Left ventricular stiffness predicts outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Echocardiographic Evaluation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Comprehensive Review

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an increasingly popular treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Recent advancements in technology and imaging tools have significantly contributed to the success of TAVI procedures. Echocardiography plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of TAVI patients, both before and after the procedure. This review aims to provide an overview of the most recent technical advancements in echocardiography and their use in the follow-up of TAVI patients. In particular, the focus will be on the examination of the influence of TAVI on left and right ventricular function, which is frequently accompanied by other structural and functional alterations. Echocardiography has proven to be key also in detecting valve deterioration during extended follow-up. This review will provide valuable insights into the technical advancements in echocardiography and their role in the follow-up of TAVI patients.

Left ventricular remodeling in end-stage liver disease and post-transplant mortality assessed using end-diastolic pressure-volume relation analysis: Observational retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Diastolic dysfunction is regarded as an important predictor of outcome after liver transplantation (LT). We investigated the influence of liver disease severity on left ventricular diastolic properties using end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR) analysis in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Association between alterations of the EDPVR and mortality after LT was evaluated.

METHODS

In this observational retrospective cohort study, 3,211 patients who underwent LT for ESLD were included in analysis. Variables derived from single-beat EDPVR (diastolic stiffness-coefficient [β] and end-diastolic volume at an end-diastolic pressure of 20 mmHg [EDVI₂₀] indicating ventricular capacitance) were estimated using preoperative echocardiographic data. Alterations in EDPVR with increased stiffness (β > 6.16) were categorized into 3 groups; leftward-shifted (EDVI₂₀ <51 mL/m²), rightward-shifted (EDVI₂₀ > 69.7 mL/m²), and intermediate (EDVI₂₀ 51-69.7 mL/m²).

RESULTS

As the model for ESLD score increases, both EDVI₂₀ and β gradually increased, which indicated ventricular remodeling with larger capacitance and higher diastolic stiffness. Among patients with increased stiffness (β > 6.16, n = 1,090), survival rates after LT were lower in leftward-shifted EDPVR than in rightward-shifted EDPVR (73.7% vs 82.9%; log-rank P = 0.002). In the adjusted Cox proportional hazard model, risk of cumulative all-cause mortality at 11 years was the highest in leftward-shifted EDPVR (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.92), followed by intermediate EDPVR (HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.12-2.26), compared with rightward-shifted EDPVR. The SHapley Additive exPlanation model revealed that the variables associated with leftward-shifted EDPVR were diabetes, female sex, old age, and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

As ESLD advances, diastolic ventricular properties are characterized by increased EDVI₂₀ and β on rightward-shifted EDPVR, indicating larger capacitance and higher stiffness. However, leftward-shifted EDPVR with left ventricle remodeling failure is associated with poor post-LT survival.

Left atrial volume index predicts adverse events in asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

In aortic stenosis (AS), chronic pressure overload on left ventricle (LV) leads to LV hypertrophy, impaired relaxation, increased chamber stiffness, fibrosis and left atrial (LA) dilatation. An enlarged LA may be a marker of longstanding diastolic dysfunction (DD) and more advanced disease in AS. We aimed to assess the impact of LA volume index (LAVI) on events in patients with moderate or severe AS.

METHODS

A total of 324 patients (mean age 69 ± 13 years, 61% men) were included. LA volume was measured by biplane Simpson's method using apical four- and two-chamber views and indexed to body surface area. An increased LAVI was defined as > 34 ml/m² .

RESULTS

The mean EF was 64 ± 8%, LAVI 35 ± 14 ml/m² and flow rate 244 ± 70 ml/s. The number of total events was 275 (85%): 243 (75%) aortic valve replacement and 32 (10%) deaths. Mean follow-up 23.7 ± 23.8 months (median 15.2 months). An increased LAVI (45% [n = 145]) was associated with adverse events (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.24-2.82, p = 0.003) independent of age, smoking, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, LV ejection fraction, LV mass, aortic valve area, and low flow rate (<200 ml/s). In the same multivariate model, when increased LAVI was replaced by E/e' ratio ≥14 cm, no association was found between E/e' ratio ≥14 cm and adverse events (HR 1.18; 95% CI .78-1.78, p = 0.430).

CONCLUSION

LAVI was an independent predictor of adverse events in patients with moderate or severe AS and preserved ejection fraction. Including LAVI in the risk assessment of AS patients may further improve risk stratification.

Long-term Implications of Post-Procedural Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Current risk models have only limited accuracy in predicting transcatheter aortic valve Implantation (TAVI) outcomes and there is a paucity of clinical variables to guide patient management after the procedure. The prognostic impact of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in TAVI patients is unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of after-procedural LVEDP in patients who undewent TAVI. Consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who undewent TAVI were divided into 2 groups according to after-procedural LVEDP above and below or equal 12 mm Hg. Collected data included baseline clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic variables. We evaluated the impact of elevated vs. normal LVEDP on in-hospital outcomes, short- and long-term mortality. Eight hundred forty-five patients were included in the study with complete in-hospital and late mortality data available for all survivors (median follow-up 29.5 months [IQR 16.5 to 48.0]). The mean age (±SD) was 82.3±6.2 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgery score was 4.0%±3.0%. Patients with LVEDP>12 mm Hg (n = 591, 70%) and LVEDP≤12 mm Hg (n = 254, 30%) had a 6-months mortality rate of 6.8% and 2%, respectively (P=0.004) and a 1-year mortality rate of 10.1% vs 4.9%, respectively (p = 0.017). By multivariable analysis, after-procedural LVEDP>12 mm Hg was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.76, p <0.001) during long-term follow-up. In conclusion, elevated after-procedural LVEDP in patients who undewent TAVI is an independent predictor of mortality following TAVI. Further research regarding the use of LVEDP as a tool for after-procedural medical management is warranted.

Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Diastolic Dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with poor outcomes; however, the effect of its severity is controversial. We sought to assess the impact of diastolic dysfunction on hospital outcomes and survival after TAVR and identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent TAVR for severe aortic stenosis with preexisting LVDD from 2009 to 2018 (n = 325). Patients with prior mitral valve surgery (n = 4), atrial fibrillation (n = 39), missing or poor baseline diastolic dysfunction assessment (n = 36) were excluded. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. 246 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

The median age was 80 years (25th and 75th percentiles:75-86.7), 154 (62.6%) were males and the median EuroSCORE II was 4.3 (2.2-8). Patients with severe LVDD had significantly higher EuroSCORE, and lower ejection fraction (p < 0.001). There was no difference in post-TAVR new atrial fibrillation (p = 0.912), pacemaker insertion (p = 0.528), stroke (p = 0.76), or hospital mortality (p = 0.95). Patients with severe LVDD had longer hospital stay (p = 0.036). The grade of LVDD did not affect survival (log-rank = 0.145) nor major adverse cardiovascular events (log-rank = 0.97). Predictors of mortality were; low BMI (HR: 0.95 (0.91-0.99); p = 0.019), low sodium (0.93 (0.82-2.5); p = 0.021), previous PCI (HR: 1.6 (1.022-2.66); p = 0.04), E-peak (HR: 1.01 (1.002-1.019); p = 0.014) and implantation of more than one device (HR: 3.55 (1.22-10.31); p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is feasible in patients with diastolic dysfunction, and the degree of diastolic dysfunction did not negatively affect the outcome. Long-term outcomes in those patients were affected by the preoperative clinical state and procedure-related factors.

The learning curve in transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical studies: A systematic review

Background

Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) has become an essential alternative to surgical aortic-valve replacement in the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, and this procedure requires technical expertise. The aim of this study was to identify prospective studies on TAVI from the past 10 years, and then to analyze the quality of information reported about the learning curve.

Materials and methods

A systematic review of articles published between 2007 and 2017 was performed using PubMed and the EMBASE database. Prospective studies regarding TAVI were included. The quality of information reported about the learning curve was evaluated using the following criteria: mention of the learning curve, the description of a roll-in phase, the involvement of a proctor, and the number of patients suggested to maintain skills.

Results

A total of sixty-eight studies met the selection criteria and were suitable for analysis. The learning curve was addressed in approximately half of the articles (n = 37, 54 percent). However, the roll-in period was mentioned by only eight studies (12 percent) and with very few details. Furthermore, a proctorship was disclosed in three articles (4 percent) whereas twenty-five studies (37 percent) included authors that were proctors for manufacturers of TAVI.

Conclusion

Many prospective studies on TAVI over the past 10 years mention learning curves as a core component of successful TAVI procedures. However, the quality of information reported about the learning curve is relatively poor, and uniform guidance on how to properly assess the learning curve is still missing.

Baseline left ventricular diastolic dysfunction affects midterm mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether preprocedural left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction impairs midterm mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), we performed a meta-analysis of currently available evidence.

METHODS

We identified all studies investigating impact of preprocedural severity of LV diastolic dysfunction on midterm (≥1-year) all-cause mortality after TAVI for patients with AS through a search of databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) until September 2019. From each study, we extracted an adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) hazard ratio (HR) of midterm mortality. We pooled study-specific estimates in the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten eligible studies with a total of 2380 patients with AS undergoing TAVI were identified. In accordance with pooled analyses, higher-grade preprocedural LV diastolic dysfunction was associated with significantly worse midterm all-cause mortality after TAVI compared to lower-grade dysfunction (HR for grade II vs I, 1.15; P = .002; HR for grade III vs I, 1.35; P = .001; HR for grade III vs II; 1.16, P = .002; HR for grade II-III vs I, II-III vs 0-I, or III vs I-II, 1.34; P < .00001 [primary meta-analysis]; HR per grade, 1.16; P = .003). No funnel plot asymmetry for the primary meta-analysis (for grade II-III vs I, II-III vs 0-I, or III vs I-II) was identified, which probably indicated no publication bias (P = .381 by the linear-regression test).

CONCLUSION

Higher-grade preprocedural LV diastolic dysfunction was associated with worse midterm all-cause mortality after TAVI for patients with AS compared to lower-grade dysfunction.

Predictive value of left ventricular diastolic chamber stiffness in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement

Aims

Despite improvements in cardiac haemodynamics and symptoms, long-term mortality remains increased in some patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Limited data exist on the prognostic role of left ventricular (LV) chamber stiffening in these patients.

Methods and results

We performed a retrospective analysis in 1893 patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for AVR. LV end-diastolic pressure–volume relations (EDPVR, P = αV^β) were reconstructed from echocardiographic measurements of end-diastolic volumes and estimates of end-diastolic pressure (EDP). The impact of EDPVR-derived LV chamber stiffness (CS30, at 30 mmHg EDP) on all-cause mortality after AVR was evaluated. Mean age was 76 ± 10 years, 39% were females, and ejection fraction (EF) was 61 ± 12%. The mean LV chamber stiffness (CS30) was 2.2 ± 1.3 mmHg/mL. A total of 877 (46%) patients had high LV stiffness (CS30 &gt;2 mmHg/mL). In these patients, the EDPVR curves were steeper and shifted leftwards, indicating higher stiffness at all pressure levels. These patients were slightly older, more often female, and had more prevalent comorbidities compared to patients with low stiffness. At follow-up [median 4.2 (interquartile range 2.8–6.3) years; 675 deaths], a higher CS30 was associated with lower survival (hazard ratio: 2.7 for severe vs. mild LV stiffening; P &lt; 0.0001), both in patients with normal or reduced EF. At multivariate analysis, CS30 remained an independent predictor, even after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, EF, LV remodelling, and diastolic dysfunction.

Conclusion

Higher preoperative LV chamber stiffening in patients with severe AS is associated with poorer outcome despite successful AVR.

Myocardial Stiffness Evaluation Using Noninvasive Shear Wave Imaging in Healthy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathic Adults

OBJECTIVES

The goal of our study was to investigate the potential of myocardial shear wave imaging (SWI) to quantify the diastolic myocardial stiffness (MS) (kPa) noninvasively in adult healthy volunteers (HVs) and its physiological variation with age, and in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) populations with heart failure and preserved ejection function (HFpEF).

BACKGROUND

MS is an important prognostic and diagnostic parameter of the diastolic function. MS is affected by physiological changes but also by pathological alterations of extracellular and cellular tissues. However, the clinical assessment of MS and the diastolic function remains challenging. SWI is a novel ultrasound-based technique that has the potential to provide intrinsic MS noninvasively.

METHODS

We prospectively included 80 adults: 60 HV (divided into 3 groups: 20- to 39-year old patients [n = 20]; 40- to 59-year-old patients [n = 20]; and 60- to 79-year-old patients [n = 20]) and 20 HCM-HFpEF patients. Echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and biological explorations were achieved. MS evaluation was performed using an ultrafast ultrasound scanner with cardiac phased array. The fractional anisotropy of MS was also estimated.

RESULTS

MS increased significantly with age in the HV group (the mean MS was 2.59 ± 0.58 kPa, 4.70 ± 0.88 kPa, and 6.08 ± 1.06 kPa for the 20- to 40-year-old, 40- to 60-year-old, and 60- to 80-year-old patient groups, respectively; p < 0.01 between each group). MS was significantly higher in HCM-HFpEF patients than in HV patients (mean MS = 12.68 ± 2.91 kPa vs. 4.47 ± 1.68 kPa, respectively; p < 0.01), with a cut-off at 8 kPa (area under the curve = 0.993; sensitivity = 95%, specificity = 100%). The fractional anisotropy was lower in HCM-HFpEF (mean = 0.133 ± 0.073) than in HV (0.238 ± 0.068) (p < 0.01). Positive correlations were found between MS and diastolic parameters in echocardiography (early diastolic peak/early diastolic mitral annular velocity, r = 0.783; early diastolic peak/transmitral flow propagation velocity, r = 0.616; left atrial volume index, r = 0.623) and with fibrosis markers in cardiac magnetic resonance (late gadolinium enhancement, r = 0.804; myocardial T1 pre-contrast, r = 0.711).

CONCLUSIONS

MS was found to increase with age in healthy adults and was significantly higher in HCM-HFpEF patients. Myocardial SWI has the potential to become a clinical tool for the diagnostic of diastolic dysfunction. (Non-invasive Evaluation of Myocardial Stiffness by Elastography [Elasto-Cardio]; NCT02537041).

Update on the clinical impact of mild aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from the Japanese multicenter OCEAN-TAVI registry

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the clinical impact of mild postprocedural aortic regurgitation (post-AR) to that of none-trivial post-AR after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to identify the vulnerability factors to mild post-AR.

BACKGROUND

Moderate-severe post-AR, associated with increased mortality, is an important issue. However, the clinical impact of mild post-AR remains controversial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed data from 1,572 consecutive patients (1,026 of none-trivial post-AR and 546 of mild post-AR) obtained from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular Intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) Japanese multicenter registry. We evaluated the 1-year cumulative cardiovascular death and re-hospitalization rates for heart failure (HF) after TAVI according to the degree of post-AR. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant difference between "none-trivial post-AR" and "mild post-AR" in terms of cardiovascular death, but a significant difference was noted in the cumulative incidence of re-hospitalization for HF between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.41, p = .04). In the stratified analysis, only in patients with not more than 50% of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and none-trivial pre-procedural aortic regurgitation (pre-AR), mild post-AR resulted in a higher incidence of re-hospitalization for HF.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the clinical impact of mild post-AR compared to none-trivial post-AR tended to be augmented in the presence of reduced LVEF, concentric LVH, and none-trivial pre-AR. Pre-procedure echocardiographic findings including LVEF, left ventricular geometry, and pre-AR may help to judge the necessity of postdilatation in case of mild post-AR just after the bioprosthesis deployment.

Prognostic Relevance of Left Ventricular Myocardial Performance After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

The left-ventricular myocardial performance index Tei is an echocardiographic parameter that incorporates the information of systolic and diastolic time intervals. While the prognostic value of selected systolic and diastolic parameters is well established after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the role of Tei has not been evaluated in this setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between August 2007 and December 2015, consecutive patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis and transthoracic echocardiography pre- and post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement were considered eligible for this analysis. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Of 824 patients with echocardiographic images to calculate Tei, pre-Tei was normal (<0.45) in 639 and high (≥0.45) in 185, whereas post-Tei was normal in 602 and high in 120, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors, high pre-Tei was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio [HR_adj] 3.62; 95% CI, 1.89-6.91) and 1 year (HR_adj 2.56; 95% CI, 1.78-3.69). Similarly, post-Tei was associated with an increased risk of mortality between 30 days and 1-year follow-up (HR_adj 6.70; 95% CI, 4.22-10.63). At multivariable analysis Tei emerged as an independent predictor of early (pre-Tei index per 0.1-HR_adj 1.40; 95% CI, 1.23-1.60) and late mortality (post-Tei index per 0.1-HR_adj 1.40; 95% CI, 1.31-1.50), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The left-ventricular myocardial performance index Tei is associated with impaired clinical outcomes during short- and longer-term follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01368250.

The integrated value of sST2 and global longitudinal strain in the early stratification of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: a translational imaging approach

Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is associated with significant myocardial fibrosis (MF). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a sensible indicator of systolic dysfunction. ST2 is a member of the interleukin (IL)-1 receptor family and a modulator of hypertrophic and fibrotic responses. We aimed at assessing: (a) the association between adverse LV remodeling, LV functional parameters (including GLS) and sST2 level. (b) The association between MF (detected by endo-myocardial biopsy) and sST2 in patients with AVS undergoing surgical valve replacement. Twenty-two patients with severe AVS and preserved EF underwent aortic valve replacement. They performed laboratory analysis, including serum ST2 (sST2), echocardiography and inter-ventricular septum biopsy to assess MF (%). We included ten controls for comparison. Compared to controls, patients showed higher sST2 levels (p < 0.0001). sST2 showed correlation with Age (r = 0.58; p = 0.0004), E/e' average (r = 0.58; p = 0.0007), GLS (r = 0.61; p = 0.0002), LAVi (r = 0.51; p = 0.003), LVMi (r = 0.43; p = 0.01), sPAP (r = 0.36; p = 0.04) and SVi (r = -0.47; p < 0.005). No correlation was found between MF and sST2. At ROC analysis, a sST2 ≥ 284 ng/mL had the best accuracy to discriminate controls from patients with impaired GLS, i.e. GLS ≤ 17% (AUC 0.80; p = 0.003; sensitivity 95%; specificity 83%) and increased E/e' average (AUC 0.87; p = 0.0001; sensitivity 96%; specificity 74%). At multivariate regression analysis GLS resulted the only independent predictor of sST2 levels (R² = 0.35; p =  0.0004). Patients with severe AVS present elevated sST2 levels. LV GLS resulted the only independent predictor of sST2 levels.