Development of the cancer-related loneliness assessment tool: Using the findings of a qualitative analysis to generate questionnaire items

The Assessment of Social Isolation and Loneliness in Cancer Patients and Survivors in the Pre-COVID-19 Period: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

In the context of cancer research, identifying social isolation and loneliness is a priority given how both exacerbate poor outcomes and lead to increased mortality in oncological populations. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify all quantitative instruments that have been used to assess either social isolation or loneliness in patients previously or currently diagnosed with cancer in the pre-COVID-19 period.

METHOD

PubMed (Web), Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched on August 22, 2019. All databases were searched from inception with no filters applied. The search strategies included terms that captured the following concepts: instruments/tools, social isolation or loneliness, and cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 289 titles/abstracts were returned. Upon review, 114 titles/abstracts were deemed to be potentially eligible and the full text was retrieved. Of the 114 full texts, 69 articles met inclusion criteria and comprised the final sample. Publications span years 1980 through 2019, with the majority (71%) occurring in the last decade prior to this review, between 2009 and 2019. Average age of the study samples, with few exceptions, was often over 50 years old. Many studies used all-female samples, while only one study used an all-male sample. The most common cancer diagnosis of participants was breast cancer. The most common measure was the UCLA Loneliness Scale, used in 22 studies. Most measures we identified were used only once, and 11 measures were used 2-3 times. When the information was given, response ranges were always Likert-type scales most often ranging from 1-4 or 1-5, and sometimes from 1-10 possible response options. In terms of psychometrics, test-retest reliability and validity were rarely reported; by contrast, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was reported more than half of the time (60.9%).

CONCLUSION

When selecting a measure to assess loneliness in cancer populations, the UCLA Loneliness Scale is both psychometrically strong and versatile across patients with different cancers, ages, and racial backgrounds. When selecting a measure to assess social isolation in cancer populations, both the PROMIS-SF V 2.0 social isolation and the Berkman-Syme Network Index are brief and have been used in patients with non-White racial backgrounds.

Development and validity of an intermediate conceptual measurement (ICM) -based measurement tool for the nursing professional values of undergraduate students

BACKGROUND

Nursing professional values are the foundation of nursing practice. There has been no research to develop an instrument to measure professional values in nursing based on intermediate conceptual measurement theory.

OBJECTIVES

To develop an ICM-based measurement tool for the nursing professional values of undergraduate students.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

METHODS

The Nursing Professional Values-Intermediate Conceptual Measurement (NPV-ICM) was developed using the steps of Cunningham's process to generate questionnaire items. The tool was devised in three stages: identifying the intermediate concepts, developing stories reflecting the intermediate concepts and setting up options for action and justification in the stories and setting up scoring criteria for the measurement tool. The tool was tested through internal consistency reliability, content validity and calibration correlation validity.

RESULTS

This study resulted in five nursing professional values situational stories containing five themes (care, altruism, responsibility, respect and justice) respectively. Each situational story contained a varying number of action options and justification options, totalling 72 Richter 5 level options and 20 ranked items. Reliability and validity were found to be good, with a total Cronbach's α of 0.93 and Cronbach's α of 0.75-0.80 for each situational story and calibrated correlational validity was found to correlate significantly between the total Nursing Professional Values Scale Revised (NPVS-R) scores and the NPV-ICM.

CONCLUSIONS

The NPV-ICM created in this study possesses high reliability and validity. It alters the values perception research, moving from abstract conceptual measurements to measurements of particular values actions and justifications for participation in activities. And the study presents preliminary evidence supporting the reliability of the NVP-ICM as a measure of professional values.

Caregiver's quality of life in advanced cancer: validation of the construct in a real-life setting of early palliative care

Introduction

Early palliative care (EPC) improves the quality of life (QoL) of advanced cancer patients and their caregivers. The increasingly widespread use of this care model requires the development of measures supporting its interventions. Although the construct of patient's QoL has been extensively investigated and several QoL measures have been further validated, there is a paucity of data concerning the QoL of the caregiver. In 2018, McDonald and colleagues addressed this issue by interviewing 23 primary caregivers of advanced cancer patients who participated in an EPC randomized clinical trial to understand their perspective on the QoL construct. The Authors identified six major dimensions associated with the construct of caregiver's QoL. The present retrospective study aimed to validate these dimensions on a larger sample and in a real-life EPC setting.

Methods

Previously collected reports from 137 primary caregivers of advanced cancer patients on EPC answering questions about their experience with this care model were qualitatively analyzed through a deductive, thematic approach to identify and confirm the six dimensions constituting the construct of interest based on McDonald's and colleagues' results.

Results

The six dimensions ("living in the patient's world", "burden of illness and caregiving", "assuming the caregiver role", "renegotiating relationships", "confronting mortality", and "maintaining resilience") were consistently found in the reports from primary caregivers in a real-life EPC setting, confirming to be significant themes associated to their QoL.

Conclusion

A definite and recurrent construct of primary caregiver's QoL as described by McDonald and colleagues was also found in a larger sample and in a real-life EPC setting. Thus it may lay the groundwork for the development of a dedicated questionnaire.

Development and psychometric testing of the safety climate instrument suitable for nurses handling chemotherapy drugs

AIM

To develop and test the psychometric properties of the Taiwanese safety climate instrument suitable for nurses handling chemotherapy drugs.

DESIGN

This is an instrument development study.

METHOD

All four stages, including questionnaire design, expert consultation, cognitive testing and psychometric validation, were used in this study. The data were collected between August and December 2018. Nurses with experience in handling chemotherapy drugs (N = 484) at one medical centre and two regional hospitals in Taiwan completed this instrument. Data were randomly split into two groups: one group (N = 237) for exploratory factor analysis and the other (N = 247) for confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

The instruments' items were based on qualitative research, and the content validity index levels exceeded the acceptable value. An exploratory factor analysis revealed 43 items remaining in six factors, which accounted for 74.4% of variance. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis verified the acceptability of a 43-item model. The composite reliability values, Cronbach's alpha values, convergent validity and discriminant validity for each factor exceeded the acceptable value.

CONCLUSION

Most climate safety instruments used in the health care sector focus mainly on patient safety outcomes. Furthermore, there is no safety climate instrument for handling chemotherapy drugs, and there is a cultural difference. Through the development and validation process, we have developed a new instrument suitable for nurses handling chemotherapy drugs, which has good psychometric properties.

IMPACT

This instrument is valuable as its development was based on the concept of a safety climate for health care perceptions and qualitative survey findings. Hospital managers can use this instrument regularly to evaluate nurses' perceptions of the safety climate to determine the strengths and weaknesses of their workplace, thereby assisting organizational managers in proposing concrete actions.