Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Assessment in Refinement of the Framingham Risk Score: Can It Predict ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction? A Pilot Study

The relationship between the neck circumference and the carotid intima-media thickness in Amerindians. Potential links to health risks?

The carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) is a predictor of cardiovascular events. The neck circumference (NC) has been investigated as a risk factor for increased cIMT with contradictory results. This study assessed the relationship between NC and cIMT in Atahualpa residents aged ≥40 years who had sonographic examination of carotid arteries (n = 590). We also discussed on potential pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this association. Participants belonged to the Native Ecuadorian (Amerindians) ethnic group. Non-parametric regression models were used to assess the aforementioned relationship, after adjusting for relevant confounders. The mean age of participants was 60.9 ± 12.7 years (58% women). The mean value of the cIMT was 0.85 ± 0.19 mm. The mean NC was 35.8 ± 34 cm. The NC was normally distributed, but the cIMT was not. Mean values of NC and cIMT were significantly greater in men than in women. Non-parametric models showed significant differences in median cIMT values according to quartiles of NC. Predictive cIMT margins increased by quartiles of NC, significantly among individuals in the 1st quartile as compared to the 3rd quartile. In this population of Amerindians, smaller NC is associated with lower values of cIMT. The pattern of this association is different in men than in women. Sex-related differences in cervical fat tissue distribution probably accounted for such differences.

Vascular age to determine cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review of its concepts, definitions, and clinical applications

BACKGROUND

Vascular age is an alternate means of representing an individual's cardiovascular risk. Little consensus exists on what vascular age represents and its clinical utility has not been determined. We systematically reviewed the literature to provide a comprehensive overview of different methods that have been used to define vascular age, and to examine its potential clinical value in patient communication and risk prediction.

DESIGN

This was a systematic review with data sources of PubMed and Embase.

RESULTS

We identified 39 articles on vascular age, 20 proposed to use vascular age as a communication tool and 19 proposed to use vascular age as a means to improve cardiovascular risk prediction. Eight papers were methodological and 31 papers reported on vascular age in study populations. Of these 31 papers, vascular age was a direct translation of the absolute risk estimated by existing cardiovascular risk prediction models in 15 papers, 12 derived vascular age from the reference values of an additional test, and in three papers vascular age was defined as the age at which the estimated cardiovascular risk equals the risk from non-invasive imaging observed degree of atherosclerosis. One trial found a small effect on risk factor levels when vascular age was communicated instead of cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSION

Despite sharing a common name, various studies have proposed distinct ways to define and measure vascular age. Studies into the effects of vascular age as a tool to improve cardiovascular risk prediction or patient communication are scarce but will be required before its clinical use can be justified.