The impact of wrong-site surgery on dental undergraduate teaching: a survey of UK dental schools

Perceived confidence of dental students and new graduates in performing tooth extractions-An exploratory study

INTRODUCTION

The ability to perform uncomplicated tooth extractions is a core clinical skill in undergraduate dental education. The aim of this study was to evaluate pre-extraction assessment skills of dental students and interns and explore their self-perceived confidence in performing these tooth extractions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey investigated the self-perceived confidence to perform the extraction for a set of eight expert-rated cases. The participants were dental students at three different stages, that is, in Years 4 and 5 of the Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) programme and interns. The participants were asked to rate the difficulty level of each of the eight tooth extraction cases. The self-perceived confidence of the participants to perform extraction of each was also explored. Finally, the participants were asked to identify the main reason for the perceived lack of confidence.

RESULTS

A total of 199 responded to the survey, yielding a response rate of 94.7%. The effect of grade of extraction (the expert rating of cases) and stage of education on difficulty ratings was assessed using a mixed three stage of education × 4-grade ANOVA, with response (Difficult = 1, Easy = 0) as the dependent variable. The results showed that there was a correlation between the stage of education and grade of extraction and affected the self-perceived confidence of the participants. Gender showed a significant impact with females categorizing significantly more cases as difficult. A three-way contingency table (counts of each confidence-level response by stage of education by expert rating of cases) suggests a statistically significant association between the three factors. Most participants identified limited clinical exposure as the main reason for their perceived lack of confidence.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that a majority of the participants were able to recognize tooth extraction cases which were beyond the scope of their training stage with females reporting a lower confidence. Increased clinical exposure to a wider range of tooth extraction cases with varying levels of difficulty may contribute to improving the self-confidence of undergraduate dental students and interns.

Patient Safety Education in the Undergraduate Dental Curriculum: Evidence Base and Current Practice in UK Dental Schools

OBJECTIVES

International consensus advises patient safety education (PSE) for dental undergraduates. A previous systematic review found no articles describing PSE in dentistry. This article aimed to review the evidence base for, and the current practice of, PSE in UK dental schools.

METHODS

Literature search and surveys were sent via email to all 16 UK dental schools.

RESULTS

Six articles describing PSE interventions were found: 2 small-scale studies for dental students and 4 interprofessional studies. Patient safety education is effective for undergraduate dental students with significant improvement in knowledge and interest. Interprofessional studies reported improved teamwork skills and more positive attitudes toward interprofessional working.The 2018 and 2021 surveys had response rates of 56% and 100%, respectively. An increase in integrated formal PSE and assessment in UK dental schools is demonstrated. No barriers to implementation were reported. Forty-six percent of schools deliver interprofessional PSE, 38% deliver human factors, 81% teach communication, 94% teach professionalism, and 31% of schools have a patient safety (PS) champion.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited published literature on PSE in dentistry is available. However, the lack of published articles does not mean that PS is not being taught, as many UK dental schools were found to have formal PSE integrated and assessed within their curriculum. Further development is needed in terms of appointing PS champions for leadership and human factors training. Patient safety must form a part of an undergraduate student's core values.

An Educational Evaluation of Thiel Cadavers as a Model for Teaching Suturing Skills to Dental Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Suturing is an essential skill in dentistry and not one easily acquired. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a change to the use of Thiel cadavers and online resources with the aim of improving skill acquisition using the best model available. This study investigated the utility of the Thiel cadaver for teaching suturing skills and the potential impact of the lockdown. Fifty-seven year 4 students attended a teaching session. Student views on this teaching were explored via a questionnaire survey and qualitative data collected from a focus group. Data were analysed using an inductive approach. The response rate was 53% (30 students) for the questionnaire with 9 students participating in the focus group. Independent feedback was provided by two members of the teaching staff. Online video resources were very well received by the students with 97% agreeing that it was useful preparation. Ninety percent (90%) thought that the cadaveric model was suitable for this teaching and realistic. Positive emergent themes from the focus group centred on the use of the cadaveric model and the positive and relaxed teaching and learning environment. Staff perceived this model as superior to previously used models. There were no reported negative pandemic impacts and the cadaver model was well received.