 0.057 (0.035-0.079), -0.040 (-0.064 to -0.016) and.061 (0.043-0.079). CONCLUSIONS Patients have stronger beliefs about medication compared to HCPs. No associations were found between HCPs' BMQ scores on the one hand and patients' BMQ scores and adherence to statins on the other hand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Liset van Dijk
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology & -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David M Burger
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bartholomeus J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Desideri I, Salvestrini V, Livi L. Recent advances in de-intensification of radiotherapy in elderly cancer patients. F1000Res 2020; 9. [PMID: 32518630 PMCID: PMC7255897 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.21151.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer in the elderly remains an evolving issue and a health challenge. Several improvements in the radiotherapy field allow the delivery of higher doses/fractions with a safe toxicity profile, permitting the reduction of radiation treatment protocols in the elderly. Regarding breast, prostate, and lung cancer, the under-representation of older patients in clinical trials limits the extension of treatment recommendations to elderly patients in routine clinical practice. Among the feasible alternatives to standard whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) in older patients are shorter courses using higher hypofractionation (HF) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The boost continues to be used in women at high risk of local recurrence but is less widely accepted for women at lower risk and patients over 70 years of age. Regarding prostate cancer, there are no published studies with a focus on the elderly. Current management decisions are based on life expectancy and geriatric assessment. Regimens of HF and ultra-HF protocols are feasible strategies for older patients. Several prospective non-randomized studies have documented the safe delivery of ultra-HF for patients with localized prostate cancer, and multiple phase III trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that the HF regimen should be offered with similar acute toxicity regardless of patient age and comorbidity. A recent pooled analysis from two randomized trials comparing surgery to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in older adult patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer did show comparable outcomes between surgery and SBRT. Elderly cancer patients are significantly under-represented in all clinical trials. Thus, the inclusion of older patients in clinical studies should be strongly encouraged to strengthen the evidence base for this age group. We suggest that the creation of oncogeriatric coordination units may promote individualized care protocols, avoid overtreatment with aggressive and unrecommended therapies, and support de-escalating treatment in elderly cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences Biochemistry, Radiotherapy Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences Biochemistry, Radiotherapy Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences Biochemistry, Radiotherapy Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Radiation and/or endocrine therapy? Recurrence and survival outcomes in women over 70 with early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 182:411-420. [PMID: 32441018 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05691-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women over 70 with early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery are typically offered adjuvant endocrine and radiation therapy. Prior studies have supported the omission of adjuvant radiation in this low-risk population. We sought to compare the effect of adjuvant treatment with endocrine therapy alone, radiation therapy alone or both versus no adjuvant treatment on local control and survival in this population. METHODS Data were extracted on 1363 breast cancer patients over the age of 70 treated with a breast-conserving surgery from 2003 until 2018. 460 patients met inclusion criteria of pT1N0, invasive disease with negative margins and not treated with chemotherapy. The primary outcome of this population-based study was local recurrence-free survival at 5 and 10 years. RESULTS Patients receiving no adjuvant therapy had worse local recurrence-free, loco-regional recurrence-free and disease-free survival than patients receiving at least one form of adjuvant therapy (p < 0.05). 5-year local recurrence rates were 0.8% in patients receiving both endocrine and radiation therapy, 1.5% in those receiving radiation alone, 4.2% in those receiving endocrine therapy alone and 12% in those receiving no adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the benefit of some form of adjuvant therapy (radiation alone, endocrine therapy alone or both) in low-risk breast cancer patients over 70. Receiving no adjuvant therapy is associated with poorer outcomes. Many of these patients are candidates for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation which can be completed in less than a week. These patients should be offered radiation therapy, endocrine therapy or both.
Collapse
|
43
|
Xu H, Jin F, Zhang XJ, Wang DQ, Yu SF, Wang AP. Adherence status to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Chinese Women with Early Breast Cancer and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional survey. Cancer Med 2020; 9:3703-3713. [PMID: 32237070 PMCID: PMC7286448 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Despite the proven benefits of adjuvant endocrine therapy, adherence to oral endocrine therapy in breast cancer treatment is a substantial problem. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy by women in China for the first 5 years, and to identify its influencing factors. Methods Stratified sampling method was adopted to select 1875 cases of breast cancer patients for cross‐sectional telephone follow‐up. Compliance to medications was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Status of endocrine therapy was assessed using nine additional questions. Binomial regression was used when assessing the factors associated with persistence, multinomial regression models were used to assess factors associated with compliance. Results Of 888 patients who started adjuvant endocrine therapy, 769(86.6%) persisted and 119 (13.4%) discontinued. 760 patients who completed Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, the compliance was 7.4% low, 42% medium, and 50.6% high. The type of medication, duration of medication and side effects had an impact both on persistence and compliance. Age, history of radiotherapy and caregivers only had an impact on persistence. Conclusions Medication adherence was affected by many factors. Special attention and interventions should be given to women taking tamoxifen in the 2nd to 3rd year of medication, and aromatase inhibitors in the 1st to 2nd year. Further prospective design studies are needed to explore effective measures to improve medication adherence of women with breast cancer treated by endocrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Xu
- Cancer hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Insititute, Shenyang, China.,The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Feng Jin
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiu-Jie Zhang
- The First affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Da-Qiu Wang
- Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China
| | - Shao-Fen Yu
- Cancer hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Insititute, Shenyang, China
| | - Ai-Ping Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Spencer JC, Reeve BB, Troester MA, Wheeler SB. Factors Associated with Endocrine Therapy Non-Adherence in Breast Cancer Survivors. Psychooncology 2020; 29:647-654. [PMID: 32048400 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer, long-term endocrine therapy (ET) can greatly reduce the risk of recurrence, yet adherence is low- particularly among traditionally underserved populations. METHODS The Carolina Breast Cancer Study oversampled Black and young women (<50 years of age). Participants answered an ET-specific medication adherence questionnaire assessing reasons for non-adherence. We used principal factor analysis to identify latent factors describing ET non-adherence. We then performed multivariable regression to determine clinical and demographic characteristics associated with each ET non-adherence factor. RESULTS 1,231 women were included in analysis, 59% reported at least one barrier to ET adherence. We identified three latent factors which we defined as: habit - challenges developing medication-taking behavior; tradeoffs - high perceived side effect burden and medication safety concerns; and resource barriers - challenges related to cost or accessibility. Older age (50+) was associated with less reporting of habit (Adjusted Risk Ratio (aRR) 0.54[95% CI: 0.43-0.69] and resource barriers (aRR 0.66[0.43-0.997]), but was not associated with tradeoff barriers. Medicaid-insured women were more likely than privately-insured to report tradeoff (aRR:1.53 [1.10-2.13]) or resource barriers (aRR:4.43[2.49-6.57]). Black race was associated with increased reporting of all factors (habit: aRR 1.29[1.09-1.53]; tradeoffs: 1.32[1.09-1.60], resources: 1.65[1.18-2.30]). CONCLUSION Barriers to ET adherence were described by three distinct factors, and strongly associated with sociodemographic characteristics. Barriers to ET adherence appear inadequately addressed for younger, Black, and publicly-insured breast cancer survivors. These findings underscore the importance of developing multi-faceted, patient-centered interventions that address a diverse range of barriers to ET adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Spencer
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine.,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine
| | | | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lesur A, Dalenc F, Beguignot M. Consultation dédiée de prescription d’une hormonothérapie adjuvante chez la femme jeune traitée pour cancer du sein hormonosensible : une clé pour améliorer l’adhésion ? Bull Cancer 2019; 106:S28-S36. [DOI: 10.1016/s0007-4551(20)30045-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
46
|
Xu H, Zhang XJ, Wang DQ, Xu L, Wang AP. Factors influencing medication-taking behaviour with adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer: A qualitative systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2019; 76:445-458. [PMID: 31657028 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To explore the experience and feelings associated with the endocrine therapy treatment trajectory in women with breast cancer and what affects medication taking behaviour. DESIGN Qualitative systematic review. DATA SOURCES Qualitative studies were extracted from PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO from inception of each database until February 2019. REVIEW METHODS The systematic search method SPIDER (sample, phenomenon of interest, design, evaluation, research type) was used. Thematic synthesis of the qualitative data was used. RESULTS A total of 478 were identified in the initial search. Only 17 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Five analytical themes and 17 descriptive subthemes were identified. CONCLUSIONS The systematic review highlights knowledge, balancing the scales, self-efficacy and support influence medication taking behaviour to women with breast cancer. IMPACT The medication taking behaviour of breast cancer women can be classified into four types: acceptance/persistence, bearing/suffering, hesitation/adjustment, refusing/abandoning. The four types can switch from one to another. Medication taking behaviour is affected by knowledge, balancing the scales, self-efficacy, and support. The medical institutions, communities, and families can gain knowledge of the treatment experiences of women to better understand medication taking behaviour and those at risk for non-adherence. Women wanted different types and amounts of information. Healthcare providers should be aware of patient preferences and take targeted interventions to help them receive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Xu
- Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Insititute, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiu-Jie Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Da-Qiu Wang
- Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China
| | - Lei Xu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ai-Ping Wang
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ozlu B, Kabay G, Bocek I, Yilmaz M, Piskin AK, Shim BS, Mutlu M. Controlled release of doxorubicin from polyethylene glycol functionalized melanin nanoparticles for breast cancer therapy: Part I. Production and drug release performance of the melanin nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2019; 570:118613. [PMID: 31415880 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In this study, polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugated melanin nanoparticles (MNPs) were prepared (PEG-MNPs). A model chemotherapy drug, doxorubicin (DOX), was loaded into the PEG-MNPs with varied concentrations (0.125, 0.250, 0.500 mg/mL). TEM images showed that, DOX-PEG-MNPs are spherical-shaped and 15 ± 2.2 nm in diameter. FTIR spectroscopy analysis demonstrated that MNPs were successfully modified with PEG. The UV-Vis spectroscopy results showed that the drug loading capacity of MNPs was 0.7 mg/ml of DOX in 2 mg/ml of PEG-MNPs. The time course data showed that, the release behavior of DOX from MNPs was primarily diffusion controlled. In vitro cytotoxicity assays demonstrated that MNP and PEG-MNP did not show any toxic effect on mouse fibroblast cells while DOX-PEG-MNP was able to inhibit the proliferation of human breast cancer cells. The results confirm that the application area of MNPs in controlled and prolonged drug release could be extended to the different types of cancer therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Busra Ozlu
- Plasma Aided Biomedical Research Group (pabmed), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Technology, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Turkey; Department of Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, South Korea
| | - Gozde Kabay
- Plasma Aided Biomedical Research Group (pabmed), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Technology, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Turkey; Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53706, WI, USA
| | - Ilyas Bocek
- Plasma Aided Biomedical Research Group (pabmed), Department of Biomedical Department, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Turkey
| | - Merve Yilmaz
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Turkey
| | - Ayse Kevser Piskin
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Turkey
| | - Bong Sup Shim
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, South Korea
| | - Mehmet Mutlu
- Plasma Aided Biomedical Research Group (pabmed), Department of Biomedical Department, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Buszek SM, Lin HY, Bedrosian I, Tamirisa N, Babiera GV, Shen Y, Shaitelman SF. Lumpectomy Plus Hormone or Radiation Therapy Alone for Women Aged 70 Years or Older With Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Stage Breast Cancer in the Modern Era: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:795-802. [PMID: 31377160 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Deintensification of adjuvant therapy is being considered for older women with early-stage, biologically favorable breast cancer. Although radiation therapy (RT) can be omitted in some cases, toxicity from hormone therapy (HT) is not trivial, and adherence rates vary. We hypothesized that adjuvant RT alone would produce survival outcomes comparable to those with adjuvant HT alone among elderly patients treated with lumpectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We searched the National Cancer Database (2010-2014) for healthy women (aged ≥70 years, Charlson/Deyo [CD] score 0-1) with T1N0 hormone-receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and adjuvant HT or RT. Propensity scores were used to match patients for analysis. RESULTS We identified 2995 patients (median age, 78 years), most (81%) with a CD score of 0, clinical stage IA (77%), of whom 65% received HT alone and 35% received RT only after lumpectomy. On multivariate analysis of the matched cohort, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.13; P < .001), CD score 1 (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.37-2.70; P = .0002), and living in a metropolitan (vs urban) area (HR 3.09; 95% CI 1.43-6.67; P = .004) were associated with inferior overall survival (OS), whereas treatment with HT (vs RT) was not (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.85-1.49; P = .406). At a median follow-up of 45 months, no difference was found in OS between HT versus RT cohorts (85% and 86%, respectively; P = .44). CONCLUSIONS For healthy, older women with biologically favorable breast cancer treated with lumpectomy, adjuvant RT or HT is associated with equivalent 5-year OS rates. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to explore these adjuvant monotherapy options in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Buszek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heather Y Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Isabelle Bedrosian
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nina Tamirisa
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gildy V Babiera
- Physicians Network, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wheeler SB, Spencer J, Pinheiro LC, Murphy CC, Earp JA, Carey L, Olshan A, Tse CK, Bell ME, Weinberger M, Reeder-Hayes KE. Endocrine Therapy Nonadherence and Discontinuation in Black and White Women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111:498-508. [PMID: 30239824 PMCID: PMC6510227 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2017] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential use of endocrine therapy (ET) by race may contribute to breast cancer outcome disparities, but racial differences in ET behaviors are poorly understood. METHODS Women aged 20-74 years with a first primary, stage I-III, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer were included. At 2 years postdiagnosis, we assessed nonadherence, defined as not taking ET every day or missing more than two pills in the past 14 days, discontinuation, and a composite measure of underuse, defined as either missing pills or discontinuing completely. Using logistic regression, we evaluated the relationship between race and nonadherence, discontinuation, and overall underuse in unadjusted, clinically adjusted, and socioeconomically adjusted models. RESULTS A total of 1280 women were included; 43.2% self-identified as black. Compared to white women, black women more often reported nonadherence (13.7% vs 5.2%) but not discontinuation (10.0% vs 10.7%). Black women also more often reported the following: hot flashes, night sweats, breast sensitivity, and joint pain; believing that their recurrence risk would not change if they stopped ET; forgetting to take ET; and cost-related barriers. In multivariable analysis, black race remained statistically significantly associated with nonadherence after adjusting for clinical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio = 2.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.75 to 4.24) and after adding socioeconomic to clinical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio = 2.44, 95% confidence interval = 1.50 to 3.97) but was not independently associated with discontinuation after adjustment. Low recurrence risk perception and lack of a shared decision making were strongly predictive of ET underuse across races. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight important racial differences in ET-adherence behaviors, perceptions of benefits/harms, and shared decision making that may be targeted with culturally tailored interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jennifer Spencer
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Laura C Pinheiro
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jo Anne Earp
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Lisa Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Andrew Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Chiu Kit Tse
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mary E Bell
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Morris Weinberger
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
The prevalence and predictors of using herbal medicines among Iranian cancer patients. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2019; 35:368-373. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|