Correlation and agreement between 2D and 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric, strain, and rotational parameters in healthy volunteers and in patients with mild mitral stenosis

Prediction of prognosis in patients with left ventricular dysfunction using three-dimensional strain echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

We evaluated three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (3DSTE) strain and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with delayed contrast enhancement (DCE) for the prediction of cardiac events in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.

METHODS

CMR and 3DSTE in 75 patients with ischaemic and 38 with non-ischaemic LV dysfunction were analysed and temporally correlated to cardiac events during 41 ± 9 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Cardiac events occurred in 44 patients, more in patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction. LV ejection fraction (LVEF), global circumferential and global area strain were reduced more in patients with more cardiac events, whereas 3DSTE LV end-systolic volumes and 3DSTE LV masses were larger. However, the area under the curve using receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed modest sensitivity and specificity for all evaluated parameters. Additionally, DCE did not differ significantly between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed ischaemic aetiology of LV dysfunction, LVEF and LV mass by CMR to be predictors of cardiac events with an increased relative risk of 2.4, 1.6 and 1.5, respectively. By multivariate analysis, only myocardial ischaemia and LVEF ≤ 39% were independent predictors of events (p = 0.004 and 0.005, respectively). Subgroup analysis in ischaemic and non-ischaemic patients showed only 3DSTE LV mass in ischaemic patients to have a significant association (p = 0.033) but without an increased relative risk.

CONCLUSION

LVEF calculated by 3DSTE or CMR were both good predictors of cardiac events in patients with LV dysfunction. A reduced LVEF ≤ 39% was associated with a 1.6-fold higher probability of a cardiac event. 3DSTE strain measurements and DCE-CMR did not add to the prognostic value of LVEF.

The Agreement of a Two- and a Three-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Global Longitudinal Strain

Background: Two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) enables assessment of myocardial function. Here, we examined the agreement between 2D and 3D STE measurement of a global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with normal left ventricle, reduced ejection fraction, and cardiac pacing. Methods: Our analysis included 90 consecutive patients (59% males; average age: 73.2 ± 11.2 years) examined between May 2019−December 2020, with valid 2D and 3D loops for further speckle-tracking strain analysis. Linear regression, Pearson correlation, and a Bland−Altman plot were used to quantify the association between 2D and 3D GLS and related segments, using the 17-segment American Heart Association (AHA) model. Analyses were performed in the entire study group and subgroups. Intra- and inter-observer variability of 2D and 3D GLS measurement was also performed in all participants. Results: We observed a strong correlation between 2D and 3D GLS measurements (R = 0.76, p < 0.001), which was higher in males (R = 0.78, p < 0.001) than females (R = 0.69, p < 0.001). Associated segment correlation was poor (R = 0.2−0.5, p < 0.01). The correlation between 2D and 3D GLS was weaker in individuals with ventricular pacing of >50% (R = 0.62, p < 0.001) than <50% (R = 0.8, p < 0.001), and in patients with LVEF of <35% (R = 0.69, p = 0.002) than >35% (R = 0.72, p < 0.001). Intra-observer variability for 2D and 3D GLS was 2 and 2.3%, respectively. Inter-observer variability for 2D and 3D GLS was 3.8 and 3.6%, respectively Conclusion: Overall 2D and 3D GLS were closely associated but not when analyzed per segment. It seems that GLS comparison is more representative of global shortening than local displacement. Right ventricular pacing and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were associated with a reduced correlation between 2D and 3D GLS.