Graduate orthodontic education in Turkey: the residents' perspective

Postgraduate orthodontic education: An international perspective on content and satisfaction levels

BACKGROUND

There is significant international variation in the postgraduate orthodontic training. The aim of this study was to obtain information relating to the design, content, and delivery of formal postgraduate orthodontic training internationally. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate the perception of orthodontists towards their training as well as identifying factors associated with an improved level of satisfaction.

METHODS

A 42-question survey was sent to orthodontists worldwide via SurveyMonkey. The survey was circulated on orthodontic Facebook groups and through other digital channels including Instagram.

RESULTS

A total of 168 respondents completed all sections of the questionnaire. The vast majority believed programme length was appropriate (n = 150; 89%). Most respondents were confident with their research skills and in their ability to diagnose and treatment plan. Social media was frequently accessed by the respondents for the purposes of orthodontic education (n = 83; 49%). A high proportion (n = 70; 42%) did not treat any clear aligner cases during postgraduate training with many having experience using InvisalignTM only. The majority of respondents across the regions had training in buccal miniscrew insertions. Exposure to three-dimensional printing during residency was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

The study offers an overview of the structure, content, and modes of delivery in orthodontic postgraduate training internationally. While satisfaction levels are good, there is a disparity in terms of exposure to certain techniques internationally. Further training in the modern diagnostic approaches and mechanics may improve satisfaction with postgraduate training.

Opinions, plans, and demographics of orthodontic residents: A follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to explore current orthodontic residents' demographics, their opinions on their residency and plans for the future and highlight secular changes since past surveys.

METHODS

An anonymous 39-item institutional review board-approved survey was implemented at the 2018 Graduate Orthodontic Resident Program using an online survey tool and portable devices. Questions fit 3 categories: program, future goals, and demographics. Responses were analyzed to determine frequencies, means, and cross tabulations. Analyses of variance and chi-square were applied with significance defined as P <0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 489 attendees, 76% completed the survey; most were female (51%), white (60%), U.S. citizens (85%), single (63%), and very satisfied with their programs (54%). Tuition costs varied, but 18% of respondents paid >$80,000 annually. Orthodontic and total educational debts were significantly correlated (r = 0.704) and averaged $137,706 ± $127,380 and $323,071 ± $266,510, respectively. These debts were significantly lower (P <0.0001) for respondents with stipends. Debts influenced the decision of where to work in the future for 62% of respondents and were a source of anxiety for 72% of respondents. Educational debts were significantly positively associated with anxiety levels (P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provided current information on orthodontic residents' opinions, plans, and demographics. Comparisons with previous surveys showed increases in the number of female respondents, tuition costs, and educational debts and decreases in stipends. Orthodontics may be approaching a "bubble market" where the financial benefits do not outweigh specialty education costs.

What I wish I'd learned as an orthodontic trainee: an online survey of British Orthodontic Society members concerning postgraduate training experiences

Objective:

To survey the opinion of recently qualified and established orthodontists on the perceived value of their training and to identify specific areas which which were considered to be deficient, adequately covered or focussed on excessively.

Design:

Descriptive cross-sectional survey

Setting:

Online electronic questionnaire.

Participants:

Members of the British Orthodontic Society (BOS).

Methods:

An electronic questionnaire was circulated to members of the BOS focusing on dental education history, and opinions concerning orthodontic teaching generally and specific clinical and non-clinical subjects. Information was also obtained in terms of possible need for improvement, modification or removal of teaching on focused academic and clinical aspects.

Results:

A total of 217 responses were received from 1080 emailed invitations resulting in a response rate of 20.1%. Respondents were generally satisfied with their training both in relation to theoretical, academic and practical aspects. However, training was regarded as deficient by some respondents in respect of temporary anchorage devices (38%), bonded retainers (6%), experience with lingual appliances (47%), removable aligners (44%), inter-proximal reduction (24%) and adult orthodontics (16%), working with therapists (32%), and NHS contracts (47%) and commissioning (47%).

Conclusion:

The overall satisfaction of BOS members with postgraduate orthodontic training is generally high, although both recently qualified and established practitioners emphasised the need for better exposure to training in specific practical aspects and practice management within the NHS.