Apical left ventricular myocardial dysfunction is an early feature of cardiac involvement in myotonic dystrophy type 1

Echocardiographic Features of Cardiac Involvement in Myotonic Dystrophy 1: Prevalence and Prognostic Value

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most common muscular dystrophy in adults. Cardiac involvement is reported in 80% of cases and includes conduction disturbances, arrhythmias, subclinical diastolic and systolic dysfunction in the early stage of the disease; in contrast, severe ventricular systolic dysfunction occurs in the late stage of the disease. Echocardiography is recommended at the time of diagnosis with periodic revaluation in DM1 patients, regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms. Data regarding the echocardiographic findings in DM1 patients are few and conflicting. This narrative review aimed to describe the echocardiographic features of DM1 patients and their prognostic role as predictors of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death.

Neuromuscular diseases and their cardiac manifestations under the spectrum of cardiovascular imaging

Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) include a broad spectrum of disorders that affect motor unit in every possible site, extending from the cell body of peripheral nerves to the muscle. The different lesion sites make this group of inherited disorders difficult to diagnose. Many NMDs, especially those involving skeletal muscles, can present significant cardiovascular complications, ranging from rhythm disturbances to the development of dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart disease represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality among NMD patients, underlining the vital need for further familiarization with the pathogenesis and assessment of cardiac involvement. Cardiovascular imaging is the cornerstone for the evaluation of heart disorders in NMDs, with conventional echocardiography still offering a portable, affordable, and easily accessible solution. Meanwhile, newer echocardiographic techniques such as speckle tracking imaging in combination with cardiac magnetic resonance add new insights into further substrate characterization. The purpose of this review is to offer a brief presentation of the main NMDs and their cardiovascular complications, as well as the presentation of data that highlight the importance of cardiovascular imaging in early diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis of these patients. Lastly, the authors provide a simple guide about which clinical features, imaging findings, and follow-up plan to adopt in each myopathic disorder.

Outcome measures frequently used to assess muscle strength in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1: a systematic review

Measurement of muscle strength is fundamental for the management of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Nevertheless, guidance on this topic is somewhat limited due to heterogeneous outcome measures used. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize the most frequent outcome measures to assess muscle strength in patients with DM1. We searched on Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase databases. Observational studies using measures of muscle strength assessment in adult patients with DM1 were included. From a total of 80 included studies, 24 measured cardiac, 45 skeletal and 23 respiratory muscle strength. The most common method and outcome measures used to assess cardiac muscle strength were echocardiography and ejection fraction, for skeletal muscle strength were quantitative muscle test, manual muscle test and maximum isometric torque and medical research council and for respiratory muscle strength were manometry and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure. We successfully gathered the more consensual methods and measures to evaluate muscle strength in future clinical studies, particularly to test muscle strength response to treatments in patients with DM1. Future consensus on a set of measures to evaluate muscle strength (core outcome set), is important for these patients.

Cardiac involvement in a cross-sectional cohort of myotonic dystrophies and other skeletal myopathies

Aims

Cardiac involvement in myopathies that primarily affect the skeletal muscle is variable and may be subtle, necessitating sensitive diagnostic approaches. Here, we describe the prevalence of cardiac abnormalities in a cohort of patients with skeletal muscle disease presenting at a tertiary care neuromuscular centre.

Methods and results

We systematically investigated patients with skeletal myopathies and comprehensively analysed their cardiac phenotype including 24 h electrocardiogram, echocardiography with strain analyses, contrast‐enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and, if at increased risk of coronary artery disease, computed tomography coronary angiography. We prospectively screened 91 patients with diverse skeletal myopathies and enrolled 73 patients. The most pronounced cardiac involvement was present in patients with dystrophic myopathies (cardiac abnormalities in 59% of patients). We analysed myotonic dystrophies (n = 29) in more detail and found prolonged QRS (99.4 ± 15.6 vs. 91.5 ± 10.3 ms; P = 0.027) and QTc times (441.1 ± 28.1 vs. 413.0 ± 23.3 ms; P < 0.001) and increased left atrial size (27.28 ± 3.9 vs. 25.0 ± 3.2 mm/m²; P = 0.021) when compared with healthy controls. Left ventricular systolic function was reduced (ejection fraction < 55%) in 31% of myotonic dystrophies, while only 4% had an ejection fraction < 50%. Apical peak systolic longitudinal strain was slightly reduced (P = 0.023).

Conclusions

Screening for cardiac involvement in the skeletal muscle disease seems prudent particularly in patients with dystrophic myopathies. In the subset of myotonic dystrophy patients, QRS and QTc times as well as myocardial strain may be useful parameters. Their potential for predicting cardiac adverse events needs further evaluation.

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring relevancy in myotonic dystrophy type 1 follow-up: Prognostic value and heart rate variability evolution

BACKGROUND

Patient prognosis in type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1) is very poor. Annual 24-hour holter ECG monitoring is recommended but its relevance is debated. Main objective was to determine whether holter ECG parameters could predict global death in DM1 patients and secondarily to assess whether they could predict cardiovascular events and sudden cardiac death, to compare DM1 patients and healthy controls, and to assess their evolution in DM1 over a 5-year period.

METHODS

This retrospective study included genetically confirmed DM1. Primary endpoint was global death. Secondary endpoints were labeled "sudden cardiac death" which was a composite of sudden cardiac death, aborted sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, sustained ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block grade 3, pause >3 s; and "cardiovascular events" which was a composite of all-cause mortality, pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator implantation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, hospitalization for acute cardiac cause and heart failure.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (22 women, 40 ± 13 years old) were included. Three (7%) DM1 patients died, 9 (19%) experienced "sudden cardiac death" endpoint and 21 (45%) experienced "cardiovascular event" endpoint during mean follow-up of 95 ± 22 months. None of holter ECG parameters were discriminant to predict death or secondary endpoints. Compared to healthy controls, DM1 patients had higher SDNN and LF/HF ratio. Finally, heart rate variability parameters remained stable over a mean interval of 61 ± 15 months excepting pNN50 which decreased significantly.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that annually-repeated holter ECG in DM1 is not useful for stratifying risk of sudden death and cardiovascular outcomes.

Neuromuscular Disease: Cardiac Manifestations and Sudden Death Risk

Cardiovascular complications of neuromuscular diseases disproportionately affect the cardiac conduction system. Cardiomyopathy and cardiac arrhythmias produce significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with neuromuscular diseases should be carefully and frequently evaluated for the presence of bradycardia, heart block, and tachyarrhythmias. Preemptive treatment with permanent pacemakers or implanted defibrillators is appropriate in patients with conduction system disease or who are at risk for ventricular arrhythmias.