Two-dimensional systolic speckle tracking echocardiography provides a noninvasive aid in the identification of acute pediatric heart transplant rejection

Multimodality Imaging to Detect Rejection, and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients—An Illustrative Review

The three most common modalities of graft surveillance in pediatric heart transplant (HT) recipients include echocardiography, coronary angiography, and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The survival outcomes after HT in children have improved considerably in recent years. However, allograft rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy remain the leading cause of death or re-transplantation. The routine surveillance by EMB and coronary angiography are invasive and risky. Newer noninvasive echocardiographic techniques, including tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), 2-D speckle tracking echocardiography, CT coronary angiography (CTCA), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive techniques such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), functional flow reserve (CFR) of coronary arteries, optical coherence tomography (OCT), have emerged as powerful tools which may help early recognition of sub-clinical rejection, response to treatment, early detection, and progression of CAV. The multimodality imaging approach, including noninvasive and invasive tests, is the future for the transplanted heart to detect dysfunction, rejections, and early CAV. This review illustrates noninvasive and invasive imaging techniques currently used or could be considered for clinical use in detecting heart transplant rejection, dysfunction, and CAV in children.

Rejection surveillance in pediatric heart transplant recipients: Critical reflection on the role of frequent and long-term routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies and comprehensive review of non-invasive rejection screening tools

BACKGROUND

Despite significant medical advances in the field of pediatric heart transplantation (HT), acute rejection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the gold-standard method for diagnosing rejection but is an invasive, expensive, and stressful process. Given the potential adverse consequences of rejection, routine post-transplant rejection surveillance protocols incorporating EMB are widely employed to detect asymptomatic rejection. Each center employs their own specific routine rejection surveillance protocol, with no consensus on the optimal approach and with high inter-center variability. The utility of high-frequency and long-term routine surveillance biopsies (RSB) in pediatric HT has been called into question.

METHODS

Sources for this comprehensive review were primarily identified through searches in biomedical databases including MEDLINE and Embase.

RESULTS

The available literature suggests that the diagnostic yield of RSB is low beyond the first year post-HT and that a reduction in RSB intensity from high-frequency to low-frequency can be done safely with no impact on early and mid-term survival. Though there are emerging non-invasive methods of detecting asymptomatic rejection, the evidence is not yet strong enough for any test to replace EMB.

CONCLUSION

Overall, pediatric HT centers in North America should likely be doing fewer RSB than are currently performed. Risk factors for rejection should be considered when designing the optimal rejection surveillance strategy. Noninvasive testing including emerging biomarkers may have a complementary role to aid in safely reducing the need for RSB.

Changes in circumferential strain can differentiate pediatric heart transplant recipients with and without graft rejection

BACKGROUND

Routine surveillance protocols rely heavily on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) for detection of rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients. More sensitive echocardiographic tools to assess rejection may help limit the number of EMBs. This study compared changes in left ventricular (LV) strain in patients who had rejection versus those who did not.

METHODS

A single center retrospective review was conducted between 2013 and 2020. Patients were categorized based on rejection history. Echocardiograms were evaluated at the time of 2 consecutive EMBs; in the rejection group, the second echocardiogram was collected at the time of a rejection episode. Conventional measures of LV function and speckle-tracking echocardiography-derived longitudinal (LS) and circumferential strain (CS) were measured.

RESULTS

17 patients were in the non-rejection group and 17 were in the rejection group (30 total rejection episodes). The rejection group was older at the time of transplant (12.5 vs. 1.3 years, p = .01). A decline in CS was seen in the rejection group at the second echocardiogram [-18.5 (IQR -21.5, -14.6) to -15.7 (IQR -19.8, -13.2)] while CS improved in the non-rejection group [-20.8 (IQR -23.9, -17.8) to -23.9 (IQR -24.9, -20.1)]. This difference in change reached significance (p = .02). A similar pattern was seen in LS that neared significance (p = .06). There was no significant difference in ejection fraction change (p = .24).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the non-rejection group displayed improvement in CS between echocardiograms while patients in the rejection group showed subsequent decline. Worsening of LV CS may help identify acute rejection in the early post-transplant period.