Survival in autoimmune hemolytic anemia remains poor, results from a nationwide cohort with 37 years of follow-up

Primary autoimmune haemolytic anaemia is associated with increased risk of ischaemic stroke: A binational cohort study from Denmark and France

Primary autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) causes the destruction of red blood cells and a subsequent pro-thrombotic state, potentially increasing the risk of ischaemic stroke. We investigated the risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with AIHA in a binational study. We used prospectively collected data from nationwide registers in Denmark and France to identify cohorts of patients with primary AIHA and age- and sex-matched general population comparators. We followed the patient and comparison cohorts for up to 5 years, with the first hospitalization of a stroke during follow-up as the main outcome. We estimated cumulative incidence, cause-specific hazard ratios (csHR) and adjusted for comorbidity and exposure to selected medications. The combined AIHA cohorts from both countries comprised 5994 patients and the 81 525 comparators. There were 130 ischaemic strokes in the AIHA cohort and 1821 among the comparators. Country-specific estimates were comparable, and the overall adjusted csHR was 1.36 [95% CI: 1.13-1.65], p = 0.001; the higher rate was limited to the first year after AIHA diagnosis (csHR 2.29 [95% CI: 1.77-2.97], p < 10-9 ) and decreased thereafter (csHR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.66-1.20], p = 0.45) (p-interaction < 10-5 ). The findings indicate that patients diagnosed with primary AIHA are at higher risk of ischaemic stroke in the first year after diagnosis.

Severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia; epidemiology, clinical management, outcomes and knowledge gaps

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is an acquired hemolytic disorder, mediated by auto-antibodies, and has a variable clinical course ranging from fully compensated low grade hemolysis to severe life-threatening cases. The rarity, heterogeneity and incomplete understanding of severe AIHA complicate the recognition and management of severe cases. In this review, we describe how severe AIHA can be defined and what is currently known of the severity and outcome of AIHA. There are no validated predictors for severe clinical course, but certain risk factors for poor outcomes (hospitalisation, transfusion need and mortality) can aid in recognizing severe cases. Some serological subtypes of AIHA (warm AIHA with complement positive DAT, mixed, atypical) are associated with lower hemoglobin levels, higher transfusion need and mortality. Currently, there is no evidence-based therapeutic approach for severe AIHA. We provide a general approach for the management of severe AIHA patients, incorporating monitoring, supportive measures and therapeutic options based on expert opinion. In cases where steroids fail, there is a lack of rapidly effective therapeutic options. In this era, numerous novel therapies are emerging for AIHA, including novel complement inhibitors, such as sutimlimab. Their potential in severe AIHA is discussed. Future research efforts are needed to gain a clearer picture of severe AIHA and develop prediction models for severe disease course. It is crucial to incorporate not only clinical characteristics but also biomarkers that are associated with pathophysiological differences and severity, to enhance the accuracy of prediction models and facilitate the selection of the optimal therapeutic approach. Future clinical trials should prioritize the inclusion of severe AIHA patients, particularly in the quest for rapidly acting novel agents.

Survival in adult patients with chronic primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated long-term survival in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (pITP). Further, changes in prognosis over the past decades and prognosis of secondary immune thrombocytopenia (sITP) are largely unstudied. Our objectives were to study comorbidity-adjusted prognostic changes and causes of death in chronic pITP and sITP patients.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS

Using nationwide Danish health registries 1980-2016, we identified 1762 patients with chronic pITP (median age 58 (IQR, 37-73) years) and 128 with chronic sITP (median age 59 (IQR, 40-73) years). Patients were age-sex-matched to 74,781 general population comparators. Comorbidity was assessed using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

RESULTS

Overall median survival was reduced by 5.1 years (95% CI, 0.7-9.4) (p < .001) for pITP and 11.1 years (95% CI, 5.8-16.4) (p < .001) for sITP. 5-year survival increased from 69% (95% CI, 59-78) in 1980-89 to 80% (95% CI, 75-83) in 2010-16 for pITP, and decreased from 100% (95% CI, 89-98) to 64% (95% CI, 87-91) for sITP. However, numbers were small for sITP. 5-year survival for pITP with high CCI was 41% (95% CI, 32-49), and 85% (95% CI, 83-87) for low CCI. Bleeding, infection and hematological cancer were relatively frequent causes of death with adjusted subhazard ratios of 3.25 (95% CI, 2.33-4.52), 1.53 (95% CI, 1.08-2.16) and 2.16 (95% CI, 1.12-4.16) in pITP respectively, and 10.52 (95% CI, 1.43-77.36) for hematological cancer in sITP.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival is reduced in chronic ITP but seems to be improving. Comorbidity and sITP are associated with a poor prognosis.

A Prospective Follow-Up Study on the Disease Course and Predictors of Poor Outcomes in a Random Population-Based Cohort of Newly Diagnosed Lupus Patients

Background and objective

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is one of the most devastating systemic autoimmune connective tissue diseases. There is a paucity of prospective data on Pakistani SLE patients, and in this prospective study, we aimed to investigate the disease course, clinical outcomes, and the predictors of poor outcomes in a random population-based cohort of newly diagnosed SLE patients (diagnosed within the last one year).

Methods

This was a prospective observational study carried out in the rheumatology department of the Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore. Lupus patients are regularly reviewed in our dedicated lupus clinic every one to three months. For the purpose of this study, a focus group of newly diagnosed patients (diagnosed within the last one year) attending our lupus clinic was identified and prospectively followed up for 12 months. A wide range of demographical and clinical parameters was recorded. The association of clinical variables with the progressive disease was determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions.

Results

Prospective data of 89 newly diagnosed SLE patients regularly attending our dedicated lupus clinic were reviewed. During the study period, (January 2021 through January 2022), these patients had multiple visits overall - median: five, minimum: three, and maximum: nine visits [interquartile range (IQR) 4-7]. All 89 patients had completed one year of follow-up. Of note, 46% of the cohort was noted to have an ongoing active disease during the majority of visits in the study period. On multiple logistic regression analysis, there was a significant association between ongoing active disease ("progressors") and low education status [odds ratio (OR): 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-7.76, p=0.046], stress at home (OR: 5.8, 95% CI: 2.13-15.8, p=0.001), and hematologic manifestations (OR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.08-8.32, p=0.03).

Conclusions

Almost half of our cohort of lupus patients demonstrated active disease manifestations throughout the one-year prospective follow-up, and these were found to be associated with low education status, stress at home, and hematological manifestations.