The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs traditional anticoagulants in cirrhosis

Advancements of direct oral anticoagulants in cirrhotic individuals with portal vein thrombosis

Individuals with cirrhosis maintain a delicate balance between pro- and anticoagulation, which can lead to a state of hypercoagulability. This hypercoagulable condition not only exacerbates liver fibrosis but also increases the risk of venous thrombosis, particularly portal vein thrombosis (PVT). PVT has detrimental effects on liver function, complicates the success of liver transplantation, and negatively impacts the survival rate of patients with cirrhosis. Currently, multiple studies have confirmed that individuals with cirrhosis responded well to treatment with novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), showing both safety and efficacy. Furthermore, the use of DOACs as a preventive measure in patients with cirrhosis following surgery has been shown to lower the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis and postpone the progression of liver fibrosis.

Drug-Drug Interactions Between DAAs and Anticoagulants or Antiplatelets: A Position Paper of the Italian Anticoagulation Clinics

The natural history of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has changed after the introduction of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). Screening programs have been ongoing to reach the World Health Organisation's goal of HCV elimination by 2030, and most infected people are eligible for treatment. Given the increased cardiovascular risk in people with HCV infection and the metabolic pathways of DAAs, it is not uncommon to face the issue of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. In the absence of clinical trials, we offer suggestions to deal with DDIs in case of treatment of patients with DAAs who are also receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, based on the best available evidence from pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics studies in conjunction with clinical experience in the field of haemostasis and thrombosis.

From Pathophysiology to Practice: Evolving Pharmacological Therapies, Clinical Complications, and Pharmacogenetic Considerations in Portal Hypertension

Background: Portal hypertension is a major complication of chronic liver diseases, leading to serious issues such as esophageal variceal bleeding. The increase in portal vein pressure is driven by both an organic component and a functional component, including tonic contraction of hepatic stellate cells. These processes result in a pathological rise in intrahepatic vascular resistance, stemming from partial impairment of hepatic microcirculation, which is further exacerbated by abnormalities in extrahepatic vessels, including increased portal blood flow. Objectives: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving pharmacological therapies for portal hypertension, with consideration and discussion of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical complications, and pharmacogenetic considerations, highlighting potential directions for future research. Methods: A review of recent literature was performed to evaluate current knowledge and potential therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. Results: For over 35 years, non-selective beta-blockers have been the cornerstone therapy for portal hypertension by reducing portal vein inflow as an extrahepatic target, effectively preventing decompensation and variceal hemorrhages. However, since not all patients exhibit an adequate response to non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs), and some may not tolerate NSBBs, alternative or adjunctive therapies that enhance the effects of NSBBs on portal pressure are being investigated in preclinical and early clinical studies. Conclusions: A better understanding of pharmacogenetic factors and pathophysiological mechanisms could lead to more individualized and effective treatments for portal hypertension. These insights highlight potential directions for future research.

Management of Portal vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is one of the common complications of cirrhosis. The incidence of PVT correlates with liver disease severity-higher incidence in patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) C, large spontaneous portosystemic shunts, hepatofugal portal flow, and in the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma. PVT may worsen ascites, increase the risk and poor control of variceal bleeding. The occurrence of PVT may increase morbidity and lower survival after a liver transplant. Using statins prevents the occurrence of PVT, whereas beta-blockers may aggravate its occurrence. Cross-sectional imaging is mandatory for the precise diagnosis and classification of PVT. Symptomatic, occlusive PVT and candidacy for liver transplantation are the main indications for anticoagulation. Vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, and newer anticoagulants are effective and safe in cirrhosis. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants are agents of choice in early cirrhosis (CTP A, B). The duration of anticoagulant therapy, predictors of response, and management of complications of cirrhosis while on therapy require in-depth knowledge and individualized treatment. Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt can be considered in nonresponsive cases or when anticoagulants are contraindicated. This manuscript reviews the latest updated knowledge about managing PVT in cirrhosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Cirrhosis and Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is reported to be <25 times lower than that of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli, which occur in 70 to 270/100,000 cases in the general population. Current guidelines recommend initial treatment with therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a transition to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis who develop SVT without severe liver dysfunction. This, however, is based on observational data. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT and receive either a DOAC or a VKA.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2021 to November 2022. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with cirrhosis and acute SVT who received either a VKA or a DOAC between July 2019 and July 2021 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the efficacy of treatment, defined as a new thrombotic event. The secondary outcome was the safety of treatment, defined as the development of major bleeding. Readmission data were followed up at 6 and 10 months. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the medication groups and each outcome and summarized as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at 5% for all of the comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients from 50 hospitals were included in this study. Sixty-one patients (59.02% male) received DOACs and 19 (57.89% male) received a VKA. Of the patients who received DOACs, 41 (67.21%) received apixaban, one (1.64%) received dabigatran, and 19 (31.15%) received rivaroxaban. The results from the bivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between DOACs and warfarin for both the efficacy (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.44-4.84, P = 0.53) and safety outcomes (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.04-26.43, P = 1) at 10 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT may be efficacious and safe compared with warfarin. The findings from our study may inform power analyses for well-conducted randomized trials to confirm these findings.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin's efficacy and safety in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver cirrhosis (LC).

BACKGROUND

Evidence of the pharmacodynamics of DOACs is limited in patients with AF and LC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the largest hospital system in Taiwan, involving patients with AF and LC for the years 2012 to 2021. Hazards of thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism), intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were investigated with a new-user, active comparator design. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance potential confounders between treatment groups.

RESULTS

In total, 478 DOAC users and 247 warfarin users were included. DOACs and warfarin demonstrated similar trends in preventing thromboembolic events, namely ischemic stroke [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.05 (95% CI: 0.42-2.61)], transient ischemic attack [aHR, 1.36 (95% CI: 0.18-10.31)], and systemic embolism [aHR, 0.49 (95% CI: 0.14-1.70)]. DOAC use was associated with a similar risk of intracranial hemorrhage [aHR, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.26-1.59)] and gastrointestinal bleeding [aHR, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.39-1.03)], a decreased risk of major bleeding [aHR, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.42-0.99)], and a reduction in mortality [aHR, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54-0.99)]. DOAC users exhibited a significant reduction in major bleeding risk in patients with Child-Pugh class A (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs showed potential safety advantages over warfarin for patients with nonvalvular AF and LC, particularly in reducing major bleeding risk in those with Child-Pugh class A.

A pilot study of safety and efficacy comparison of low molecular heparin calcium sequential oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to compare and assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium (LMWH-Ca), followed by either warfarin or rivaroxaban, as treatment options for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

In this pilot study, cirrhotic (with liver function score of Child-Pugh A) patients diagnosed with PVT who were not on anticoagulant therapy received 2 weeks of subcutaneous injections of LMWH-Ca. They were then randomized to either warfarin (a full course of oral warfarin for 6 months) or rivaroxaban (a full course of oral rivaroxaban for 2 months), with 30 cases in each group. After a treatment period of up to 6 months, a comparative analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of both groups. Volumetric changes in PVT were monitored dynamically using enhanced computed tomography scans before treatment at week 2 and month 6.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the patients between the two groups. Rivaroxaban treatment reduced PVT median volume from 1.83 cm3 at week 2 to 0.0 cm3 at month 6 and prevented the worsening of PVT after 6 months of treatment with LMWH-Ca (P < 0.001). On the other hand, warfarin treatment increased PVT median volume from 1.95 cm3 at week 2 to 3.78 cm3 at month 6 (P = 0.002). None of the 30 patients in the rivaroxaban group had clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding, while 2 of the 30 patients (7%) in the warfarin group had gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.317).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban followed by LMWH-Ca is an effective anticoagulant treatment strategy for PVT in cirrhosis.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis. Part 2: Treatment, Primary and Secondary Prevention

In most cases, portal vein thrombosis progresses without treatment; spontaneous recanalization of portal vein develops in 42 % of patients with liver cirrhosis. Effective treatment strategies include administration of anticoagulants, interventional procedures such as transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt or endovascular fibrinolysis. Anticoagulant therapy has certain difficulties in patients with liver cirrhosis due to the complex profile of hemostasis, a tendency to both hemorrhages and hypercoagulation. In addition to traditional anticoagulants (heparin preparations, fondaparinux, vitamin K antagonists), direct oral anticoagulants have been widely used in recent years for portal vein thrombosis. Previously, portal vein thrombosis was considered a contraindication to performing transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt, currently the method is often used to restore portal blood flow through the shunt and prevent repeated thrombosis. Endovascular fibrinolysis is still an option for specialized centers for «difficult» patients. In cases of increased risk of venous thromboembolism, patients with liver cirrhosis are recommended to be prevented with low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants, but further studies should clarify their effectiveness in this aspect. The review highlights data on the features of therapy, primary and secondary prevention of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. Despite the existing clinical recommendations for management of patients with cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, the choice of a particular strategy primarily depends on an individualized assessment of risks and benefits of each treatment method.

Recommendations for the safe use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cirrhosis based on a systematic review of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety data

PURPOSE

The popularity of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing among patients with cirrhosis. Cirrhosis has a major impact on the pharmacokinetics of drugs, potentially increasing adverse events. Safe use of drugs in cirrhosis requires a diligent risk-benefit analysis. The aim of this study is to develop practice recommendations for safe use of DOACs in cirrhosis based on a systematic review of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety data.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of DOACs in cirrhosis. Data were collected and presented in summary tables by severity of cirrhosis using the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification. A multidisciplinary expert panel evaluated the results and classified the DOACs according to safety.

RESULTS

Fifty four studies were included. All DOACs were classified as 'no additional risks known' for CTP A. For CTP B, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were classified as 'no additional risks known'. Apixaban and edoxaban showed fewer adverse events in patients with cirrhosis, while dabigatran may be less impacted by severity of cirrhosis based on its pharmacokinetic profile. Rivaroxaban was classified as 'unsafe' in CTP B and C based on significant pharmacokinetic alterations. Due to lack of data, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were classified as 'unknown' for CTP C.

CONCLUSION

DOACs can be used in patients with CTP A cirrhosis, and apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban can also be used in CTP B. It is recommended to avoid rivaroxaban in CTP B and C. There is insufficient evidence to support safe use of other DOACs in CTP C cirrhosis.

Safety of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation

Background

Anticoagulation (AC) is used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe in patients with AF without cirrhosis, they are hardly studied in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Our study evaluates the safety and outcomes of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis (CPC).

Methods

We queried TriNetX Database. Patients with CPC and AF were divided into three cohorts: patients on DOACs, no AC, and warfarin. Three study arms were created using a 1:1 propensity score matching system (PSM).

Results

Totally 16 029 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 20.2% (n = 3235) were on DOACs, 47.1% (n = 7552) were not on AC, and 32.7% (n = 5242) were on warfarin. First arm comparing AC versus no AC, a statistically significant benefit was identified in 3-year mortality risk (47% vs 71%, P < 0.0001) and transplant status (17% vs 5%, p < 0.0001) with AC. However, no significant difference was identified regarding intracranial hemorrhage and GI bleeding risk. Second arm comparing patients on DOACs versus no AC, we identified mortality benefit (40% vs 72%, P < 0.0001) and a higher transplant rate (9% vs 3.2%, P < 0.0001) with DOACs. Intracranial hemorrhage rates (6% vs 4%, P = 0.03) were higher in patients on DOACs. Third arm comparing patients on DOACs versus Warfarin, a statistically significant lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (6.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.004) and GI bleed (2% vs 2.4%, P < 0.0001) were identified in patients on DOACs.

Conclusion

Anticoagulation is safe in patients with CPC with AF and may provide a mortality benefit. DOACs are a safer alternative to warfarin.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Traditional Anticoagulation in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis: Updated Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to traditional anticoagulation (vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins) in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase databases up to May 2024. Studies were selected according to the PICOS criteria, focusing on cirrhotic patients with PVT treated with DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) compared to traditional anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included four observational studies conducted in Japan, China, and the United States, involving a total of 223 patients with cirrhosis and PVT. The included studies collectively suggested that anticoagulation therapy, including DOACs, was associated with improved recanalization rates and reduced progression of PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis, without a significant increase in bleeding complications. Specifically, edoxaban demonstrated superior effectiveness in reducing PVT volume compared to traditional anticoagulation, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

CONCLUSION

DOACs may provide a promising therapeutic option for PVT in cirrhotic patients. Further research is needed to confirm the potential benefits and risks of DOACs in this population.

Assessing Safety of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Real-World Outcomes Study

AIMS

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke risk factors, randomized trials have demonstrated that anticoagulation decreases the risk of ischemic stroke. However, all trials to date have excluded patients with significant liver disease, leaving guidelines to extrapolate recommendations. We aim to evaluate the impact of anticoagulation on safety events in patients with AF and cirrhosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study, we obtained de-identified health record data to extract anticoagulation strategy, comorbidities, prescriptions, lab values, and procedures for a cohort of patients with cirrhosis who develop AF. After selecting a propensity matched population to match patients with various anticoagulation strategies, we tracked data on outcomes for death, transfusion requirements, hospital and ICU admissions. After propensity score weighting and multivariable adjustment, anticoagulation strategy was associated with increased hospital admission count (OR = 1.74 per admission, P < .001), binary risk of hospital admission (OR = 1.54, P = .010) and risk of ICU admission (OR = 1.41, P = .047). We detected no significant differences in mortality, transfusion of blood products, or average length of stay. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescriptions were associated with increased binary risk of hospital admission compared to warfarin prescriptions. In a third comparison, DOAC strategy alone was associated with increased hospital admission count (OR = 1.41 per admission, P < .001) and binary risk of hospital admission (OR = 1.52, P = .038) compared to no anticoagulation strategy.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation strategy in patients with cirrhosis and AF was associated with increased rate of hospital admission and ICU admission but not associated with increased risk of mortality or transfusion requirement.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in this population.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus databases from inception to August 2024. Clinical studies comparing the use of DOACs with warfarin in cirrhotic patients were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated by either fixed or random effects models. Primary efficacy outcomes were ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (IS/TE) and all-cause death, the primary safety outcomes were the bleeding risks.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included (16 829 individuals). DOACs had similar benefits in preventing IS/TE (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69-1.10), but DOACs were significantly associated with reduced risk of all-cause death (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97). On the other hand, we observed significantly reduced risks of any bleeding (HR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.37-0.95), major bleeding (HR = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.63-0.82), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (HR = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.30-0.73), and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.87) in patients receiving DOACs. Results were consistent in cirrhotic patients with AF. Furthermore, DOACs reduced the incidence of major bleeding (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.55-0.78) and ICH (HR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.04-0.76) in patients with moderate to severe cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that DOACs, compared with warfarin, exerted comparable efficacy and better safety and may represent a safer alternative to warfarin in cirrhotic patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants to treat deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with cirrhosis: are we there yet?

A 59-year-old female with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis attributed to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis complicated by hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertension with esophageal varices, and thrombocytopenia is seen for management of an acute segmental right lower lobe pulmonary embolism in a clinic. She is hemodynamically stable. Complete blood count is notable for hemoglobin 11.6  g/dL and platelets 80 K/μL. Prothrombin time is 12.6 seconds; partial thromboplastin time, 33.7 seconds; and fibrinogen, 221  mg/dL. She was referred to discuss if a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) can be used for anticoagulation. What would you suggest?

Antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation in the outpatient setting

With burgeoning evidence for early rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the management of AF in the outpatient setting has become more challenging. The primary care clinician often serves as the frontline in the pharmacologic management of AF. Because of drug interactions and the risk of proarrhythmia, many clinicians remain hesitant about the initiation and chronic management of antiarrhythmic drug prescriptions. However, with the likely increased use of antiarrhythmics for early rhythm control, understanding and familiarity with these medications have likewise become more important, especially since patients with AF probably have other non-cardiac medical conditions that can impact their antiarrhythmic therapy. In this comprehensive review, we provide informative, high-yield cases and edifying references that will help primary care providers become comfortable handling various clinical scenarios.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Cirrhotic Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Update of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prevention of ischemic stroke is an essential part of managing atrial fibrillation (AF). In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Little is understood regarding the efficacy and safety of DOACs in AF patients with liver cirrhosis (LC).

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis is designed to evaluate the benefits and risks of DOACs compared to VKAs in AF patients with concomitant LC.

METHODS

A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and CNKI databases up to February 2023. A total of seven clinical studies including 7551 patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis. All data analyses were performed using Review Manager software version 5.3.

RESULTS

Regarding efficacy outcomes, DOACs had comparable clinical benefit in reducing ischemic stroke/systemic thromboembolism (HR=0.79, 95% CI [0.59, 1.06], p = 0.12) to VKAs. The incidence of all-cause death was similar between the DOACs and VKAs group (HR 0.94, 95% CI [0.69, 1.28], p = 0.69). Regarding safety outcomes, DOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (HR 0.61, 95% CI [0.50, 0.75], p < 0.00001), intracranial hemorrhage (HR 0.55, 95% CI [0.31, 0.98], p = 0.04) and major gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.66, 95% CI [0.51, 0.85], p = 0.001) than VKAs. Additional subgroup analysis of advanced cirrhosis revealed that DOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.39, 0.89], p = 0.01) than VKAs. There were no significant differences between the DOACs and VKAs group concerning the incidence of ischemic stroke/systemic thromboembolism (HR 1.38, 95% CI [0.75, 2.55], p = 0.31) and major gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.65, 95% CI [0.41, 1.04], p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

DOACs are associated with more favorable safety outcomes and may be a feasible option of oral anticoagulant for individuals with atrial fibrillation and cirrhosis. Pending validation by randomized prospective studies, the findings of this study should be interpreted with caution.

Risk of Bleeding in Liver Cirrhosis Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective for the management of thromboembolic disorders. However, bleeding remains a major concern in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs.

METHODS

 PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The incidence of bleeding episodes in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs was pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the incidence of bleeding episodes in cirrhotic patients who received DOACs versus those who received conventional anticoagulants and did not receive anticoagulants.

RESULTS

 Twenty-nine studies were included. All bleeding, major bleeding, fatal bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage episodes were observed in 310/2,469, 100/1,388, 2/611, 166/1,886, and 5/1,147 cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs, respectively. Their pooled incidences were 13, 6, 0, 8, and 0%, respectively. They became higher in subgroup analyses of studies with advanced age, a longer treatment duration, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C. Compared with conventional anticoagulants, DOACs were associated with lower incidences of all bleeding (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.98) and major bleeding (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.37-0.83) in cirrhotic patients, but not those of fatal bleeding (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.04-1.28), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.52-1.17), or intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.12-1.12). The incidences of all bleeding (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.22-4.79) and major bleeding (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.26-3.61) did not significantly differ between cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) who received DOACs and those who did not receive anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

 DOACs carry a low risk of bleeding in liver cirrhosis. Age, treatment duration, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class may be associated with bleeding in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs. The risk of bleeding is not increased by DOACs in cirrhotic patients with PVT.

Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis: A state of art

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a manifestation of venous thromboembolism in an unusual site. Portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins are the most common vessels involved in SVT which occurs mainly in patients with liver cirrhosis, although non-cirrhotic patients could be affected as well. Thrombosis of hepatic veins, also known as Budd-Chiari syndrome, is another manifestation of SVT. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are mandatory in order to increase the recalization rate and reduce the risk of thrombus progression and hypertensive complications. Traditional anticoagulation with heparin and vitamin-K antagonists is the treatment of choice in these cases. However, recent studies have shown promising results on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this setting. Available results are mainly based on retrospective studies with small sample size, but first clinical trials have been published in the last years. This manuscript aims to provide an updated overview of the current evidence regarding the role of DOACs for SVT in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

Management of Stroke in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease: A Practical Review

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a highly prevalent condition. There is burgeoning recognition that there are many people with subclinical liver disease that may nonetheless be clinically significant. CLD has a variety of systemic aberrations relevant to stroke, including thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, elevated liver enzymes, and altered drug metabolism. There is a growing body of literature on the intersection of CLD and stroke. Despite this, there have been few efforts to synthesize these data, and stroke guidelines provide scant guidance on this topic. To fill this gap, this multidisciplinary review provides a contemporary overview of CLD for the vascular neurologist while appraising data regarding the impact of CLD on stroke risk, mechanisms, and outcomes. Finally, the review addresses acute and chronic treatment considerations for patients with stroke-ischemic and hemorrhagic-and CLD.

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Vascular Liver Diseases: Focus on Thrombosis

Vascular liver disorders (VLDs) comprise a wide spectrum of clinical-pathological entities that primarily affect the hepatic vascular system of both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. VLDs more frequently involve the portal and the hepatic veins, as well as liver sinusoids, resulting in an imbalance of liver homeostasis with serious consequences, such as the development of portal hypertension and liver fibrosis. Surprisingly, many VLDs are characterized by a prothrombotic phenotype. The molecular mechanisms that cause thrombosis in VLD are only partially explained by the alteration in the Virchow's triad (hypercoagulability, blood stasis, and endothelial damage) and nowadays their pathogenesis is incompletely described and understood. Studies about this topic have been hampered by the low incidence of VLDs in the general population and by the absence of suitable animal models. Recently, the role of coagulation imbalance in liver disease has been postulated as one of the main mechanisms linked to fibrogenesis, so a novel interest in vascular alterations of the liver has been renewed. This review provides a detailed analysis of the current knowledge of molecular mechanisms of VLD. We also focus on the promising role of anticoagulation as a strategy to prevent liver complications and to improve the outcome of these patients.

Perioperative Myocardial Infarction Following Dabigatran Reversal With Idarucizumab in a Patient Undergoing Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Insufficient information is available regarding the administration of anticoagulants, specifically direct oral anticoagulants, in individuals with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. In this report, we present a case of a 66-year-old male with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran who received idarucizumab prior to orthotopic liver transplantation. Hemostatic status was monitored throughout the procedure with both conventional hemostatic tests and point-of-care viscoelastic hemostatic assays. The patient suffered an intraoperative myocardial infarction, which could be related to the use of idarucizumab.

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A literature review

Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT), a common complication of advanced liver disease, is defined as an obstruction of the portal vein due to thrombus formation that can extend to the superior mesenteric and splenic veins. It was believed that PVT occurred predominantly due to prothrombotic potential. However, recent studies have shown that decreased blood flow related to portal hypertension appears to increase PVT risk as per Virchow's triad. It is well known that there is a higher incidence of PVTs in cirrhosis with a higher MELD and Child Pugh score. The controversy for management of PVTs in cirrhotics lies in the individualized assessment of risks versus benefits of anticoagulation, since these patients have a complex hemostatic profile with both bleeding and procoagulant propensities. In this review, we will systematically compile the etiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, and management of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis.

Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis: Bold and Brave?

Atrial fibrillation is frequently diagnosed in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially in those with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or alcoholic etiology. Anticoagulant treatment is recommended for thromboembolic protection in patients with atrial fibrillation. Considering the impaired coagulation balance in liver cirrhosis, predisposing patients to bleed or thrombotic events, the anticoagulant treatment is still a matter of debate. Although patients with liver cirrhosis were excluded from the pivotal studies that confirmed the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation, data from real-life cohorts demonstrated that the anticoagulant treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis could be safe. This review aimed to evaluate the recent data regarding the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant treatment in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Direct oral anticoagulants are safer than warfarin in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. In Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis, direct oral anticoagulants are contraindicated. New bleeding and ischemic risk scores should be developed especially for patients with liver cirrhosis, and biomarkers for bleeding complications should be implemented in clinical practice to personalize this treatment in a very difficult population represented by decompensated liver cirrhosis patients.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Liver Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic liver disease is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a new-user, retrospective cohort study of patients with AF and chronic liver disease who were enrolled in a large, US-based administrative database between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of DOACs (as a class and individually) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with AF and chronic liver disease. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and hospitalization for major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weights were used to balance the treatment groups on measured confounders.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 209 participants were included, with 4421 (43.2%) on warfarin, 2721 (26.7%) apixaban, 2211 (21.7%) rivaroxaban, and 851 (8.3%) dabigatran. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism were 2.2, 1.4, 2.6, and 4.4 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for major bleeding were 7.9, 6.5, 9.1, and 15.0 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. After inverse probability treatment weights, the risk of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was significantly lower between DOACs as a class (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]) or apixaban (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.82]) compared with warfarin, but not significantly different between rivaroxaban versus warfarin (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47-1.21]) or rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.91-3.29]). Compared with warfarin, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was lower with DOACs as a class (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.82]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.78]), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62-1.0]). However, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.14]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AF and chronic liver disease, DOACs as a class were associated with lower risks of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding versus warfarin. However, the incidence of clinical outcomes among patients with AF and chronic liver disease varied between individual DOACs and warfarin, and in head-to-head DOAC comparisons.

Treatment of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: a multicenter real life cοhort study

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication of cirrhosis and can be a cause or consequence of liver disease progression. It is unclear whether PVT treatment is affecting clinical outcomes in cirrhotics.

METHODS

This is a multicenter study of cirrhotics with PVT, initially retrospectively and thereafter prospectively registered in a data base. We studied the impact of PVT treatment on this population for efficacy, safety and the impact on survival. In survival analysis Mantel-Cox and Wilcoxon-Breslow-Gehan tests were used. A P value of <0.05, was considered significant. For statistical computations the STATA 12.1 was used.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included (76% decompensated, median MELD score 12 and Child-Pugh score 7), 47% with concomitant HCC. Fifty-one patients with PVT were treated with Vitamin-K antagonists or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months after PVT diagnosis, or until death or transplantation. PV patency after 6 months was not statistically different between patients receiving or not anticoagulation (complete-partial recanalization 27.4% of treated vs. 20% of untreated, P=0.21). Median survival was statistically worse between patients treated with anticoagulation than those untreated (10 vs. 15 months, P=0.036). Less portal hypertensive bleeding and less decompensation rates were found in treated cirrhotics vs. untreated (45.8% vs. 54.2%, P=0.003 and 78% vs. 80.9%, P=0.78, respectively). Patients with HCC had worse survival when treated vs. untreated (P=0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of cirrhotics with PVT, treatment was feasible with acceptable side effects, but without meaningful clinical benefits.

Review article: the safety of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis were long thought to be coagulopathic. However, this paradigm has changed in recent years and currently, cirrhosis is recognised as a prothrombotic state. Due to the increasing incidence of cirrhosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis which is closely associated with cardiac disease, patients with cirrhosis increasingly require therapy with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. However, their potential for causing catastrophic and life-threatening bleeding in patients with cirrhosis leads to hesitancy about their use in patients with cirrhosis. Overall, traditional anticoagulation is safe for all Child-Pugh classes while newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are mostly safe in Child-Pugh class A/B and contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment. For different indications, published data to date suggest that anticoagulation is overall safe for patients with cirrhosis who have venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation and portal vein thrombosis, and does not increase the risk of variceal bleeding. Moreover, DOACs appear to have similar safety profiles as traditional anticoagulants. Finally, most studies suggest that antiplatelet agents are also safe to use in patients with cirrhosis although they are mostly contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment. For both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, severe thrombocytopaenia presents a relative contraindication to their use. More prospective trials and large cohort studies are needed to advance our understanding of the safety and nuances of DOACs and antiplatelet agents in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Rivaroxaban Prophylaxis in Noncirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis

BACKGROUND: In patients with noncirrhotic chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT), the benefit of long-term anticoagulation is unknown. We assessed the effects of rivaroxaban on the risk of venous thromboembolism and portal hypertension-related bleeding in such patients. METHODS: In this multicenter, controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with noncirrhotic chronic PVT without major risk factors for thrombosis to receive either rivaroxaban 15 mg/day or no anticoagulation. The primary end point was 2-year thrombosis-free survival. Secondary end points included the occurrence of site-specific thromboses and major bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 111 participants were enrolled in the trial, with a mean age of 50.4±13.2 years; 58% of participants were men. An unplanned interim analysis was requested by the independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) after 10 thrombotic events occurred. The thrombosis incidence rate was 0 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban group and 19.71 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval, 7.49 to 31.92) in the no anticoagulation group (log-rank P=0.0008) after a median follow-up of 11.8 months. Based on the interim analysis, the DSMB recommended switching patients from the no anticoagulation group to anticoagulation. After a median follow-up of 30.3 months (intraquartile range, 24.3 to 47.8), major bleeding occurred in two patients receiving rivaroxaban and in one patient not receiving anticoagulation. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: After a median follow-up of 11.8 months, among patients with noncirrhotic chronic PVT without major risk factors for thrombosis, daily rivaroxaban reduced the incidence of venous thromboembolism and did not increase major bleeding events. (Funded by grants from the French Ministry of Health and the Association de Malades des Vaisseaux du foie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02555111.)

Rational hemostatic management in cirrhosis: from old paradigms to new clinical challenges

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cirrhosis are at risk of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Traditional hemostatic tests are inadequate to assess the complex and fragile balance of hemostasis in this setting, especially in advanced stages of disease such as decompensated cirrhosis or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). Furthermore, the indiscriminate use of pro-hemostatic agents for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes is still debated and often contraindicated. Alongside, splanchnic, and peripheral thrombotic events are frequent in this population and require management that involves a careful balance between risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to address the state of the art on the clinical management of the hemostatic balance of cirrhosis in terms of established knowledge and future challenges.

EXPERT OPINION

The old paradigm of cirrhosis as a naturally anticoagulated condition has been challenged by more sophisticated global tests of hemostasis. Integrating this information in the clinical decision-making is still challenging for physicians and experts in hemostasis.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of Cirrhosis: A Comprehensive Review

Portal vein thrombosis constitutes the most common thrombotic event in patients with cirrhosis, with increased rates in the setting of advanced liver disease. Despite being a well-known complication of cirrhosis, the contribution of portal vein thrombosis to hepatic decompensation and overall mortality is still a matter of debate. The incorporation of direct oral anticoagulants and new radiological techniques for portal vein recanalization have expanded our therapeutic arsenal. However, the lack of large prospective observational studies and randomized trials explain the heterogenous diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of current guidelines. This article seeks to make a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.

Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, are an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) and deep venous thromboembolism. We hope to evaluate the safety of DOACs versus warfarin/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in improving bleeding events in patients with different severity of the liver disease.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies reporting the effects of DOACs in patients with liver cirrhosis. A random-effects model or fixed-effects model was selected to pool risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies involving 41,447 participants was included in this meta-analysis. Compare with warfarin/ LMWH, the use of DOACs significantly reduced the incidence of all bleeding (RR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.66 to 0.87), major bleeding (RR: 0.51; 95%CI: 0.28 to 0.91), intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.81), and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.97), and all-cause death in patients with liver disease (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.62 to 0.95). Similar results were observed in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease and cirrhosis subgroups. Furthermore, the pooled estimates of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class indicated that DOACs reduced the incidence of all bleeding (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.45 to 0.82), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.55; 95%CI: 0.37 to 0.83), and all-cause death (RR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.49 to 0.79) in patients with mild to moderate cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that DOACs significantly reduce the risk of bleeding in patients with liver disease compared with warfarin/LMWH.

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Moderate to Severe Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remain mostly investigational in patients with moderate to severe hepatic cirrhosis, yet are often selected over traditional anticoagulants including warfarin and enoxaparin in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with moderate to severe hepatic cirrhosis as compared with traditional anticoagulation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study evaluating inpatients and outpatients who were prescribed a DOAC, warfarin, or enoxaparin for therapeutic anticoagulation with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) B or C status at the time that the prescription was written. Included patients were followed until first bleeding or thromboembolic event, or until discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. Data were collected by manual chart review. The primary outcomes included both bleeding events and thromboembolic events in the DOAC population as compared with traditional anticoagulation.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were included in the study, 69 treated with DOAC therapy and 32 with traditional anticoagulation. Bleeding events occurred in 36% of patients in the DOAC group and 22% of patients in the traditional group (P = 0.149). In both groups, bleeds were most commonly gastrointestinal. Thromboembolic events occurred in 4% of the DOAC population and no patients in the traditional population (P = 0.55). No fatal bleeding or thromboembolic events occurred.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

DOACs do not appear to be more harmful than traditional anticoagulation in patients with CTP B or C status. These results support the use of DOACs in patients with CTP B or C hepatic cirrhosis when considering safety, efficacy, and convenience.

Anticoagulation after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal hypertension: A systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is widely applied to decrease portal hypertension. Because of the lack of strong evidence, it is controversial whether anticoagulation should be performed after TIPS. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for patients with portal hypertension following TIPS.

METHODS

Studies making comparisons between combination treatment and TIPS alone were searched in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Library, PubMed, the Wan Fang electronic databases, and EMBASE, delivered between the earliest accessible date and September 4, 2021. The RevMan version 5.3 was applied to conduct all statistical analyses. I2 index statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies were selected, and total 707 patients were enrolled. According to the meta-analysis, compared to TIPS alone, TIPS + anticoagulation led to much lower incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT; odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.84, P = .02) as well as low heterogeneity (P = 0.36, I2 = 3%). Other index like the stent dysfunction rate (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.71-2.77, P = .42), bleeding rate (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.71-2.77, P = .42), and incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.56-1.36, P = .55) showed no statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In certain patients with portal hypertension, anticoagulation following TIPS may not be required. However, for patients who do not have a PVT before TIPS, post-TIPS anticoagulation can decrease the incidence of PVT. Nonetheless, further research is still required.

Anticoagulation in Cirrhosis: Evidence for the Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis and Applications for Prophylactic Therapy

The clinical utility of anticoagulation for patients with cirrhosis and asymptomatic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is widely debated. Complex hemostatic derangements in cirrhosis that increase risk of both bleeding and thrombosis, as well as a lack of randomized controlled data, limit conclusive assessments regarding optimal management of anticoagulation in this setting. In this review, we summarize the relevant literature pertaining to PVT in cirrhosis, including the effect of untreated PVT on the natural progression of liver disease and the overall impact of anticoagulation on clot burden and other relevant clinical outcomes. Apart from patients who are symptomatic or listed for liver transplantation, data supporting anticoagulation for the treatment of PVT is limited and without clear consensus guidelines. In patients with cirrhosis without PVT, emerging evidence for the role of prophylactic anticoagulation to mitigate the progression of fibrosis suggests an optimal risk-benefit tradeoff with decreased rates of liver decompensation and mortality, without a heightened risk of bleeding. In summation, as our understanding of the role of both prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation in cirrhosis continues to evolve, ongoing risk stratification of patients with asymptomatic PVT demands further attention.

Investigational drugs in early clinical development for portal hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Advanced chronic liver disease is considered a reversible condition after removal of the primary aetiological factor. This has led to a paradigm shift in which portal hypertension (PH) is a reversible complication of cirrhosis. The pharmacologic management of PH is centered on finding targets to modify the natural history of cirrhosis and PH.

AREAS COVERED

This paper offers an overview of the use of pharmacological strategies in early clinical development that modify PH. Papers included were selected from searching clinical trials sites and PubMed from the last 10 years.

EXPERT OPINION

A paradigm shift has generated a new concept of PH in cirrhosis as a reversible complication of a potentially curable disease. Decreasing portal pressure to prevent decompensation and further complications of cirrhosis that may lead liver transplantation or death is a goal. Therapeutic strategies also aspire achieve total or partial regression of fibrosis thus eliminating the need for treatment or screening of PH.

Haemostatic alterations and management of haemostasis in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis frequently acquire complex changes in their haemostatic system including a decreased platelet count and decreased levels of various haemostatic proteins. Although historically patients with cirrhosis were thought to have a haemostasis-related bleeding tendency, it is now widely accepted that the haemostatic system of patients with cirrhosis remains in balance as a result of simultaneous changes in pro- and anti-haemostatic systems. The concept of rebalanced haemostasis has led to changes in clinical management, although firm evidence from well-designed clinical studies is largely lacking. For example, many invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and a prolonged prothrombin time are now performed without prophylaxis with fresh frozen plasma. Conversely, clinicians have become more aware of the need for anti-thrombotic therapy, even in those patients with abnormal routine coagulation tests. This paper will outline recent advances in pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of both bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with cirrhosis. Among other topics, we will discuss the haemostatic status of acutely ill patients with cirrhosis, the various causes of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, and how best to prevent or treat bleeding. In addition, we will discuss the hypercoagulable features of patients with cirrhosis, new insights into the pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis, and how best to prevent or treat thromboses.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for Treatment of Thrombosis or Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Evidence for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cirrhosis is limited. Few patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class B and C cirrhosis have been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare major bleeding rates in patients with cirrhosis receiving a DOAC versus warfarin.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adults with cirrhosis receiving a DOAC versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism, portal-vein thrombosis, or atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome was the rate of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included time to major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, all bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and new thromboembolic events. The study was approved by the Ochsner Health System Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients receiving a DOAC and 41 patients receiving warfarin were included. Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients receiving a DOAC and 6 patients receiving warfarin (9.1% vs 14.6%; P = 0.881). Rates of major bleeding were similar in 24 DOAC and 17 warfarin patients with CTP Class B (4.2% vs 17.6%; P = 0.37) and 8 DOAC and 9 warfarin patients with CTP Class C (37.5% vs 11.1%; P = 0.41) cirrhosis. Secondary bleeding and efficacy outcomes were similar between cohorts. The study was limited by a small sample size.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Treatment with DOACs in patients with cirrhosis was associated with a similar rate of major bleeding compared with warfarin. Inclusion of CTP class C patients in future studies remains valuable to evaluate safety and efficacy of DOACs in this population.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on prevention and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis

The prevention and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis poses several difficult clinical questions. These Clinical Practice Guidelines have been developed to provide practical guidance on debated topics, including current views on haemostasis in liver disease, controversy regarding the need to correct thrombocytopenia and abnormalities in the coagulation system in patients undergoing invasive procedures, and the need for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised patients with haemostatic abnormalities. Multiple recommendations in this document are based on interventions that the panel feels are not useful, even though widely applied in clinical practice.

Safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in cirrhotic patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin in patients with both nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and clinically confirmed liver cirrhosis (LC) has not been well studied. We compared the risk of a major bleeding event between DOAC and warfarin treatments in this patient population.

METHODS

A total of 238 cirrhotic patients with AF were retrospectively analyzed. The major bleeding event risk was compared between DOAC- and warfarin-treated groups. The median follow-up duration was 5.6 years.

RESULTS

Among the 238 study patients with LC and AF, 128 (53.8%) received DOACs and 110 (46.2%) received warfarin. The mean patient age was 68.8 years, and 78.2% were men. A major bleeding event occurred in 10 and 20 patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively, most commonly caused by gastrointestinal bleeding (70.0%). The cumulative risk of major bleeding did not differ between the groups by log-rank test (p = 0.12). This finding did not change when using 60 propensity score-matched pairs. A multivariable Cox regression model indicated that the concomitant use of antiplatelet agents (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 4.30; p = 0.048) and presence of esophageal or gastric varices confirmed by endoscopic examination (aHR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.03 to 5.17; p = 0.04) were associated with major bleeding in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

A major bleeding event risk is not increased by DOAC compared with warfarin treatment. Antiplatelet agent use and varices are independently associated with a higher risk of major bleeding during anticoagulation.

Direct oral anticoagulant administration in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: What is the evidence?

In recent years, the traditional concept that cirrhosis-related coagulopathy is an acquired bleeding disorder has evolved. Currently, it is known that in cirrhotic patients, the hemostatic system is rebalanced, which involves coagulation factors, fibrinolysis and platelets. These alterations disrupt homeostasis, skewing it toward a procoagulant state, which can lead to thromboembolic manifestations, especially when hemodynamic and endothelial factors co-occur, such as in the portal vein system in cirrhosis. Portal vein thrombosis is a common complication of advanced liver cirrhosis that negatively affects the course of liver disease, prognosis of cirrhotic patients and success of liver transplantation. It is still debated whether portal vein thrombosis is the cause or the consequence of worsening liver function. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay treatment for acute symptomatic portal vein thrombosis. In chronic portal vein thrombosis, the role of anticoagulant therapy is still unclear. Traditional anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparin are standard-of-care treatments for portal vein thrombosis. In the last ten years, direct oral anticoagulants have been approved for the prophylaxis and treatment of many thromboembolic-related diseases, but evidence on their use in cirrhotic patients is very limited. The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence about the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants for treating portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients.

Anticoagulation Considerations in Liver Disease

Coagulopathy of liver disease is a complex pathology that may result in thrombosis and/or bleeding complications. Routine laboratory values are not always reflective of the degree of these risks. Additionally, prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cirrhosis require careful evaluation when selecting and monitoring drug therapy for these indications. Therefore, this article aims to provide insight regarding coagulopathy of liver disease, influence on laboratory values, and anticoagulant therapy considerations for critical care nurses assuming care for patients with cirrhosis.

Drug Use Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in Patients With Advanced Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists are commonly used in cirrhotic patients requiring anticoagulation. However, their monitoring with anti-factor Xa and international normalized ratio (INR) may not be reliable in cirrhosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) do not need laboratory monitoring, making these agents a favorable alternative. However, apixaban and rivaroxaban have been avoided in advanced liver disease due to their metabolism in the liver. The purpose of this medication use evaluation was to assess the use of DOACs, specifically apixaban and rivaroxaban, in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center study. Inpatients who had a diagnosis of cirrhosis and received at least one dose of a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban) from April 2016 through June 2020 at our hospital were included in the analysis. Data collected included the reason for admission, Child-Pugh classification, renal function, if this was a home medication or newly started as an inpatient medication, indication, and dosing. The clinical efficacy outcome (new venous thromboembolic event (VTE) or progression of old VTE), and clinical safety outcome (bleeding event) were analyzed.

RESULTS

41 patients with cirrhosis were treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Based on the Child-Pugh classification, 29.3% (n=12/41) were placed on a DOAC outside of the FDA prescribing recommendations. In this subpopulation, 8.3% (n=1/12) patients had venous thromboembolism (VTE) and 16.6% (n=2/12) had bleeding events. Overall, 7.3% patients (n=3/41) had VTE and 4.8% (n=2/41) had bleeding events. In the Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-Line Therapy (AMPLIFY) trial comparing the efficacy and safety profile of apixaban with enoxaparin/warfarin therapy in acute VTE, 2.3% of patients had VTE and 15% had bleeding events.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that it may be possible to safely use DOACs in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in this patient population, as our study was limited by the small sample size and its retrospective design.

Dealing with the high bleeding and thrombosis risks in critically ill patients with chronic liver disease: A dilemma in the clinical practice

No Abstract.

Atrial fibrillation, liver cirrhosis, thrombosis, and bleeding: A Danish population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We examined the impact of liver cirrhosis on the risk of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF).

METHODS

This population-based cohort study used data from Danish health registries. We identified all patients with a first-time diagnosis of AFF during 1995 to 2015, and followed them from their AFF diagnosis until the end of 2016. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis. We computed incidence rates per 1000 person-years and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on Cox regression analyses, adjusting for age, CHA2DS2VASc score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score.

RESULTS

We identified 273 225 patients with AFF. Of these, 1463 (0.54%) had liver cirrhosis. During 0 to 5 years of follow-up, compared to patients without liver cirrhosis, patients with liver cirrhosis had higher incidence rates and hazards of ischemic stroke (29.7 vs 21.6; HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6), venous thromboembolism (9.2 vs 5.5; HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.3), but not myocardial infarction (10.2 vs 11.2; HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.2). Patients with liver cirrhosis also had higher rates of hemorrhagic stroke (5.8 vs 3.3; HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6), subdural hemorrhage (5.3 vs 1.6; HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.1-4.9), hemorrhage of the lung or urinary tract (24.6 vs 15.2; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (34.5 vs 10.4; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.7-3.9).

CONCLUSION

In patients with AFF, liver cirrhosis was associated with an elevated risk of ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all evaluated bleeding complications.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with a higher risk of liver-related complications. Recent guidelines recommend direct-acting anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis and non-tumoral PVT. However, data on the efficacy and safety of DOAC in these patients remain limited. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOAC compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to treat non-tumoral PVT in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of six electronic databases using MeSH term and free text. We selected all studies comparing the use of DOACs with vitamin K antagonist to treat PVT in cirrhosis. The primary outcome was PVT recanalization. Secondary outcomes were and PVT progression, major bleeding, variceal bleeding and death.

RESULTS

From 944 citations, we included 552 subjects from a total of 11 studies (10 observational and 1 randomized trial) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that DOAC were associated with a higher pooled rate of PVT recanalization (RR = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.02, 2.74, I2 = 79%) and lower pooled risk of PVT progression (RR = 0.14, 95%CI: 0.03-0.57, I2 = 0%). The pooled risk of major bleeding (RR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.08-1.01, I2 = 0%), variceal bleeding (RR = 1.29, 95%CI: 0.64-2.59, I2 = 0%) and death (RR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.01-9.578, I2 = 80%) was similar between DOAC and VKA.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of PVT in patients with cirrhosis, the bleeding risk was comparable between DOAC and VKA. However, DOAC were associated with a higher pooled rate of PVT recanalization. Dedicated randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.