Subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients recovered from COVID-19

Myocardial Work Indices in Patients Recently Recovered from Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19

Background/Objectives: Persistent cardiovascular issues are common in COVID-19 survivors, making the detection of subtle myocardial injuries critical. This study evaluates myocardial work (MW) indices in patients recently recovering from mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Methods: A total of 105 recently recovered COVID-19 patients (who had a mean age of 52 years) underwent comprehensive laboratory testing and advanced echocardiographic assessments. The median time since their COVID-19 infections was 56 days (IQR: 42-71). The cohort was stratified based on high-sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) levels: undetectable versus detectable. The echocardiographic analysis utilized pressure-strain loops to evaluate MW indices. Results: Detectable hs-TnI levels were observed in 42% of patients. The median values of MW indices for the entire group were slightly below normal values: global work index (GWI)-1834 mmHg% (IQR 1168-2054 mmHg%), global constructive work (GCW)-2130 mmHg% (IQR 2010-2398 mmHg%), global wasted work (GWW)-119 mmHg% (IQR 78-175 mmHg%), and global work efficiency (GWE)-94% (IQR 92-96%). Patients with detectable hs-TnI had higher GWW (168 vs. 97 mmHg%, p < 0.005) and lower GWE (93% vs. 95%, p < 0.005). In multiple regression analysis, strain dispersion (PSD) was the sole predictor for GWW (β = 0.67, p < 0.001), while for GWE, PSD (β = -0.67, p < 0.001) and LVEF (β = 0.16, p = 0.05) were significant predictors. Conclusions: Among patients recently recovering from mild-to-moderate COVID-19, elevated hs-TnI levels are linked with a reduction in GWE and an increase in GWW. PSD is an important predictor of myocardial inefficiency and wasted work. In this group, disruptions in the timing and coordination of cardiac muscle contractions may play a key pathophysiological role in reducing the efficiency of the heart's performance.

Clinical and echocardiographic findings in patients with COVID-19 across different severity levels

Cardiovascular pathology can complicate the course of COVID-19. The study aimed to identify echocardiographic abnormalities and key prognostic factors influencing severe and fatal COVID-19 outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included clinical and echocardiogram data from 194 medical records of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: 100 moderate cases, 34 severe cases with favorable outcomes, and 60 severe cases with fatal outcomes. Severe patients with favorable outcomes had greater reductions in left ventricular systolic fraction of left ventricle compared to moderate cases (23.5% vs. 7.0%, respectively, p=0.008) and ejection fraction of left ventricle (14.7% vs. 3.0%, respectively, p=0.013), grade I diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle (20.6% vs. 8.0%, respectively, p=0.044), and pulmonary hypertension (29.41% vs. 10.0%, respectively, p=0.006). Patients with fatal outcomes had a mean age of 67.1±1.51 years, chronic heart failure functional class II (58.3%), hypertension (50.0%), type 2 diabetes (43.3%), and obesity (33.3%). Compared to severe cases but with favorable outcomes, fatal cases had a greater decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (36.7% vs. 14.7%, respectively, p=0.024), various types of myocardial dysfunction (51.7% vs. 29.4%, respectively, p=0.037) and a trend towards increased pulmonary hypertension (48.3% vs. 29.4%, respectively, p=0.074). Consequently, chronic heart failure class II, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, various myocardial dysfunctions, and pulmonary hypertension emerged as key cardiac risk factors for severe disease progression and mortality in patients with COVID-19.

Cell-Specific Mechanisms in the Heart of COVID-19 Patients

From the onset of the pandemic, evidence of cardiac involvement in acute COVID-19 abounded. Cardiac presentations ranged from arrhythmias to ischemia, myopericarditis/myocarditis, ventricular dysfunction to acute heart failure, and even cardiogenic shock. Elevated serum cardiac troponin levels were prevalent among hospitalized patients with COVID-19; the higher the magnitude of troponin elevation, the greater the COVID-19 illness severity and in-hospital death risk. Whether these consequences were due to direct SARS-CoV-2 infection of cardiac cells or secondary to inflammatory responses steered early cardiac autopsy studies. SARS-CoV-2 was reportedly detected in endothelial cells, cardiac myocytes, and within the extracellular space. However, findings were inconsistent and different methodologies had their limitations. Initial autopsy reports suggested that SARS-CoV-2 myocarditis was common, setting off studies to find and phenotype inflammatory infiltrates in the heart. Nonetheless, subsequent studies rarely detected myocarditis. Microthrombi, cardiomyocyte necrosis, and inflammatory infiltrates without cardiomyocyte damage were much more common. In vitro and ex vivo experimental platforms have assessed the cellular tropism of SARS-CoV-2 and elucidated mechanisms of viral entry into and replication within cardiac cells. Data point to pericytes as the primary target of SARS-CoV-2 in the heart. Infection of pericytes can account for the observed pericyte and endothelial cell death, innate immune response, and immunothrombosis commonly observed in COVID-19 hearts. These processes are bidirectional and synergistic, rendering a definitive order of events elusive. Single-cell/nucleus analyses of COVID-19 myocardial tissue and isolated cardiac cells have provided granular data about the cellular composition and cell type-specific transcriptomic signatures of COVID-19 and microthrombi-positive COVID-19 hearts. Still, much remains unknown and more in vivo studies are needed. This review seeks to provide an overview of the current understanding of COVID-19 cardiac pathophysiology. Cell type-specific mechanisms and the studies that provided such insights will be highlighted. Given the unprecedented pace of COVID-19 research, more mechanistic details are sure to emerge since the writing of this review. Importantly, our current knowledge offers significant clues about the cardiac pathophysiology of long COVID-19, the increased postrecovery risk of cardiac events, and thus, the future landscape of cardiovascular disease.

Corrigendum to "The prevalence and long-term health effects of long Covid among hospitalised and non-hospitalised populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis"

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101762.].

Long-term prognostic impact of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients recovered from COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular sequelae may occur in patients recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recent studies have detected a considerable incidence of subclinical myocardial dysfunction-assessed with speckle-tracking echocardiography-and of long-COVID symptoms in these patients. This study aimed to define the long-term prognostic role of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and long-COVID condition in patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS

We prospectively followed up 110 patients hospitalized at our institution due to COVID-19 pneumonia in April 2020 and then recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 7-month clinical and echocardiographic evaluation was performed, followed by a 21-month clinical follow-up. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A subclinical myocardial dysfunction-defined as an impairment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (≥-18%)-was identified at a 7-month follow-up in 37 patients (34%), was associated with an increased risk of long-term MACE with a good discriminative power (area under the curve: .73) and resulted in a strong independent predictor of extended MACE in multivariate regression analyses. Long-COVID condition was not associated with a worse long-term prognosis, instead.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia, a subclinical myocardial dysfunction is present in one-third of the whole population at 7-month follow-up and is associated with a higher risk of MACE at long-term follow-up. Speckle-tracking echocardiography is a promising tool to optimize the risk-stratification in patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia, while the definition of a long-COVID condition has no prognostic relevance.

Strain Echocardiography in Acute COVID-19 and Post-COVID Syndrome: More than Just a Snapshot

Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) has become an established, widely available diagnostic method in the past few years, making its value clear in cases of COVID-19 and the further course of the disease, including post-COVID syndrome. Since the beginning of the pandemic, many studies have been published on the use of STE in this condition, enabling, on the one hand, a better understanding of myocardial involvement in COVID-19 and, on the other, a better identification of risk to patients, although some questions remain unanswered in regard to specific pathomechanisms, especially in post-COVID patients. This review takes a closer look at current findings and potential future developments by summarising the extant data on the use of STE, with a focus on left and right ventricular longitudinal strain.

Abnormal right ventricular echocardiographic findings in recovered patients associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome in COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) echocardiographic changes such as dilation or systolic dysfunction, and pulmonary arterial hypertension were observed in patients with COVID-19. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of RV echocardiographic changes in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 and to verify the association between severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and echocardiographic findings.

METHODS

Patients who had recovered from COVID-19 undergoing outpatient follow-up underwent transthoracic echocardiography, and based on the findings, were divided into two groups: normal and abnormal. It was then verified whether there is an association between SARS and RV echocardiographic abnormalities in recovered patients.

RESULTS

The study included 61 patients, with a mean age of 54.2 ± 12.0 years, 57.4% had presented with SARS. The mean period of time between COVID-19 and the echocardiographic examination was 11.9 ± 7.0 months. Patients presented normal left ventricular systolic function. The frequency of RV echocardiographic changes in patients who had recovered from COVID-19 was 44.3%. RV systolic dysfunction was identified in 31.1%, followed by ventricular dilation in 14.7% and pulmonary hypertension in 9.8%. An association was observed between SARS and RV echocardiographic changes in recovered patients during outpatient follow-up (OR: 4.96; 95% CI: 1.37-17.9; p = 0.015). An association was also demonstrated between SARS and RV dilation (p = 0.007) and between SARS and systolic dysfunction (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

SARS is a risk factor for abnormal RV echocardiographic findings in patients recovered from COVID-19.

Prevalence, risk factors and treatments for post-COVID-19 breathlessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Persistent breathlessness >28 days after acute COVID-19 infection has been identified as a highly debilitating post-COVID symptom. However, the prevalence, risk factors, mechanisms and treatments for post-COVID breathlessness remain poorly understood. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for relevant studies published from 1 January 2020 to 1 November 2021 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021285733) and included 119 eligible papers. Random-effects meta-analysis of 42 872 patients with COVID-19 reported in 102 papers found an overall prevalence of post-COVID breathlessness of 26% (95% CI 23-29) when measuring the presence/absence of the symptom, and 41% (95% CI 34-48) when using Medical Research Council (MRC)/modified MRC dyspnoea scale. The pooled prevalence decreased significantly from 1-6 months to 7-12 months post-infection. Post-COVID breathlessness was more common in those with severe/critical acute infection, those who were hospitalised and females, and was less likely to be reported by patients in Asia than those in Europe or North America. Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed (including deconditioning, restrictive/obstructive airflow limitation, systemic inflammation, impaired mental health), but the body of evidence remains inconclusive. Seven cohort studies and one randomised controlled trial suggested rehabilitation exercises may reduce post-COVID breathlessness. There is an urgent need for mechanistic research and development of interventions for the prevention and treatment of post-COVID breathlessness.

2D speckle-tracking echocardiography as a prognostic imaging modality for COVID-19 adverse outcomes

2D speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) has been used to assess cardiac recovery during the COVID-19 patient follow-ups within the pandemic. The novel role of STE in predicting adverse outcomes of COVID-19 has received attention due to its high sensitivity in identifying subclinical myocardial dysfunction. We reviewed the studies on using 2D-STE to assess COVID-19 prognosis. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus for eligible articles, 24 of which discussed using prognostic 2D-STE for COVID-19 patients. 2D-STE predicts cardiovascular impairments more rapidly and precisely than conventional echocardiography. The 2D-STE technique presents an independent prognostic factor in COVID-19 infection. 2D-STE could be considered a time-efficient and accurate risk predictor of all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Cardiac Manifestations of Post-Acute COVID-19 Infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is emerging evidence that the post-acute and chronic phases of COVID-19 infection are associated with various significant cardiovascular sequelae.

RECENT FINDINGS

Long COVID has been shown to be associated with multiple cardiovascular sequelae including direct myocardial injury, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathies. Hypotheses on the mechanism of myocardial injury include direct viral infiltration and autoimmune dysregulation. Long COVID is associated with persistent cardiac ischemia in patients with no previous history of coronary disease, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, and the development of new-onset heart failure in previously healthy patients. Onset of long COVID may be related to severity of the initial SARS-CoV2 infection. Cardiac MRI is a valuable tool in assessing myocarditis and the development of cardiomyopathies in the setting of long COVID. Both patients with and without pre-existing cardiovascular disease are at risk of developing myocardial injury in the setting of long COVID. Future studies will elucidate both cardiovascular mortality and cardiac rehabilitation in the post-acute and chronic phases of COVID-19.

First Identified Case of Fatal Fulminant Necrotizing Eosinophilic Myocarditis Following the Initial Dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2, Comirnaty): an Extremely Rare Idiosyncratic Hypersensitivity Reaction

RATIONALE

Transient myopericarditis has been recognised as an uncommon and usually mild adverse event predominantly linked to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. These have mostly occurred in young males after the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

OBJECTIVES

Fulminant necrotising eosinophilic myocarditis triggered by a variety of drugs or vaccines is an extremely rare hypersensitivity reaction carrying a substantial mortality risk. Early recognition of this medical emergency may facilitate urgent hospital admission for investigation and treatment. Timely intervention can lead to complete cardiac recovery, but the non-specific clinical features and rarity make early diagnosis challenging.

FINDINGS

The clinical and pathological observations from a case of fatal fulminant necrotising myocarditis in a 57-year-old woman, following the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, are described. Other causes have been discounted with reasonable certainty.

CONCLUSION

These extremely rare vaccine-related adverse events are much less common than the risk of myocarditis and other lethal complications from COVID-19 infection. The benefits of vaccination far exceed the risks of COVID-19 infection.

Myocardial performance index increases at long-term follow-up in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19

Background

The long‐term cardiovascular effects of Coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) are not yet well known. Myocardial performance index (MPI) is a non‐invasive, inexpensive and reproducible echocardiographic parameter that reflects systolic and diastolic cardiac functions. The aim of the study was to compare MPI with a healthy control group in patients with mild or moderate COVID‐19 infection who subsequently had unexplained cardiac symptoms.

Methods

The study included 200 patients aged 18–70 years who were diagnosed with COVID‐19 infection at least 2 months ago and defined cardiac symptoms in their follow‐up. Patients with mild or moderate symptoms, no history of hospitalization, and no other pathology that could explain cardiac symptoms were included in the study. As the control group, 182 healthy volunteers without COVID‐19 were evaluated. Echocardiographic examination was performed on the entire study group. Isovolumetric contraction time (IVCT), isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), and ejection time (ET) were measured by tissue Doppler imaging. MPI was calculated with the IVCT+IVRT/ET formula.

Results

The mean age of the study group was 44.24 ± 13.49 years. In the patient group the MPI was significantly higher (.50 ± .11 vs .46 ± .07, p < .001), IVRT was longer (69.67 ± 15.43 vs 65.94 ± 12.03 ms, p = . 008), and ET was shorter (271.09 ± 36.61 vs 271.09 ± 36.61 ms, p = .028). IVCT was similar between groups (63.87 ± 13.66 vs. 63.21 ± 10.77 ms, p = .66). Mitral E and mitral A wave, E’, A’, and E/A were similar in both groups.

Conclusions

Our study showed that conventional diastolic function parameters were not affected in patients who survived COVID‐19 with mild symptoms but had symptoms in the long term. However, MPI measurements showed left ventricular dysfunction. To our knowledge, this is the first echocardiographic follow‐up study to evaluate left ventricular systolic and diastolic functions with MPI in COVID‐19 patients. We think that when cardiac involvement assessment is required in patients who have survived COVID‐19, MPI should be measured alongside other echocardiographic measurements.

Subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients recovered from COVID-19

Background

Myocardial injury (MI) can be detected during the acute phase of Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) and is associated with a dismal prognosis. Recent imaging studies described the persistence of cardiac abnormalities after the recovery. The aim of the study was to investigate the spectrum of cardiac abnormalities at mid‐term follow‐up in patients recovered from COVID‐19 using clinical assessment, laboratory tests, and imaging evaluation with comprehensive echocardiography.

Methods

This is an observational, cross‐sectional study assessing an unselected cohort of consecutive patients recovered from COVID‐19. MI was defined by elevated plasma levels of high sensitive troponin T (hsTnT). At the follow‐up, a complete examination including echocardiography was performed.

Results

The 123 patients included were divided into two groups according to the presence of MI during hospitalization: group A (without MI) and group B (with MI). After a median of 85 days, group B patients were more frequently symptomatic for dyspnea and had significantly higher values of hsTnT and N‐Terminal prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT‐proBNP), compared to Group A. No differences between the two groups in left nor right ventricle dimension and ejection fraction were found. However, in group B a significant reduction of mean left ventricle global longitudinal strain was observed (‐15.7±.7 vs ‐18.1± .3 in group A, p < 0.001), together with higher frequency of impaired diastolic function and higher values of pulmonary pressure.

Conclusions

In patients recovered from COVID‐19, echocardiography with speckle‐tracking analysis may be an useful imaging tool to identify subclinical myocardial dysfunction and potentially guide management strategies.