Cancer patients' diagnosis and symptoms and their family caregivers' self-efficacy and social support are associated with different caregiver reactions

The socioeconomic impact of cancer on patients and their relatives: Organisation of European Cancer Institutes task force consensus recommendations on conceptual framework, taxonomy, and research directions

Loss of income and out-of-pocket expenditures are important causes of financial hardship in many patients with cancer, even in high-income countries. The far-reaching consequences extend beyond the patients themselves to their relatives, including caregivers and dependents. European research to date has been limited and is hampered by the absence of a coherent theoretical framework and by heterogeneous methods and terminology. To address these shortages, a task force initiated by the Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) produced 25 recommendations, including a comprehensive definition of socioeconomic impact from the perspective of patients and their relatives, a conceptual framework, and a consistent taxonomy linked to the framework. The OECI task force consensus statement highlights directions for future research with a view towards policy relevance. Beyond descriptive studies into the dimension of the problem, individual severity and predictors of vulnerability should be explored. It is anticipated that the consensus recommendations will facilitate and enhance future research efforts into the socioeconomic impact of cancer and cancer care, providing a crucial reference point for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome instruments aimed at measuring its broader effects.

Caring for an Individual with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Understanding Family Caregivers' Perceptions of Social Support, Caregiver Burden, and Unmet Support Needs

Family caregivers (FCs) of a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) can encounter unpredictable challenges and care demands. They can experience high levels of burden, a loss of self-care, and poor quality of life. Their receipt of social support and ability to communicate with clinicians may impact their burden. FCs would benefit from educational resources that teach them communication skills central to their ability to obtain the support they need-support that is imperative to reducing burden. To better target psychosocial educational interventions focused on social support and communication skills, we aimed to explore the relationship between social support, sources of support, and burden; the relationship between FCs' clinical communication and their perceptions of support and burden; and any unmet support needs. A total of 575 CLL FCs completed an online survey of validated scales about social support, burden, and clinical communication, as well as an open-ended item in which they reported any unmet support needs. Statistical analyses showed that FCs who perceived they were more supported reported less burden, and female FCs reported more burden than males. Support from family, friends, and professionals collectively contributed to FCs' support. FCs who perceived they had stronger communication skills with their loved one's clinicians reported more social support. FCs identified six areas of unmet support needs: financial, emotional, informational, instrumental, peer, and communication support. Collectively, findings show that increased social support can reduce FCs' burden and qualitative findings provide a roadmap of social support domains to target that could potentially improve the caregiving experience.

"Queer people are excellent caregivers, but we're stretched so very thin": Psychosocial wellbeing and impacts of caregiving among LGBTQI cancer carers

BACKGROUND

LGBTQI (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and/or intersex) communities are increasingly recognized as a vulnerable and high-risk population in oncology. LGBTQI cancer carers, including carers who are LGBTQI and other carers of LGBTQI people, experience many of the same stressors as LGBTQI patients but their support needs are often overlooked in the cancer literature.

METHOD

This mixed-methods study examined distress and quality of life in LGBTQI cancer carers. Online surveys were completed by 129 carers and 31 carers took part in a one-to-one semi-structured interview. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) tested for differences in psychosocial outcomes and carer experiences by gender, sexuality, age, carer relationship and carer/patient LGBTQI status. Reflexive thematic analysis of interviews and open-ended survey responses facilitated in-depth examination of subjective experiences.

RESULTS

42.6% of participants reported high or very high distress. Distress was significantly positively correlated with discrimination in cancer care, health impact, financial impact and lack of family support; it was negatively correlated with comfort in LGBTQI sexuality and gender identity, social support and quality of life. Four themes were identified in thematic analysis of qualitative data: (1) Identity on the sidelines: LGBTQI sexuality and gender pushed aside during cancer caregiving; (2) Fear of being shut-out: rejection and exclusion of LGBTQI cancer carers; (3) Lack of support for LGBTQI caregivers; and (4) Closer and stronger relationships due to a culture of mutual caregiving.

CONCLUSIONS

LGBTQI cancer carers must contend with typical caregiving demands whilst also managing additional minority stressors, including discrimination, rejection from family, isolation from LGBTQI communities, and invisibility in healthcare and support services. Despite this, LGBTQI carers showed resilience in building their own mutually supportive networks to rally around the person with cancer, which were reported to ameliorate psychosocial vulnerabilities. Service providers need to recognize the needs of LGBTQI cancer carers through inclusive and reflective practices. This will facilitate trust and patient and carer sexuality and gender identity disclosure, with positive consequences for wellbeing and satisfaction with cancer care.

Behind the scenes of caregiving in patients with advanced cancer: A qualitative study on family caregivers

Objective

Family caregivers may have concerns that they do not want to disclose to others. This study aims to delve into the concealed facets of care provided by family caregivers to patients with advanced cancer.

Methods

A qualitative approach was conducted in Iran from June 2022 to February 2023. Face-to-face, in-depth semi-structured interviews were carried out with 16 Iranian family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer, employing purposive sampling. The gathered data were analyzed using conventional content analysis, and Lincoln and Guba's criteria for rigor were applied to ensure the study's trustworthiness.

Results

The analysis of the data resulted in the identification of three main themes with nine subthemes. The key themes derived from the experiences of family caregivers encompassed (1) chaotic mentalities, (2) troubling interdependence, and (3) desperational emotions.

Conclusions

Caregivers of patients with advanced cancer commonly experience a highly fragile psychological state and are profoundly impacted by their concerns for the patient. Healthcare systems should prioritize ensuring that caregivers receive sufficient support and care.

Dyadic Effects of Psychological Health on Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to review dyadic research on psychological health and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and caregivers and examine the pooled partner effects and actor effects based on the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. We registered our review protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42021258482). Six databases were searched until June 2021 using the following keywords: colorectal neoplasms, caregivers, depression, anxiety, stress, and quality of life. Two reviewers independently screened 1,597 studies that included both CRC patients and family caregivers. Meta-analyses were performed of the partner and actor effects of psychological health on HRQL in CRC.

CONCLUSION

Eighteen observational studies involving 2,757 patients with CRC and 2,601 caregivers were included. Regarding partner effects, the distress of patients with CRC affected their family caregivers' distress and burden. There were three types of actor effects among patients with CRC and family caregivers: 1) the social support of patients with CRC affects their level of distress; (2) the distress of patients with CRC affects their HRQL; and (3) caregivers' social support affects their level of distress. This study provides the first comprehensive overview of the dyadic relationships between psychological health and HRQL in patients with CRC and their caregivers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The development of dyadic interventions for improving psychological health is warranted to help both patients with CRC and their family caregivers live with improved HRQL and well-being.

Perceived burden and need for support among caregivers of cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to examine (1) the perceived burden among caregivers and identify those in risk of high burden and (2) the need for support among caregivers and identify associated factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cancer patients who participated in an educational program at the Montebello Center (MBC) in Norway between May 2021 and February 2022 were asked to invite a caregiver to answer a questionnaire. The caregiving burden was assessed with the Caregivers Reaction Assessment (CRA) that consists of 24 questions scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), covering five domains. A mean sum score was calculated for each domain. Higher subscale scores indicate higher levels of burden, except for caregiver esteem where a high score indicates a low burden. Need for support was assessed with 13 questions.

RESULTS

Of 464 invitations, 185 caregivers responded (response 40%), median age was 58.0 years and 58% were male. Caregiver burden mean scores were: 2.6 (SD 1.03) for Impact on schedule, 2.1 (SD 0.79) for Lack of family support, 2.1 (SD 0.76) for Impact on health, 2.0 (SD 0.86) for Impact on finances, and 4.2 (SD 0.47) for Caregiver esteem. Female caregivers, younger, higher education, having comorbidities, caring for patients having recurrence of cancer, and shorter time since diagnosis were associated with higher burden measured on individual subscales of the CRA. Most reported needs were information about: cancer, late effects and rehabilitation services and support from peers and professionals to cope with the new situation. Younger, caregiver comorbidity and recurrence of cancer of the patient were associated with more needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that caregivers of cancer patients participating at the MBC report moderate caregiver burden, however, numerous caregivers reported need for support within several areas. Our findings need to be confirmed in a larger unselected group.

Psychological Burden of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy and Their Family Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Background

The consequences of Head and neck cancer (HNC) affect both the person who receives the diagnosis and their family caregivers (FCs).

Objective

To investigate the psychological status of patients and their FCs, and the burden of the FCs during radiotherapy.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted with a questionnaire survey by convenience sampling method. Patients with HNC and their caregivers (both N = 85) from the radiotherapy department of our hospital were recruited between March 2021 and March 2022. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Chinese version of the Connor and Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) were used to assess the symptoms of anxiety and depression, psychological resilience, and the impact of care work, emotions and social lives of participants. Pearson's correlation analysis and a Mann-Whitney test were used to analyse the association between the HADS and the CD-RISC scores of the patients.

Results

About half of the patients (56.47%) and the caregivers (62.35%) have had anxiety. The average HADS-Anxiety scores, HADS-Depression scores, and CD-RISC scores of the patients with HNC were 7.4±1.9, 6.4±2.2, and 56.8±12.6. The "Strength" and "Resilience" scores of the patients were inversely related to their HADS anxiety scores (p < 0.05). The "Resilience" and "optimism" scores of them were inversely related to HADS depression scores (p < 0.05). The average ZBI score of the caregivers was 23.8±10.1; HADS anxiety scores and HADS depression scores of the caregivers were positively associated with total ZBI scores and individual burden scores (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

More than half of patients with HNC undergoing radiotherapy have anxiety, and about a third have depression. The anxiety and depression status of the FCs of patients with HNC undergoing radiotherapy is related to caregiver burden, deserving the attention of clinical medical staff.

Self-efficacy and coping style in relation to psychological distress and quality of life in informal caregivers of patients with head and neck cancer: a longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

In order to understand how informal caregivers of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients deal with the consequences of the disease, we investigated their self-efficacy and coping style in relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression (distress) and quality of life (QoL) over time. In addition, factors associated with self-efficacy and coping style were investigated.

METHODS

A total of 222 informal caregivers and their related HNC patients were prospectively followed as part from the multicenter cohort NETherlands QUality of life and Biomedical cohort studies In Cancer (NET-QUBIC). Self-efficacy and coping style were measured at baseline, and distress and QoL at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Informal caregivers had a high level of self-efficacy comparable with patients. Caregivers used "seeking social support," "passive reacting," and "expression of emotions" more often than patients. Factors associated with self-efficacy and coping were higher age and lower education. Higher self-efficacy was related with better QoL and "active tackling" was associated with less depression symptoms. "Passive reacting" and "expression of emotions" were associated with higher psychological distress and reduced QoL.

CONCLUSION

Among informal caregivers of HNC patients, higher self-efficacy and "active tackling" were associated with better functioning over time, while "passive reacting" and "expression of negative emotions" were associated with worse functioning. Awareness of the differences in self-efficacy skills and coping and their relationship with QoL and psychological distress will help clinicians to identify caregivers that may benefit from additional support that improve self-efficacy and "active tackling" and reduce negative coping styles.

Caregiver Burden, Psychological Distress and Quality of Life among Informal Caregivers of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Longitudinal Study

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to investigate caregiver burden among informal caregivers of head and neck cancer patients, in relation to distress and quality of life (QoL), and the relationship between informal caregivers and patients. (2) Methods: Data of 234 dyads from the multicenter prospective cohort study Netherlands Quality of life and Biomedical Cohort studies in cancer was used. Caregiver burden, psychological distress, global QoL, physical and social functioning were measured from baseline until 24 months after treatment. (4) Conclusions: This prospective cohort study shows the high burden of caring for HNC patients, the impact of this burden and the interaction between caregiver and patient. We suggest that healthcare professionals include caregivers in counseling and support.

Family Caregivers of Adult Cancer Patients in Oman: Predictors of Caregivers' Self-efficacy for Cancer Pain and Related Symptom Management at Home

BACKGROUND

Family caregivers (FCGs) contribute significantly to the management of pain and other symptoms experienced by their family member with cancer and may not receive preparation to meet the changing patient needs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of FCG self-efficacy (SE) for pain and related symptom management of adult family members with cancer.

METHODS

Data were collected from 165 Omani FCGs. The questionnaire comprised the caregiver cancer pain and related symptom management SE scale, the Katz index, Caregiver Reaction Assessment, and Family Pain Questionnaire. Electronic medical records provided data on patients' cancer diagnosis, pain, and symptoms. Predictors of SE were examined using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Most FCGs were female (58.2%) and children of the patient (53.9%). Most patients were on chemotherapy or palliative care (82.4%) and had at least stage 3 cancer (58.8%). Family caregivers reported average SE. The predictors of SE were as follows: patients' functional status (β = 40.90, P = .001), patients' pain intensity (β = -15.10, P = .036), FCGs' confidence in controlling the patients' pain (β = 28.80, P = .000), FCGs' self-rated health (β = -25.90, P = .038), and interaction of FCGs' knowledge level with patients' pain intensity (β = -1.31, P = .008), caregiving hours (β = -0.10, P = .025), and impact of caregiving on FCGs' physical health (β = 1.29, P = .031).

CONCLUSION

Family caregivers' health status, knowledge, caregiving demands, patient functional status, and pain intensity have a significant effect on caregivers' symptom management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A deliberate model of care that includes supportive interventions to enhance the abilities of FCGs with symptom management is needed in Oman.

Caregiving burden and social support in family caregivers of patients with cancer: A cross-sectional study

Introduction

Providing care for patients by family caregivers causes in several consequences known as “Caregiving Burden”, which affects the caregiver's health and the whole family process, considered in holistic healthcare/nursing. This study aimed to evaluate the caregiving burden and social support in family caregivers of patients with cancer and their influencing factors in a local area in Iran.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 190 family members of patients with cancer were studied through convenient sampling method. Data were collected using demographic data sheet enriched with Karnofsky Performance Status Scale and Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and Zarit Burden Inventory and Medical Outcomes Social Support Survey questionnaires.

Results

The results indicated intermediate performance status and moderate independence in ADL in patients. The mean score of caregiving burden was 43.95 ± 17.48 which indicates moderate to severe burden. The average social support in the caregivers was 60.25 ± 23.81% which shows above the average social support. Both performance status and dependence in ADL of patient had statistically significant effect on the caregiving burden in caregivers. Also a statistically significant negative relationship was observed between caregiving burden and social support in primary family caregivers of patients with cancer.

Discussion

Considering the increasing importance of primary care provided by families, developing strategies for providing caregiver's needs through family care in cancer nursing is essential. So supporting caregivers through family nursing in holistic healthcare by providing social support, can play a significant role in reducing caregiving burden in healthcare services considering the qualified holistic healthcare/nursing.

Cancer-related challenges, unmet needs and emotional distress in male caregivers of women with breast cancer: the influence of self-efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the challenges, unmet needs, and emotional distress of male caregivers of women with breast cancer (BC); and determine how self-efficacy relates to these variables. Methods: Adult (≥18 yr) males currently caring for or who had previously cared for a woman with BC completed questionnaires assessing their emotional distress, challenges, unmet needs, and self-efficacy. Bivariate correlations determined the relationships between the variables used in the regression and mediation models. Mediation analysis examined whether cancer-related challenges and unmet needs predict emotional distress and whether self-efficacy mediates the relationships between challenges, unmet needs and distress, while accounting for education, employment, and time from diagnosis. Results: Self-efficacy was significantly negatively related to emotional distress, challenges experienced, and unmet needs. The mediation model accounted for a significant 18% of emotional distress variability. Self-efficacy did not mediate the relationship between challenges and emotional distress or between unmet needs and emotional distress. Conclusions: Male caregivers may benefit from interventions to enhance self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is a modifiable variable, ideally suited for inclusion in supportive interventions.

Relationship between social support, physical symptoms, and depression in women with breast cancer and pain

PURPOSE

Fatigue and pain are common among women with breast cancer, and often related to depressive symptoms. Social support may influence levels of fatigue, pain interference, and depressive symptoms. We tested a theory-based, structural model examining the relationship between social support (i.e., emotional and instrumental) and depressive symptoms via fatigue and pain interference in women with breast cancer.

METHODS

Women (N = 327) with stages I-III breast cancer were enrolled in a randomized trial investigating a behavioral pain intervention. Measures of social support, fatigue, pain interference, and depressive symptoms were completed at enrollment. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling to test direct and indirect pathways relating social support, fatigue, pain interference, and depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

Our model evidenced good fit. Significant direct effects emerged linking higher levels of emotional support with lower levels of fatigue (β = -.30), pain interference (β = -.32), and depressive symptoms (β = -.31). More instrumental support was significantly associated with more depressive symptoms (β = .11), but not fatigue or pain interference. Higher levels of fatigue (β = .30) and pain interference (β = .34) were significantly related to higher levels of depressive symptoms. More emotional support related to less depressive symptoms via lower levels of fatigue (β = -.09) and pain interference (β = -.11).

CONCLUSION

Women reporting higher levels of emotional support endorsed fewer depressive symptoms, and that relationship was driven by lower levels of fatigue and pain interference. Our results highlight novel pathways that healthcare professionals can leverage to optimize social support topics in psychosocial interventions targeting breast cancer symptoms. This model should be replicated using longitudinal data.