Analysis of dental students' written peer feedback from a prospective peer assessment protocol

Reduction of discrepancies between students and instructors in the assessment of practical tasks through structured evaluation sheets and peer feedback

The aim of this study was to reduce discrepancies between students and instructors in a preclinical dental course by employing structured peer feedback based on a detailed evaluation sheet. In a crossover study of dental students (n = 32), which compared peer feedback using an evaluation sheet (test) with the traditional method (control), participants completed tasks involving cavity and partial crown preparation. The practical tasks were scored numerically on a scale ranging from one (excellent) to six (failure). The amount of feedback provided by the instructor was also recorded. Statistical analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (p < 0.05). Regarding cavity preparation, no statistically significant difference was observed (median (25th-75th percentile)) between the grades received by the test (2.00 (1.50-3.00)) and control groups (2.25 (2.00-3.00)). However, the grades pertaining to partial crown preparation exhibited a statistically significant difference between the test (2.25 (2.00-2.50)) and control (2.50 (2.00-3.00)) groups. LimeSurvey and five-finger feedback were used to assess satisfaction with the new method, revealing that most students found the evaluation sheet and peer feedback to be effective. Within the limitations of this study, structured peer feedback using the evaluation sheet positively impacted grades pertaining to partial crown preparation, requiring less instructor feedback.

[iMED DENT-First in place model curriculum in dentistry in Germany]

October 2019 saw the launch of iMED DENT, the first model study program in dentistry in Germany. The launch was preceded by a development process lasting several years in which European locations, among others, with innovative dental study programs were initially visited. The central reform objective of the model study program was then defined: the development, implementation, and ongoing optimization of an interdisciplinary curriculum with a scientific focus that integrates theoretical and practical dental content. Further steps were the development of the study program objectives and the modular study structure. The latter consists of the three parts: "Normal Function," "From Symptom to Disease," and "Therapy." In the curriculum, the central area of dentistry is flanked by basic and clinical medical subjects. This article reports on the important development steps of the model study program, its structure, and quality assurance measures. First evaluations of the achievement of study program objectives and the need for optimization in the current curriculum are presented.

Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Formative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer assessment presented in higher healthcare education, focusing on the rationale, the interventions, the experiences of students and teachers and the outcomes of formative assessment interventions.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Research Complete and Education Research Centre. Grey literature was searched in Library Search, Google Scholar and Science Direct.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies addressing formative peer assessment in higher education, focusing on medicine, nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupational therapy and radiology published in peer-reviewed articles or in grey literature.

DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESIS

Out of 1452 studies, 37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools. The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULT

The critical appraisal resulted in 18 included studies with high and moderate quality. The rationale for using formative peer assessment relates to giving and receiving constructive feedback as a means to promote learning. The experience and outcome of formative peer assessment interventions from the perspective of students and teachers are presented within three themes: (1) organisation and structure of the formative peer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes and consequences for oneself and relationships and (3) experience and outcome of feedback and learning.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare education must consider preparing and introducing students to collaborative learning, and thus develop well-designed learning activities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peer collaboration seems to affect students' and teachers' experiences of formative peer assessment, empirical investigations exploring collaboration between students are of utmost importance.

Graduating dentists' perceptions about their professional competence in Finland and Lithuania

AIMS

Efforts to harmonise dental education in Europe have been put into action by the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE). The aim of the study was to explore graduating dentists' perceptions about their professional readiness for clinical work in Finland and Lithuania.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The survey targeted fifth-year dental students at the University of Oulu and the University of Turku in Finland, and at the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania (Lithuanian and international students) in 2016-2017. The competences were evaluated in the questionnaire in 21 dental procedures based on ADEE competences by options: "I'd manage well," "I'd need more training" or "It would not quite succeed." The option "I'd manage well" was chosen in the analyses.

RESULTS

Students felt that they were most competent in producing and maintaining accurate patient records (91.9%), implementing sterilisation and hygiene in dental practice (91.3%) and working with other members of dental team and health profession (90.0%). The largest differences between Finnish and Lithuanian students were in designing and adjusting occlusal splints (87.0% vs. 14.3%) and in undertaking subgingival scaling (95.7% vs. 57.1%). The biggest differences between Lithuanian and international students were in identifying (and treating) abnormal and anxiety-related patient (73.1% vs. 25.5%) and implementing tobacco cessation (65.3% vs. 31.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The graduating dental students in Finland and Lithuania manage well in most of the clinical procedures based on the ADEE competences. The students were most confident when dealing with tasks that are common in dental practice.