Extracorporeal photopheresis for graft‐vs‐host disease: A literature review and treatment guidelines proposed by the Nordic ECP Quality Group

The Role of Extracorporeal Photopheresis in the Management of Graft Versus Host Disease: Narrative Review

Hematopoietic stem cell donation is a method used to treat both blood-related and non-blood-related malignancies. Graft-versus-host disease is a potentially life-threatening complication that can occur following a stem cell transplant from a donor. This happens after the transplanted grafts attack the recipient's body as foreign cells, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Clinically, this condition can be classified as acute or chronic based on onset and pathophysiology. This review aims to provide an overview of recent studies on extracorporeal photopheresis as a treatment strategy option for graft-versus-host-diseased patients. It will explain how it treats graft-versus-host disease, summarize its promising effects, and provide future recommendations for its use in treating this illness. Extracorporeal photopheresis is used to treat graft-versus-host disease by collecting and separating white blood cells from the patient. This blood is fractionated into different parts, and white blood cells undergo treatment with 8-methoxy psoralen, a photoactivable drug, before exposure to ultraviolet light A. Lastly, the cells that have been treated are reinfused into the recipient's body. It prompts the programmed cell death of lymphocytes and the engulfment of cellular debris by host antigen-presenting, leading to a subsequent rise in T regulatory cells. However, more experimental and randomized controlled studies are required to identify the best patient selection requirements, environments, and treatment regimens for graft-versus-host disease.

Survey of European Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) nurses to explore the current topical skin management of chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease in the real-world clinical environment

PURPOSE

To understand the current practice in relation to the management of topical therapy for cutaneous chronic Graft versus Host Disease (ccGvHD) and access to extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) within European allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation centres by a survey of nurses.

METHOD

This was a multicentre cross-national study at eligible European Blood and Marrow Transplant centres. Eligibility required more than 30% of treated patients having allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant. Centres performing only autologous stem cell transplants were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

12% of respondents were unaware of whether their centre had a policy or not for monitoring chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease. Over half had the affiliation of a dermatologist for referral, but only 19% had access to a specialist nurse. Patient education was routinely provided in most of the centres (86%). Results suggested as the severity of a patient's chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease increased, there was a reduction in the amount of topical emollients and steroids employed. Following topical therapies, systemic treatments, and other modalities such as ECP were employed with less focus directed towards topical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical treatment is the backbone of any treatment paradigm for chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease, however, there is no universally agreed algorithm. Improved skin care may lead to a reduction in the amount of systemic therapy required, thus increasing patients' quality of life. There is little standardisation in the topical management of chronic cutaneous graft versus host disease, despite skin being the most cited organ affected by chronic graft versus host disease, this should be addressed.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II: Disease activity grading and therapeutic management

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and a leading cause of long-term morbidity, nonrelapse mortality, and impaired health-related quality of life. The skin is commonly affected and presents heterogeneously, making the role of dermatologists critical in both diagnosis and treatment. In addition, new clinical classification and grading schemes inform treatment algorithms, which now include 3 Federal Drug Administration-approved therapies, and evolving transplant techniques are changing disease epidemiology. Part I reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of cGVHD. Part II discusses disease grading and therapeutic management.

Mode of action, indications and recommendations on extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP)

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has gained importance in the treatment of several diseases. Initially introduced as a new therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, the indications for the use of ECP have expanded to include hematology and transplantation immunology. Extracorporeal photopheresis has found its place in the treatment plan of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, systemic sclerosis, graft-versus-host disease, organ transplantation such as heart and lung, sometimes as first-line therapy and very often in combination with various systemic immunosuppressive therapies. The procedure basically consists of three steps: leukapheresis, photoactivation and reinfusion. The following article presents possible theories about the mechanism of action, which is not yet fully understood, and discusses the five most common indications for ECP treatment with corresponding therapy recommendations.

Wirkweise, Indikationen und Therapieempfehlungen der extrakorporalen Photopherese (ECP)

Die extrakorporale Photopherese (ECP) hat in jüngster Zeit bei der Behandlung verschiedener Krankheiten an Bedeutung gewonnen. Ursprünglich als neue Therapie zur Behandlung von Patienten mit kutanem T‐Zell‐Lymphom vorgestellt, hat sich der Indikationsbereich für die ECP auf Hämatologie und Transplantationsimmunologie erweitert. Die ECP hat ihren festen Platz im Therapieplan bei kutanen T‐Zell‐Lymphomen, systemischer Sklerose, Graft‐versus‐Host‐Erkrankung, Organtransplantationen wie Herz und Lunge, teilweise als Erstlinientherapie und sehr häufig in Kombination mit verschiedenen systemischen immunsuppressiven Therapien. Das Verfahren besteht im Wesentlichen aus drei Schritten: Leukapherese, Photoaktivierung und Reinfusion. Im folgenden Artikel werden die noch nicht vollständig verstandenen Wirkmechanismen dargestellt, die fünf häufigsten Indikationen für die Behandlung mit ECP diskutiert und Therapieempfehlungen für die jeweilige Indikation gegeben.

Midline catheters for extracorporeal photopheresis in hematological patients

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral venous access for extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) may be difficult in graft versus host disease (GVHD) patients, because of previous intravenous therapies and multiple peripheral cannulations; in this population of patients, ultrasound guided midline catheters may be an alternative option to central venous access.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective preliminary study, we enrolled all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of GVHD and candidate to ECP, over a period of 10 months. We used inserted power injectable, non-valved, polyurethane, 20-25 cm single lumen midline catheters (MC).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine ECP procedures were carried out in six patients, using single-lumen MCs for outflow (5Fr in 74% and 4Fr in 26% of cases). For inflow, we used 5Fr or 4Fr MCs, or central venous access devices previously placed for other clinical reasons. There were no catheter-related complications during the entire period of ECP treatment. Mean outflow was significantly higher for 5Fr than for 4Fr MCs (35.8 ± 7.3 vs 29.2 ± 7.8 ml/min; p = 0.0008) and the procedure time was significantly shorter (92.9 ± 9.2 vs 108 ± 13.2 min; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In GVHD patients, ECP can be performed efficiently and safely using single lumen polyurethane power injectable MCs. The best results are obtained with 5Fr rather than with 4Fr catheters. This strategy of venous access should be implemented in DIVA patients requiring ECP treatments, and probably also in other types of apheresis.

Extracorporeal photopheresis as an immunomodulatory treatment modality for chronic GvHD and the importance of emerging biomarkers

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the treatment of choice for malignant haematological diseases. Despite continuous improvements in pre- and post-transplantation procedures, the applicability of allo-HSCT is limited by life-threatening complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), engraftment failure, and opportunistic infections. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is used to treat steroid resistant GvHD with significant success. However, the molecular mechanisms driving its immunomodulatory action, whilst preserving immune function, require further understanding. As ECP is safe to administer with few significant adverse effects, it has the potential for earlier use in the post-HSCT treatment of GvHD. Thus, further understanding the immunomodulatory mechanisms of ECP action may justify more timely use in clinical practice, as well as identify biomarkers for using ECP as first line or pre-emptive GvHD therapy. This review aims to discuss technical aspects and response to ECP, review ECP as an immunomodulatory treatment modality for chronic GvHD including the effect on regulatory T cells and circulating vs. tissue-resident immune cells and consider the importance of emerging biomarkers for ECP response.

Novel and Promising Strategies for Therapy of Post-Transplant Chronic GVHD

Despite the achievements that have increased viability after the transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (aHSCT), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains the main cause of late complications and post-transplant deaths. At the moment, therapy alternatives demonstrate limited effectiveness in steroid-refractory illness; in addition, we have no reliable data on the mechanism of this condition. The lack of drugs of choice for the treatment of GVHD underscores the significance of the design of new therapies. Improved understanding of the mechanism of chronic GVHD has secured new therapy goals, and organized diagnostic recommendations and the development of medical tests have ensured a general language and routes for studies in this field. These factors, combined with the rapid development of pharmacology, have helped speed up the search of medicines and medical studies regarding chronic GVHD. At present, we can hope for success in curing this formidable complication. This review summarizes the latest clinical developments in new treatments for chronic GVHD.

Infectious risks in patients treated with extracorporeal photopheresis for graft-versus-host disease: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Infections are common with significant mortality and morbidity in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an advantageous treatment option for patients with GvHD because it is not immunosuppressive. The objective of this study was to assess the rate of infections and to determine risk factors in patients with GvHD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a single-center cohort, we retrospectively collected data on infectious episodes by evaluating the clinical records of patients with GvHD treated by ECP since 2011.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included in this study. At ECP initiation, there were 10 patients with acute GvHD and 37 with chronic GvHD. At the final follow-up, 200 infectious episodes were diagnosed in 91.5% of patients with an average follow-up of 25.9 months (ie, 1.97 infections per patient per year). Most episodes had positive outcomes as there was no death related to infections, and only six infections required long-term treatment. Higher dose of corticosteroids at the initiation of ECP was significantly associated with a shorter onset of the first infection (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.17, 3.57]; P = .013). Unrelated donor transplants were significantly associated with a lower rate of infection (HR = 0.61; 95% CI [0.39, 0.95]; P = .028).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that ECP is associated with a low infection rate and an optimal clinical efficacy. Thus, ECP is still a suitable treatment for GvHD. Yet, a future study with a larger cohort will be necessary to deepen the identification of risk factors for infection.

Application of Photodynamic Therapy with 5-Aminolevulinic Acid to Extracorporeal Photopheresis in the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A First-in-Human Study

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulatory therapy for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), exposes isolated white blood cells to photoactivatable 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and UVA light to induce the apoptosis of T-cells and, hence, to modulate immune responses. However, 8-MOP-ECP kills diseased and healthy cells with no selectivity and has limited efficacy in many cases. The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and light (ALA-based photodynamic therapy) may be an alternative, as ex vivo investigations show that ALA-ECP kills T-cells from cGvHD patients more selectively and efficiently than those treated with 8-MOP-ECP. The purpose of this phase I-(II) study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ALA-ECP in cGvHD patients. The study included 82 treatments in five patients. One patient was discharged due to the progression of the haematological disease. No significant persistent changes in vital signs or laboratory values were detected. In total, 62 adverse events were reported. Two events were severe, 17 were moderate, and 43 were mild symptoms. None of the adverse events evaluated by the internal safety review committee were considered to be likely related to the study medication. The results indicate that ALA-ECP is safe and is mainly tolerated well by cGvHD patients.

Extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: A multicenter experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is one of the second-line treatment strategies in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD). We aimed to share our multicenter experience using ECP in our steroid-refractory aGvHD patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational series of 75 aGvHD patients from 4 transplant centers were analyzed. All ECP procedures were performed with the off-line system. All patients received ECP as second-line therapy.

RESULTS

74.7 % of aGvHD patients were grade 3 or 4. The overall response rate was 42.7 % (32/75) in aGvHD including 17 complete responses (22.7 %). Median follow-up was 6 months (range, 1-68). Median overall survival (OS) was 5 months for non-responders and 68 months for responders (p < 0.001). Twenty-seven (36 %) patients are alive, and 48 (64 %) patients have died.

CONCLUSIONS

Early initiated ECP could be an effective treatment alternative in patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD.

Analysis of extracorporeal photopheresis within the frame of the WAA register

The aim of the study was to investigate safety and if extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) may change health criteria (HC) and quality of life (QoL).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

560 patients (33 % women) were treated with ECP for a total of 13,871 procedures during a 17-years period. Mean age was 48 years (±18, range 3-81 years). Self-estimation of QoL was graded: 0 (suicidal) up to 10 (best ever) and HC: 0 (Bed ridden, ICU condition) up to 10 (athletic). Adverse events were analyzed. ANOVA and paired comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

Patients were treated due to graft versus host disease (GVHD, n = 317), skin lymphoma (n = 70), solid organ transplants (n = 47), skin diseases (n = 20) and other diseases (n = 106). Adverse events (AEs) were registered in 5.4 % of the first treatments and in 1.2 % of the subsequent procedures. Severe AEs were present in 0.04 % of all procedures. No patient died due to the procedure. Tingling and stitching were the most common AE. For those with GVHD an improvement was noticed within approximately 10 procedures of ECP in the severity stage, QoL (from a mean of 6.1 to 6.8, p < 0.002) and the HC (6.1 -> 6.4, p < 0.014) and improved further with added procedures.

CONCLUSION

Photopheresis is an established therapy with few side effects. The present study of soft variables indicate that GVHD shows benefits upon ECP within approximately 10 procedures in regard to the severity of mainly skin GVHD, and lower baseline levels of HC and QoL.

Current Concepts and Advances in Graft-Versus-Host Disease Immunology

Worldwide, each year over 30,000 patients undergo an allogeneic hema-topoietic stem cell transplantation with the intent to cure high-risk hematologic malignancy, immunodeficiency, metabolic disease, or a life-threatening bone marrow failure syndrome. Despite substantial advances in donor selection and conditioning regimens and greater availability of allograft sources, transplant recipients still endure the morbidity and mortality of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Herein, we identify key aspects of acute and chronic GVHD pathophysiology, including host/donor cell effectors, gut dysbiosis, immune system and cytokine imbalance, and the interface between inflammation and tissue fibrosis. In particular, we also summarize the translational application of this heightened understanding of immune dysregulation in the design of novel therapies to prevent and treat GVHD.

Multiple strictures of the small intestine demanding surgical intervention as a rare consequence of graft versus host disease – case report

Background

Intestinal strictures are an extremely rare and life-threating complication in patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We describe the case of a child operated for multiple strictures of the small intestine secondary to GvHD.

Case presentation

A 7-year-old girl underwent second allo-HSCT from matched unrelated donor for post-CALR-positive-ET myelofibrosis and its relapse after the first HSCT. HSCT was complicated with grade IV acute GvHD (skin and gut). The patient was treated with CsA, with methylprednisolone, and due to corticosteroid resistance subsequently with etanercept and ECP. She required parenteral nutrition due to malabsorption symptoms and anorexia for 15 months after HSCT. On day + 457, the laparotomy was performed due to increasing symptoms of mechanical bowel obstruction. Ten critical cicatricial strictures of the small intestine were revealed. Nine segmental resections of the strictured segments and 6 intestinal anastomoses were done during one surgical procedure. The postoperative period was uncomplicated, and oral feeding was gradually implemented, achieving full coverage. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of overlap syndrome of acute and chronic GvHD. Therefore, the patient started therapy with ruxolitinib which was continued till 30 months after HSCT. Corticosteroids were gradually withdrawn on day + 574. Currently, 32 months after the second HSCT, no GvHD and no gastrointestinal disturbances are observed. The patient remains in hematological and molecular remission of myelofibrosis.

Conclusions

GvHD therapy is largely based on conservative treatment, but a patient presenting with occlusive symptoms due to permanent changes in the gastrointestinal wall needs to undergo surgery to ensure its efficient functioning.

Inline and offline extracorporeal photopheresis: Device performance, cell yields and clinical response

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective treatment for graft-vs-host-disease (GvHD). Photopheresis can be performed in offline or inline method. The first uses a conventional cell separator for collection of mononuclear-cells that are photoactivated by a separate device and manually reinfused; the second one involves a dedicated device performing the entire procedure (collection, photoactivation and reinfusion).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The objective was to compare the two methods and cell product features to highlight key process, devices performance, and to evaluate ECP clinical response. Patients developing steroid-resistant GvHD underwent ECP as second-line treatment using either inline (Therakos CellEx) or offline system (Terumo BCT Spectra or Optia and UVA PIT system). Data about patients' features, pre-apheresis blood-count, cell product characteristics and clinical response were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

We evaluated 494 procedures performed on 28 patients from April 2018 to March 2019. The offline procedure allows to achieve greater cell yield, it is characterized by larger processed blood volume, longer runtime, and higher ACD consumption. The inline procedure shows shorter runtime, high mononuclear-cells percentage and low percentage of granulocytes in cell product. We observed a significant difference in cell yields between inline and offline system; furthermore we did not find a significant relationship between cell dose and clinical response.

CONCLUSION

Inline ECP is fast, highly automated and productive, making it particularly suitable for ECP treatments. Offline ECP collects high cell yields implying longer procedure and greater operator intervention. Our study did not find a significant relationship between cell dose and GVHD response.