Immune-related adverse events in cancer patients being treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune-related adverse events among patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy: real-world data from the Neo-Real/GBECAM 0123 study

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) based on the KEYNOTE-522 trial. However, 13 % of patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of grade ≥3 in the trial. This study aims to describe patterns of irAEs in a real-world scenario during treatment with pembrolizumab for early-stage TNBC.

METHODS

Patients treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy across ten Brazilian cancer centers were evaluated in the Neo-Real/GBECAM0123 study. This analysis focuses on irAE evaluation, including time to onset, management, and association between irAEs and pathological complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

A total of 368 patients were included. Overall, 31 % of patients (n = 114) presented with any grade irAEs. Most of irAEs (72.8 %) occurred during the neoadjuvant phase while 28.1 % happened during the adjuvant period. The most frequent irAEs were endocrine (12.8 % of the entire cohort), cutaneous (7.6 %) and gastrointestinal (7.1 %). A total of 50 patients (13.6 %) experienced grade ≥3 irAEs, predominantly gastrointestinal (32 %). 58 patients (56 %) needed corticosteroids. Immunotherapy rechallenge was possible in 53 % of the cases; permanent discontinuation of pembrolizumab was necessary for 16 %. No significant association was observed between irAEs and clinic-pathologic features nor pCR status.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world analysis, we observed a similar incidence of irAEs as reported in the KEYNOTE-522 trial. Most patients experienced resolution of their irAEs, but some required permanent discontinuation of pembrolizumab. Additionally, there were lasting dysfunctions, particularly endocrine, demanding lifelong support. Careful monitoring and management of these events are essential.

Real-world data of immune-related adverse events in lung cancer patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized lung cancer (LC) treatment; however, immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) may occur. The risk factors of irAEs and the impact of irAEs on patient outcomes in LC remain uncertain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

irAEs within 12 months of ICI initiation in LC patients who initiated ICIs 2018-2021 were identified. Cause-specific Cox regression was used to assess risk factors for irAEs with the competing risk of death; a subset analysis was done among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) group. Multivariable Cox regressions were used to evaluate the impact of irAEs on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 125 patients, 50 irAEs occurred in 39 patients. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) histology was associated with a higher risk of irAEs (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73, 95% CI [1.17, 6.35], p = 0.020) than NSCLC. In NSCLC subset, programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) positivity (HR = 2.68, 95% CI [1.10. 6.53], p = 0.030) was identified as a risk factor. irAEs were not significantly associated with PFS (HR = 0.69, p = 0.204) or OS (HR = 0.72, p = 0.353).

CONCLUSION

SCLC histology and PDL1 positivity were associated with irAEs, and the occurrence of irAEs showed no impact on survival in LC patients. Future studies are required to validate the findings.

Incidence and management of hepatic immune‑related adverse events in advanced urologic cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A multicenter retrospective study

The present study aimed to evaluate the incidence, characteristics and management of hepatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Data regarding the demographics, ICI regimens and hepatic irAEs from 213 patients with metastatic UC or metastatic RCC receiving ICIs between February 2018 and September 2023 at three tertiary medical centers (Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea; Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences Cancer Center, Busan, South Korea; Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea) in South Korea were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Hepatic irAEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and classified based on R value patterns. Among the 213 patients evaluated, 76 (35.6%) experienced at least one irAE, whereas 48 (22.5%) developed hepatic irAEs. The median onset time for hepatic irAEs was 6.5 weeks, with incidence rates being higher with combination therapies than with monotherapies (31.8 vs. 18.3%; P=0.014). Furthermore, 72.9 and 27.1% of the patients had grade 1-2 and 3-4 hepatic irAEs, respectively. The patterns of liver toxicity included cholestatic (35.4%), mixed (35.4%) and hepatocellular (29.2%). All patients with grade 1-2 hepatic irAE recovered with supportive treatment without ICI discontinuation or corticosteroids use. Among the 13 patients with grade ≥3 hepatic irAEs, 12 recovered with high-dose corticosteroids, while 1 died due to fulminant hepatitis. Hepatic irAEs are common in patients with advanced and metastatic urologic cancers who are treated with ICIs, particularly with combination therapies. Most cases have low-grade irAE that are manageable without ICI discontinuation; however, severe cases require prompt recognition and treatment with corticosteroids. These findings emphasize the importance of regular liver function monitoring and appropriate management strategies for hepatic irAEs in patients with urologic cancer receiving ICI therapy.

Fixed-Dose Versus Weight-Adapted Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma: A Retrospective Monocentric Analysis of Efficacy and Immune-Related Adverse Events

Changes in the dosing schedules for immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, were introduced based on pharmacokinetic data and analysis of pre-existing clinical trial data in the absence of new clinical trials. Therefore, we sought to provide real-world data examining whether fixed-dose therapy (FDT) or weight-adapted therapy (WAT) influenced progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The electronic case notes of all patients (n = 77) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (ICI) in the first-line setting for melanoma in the Department of Dermatology, University of Luebeck, between the 1 January 2017 and the 31 December 2020, were retrospectively analysed. Although a higher proportion of patients in the WAT cohort were treated in the palliative setting, there were no correlations between dosing schedule, renal function, or BMI and PFS. Moreover, there were no differences between the cohorts in terms of PFS, OS, or the number and nature of irAEs. An elevated serum S100 concentration was associated with a decreased mean PFS in the FDT cohort (p < 0.001). This study, although inherently limited by its retrospective and monocentric nature, provides reassuring evidence that dosing schedule and pre-existing comorbidities do not influence efficacy or the irAE profile of ICI therapy in the management of melanoma.

Comparative analysis of immune-related adverse events among patients with melanoma on immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study

In a large, multi-institutional cohort of 672 patients with melanoma, we examined the comparative incidence and severity of immune-related adverse events among patients receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors. Comparing PD-1 inhibitors, nivolumab was associated with significantly lower risk of high-grade toxicity onset compared with pembrolizumab on unadjusted logistic regression analysis. Compared with pembrolizumab, use of the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab was associated with a significant increase in risk of gastrointestinal, but not endocrine and cutaneous toxicities.

Predictors for the development of neurological immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and impact on mortality

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Little is known about risk factors for developing neurological immunological adverse events (neuro-irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We report the incidence, predictors for development, impact on mortality of neuro-irAEs, and impact of ICIs on pre-existing neurological conditions in a large clinical cohort.

METHODS

Patients who received ICIs between January 2011 and December 2018 were identified from a tertiary cancer center registry. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient, cancer, and treatment data. Odds ratios from univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were calculated to identify potential predictors for developing a neuro-irAE. Impact of neuro-irAEs on overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Overall frequency of neurological irAEs was 2.3%. Peripheral nervous system complications were most frequent (53.6%). Melanoma, younger age, prior chemotherapy, prior resection, CTLA-4 ICIs exposure, and combination PD-1 and CTLA-4 ICIs exposure had significantly higher odds for developing a neuro-irAE (p < 0.05) in univariate but not multivariate models. Those with a neuro-irAE were less likely to die at 3 years compared to those without a neuro-irAE (69% vs. 55%, p = 0.004) in univariate but not multivariate model. Flare of pre-existing neurological condition after exposure to ICIs was present (15.4%, 2 of 13 patients) but manageable. One patient was rechallenged with ICIs without recurrent flare.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuro-irAEs are not associated with increase in overall mortality. Potential predictors for the development of neuro-irAEs are younger age, melanoma, prior chemotherapy and resection, CTLA-4, or combination ICIs exposure.

Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Practical Guide to Identifying High-Risk Patients and Rechallenging Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a range of complications associated with the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Two major classes of ICIs widely used are Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA4) and Programmed Cell death-1 (PD-1)/Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. High-grade irAEs are life-threatening and often cause a severe decline in performance status in such that patients do not qualify for any further anticancer treatments. It is difficult to generalize the evidence in the current literature on risk factors or biomarkers for the entire class of ICIs as the studies so far are either disease-specific (e.g., lung cancer or melanoma) or ICI agent-specific (e.g., pembrolizumab, ipilimumab) or irAE-specific (e.g., pneumonitis or gastritis). In this review, risk factors and biomarkers to consider before initiating or monitoring ICI are listed with a practical purpose in day-to-day practice. Risk factors are grouped into demographics and social history, medical history, and medication history, tumor-specific and agent-specific risk factors. A higher risk of irAE is associated with age <60 years, high body mass index, women on CTLA4 and men on PD-1/PD-L1 agents, and chronic smokers. Patients with significant kidney (Stage IV-V), cardiac (heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, hypertension), and lung (asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) are at a higher risk of respective organ-specific irAEs. Pre-existing autoimmune disease and chronic use of certain drugs (proton pump inhibitors, diuretics, anti-inflammatory drugs) also increase the irAE-risk. Biomarkers are categorized into circulating blood counts, cytokines, autoantibodies, HLA genotypes, microRNA, gene expression profiling, and serum proteins. The blood counts and certain protein markers (albumin and thyroid-stimulating hormone) are readily accessible in current practice. High neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, eosinophil/monocyte/lymphocyte counts; TSH and troponins at diagnosis and drop in the white count and lymphocyte count can predict irAE. Other biomarkers with limited evidence are cytokines, autoantibodies, HLA genotypes, microRNA, and gene expression profiling. With fast-expanding approvals for ICIs in various cancer types, knowledge on risk factors and biomarkers can help providers assess the irAE-risk of their patients. Prospective disease and agent-specific studies are needed to provide further insight on this essential aspect of ICI therapy.

Predicting Outcome in Combination Treatment of TACE and Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma: Tumor Hypervascularity and Reactive Cutaneous Capillary Endothelial Proliferation

Objective

To validate the robust predictive values of tumor vascularity and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) in combination treatment of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and camrelizumab for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and then select the potential candidates who would survive best from such treatment.

Methods

The clinical data of 113 patients with advanced HCC treated with TACE and camrelizumab from January 2019 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Mann Whitney U-test was used to evaluate the correlation between vascular distribution and RCCEP and tumor response; Kaplan Meier technique was used to evaluate time to progress (TTP) and overall survival (OS), and log rank test was used for comparison; multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the related influencing factors.

Results

The TTP and OS of TACE combined with carrelizumab in patients with advanced HCC were 7.1 and 14.3 months. Hypervascularity and development of RCCEP were good predictors of TTP (HR 2.561, P < 0.001; HR 1.486, P = 0.032) and OS (HR 2.854, P < 0.001; HR 1.634, P = 0.011). The median TTP and OS of patients with hypervascularity and RCCEP were 10.6 and 19.3 months, which were better than those with only hypervascularity (6.8 months, P = 0.016; 11.6 months, P = 0.003) and only RCCEP (6.2 months, P = 0.039; 13.5 months, P = 0.042), as well as those with neither (3.8 months, P < 0.001; 7.4 months, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Tumor hypervascularity and development of RCCEP were favorable predictive factors for the combination treatment of TACE and carrelizumab, with both of which the patients survived longest and might be the potential candidates.