Prognostic value of baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for forecasting chemotherapy outcome in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma: Data from the phase III HD17 trial

PET/CT Reconstruction and Its Impact on [Measures of] Metabolic Tumor Volume

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

In oncological imaging, the use of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for further prognostic differentiation and the development of risk adapted strategies appears promising. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate ultra-high definition (UHD) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) PET/CT reconstructions for their potential impact on different methods of MTV measurement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) scans of 40 Hodgkin lymphoma patients before first-line treatment who had undergone fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. The MTVs were determined taking an SUV of 4.0 (MTV4.0) as a fixed threshold or 41% of the single hottest voxel (MTV41%) as an adaptive threshold for automated lymphoma delineation in both UHD and OSEM reconstructions. We then compared the absolute and relative differences between MTV4.0 and MTV41% in UHD and OSEM reconstructions. The relative distribution of MTV4.0 and MTV41% in relation to the reconstruction method applied was recorded and respective differences were tested for statistical significance using the paired sample t-test.

RESULTS

A comparison of MTV4.0 and MTV41% showed smaller relative and absolute differences in MTV between different reconstruction settings for the MTV4.0 method. Conversely, the absolute as well as the relative differences between MTVs obtained from different reconstructions settings were significantly greater when the MTV41% method was applied (p < 0001).

CONCLUSION

MTV4.0 brings higher robustness between different reconstruction settings, while with MTV41% the deviation between volumes obtained with different reconstruction settings is greater. For clinical routine and for multicenter settings, the MTV4.0 therefore appears most promising.

Artificial Intelligence-powered automatic volume calculation in medical images - available tools, performance and challenges for nuclear medicine

Volumetry is crucial in oncology and endocrinology, for diagnosis, treatment planning, and evaluating response to therapy for several diseases. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Deep Learning (DL) has significantly accelerated the automatization of volumetric calculations, enhancing accuracy and reducing variability and labor. In this review, we show that a high correlation has been observed between Machine Learning (ML) methods and expert assessments in tumor volumetry; Yet, it is recognized as more challenging than organ volumetry. Liver volumetry has shown progression in accuracy with a decrease in error. If a relative error below 10 % is acceptable, ML-based liver volumetry can be considered reliable for standardized imaging protocols if used in patients without major anomalies. Similarly, ML-supported automatic kidney volumetry has also shown consistency and reliability in volumetric calculations. In contrast, AI-supported thyroid volumetry has not been extensively developed, despite initial works in 3D ultrasound showing promising results in terms of accuracy and reproducibility. Despite the advancements presented in the reviewed literature, the lack of standardization limits the generalizability of ML methods across diverse scenarios. The domain gap, i. e., the difference in probability distribution of training and inference data, is of paramount importance before clinical deployment of AI, to maintain accuracy and reliability in patient care. The increasing availability of improved segmentation tools is expected to further incorporate AI methods into routine workflows where volumetry will play a more prominent role in radionuclide therapy planning and quantitative follow-up of disease evolution.