Early versus later treatment start in multiple sclerosis: a register-based cohort study

Socioeconomic impact of initial high vs. moderate efficacy disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: Effects on labor market affiliation

BACKGROUND

The clinical effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are well understood. However, evidence of DMTs' impact on socioeconomic outcomes, such as working capacity, is limited.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesised that patients initiating high-efficacy (he)DMTs as their first DMT have a lower risk of disability pension and a lower risk of employment in a protected employment scheme than patients initiating moderate-efficacy (me)DMTs as their first DMT.

METHODS

We performed a nationwide registry-based, propensity score-matched cohort study including 1064 patients (532 pairs) newly diagnosed with RRMS who initiated heDMT or meDMT, and we followed the development in their labour market affiliation. For analyses, we used Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable at baseline. Initiating heDMT was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.9 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.6-1.3) for disability pensions and an HR of 0.6 (95 % CI: 0.4-0.9) for becoming employed in a protected employment scheme compared with initiating meDMT.

CONCLUSION

Initiating heDMT as the first DMT was associated with a lower risk of becoming employed in a protected employment scheme. The two DMT groups did not differ in their risk of receiving disability pensions.

De-escalating and discontinuing disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis

The development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been highly successful in recent decades. It is now widely accepted that early initiation of DMTs after disease onset is associated with a better long-term prognosis. However, the question of when and how to de-escalate or discontinue DMTs remains open and critical. This topic was discussed during an international focused workshop organized by the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) in 2023. The aim was to review the current evidence on the rationale for, and the potential pitfalls of, treatment de-escalation in MS. Several clinical scenarios emerged, mainly driven by a change in the benefit-risk ratio of DMTs over the course of the disease and with ageing. The workshop also addressed the issue of de-escalation by the type of DMT used and in specific situations, including pregnancy and paediatric onset MS. Finally, we provide practical guidelines for selecting appropriate patients, defining de-escalation and monitoring modalities and outlining unmet needs in this field.

Consensus recommendations on multiple sclerosis management in Australia and New Zealand: part 1

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating and degenerative disease of the central nervous system. There were 33 335 people with MS in Australia in 2021 and 2917 in New Zealand in 2006 and the prevalence and incidence are increasing with time. Although new treatments have substantially improved outcomes in recent decades, the treatment landscape has become increasingly complex due to the expanding number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and associated safety considerations.

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS

A total of 80 consensus recommendations were developed on the current best-practice management of MS in Australia and New Zealand. Part 1 of these guidelines outlines the consensus recommendations covering domains including DMT counselling and selection, pre-DMT assessments, monitoring disease activity on DMT, switching DMT, and discontinuing DMT. The remaining recommendations are outlined in Part 2, encompassing risk mitigation strategies during treatment with DMT, managing DMT in special situations (including pregnancy, postpartum, breastfeeding, active infection including COVID-19, and malignancy), general lifestyle measures, acute MS relapses, and symptomatic treatments for MS.

CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THE GUIDELINES

This two-part position statement provides a practical resource for clinicians on current best-practice consensus recommendations for managing adults (≥ 18 years old) with MS in the Australian and New Zealand health care settings. It outlines the 14 DMTs currently available through the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and eight through the New Zealand Pharmaceutical Schedule, including the unique efficacy, safety and monitoring considerations of each. Through these guidelines, we aim to support safe, timely and effective management of patients with MS in Australia and New Zealand.

Performance of treatment response scoring systems among patients with multiple sclerosis treated with high-efficacy therapies

BACKGROUND

Predicting treatment response and disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging. Treatment Response Scoring Systems (TRSS) are potentially useful, but their utility in patients receiving high-efficacy therapies and very high-efficacy therapies (HET/vHET) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of TRSS in patients treated with HET/vHET.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied MS patients treated with HET/vHET in an MS specialized centre. TRSS, including the Rio Score, modified Rio Score and MAGNIMS score, were applied to assess response to treatment. We evaluated the predictive value of the TRSS on disease activity and disability progression.

RESULTS

TRSS effectively predicted disease activity and progression of disability in patients treated with HET/vHET. Patients with high TRSS scores at 12 months post-HET/vHET initiation had a significantly increased risk of relapses, new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and progression of disability at 4 years.

DISCUSSION

Our findings highlight the importance of personalized treatment strategies in MS. TRSS are valuable tools for monitoring treatment response, guiding clinical decision-making and optimizing patient care.

Evaluating natalizumab first-line and later-line use in multiple sclerosis: a US claims database analysis

Background

Limited information exists on the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with real-world natalizumab used as a first-line (1L) versus later-line (2L+) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objectives

To describe natalizumab use in newly diagnosed MS patients treated as 1L or 2L+ and evaluate unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARR) and MS-related HCRU before and after treatment initiation.

Design

This retrospective observational study utilized Komodo Health Sentinel claims data from October 2015 to August 2022. The study included adults diagnosed with incident MS who initiated natalizumab treatment, with insurance coverage for at least 12 months before diagnosis and 24 months after. The index date was the first natalizumab claim on or after the diagnosis. Baseline was defined as the 365 days prior to the index date, truncated at the time of diagnosis. Follow-up ended at the earliest occurrence of death, insurance disenrollment, treatment discontinuation (gap ⩾45 days), switch to another disease-modifying therapy before natalizumab discontinuation, or study end.

Methods

Relapses and HCRU were assessed using person-time methods to account for varying follow-up times. Relapses were identified using a validated claims-based algorithm, and time to first relapse was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios for relapse were estimated using univariate Cox models. Mean differences (MD) in HCRU between baseline and follow-up and between 1L and 2L+ treatment groups were calculated.

Results

A total of 1174 patients in the 1L group (mean age 39.0, 72.0% female) and 394 in the 2L+ group (mean age 39.7, 79.4% female) were included. Patients in the 1L group had a significantly higher baseline ARR (1.48 vs 0.92, p < 0.001) and lower on-treatment ARR (0.28 vs 0.41 for 2L+, p < 0.001). HCRU decreased significantly in the 1L group from baseline to follow-up: hospitalizations (MD 17.01 visits/year), length of stay (LOS; MD 20.96 days/year), emergency room visits (MD 9.83 visits/year), non-natalizumab outpatient visits (MD 12.11 visits/year) and long-term care facility stays (MD 22.18 days/year, p = 0.002). The 1L group showed greater reductions in inpatient visits (MD 10.01 visits//year), LOS (MD 16.73 days/year) and non-natalizumab outpatient visits (MD 11.64 visits/year) compared to the 2L+ group.

Conclusion

Natalizumab as a first-line treatment was associated with greater reductions in ARR and MS-related HCRU compared to later-line use.

Optimizing Drug Selection in Children with Multiple Sclerosis: What Do We Know and What Remains Unanswered?

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) refers to multiple sclerosis with onset before 18 years of age. It is characterized by a more inflammatory course, more frequent clinical relapses, and a greater number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions compared with adult-onset MS (AOMS), leading to significant impacts on both disability progression and cognitive outcomes in affected individuals. Managing POMS presents distinct challenges due to the unique needs of pediatric patients and the limited number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved for pediatric use. Notably, only one therapy (fingolimod) is approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and three (fingolimod, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate) by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for use in youth with MS. However, observational evidence identifies use of almost all agents off-label in this population. This review provides a comprehensive overview of literature supporting the use of DMTs for POMS, including evidence from observational studies. In this paper, we highlight the shift in clinical practice, which has led to increased use of high-efficacy therapies (HETs) at or near disease onset. We review emerging evidence indicating better cognitive and motor outcomes in this population with early initiation of therapy. Finally, in this paper, we provide a suggested treatment algorithm for managing POMS. We underscore the need for personalized approaches in POMS management. We identify special considerations unique to pediatric care, including attention to family dynamics, and strategies to improve medication adherence and a smooth transition to adult care. Further research on DMTs in POMS is essential to optimize outcomes and improve long-term prognosis.

B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, DenmarkHvilsted NielsenHelleMD, PhDOdense University Hospital, Department of Neurology, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, DenmarkDemirovicManuelMDOdense University Hospital, Department of Neurology, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, DenmarkLaszlo IllésZsoltMD, PhD, DMScOdense University Hospital, Department of Neurology, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, DenmarkRoshanisefatHomayounMD, PhDSlagelse Hospital, Department of Neurology, Fælledvej 11, 4200 SlagelseMasoud Falah, MD, Slagelse Hospital, Department of Neurology, Fælledvej 11, 4200 SlagelseAsgariNasrinMD, PhD, DMScSlagelse Hospital, Department of Neurology, Fælledvej 11, 4200 Slagelse, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, DenmarkGardeziAfzalMDHospital of Southern Jutland, Department of Neurology, University of Southern Denmark, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200 Aabenraa, DenmarkKantMatthiasMD, PhDHospital of Southern Jutland, Department of Neurology, University of Southern Denmark, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200 Aabenraa, DenmarkPetersenThorMD, PhDHospital of Southern Jutland, Department of Neurology, University of Southern Denmark, Kresten Philipsens Vej 15, 6200 Aabenraa, DenmarkSejbækTobiasMD, PhDSouthwest Jutland Hospital, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, DenmarkChristensenClaudiaMD, PhDAalborg University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Reberbanegade 15, 9100 Aalborg, DenmarkUrbonaviciuteIngaMDAalborg University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Reberbansgade 15, 9100 Aalborg, DenmarkBarzinjiIsmaelMDAalborg University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Reberbanegade 15, 9100 Aalborg, DenmarkSchäferJakobMDAalborg University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Reberbanegade 15, 9100 Aalborg, DenmarkMærsk-MøllerCamillaPhDAarhus University Hospital, Department of Neurology, PJJ Boulevard 165, J504, 8200 Aarhus N, DenmarkWinther TørringCarolineMD, PhDAarhus University Hospital, Department of Neurology, PJJ Boulevard 165, J504, 8200 Aarhus N, DenmarkBacher SvendsenKristinaMD, PhDAarhus University Hospital, Department of Neurology, PJJ Boulevard 165, J504, 8200 Aarhus N, DenmarkVestergaard RasmussenPeterMD, PhDAarhus University Hospital, Department of Neurology, PJJ Boulevard 165, J504, 8200 Aarhus N, DenmarkSirakovGeorgi P.MDRegionshospital Viborg, Hospitalsenhed Midt, Department of Neurology, Heibergs Allé 4, 8800 ViborgPrakashSivaginiMDRegionshospital Viborg, Hospitalsenhed Midt, Department of Neurology, Heibergs Allé 4, 8800 ViborgAsenovTsvetomirMD, PhDRegionshospital Viborg, Hospitalsenhed Midt, Department of Neurology, Heibergs Allé 4, 8800 ViborgKristian StorrLarsMD, PhDZealand University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Sygehusvej 10, 4000 Roskilde, DenmarkChristina RougLenaMDZealand University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Sygehusvej 10, 4000 Roskilde, DenmarkKatarzyna GóraMonikaMDZealand University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Sygehusvej 10, 4000 Roskilde, DenmarkAshnaSaidMDZealand University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Sygehusvej 10, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark. The impact of educational attainment on diagnostic and treatment delays in multiple sclerosis: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark

Background

In multiple sclerosis (MS), the educational gradient in diagnostic and disease-modifying treatment (DMT) delays is sparsely examined, and the results are mixed.

Objectives

Among patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), we aimed to examine the educational gradient in diagnostic delay and delay in the initiation of the first DMT.

Design

A nationwide cohort study.

Methods

We linked the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry with other nationwide registries. Diagnostic delay was evaluated in 4344 patients ⩾20 years at clinical onset with clinical onset from January 1, 2012, onwards, diagnosed by March 1, 2023. DMT delay was evaluated in 5402 patients ⩾20 years at MS diagnosis who were diagnosed from January 1, 2012, to March 1, 2022, with DMT initiation follow-up until March 1, 2023. The highest completed education before onset and diagnosis, respectively, was categorized using the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) into low (ISCED 0-2), medium (ISCED 3-4) and high (ISCED ⩾5) education. Endpoints were categorized according to their duration into four groups based on a population-specific quartile split. The highest quartile comprised long duration (⩾500 days (diagnostic delay) and ⩾76 days (DMT delay)). We calculated crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The mean age was 36.7 years (SD = 10.3, diagnostic delay population) and 39.2 years (SD = 10.9, DMT delay population). Most were female (67.4% and 68.3%) and of Danish origin (90.3% and 90.5%). Patients with low educational attainment did not have higher odds of diagnostic delay (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.81-1.35) but had higher odds of DMT delay (OR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.17-1.87) compared to patients with high educational attainment.

Conclusion

In adult patients with RRMS, low educational attainment was associated with higher odds of DMT delay but not diagnostic delay. Targeted interventions are needed to address educational disparities in healthcare access and treatment initiation.

Inequities in the Use of Disease-Modifying Therapy Among Adults Living With Multiple Sclerosis in Urban and Rural Areas in Alberta, Canada

OBJECTIVES

To compare disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use between people living with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) who resided in rural vs urban areas.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used population-level individually linked administrative data to identify pwMS on April 1, 2019 (index date), in Alberta, Canada. DMT use was compared between pwMS who resided in rural vs urban areas during a 1-year postindex period. Structural equation modelling (SEM) and logistic regression (with 95% confidence intervals) were applied.

RESULTS

PwMS (n = 4,593) who resided in rural areas (vs urban) were 17% less likely to have received a DMT (odds ratio: 0.83 [0.69-0.99]; SEM total β: -0.032, p < 0.05), of which 39% of this disparity was explained by a lower socioeconomic status (SEM indirect β: -0.012 [p < 0.001]/total β: -0.032); 26% were less likely to have received an induction/higher efficacy therapy (odds ratio: 0.74 [0.57-0.95]), of which <1% of this disparity was explained by socioeconomic status (SEM indirect β: -0.0001 [p < 0.01]/total β: -0.040).

DISCUSSION

PwMS residing in rural (vs urban) Alberta are less likely to receive any DMT, especially induction/higher-efficacy therapy; this inequality may be mediated by socioeconomic status and geography. Identifying and overcoming barriers to optimal clinical care in this patient population is needed.

Evolving Patterns of Initial RRMS Treatment in Finland (2013-2022): Insights From a Nationwide Multiple Sclerosis Register

BACKGROUND

The treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is changing. There are limited data about initial treatment of RRMS in Finland.

OBJECTIVE

Our objectives were to study the trends of initial disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for patients with RRMS from 2013 to 2022, treatment delays, factors associated with DMT choice, DMT switch patterns, and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This retrospective register study used secondary data from the Finnish MS register. The DMTs were classified into medium-efficacy DMTs (meDMTs; beta interferons, glatiramer acetate, fumarates, and teriflunomide) and high-efficacy DMTs (heDMTs; alemtuzumab, cladribine, daclizumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and rituximab).

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 2479 individuals. From 2013 to 2022, the proportion of heDMTs as the initial therapy increased by 5.3-fold from 6.9% to 43.7% (p < 0.001). Median diagnostic delay decreased from 10.1 to 4.6 months (p < 0.001). The COVID-19 pandemic did not cause treatment delays. Higher disease activity and younger age were associated with the choice of heDMT as the initial DMT. heDMTs were the preferred second DMT in patients switching due to lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSION

In Finland, the treatment of RRMS has shifted toward earlier diagnosis and earlier initiation of heDMTs, likely improving the prognosis of the patients.

Typical and Emerging Diagnostic MRI Features in Multiple Sclerosis

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stands as the most sensitive paraclinical technique for detecting the demyelinating lesions characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). Consequently, MRI plays a pivotal role in establishing an accurate and timely diagnosis of the disease, ultimately based on the application of the McDonald criteria. Early diagnosis is particularly important as it facilitates the prompt initiation of disease-modifying treatments, deemed most effective during the initial phases of MS. This review article examines the recommended standardized MRI protocol, as well as the classic imaging features of MS in the brain, optic nerve, and spinal cord, capable of discriminating, in most cases, MS from other disorders that can mimic this disease. Additionally, novel MR imaging findings, such as the central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesion, which have been proposed as new imaging biomarkers to enhance diagnostic specificity for MS, are also discussed. These emerging features are likely to be incorporated in the future iterations of the McDonald criteria, and therefore, radiologists should be familiar with their appearance and with the optimal MRI protocols required for their detection.

Association between education level and disability progression in patients with multiple sclerosis in France

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported an association between socioeconomic status and disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), but findings using the pre-MS individual socioeconomic status are missing.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to investigate the association between education level and disability progression.

METHODS

All Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) patients with MS clinical onset over 1960-2014, and aged ⩾25 years at MS onset were included. Education level was classified into four categories from low (primary/secondary school) to very high (master/doctoral degree). Time from MS onset to EDSS 4.0 was studied using flexible parametric survival models adjusted for age, period, and center, and stratified by phenotype (relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS)) and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 11,586 patients were included (women/men ratio = 2.5; age = 36.7 ± 8.6 years; follow-up duration 16.7 ± 9.3 years; 86.4% RMS). For women with RMS, the risk of reaching the outcome at 5 years was inversely associated with the education level (Hazard Ratio medium: 0.74 (0.63-0.87), high: 0.51 (0.43-0.62), very high: 0.39 (0.30-0.50) vs low). Results were similar for men. In PPMS, the risk was significantly different between the extreme groups (very high vs low) for women (0.45 (0.28-0.75)) and men (0.54 (0.32-0.91)), but no gradient was evident.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a strong association between education level and disability progression, regardless of sex and phenotype.

Time between the first symptom, diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis in a Brazilian cohort. The impact of early diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) diagnosis can be challenging, especially in populations where the disease is rare. In Brazil, the average prevalence is 14/100,000 inhabitants, lower than the worldwide. Early treatment initiation can markedly reduce disease activity and accumulation of disability. Therefore, delayed diagnosis and access to disease modifying therapy (DMT) can have a negative impact on the course of MS.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to estimate the mean time between the first relapse, the diagnosis of MS and initiation of treatment in a cohort of Brazilian MS patients.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of MS patients who met the 2017 McDonald diagnostic criteria followed in a MS reference center in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais. We assessed demographic and clinical data with focus on time to first symptom, time to diagnosis and treatment begging. The last Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was collected to access disability. The program GraphPad Prism 8.4.3. was used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Data of 66 patients were analyzed, 77 % (51) were women. The mean age of the first symptom, diagnosis and DMT initiation was, respectively, 30,06 (± 12,43), 35,2 (± 13,59) and 36,10 (± 13,89) years. In 32 (46,38 %) patients the diagnosis was early (<1 year of disease), in 18 (26,09 %) between 1 and 5 years and in 19 (27,54 %) after to five years. Once the diagnosis was established, 65,5 % had access to DMT within 6 months and 79,71 % in the first year. Patients with diagnosis in the two first years had their first symptom at a younger age (p < 0.05). Comparing these two groups, patients with an earlier diagnosis presented less disability (EDSS: 3,5 vs 1,5; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MS diagnosis can be challenging especially in low prevalence population of diseased and developing countries. Our study demonstrated the importance of early recognition of MS and its precocious intervention, impacting in reducing of disability a long term.

Nano-based approaches for the treatment of neuro-immunological disorders: a special emphasis on multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neuroimmunological disorder which causes axonal damage, demyelination and paralysis. Although numerous therapeutics have been developed for the effective treatment of MS and a few have been approved in recent decades, complete remission and treatment of MS remain a matter of concern. Nanotechnology is a potential approach for manipulating the properties of materials at the molecular level to attain desired properties. This approach is effective in the treatment of several CNS disorders by enhancing drug delivery, bioavailability and efficacy. We have briefly discussed the neuroimmunological disorders with a particular emphasis on MS. We also explored nanoengineered drug delivery systems, describing several nano-formulations for the treatment of MS, challenges and future of nanotechnology.

Multiple sclerosis: economic burden, therapeutic advances, and future forecasts in the Middle East and North Africa region

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a persistent condition characterized by immune-mediated processes in the central nervous system, affecting around 2.8 million individuals globally. While historically less prevalent in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, recent trends mirror the global rise in MS.

AREA COVERED

The impact of MS is substantial, particularly in the MENA region, with costs per patient surpassing nominal GDP per capita in certain countries. Disease-modifying therapies aim to alleviate MS effects, but challenges persist, especially in managing progressive MS as it shifts from inflammatory to neurodegenerative phases. Limited resources in the MENA region hinder care delivery, though awareness initiatives and multidisciplinary centers are emerging. Contrary to global projections of a decline in the MS market, the MENA region is poised for growth due to increased prevalence, healthcare expenditures, and infrastructure investments.

EXPERT OPINION

This review underscores the urgent necessity for effective treatments, robust disease management, and early diagnosis in tackling MS's repercussions in the MENA region. Bolstering resources tailored to MS patients and elevating the quality of care stand as pivotal strategies for enhancing health outcomes in this context. Taking decisive action holds the key to enhancing the overall well-being of individuals grappling with MS.

Rituximab in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in stabilizing disability progression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, encompassing studies from inception to April 2023, utilizing the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria comprised studies with a minimum of 3 SPMS patients receiving intravenous RTX in at least one infusion, with a follow-up duration of at least 6 months. Primary outcome measures included changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Mean differences in pre- and post-RTX EDSS scores were analyzed using a random-effects model. Meta-regression examined age at RTX initiation, pre-RTX EDSS scores, disease duration, and outcome reported time as variables. Secondary outcomes assessed changes in the annualized relapse rate (ARR).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies, involving 604 SPMS patients, met the inclusion criteria. Following a mean follow-up of 2 years, the mean difference in EDSS scores (ΔEDSS = EDSSpre-RTX - EDSSpost-RTX) was -0.21 (95% CI -0.51 to 0.08, p = 0.16), indicating no significant variation. Multivariable meta-regression identified significant associations between EDSS score mean difference and pre-RTX EDSS scores, disease duration at RTX initiation, and outcome reported time. However, age at RTX initiation showed no significant association. Pre- and post-RTX ARR data were available for 245 out of 604 SPMS patients across seven studies, revealing a mean difference in ARR (ΔARR = ARRpre-RTX - ARRpost-RTX) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.19-1.29, p = 0.008).

INTERPRETATION

RTX demonstrates efficacy in reducing relapse frequency and exhibits potential in stabilizing disability progression over a 2-year follow-up, particularly among individuals with shorter disease duration.

Treatment effect modifiers of immunotherapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the treatment effects of immunotherapies in subgroups of adults with clinically isolated syndrome or relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) and the effect of potential treatment effect modifiers (TEMs).

Methods

Phase 2 and 3 RCTs with a placebo comparator were analyzed. Risk of bias was assessed. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to summarize treatment effects within subgroups and differences in treatment effects between subgroups.

Results

Thirty-one studies were included. Age < 40 years was the strongest TEM for relapse rate across DMTs with a ratio of rate ratios (RRR) of 1.44 (95% CI 1.09-1.90; 7 studies). Disability progression was influenced by age (ratio of hazard ratios, RHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.11-2.29; 4 studies). Dichotomizing patients based on EDSS cut-offs (EDSS 2.0 and 3.0) also showed a significantly higher benefit for those less disabled for relapse rate (RRR 1.35, CI 1.03-1.76; 8 studies). Sex, baseline MRI parameters, previous immunotherapy, and clinical presentation showed no effect in this meta-analysis.

Conclusion

Age < 40 is a robust TEM for a lower relapse rate as well as less disability progression across six MS immunotherapies. Additionally, a lower baseline EDSS was predictive of the relapse rate.

Quality of life and tolerability of B-cell directed therapy of multiple sclerosis with ofatumumab in a patient-centered real-world observational study

INTRODUCTION

Ofatumumab (Kesimpta®) is a subcutaneous CD20-targeting antibody approved in Germany in 2021 for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). After careful instruction, patients can administer the treatment themselves. We previously reported data of 101 patients (Klimas et al. in Nervenarzt 94:923-933, 2023). The objective of this longitudinal study is to explore the tolerability and acceptability of ofatumumab from a patient perspective over a follow up period of 6 months.

METHODS

In this prospective observational real-world study, we report follow up data of 81 patients. We evaluated sociodemographic data, disease duration, duration and side effects of ofatumumab use, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Short-Form 36 (SF-36), Fatigue Scale of Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), and modified Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Test (MSFC). In addition, we asked for subjective treatment outcomes, such as impact on quality of life, walking distance, concentration, mood, medication adherence, fatigue and the subjective course of MS on a numerical rating scale (1 = very negative; 5 = very positive). Furthermore, treatment discontinuations were recorded.

RESULTS

The average duration of ofatumumab treatment was 10 months. In comparison to previous published data of our cohort, patients reported a significant increase in headache (10% up to 26%, p = 0.004) and limb pain (5% up to 26%, p < 0.001) as persistent side effects after the injections. More patients reported a very positive effect (p < 0.0001) on quality of life. 4 confirmed relapses occurred but no EDSS worsening, and no treatment discontinuations were documented during the observation period.

DISCUSSION

As previously described, our prospective study indicates that patients have a good tolerability of ofatumumab, precisely because of the mild and few side effects at the first administration. However, the longer the observation period, the more headaches and limb pain occurred after the injections. Despite this, patients' subjective quality of life improved. There were no discontinuations during the follow-up period, with the limitation of a high loss to follow-up.

Delayed initiation of disease modifying therapy increases relapse frequency and motor disability in pediatric onset multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate association between time to initiation of disease modifying treatment (DMT) and outcomes in pediatric-onset Multiple Sclerosis (POMS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of children with POMS from two tertiary referral pediatric Neuroimmunology clinics. Outcome measures comprised annualized relapse rate (ARR), MRI lesion burden (T1, T2-FLAIR, and post-GAD contrast sequences), EDSS, and 25-ft walk duration at the latest follow-up visit. Univariate and multivariate analysis using linear and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between patient characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 68 patients were reviewed. More than half of patients were female (62 %) and 32 (47 %) were Hispanic/LatinX. Median age at diagnosis was 14.2 years (IQR: 11.0-16.5), and median duration from diagnosis to the latest follow-up was 2.5 years (IQR: 1.6-4.6). Sensory (29.4 %), brainstem (23.5 %), and pyramidal (19.1 %) symptoms were most common. Interferon beta (32.4 %), dimethyl fumarate (27.9 %) and rituximab (26.5 %) were the most frequently used first-line DMT. Patients had a median ARR of 0.5 (IQR: 0.08-0.84), and EDSS score of 1.0 (IQR: 0.0-2.0) at the most recent follow-up. Delayed DMT initiation correlated with higher ARR (R = 0.38, p = 0.0016) and longer 25-ft walk duration (R = 0.34, p = 0.0077). In multivariate analysis, delayed DMT remained a significant predictor of higher ARR (p = 0.002) and longer 25-ft walk duration (p = 0.047). Delayed DMT initiation and use of low/moderate efficacy DMT predicted GAD enhancing lesions at the latest follow-up (p = 0.004 and 0.019 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Delayed DMT initiation in POMS is linked to unfavorable outcomes, including higher ARR and longer 25-ft walk duration.

Modeling and simulation for prediction of multiple sclerosis progression

In light of extensive work that has created a wide range of techniques for predicting the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease, this paper attempts to provide an overview of these approaches and put forth an alternative way to predict the disease progression. For this purpose, the existing methods for estimating and predicting the course of the disease have been categorized into clinical, radiological, biological, and computational or artificial intelligence-based markers. Weighing the weaknesses and strengths of these prognostic groups is a profound method that is yet in need and works directly at the level of diseased connectivity. Therefore, we propose using the computational models in combination with established connectomes as a predictive tool for MS disease trajectories. The fundamental conduction-based Hodgkin-Huxley model emerged as promising from examining these studies. The advantage of the Hodgkin-Huxley model is that certain properties of connectomes, such as neuronal connection weights, spatial distances, and adjustments of signal transmission rates, can be taken into account. It is precisely these properties that are particularly altered in MS and that have strong implications for processing, transmission, and interactions of neuronal signaling patterns. The Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) equations as a point-neuron model are used for signal propagation inside a small network. The objective is to change the conduction parameter of the neuron model, replicate the changes in myelin properties in MS and observe the dynamics of the signal propagation across the network. The model is initially validated for different lengths, conduction values, and connection weights through three nodal connections. Later, these individual factors are incorporated into a small network and simulated to mimic the condition of MS. The signal propagation pattern is observed after inducing changes in conduction parameters at certain nodes in the network and compared against a control model pattern obtained before the changes are applied to the network. The signal propagation pattern varies as expected by adapting to the input conditions. Similarly, when the model is applied to a connectome, the pattern changes could give an insight into disease progression. This approach has opened up a new path to explore the progression of the disease in MS. The work is in its preliminary state, but with a future vision to apply this method in a connectome, providing a better clinical tool.

Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by progressive neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration from disease onset that, if left untreated, can result in the accumulation of irreversible neurological disability. Early intervention with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) is increasingly recognized as the best strategy to delay or mitigate disease progression from the earliest stages of the disease and to prevent long-term neurodegeneration. Although there is growing clinical and real-world evidence supporting early HET intervention, foregoing this strategy in favor of a traditional escalation approach prioritizing lower-efficacy disease-modifying therapies remains a common approach in clinical practice. This review explores potential health care professional- and patient-related barriers to the early use of HETs in patients with MS in the United States. Barriers can include regulatory and reimbursement restrictions; knowledge gaps and long-term safety concerns among health care professionals; and various individual, cultural, and societal factors affecting patients. Potential strategies for overcoming these barriers and encouraging early HET use are proposed.

Managing multiple sclerosis in individuals aged 55 and above: a comprehensive review

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) management in individuals aged 55 and above presents unique challenges due to the complex interaction between aging, comorbidities, immunosenescence, and MS pathophysiology. This comprehensive review explores the evolving landscape of MS in older adults, including the increased incidence and prevalence of MS in this age group, the shift in disease phenotypes from relapsing-remitting to progressive forms, and the presence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. We aim to provide an updated review of the available evidence of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in older patients, including the efficacy and safety of existing therapies, emerging treatments such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTKs) inhibitors and those targeting remyelination and neuroprotection, and the critical decisions surrounding the initiation, de-escalation, and discontinuation of DMTs. Non-pharmacologic approaches, including physical therapy, neuromodulation therapies, cognitive rehabilitation, and psychotherapy, are also examined for their role in holistic care. The importance of MS Care Units and advance care planning are explored as a cornerstone in providing patient-centric care, ensuring alignment with patient preferences in the disease trajectory. Finally, the review emphasizes the need for personalized management and continuous monitoring of MS patients, alongside advocating for inclusive study designs in clinical research to improve the management of this growing patient demographic.

Disease-modifying therapy initiation patterns in multiple sclerosis in three large MS populations

Background

Treatment guidelines recommend early disease-modifying therapy (DMT) initiation after diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Multinational comparative studies that assess time to DMT initiation in MS may allow detection of barriers inherent to healthcare systems to explain potential adverse systematic delays in commencing DMTs.

Objectives

To investigate and compare the time to first DMT and its association with sociodemographic and clinical variables after MS diagnosis in three large MS registries.

Design

This observational study was conducted using data from the German MS Registry (GMSR), the North American Research Committee on MS Registry (NARCOMS, US data only), and the United Kingdom MS Registry (UKMSR, both self- and clinician-reported).

Methods

Data from relapsing people with MS (PwMS), with a diagnosis of MS between 2014 and 2019, and available DMT and disability status were pooled using a meta-analytic approach.

Results

A total of 5395 PwMS were included in the analysis (GMSR: n = 2658; NARCOMS: n = 447; UKMSR: n = 2290). Kaplan-Meier estimates for the time to first DMT [median months (95% CI)] were 2.0 (1.9-2.0), 3.0 (2-4), and 9.0 (7.7-10.6) for GMSR, NARCOMS, and UKMSR, respectively. Pooled multivariable Cox regression demonstrated shorter time to first DMT for PwMS diagnosed after 2017 [1.65 (1.42-1.92), p < 0.01], and longer time to DMT when a higher-efficacy DMT was selected (0.69 (0.54-0.90), p < 0.0001].

Conclusion

Time to DMT initiation differs across the populations studied, indicating that barriers may exist in early access to DMT, particularly in the United Kingdom. However, a consistent decrease in time to DMT initiation was noted since 2017 across all registries. Further studies are warranted comparing the effects of time to DMT and time to higher-efficacy DMT on long-term outcome.

Adult inflammatory leukoencephalopathies

Inflammatory white matter disorders may commonly mimic genetic leukoencephalopathies. These include atypical presentations of common conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, together with rare inflammatory disorders. A structured approach to such cases is essential, together with judicious use of the many available diagnostic biomarkers. The potential for such conditions to respond to immunotherapy emphasizes the importance of an accurate and prompt diagnosis in improving patient outcomes.

Using instrumental variables to correct for bias in real-world cohort studies of the effects of disease-modifying treatment in MS

BACKGROUND

Estimating the effect of disease-modifying treatment of MS in observational studies is impaired by bias from unmeasured confounders, in particular indication bias.

OBJECTIVE

To show how instrumental variables (IVs) reduce bias.

METHODS

All patients with relapsing onset of MS 1996-2010, identified by the nationwide Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, were followed from onset. Exposure was treatment index throughout the first 12 years from onset, defined as a cumulative function of months without and with medium- or high-efficacy treatment, and outcomes were hazard ratios (HRs) per unit treatment index for sustained Expanded Disability Scale Score (EDSS) 4 and 6 adjusted for age at onset and sex, without and with an IV. We used the onset cohort (1996-2000; 2001-2005; 2006-2010) as an IV because treatment index increased across the cohorts.

RESULTS

We included 6014 patients. With conventional Cox regression, HRs for EDSS 4 and 6 were 1.15 [95% CI: 1.13-1.18] and 1.17 [1.13-1.20] per unit treatment index. Only with IVs, we confirmed a beneficial effect of treatment with HRs of 0.86 [0.81-0.91] and 0.82 [0.74-0.90].

CONCLUSION

The use of IVs eliminates indication bias and confirms that treatment is effective in delaying disability. IVs could, under some circumstances, be an alternative to marginal structural models.

Discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis - a nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Adherence is a prerequisite for the efficacy of any drug, and previous studies have shown that non-adherence is associated with disease activity and increased health care cost in multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to investigate rates and reasons for discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) among people with MS on a national level and differences between clinics in Denmark.

METHODS

This was a nationwide, registry and population study of patients treated with DMF. We calculated standard residuals (SR) demonstrate differences between clinics. For survival analysis regarding discontinuation rates and discontinuation due to specific AEs we used log-rank test Cox-proportional hazards and plotted Kaplan-Meier graphics.

RESULTS

We included 2,448 people with MS, treated with DMF from 2013 to 2020. Average treatment duration was 26 months (5,382 treatment years). 49.2 % of patients who initiated treatment with DMF (n = 1205) were continuously treated. Reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (54.5 %, n = 656), active disease (26.1 %, n = 315), pregnancy (9.4 %, n = 113) or other reasons (13.2 %, n = 159). We compared SR to the mean regarding reasons for discontinuation and found significant differences between sites regarding gastrointestinal adverse events, flushing and lymphopenia. Discontinuation due to all adverse events, flushing and lymphopenia were more frequent in female than male patients.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, we found major differences between the MS clinics in rates and reason for discontinuation of DMF. Our results suggest that management strategies during DMF treatment can reduce discontinuation rates.

Proteomics reveal biomarkers for diagnosis, disease activity and long-term disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis

Sensitive and reliable protein biomarkers are needed to predict disease trajectory and personalize treatment strategies for multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we use the highly sensitive proximity-extension assay combined with next-generation sequencing (Olink Explore) to quantify 1463 proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma from 143 people with early-stage MS and 43 healthy controls. With longitudinally followed discovery and replication cohorts, we identify CSF proteins that consistently predicted both short- and long-term disease progression. Lower levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in CSF is superior in predicting the absence of disease activity two years after sampling (replication AUC = 0.77) compared to all other tested proteins. Importantly, we also identify a combination of 11 CSF proteins (CXCL13, LTA, FCN2, ICAM3, LY9, SLAMF7, TYMP, CHI3L1, FYB1, TNFRSF1B and NfL) that predict the severity of disability worsening according to the normalized age-related MS severity score (replication AUC = 0.90). The identification of these proteins may help elucidate pathogenetic processes and might aid decisions on treatment strategies for persons with MS.

[Over one year of B‑cell targeted therapy with Ofatumumab s.c.: first results of a prospective, patient-centered real-world observational study]

INTRODUCTION

Ofatumumab (Kesimpta™) is a s.c. applicable anti-CD20 antibody, which has been used in Germany since 2021 for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). The self-application offers a high degree of independence from intravenous forms of application with highly effective immunotherapy. In this study we recorded the patient-centered experience in 99 out of 127 patients who were adjusted to the drug by us. The aim was to investigate the tolerability and acceptance from the patient's perspective.

METHODS

Data collection was carried out using doctor documentation, questionnaires and telephone interviews.

RESULTS

The cohort consists of 127 patients. The patients received 2.8 (± SD 1.7) pre-therapies. The mean duration of therapy with Ofatumumab was 9.8 months (± SD 3.5). Structured data were collected from 99 patients. 23% of patients had no side effects during initial application. 19% rated the side effects as "very mild" and 18% as "mild". In addition to chills/fever (48%), headache (46%), limb pain (45%) and "other symptoms" (19%) also occurred. For subsequent injections, 72% of patients reported no side effects. 87% of patients found handling the medication "very easy". There was one relapse event during therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that Ofatumumab is well accepted and tolerated by patients. There was one relapse event during the observation period. The side effects are mild and occur during initial application. No increased tendency to infection could be observed. The data suggest that Ofatumumab is also an effective and safe treatment option for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in real-world use.

Should autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation be offered as a first-line disease modifying therapy to patients with multiple sclerosis?

In multiple sclerosis (MS), progression independent of new focal inflammation may commence shortly after disease onset, and it is increasingly revealed that the risk of disability accrual is reduced by early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HE-DMTs). People with aggressive MS may therefore benefit from early treatment with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), a procedure inducing maximal immunosuppression followed by immune reconstitution, demonstrated to be superior to DMTs in one randomized clinical trial. However, in current practice prior failure to HE-DMTs is typically required to establish the indication for AHSCT. In the present article, the available evidence on the potential role of AHSCT as first-line treatment in aggressive MS and the rationale for its early use will be summarized. Proposed definitions of aggressive MS that could help identifying MS patients eligible for early treatment with AHSCT will also be discussed.

Association of Very Early Treatment Initiation With the Risk of Long-term Disability in Patients With a First Demyelinating Event

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Early treatment is associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with a first demyelinating event and early multiple sclerosis (MS). However, magnetic resonance (MR) findings are not usually integrated to construct propensity scores (PSs) when evaluating outcomes. We assessed the association of receiving very early treatment with the risk of long-term disability including an MR score (MRS) in patients with a first demyelinating event.

METHODS

We included 580 patients with a first demyelinating event prospectively collected between 1994 and 2021, who received at least 1 disease-modifying drug (DMD). Patients were classified into tertiles according to the cohort's distribution of the time from the first demyelinating event to the first DMD: first tertile (FT) or very early treatment (6 months; n = 194), second tertile (6.1-16 months, n = 192), and third tertile (TT) (16.1 months, n = 194). A 5-point MRS was built according to the sum of the following indicators: ≥9 brain lesions (1 point); ≥1 infratentorial lesion (1 point); ≥1 spinal cord (SC) lesion (1 point); ≥1 contrast-enhancing (CE) brain lesion (1 point); and ≥1 CE SC lesion (1 point). PS based on covariates and the MRS was computed for each of the outcomes. Inverse PS-weighted Cox and linear regression models assessed the risk of different outcomes between tertile groups. Finally, to confirm the role of MR in treatment decision, we studied the time elapsed from the first demyelinating event to treatment initiation according to the MRS in all patients with radiologic available information, renamed as raw-MRS.

RESULTS

Very early treatment decreased the risk of reaching Expanded Disability Status Scale 3.0 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.97), secondary progressive MS (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.85), and sustained disease progression at 12 months after treatment initiation (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.84), when compared with patients from the TT group. Patients from the FT group had a lower disability progression rate (β estimate -0.009, 95% CI -0.016 to -0.002) and a lower severe disability measured by the Patient-Determined Disease Step (β estimate -0.52, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.13) than the TT group. Finally, there was a 62.4% reduction in the median time between the first demyelinating event and the first-ever treatment initiation from patients displaying a raw-MRS 1 to patients with a raw-MRS 5.

DISCUSSION

Using PS models with and without MRS, we showed that treatment initiation at very early stages is associated with a reduction in the risk of long-term disability accrual in patients with a first demyelinating event.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that earlier treatment of patients with MS presenting with a first demyelinating event is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Global Barriers to the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Data From the Multiple Sclerosis International Federation Atlas of MS, Third Edition

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recent data suggest increasing global prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS). Early diagnosis of MS reduces the burden of disability-adjusted life years and associated health care costs. Yet diagnostic delays persist in MS care and even within national health care systems with robust resources, comprehensive registries, and MS subspecialist referral networks. The global prevalence and characteristics of barriers to expedited MS diagnosis, particularly in resource-restricted regions, have not been extensively studied. Recent revisions to MS diagnostic criteria demonstrate potential to facilitate earlier diagnosis, but global implementation remains largely unknown.

METHODS

The Multiple Sclerosis International Federation third edition of the Atlas of MS was a survey that assessed the current global state of diagnosis including adoption of MS diagnostic criteria; barriers to diagnosis with respect to the patient, health care provider, and health system; and existence of national guidelines or national standards for speed of MS diagnosis.

RESULTS

Coordinators from 107 countries (representing approximately 82% of the world population), participated. Eighty-three percent reported at least 1 "major barrier" to early MS diagnosis. The most frequently reported barriers included the following: "lack of awareness of MS symptoms among general public" (68%), "lack of awareness of MS symptoms among health care professionals" (59%), and "lack of availability of health care professionals with knowledge to diagnose MS" (44%). One-third reported lack of "specialist medical equipment or diagnostic tests." Thirty-four percent reported the use of only 2017 McDonald criteria (McD-C) for diagnosis, and 79% reported 2017 McD-C as the "most commonly used criteria." Sixty-six percent reported at least 1 barrier to the adoption of 2017 McD-C, including "neurologists lack awareness or training" by 45%. There was no significant association between national guidelines pertaining to MS diagnosis or practice standards addressing the speed of diagnosis and presence of barriers to early MS diagnosis and implementation of 2017 McD-C.

DISCUSSION

This study finds pervasive consistent global barriers to early diagnosis of MS. While these barriers reflected a lack of resources in many countries, data also suggest that interventions designed to develop and implement accessible education and training can provide cost-effective opportunities to improve access to early MS diagnosis.

Efficacy of Dimethyl Fumarate in Young Adults with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of the DEFINE, CONFIRM, and ENDORSE Studies

INTRODUCTION

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) showed favorable benefit-risk in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM trials and in the ENDORSE extension study. Disease activity can differ in younger patients with MS compared with the overall population.

METHODS

Randomized patients received DMF 240 mg twice daily or placebo (PBO; years 0-2 DEFINE/CONFIRM), then DMF (years 3-10; continuous DMF/DMF or PBO/DMF; ENDORSE); maximum follow-up (combined studies) was 13 years. This integrated post hoc analysis evaluated safety and efficacy of DMF in a subgroup of young adults aged 18-29 years.

RESULTS

Of 1736 patients enrolled in ENDORSE, 125 were young adults, 86 treated continuously with DMF (DMF/DMF) and 39 received delayed DMF (PBO/DMF) in DEFINE/CONFIRM. Most (n = 116 [93%]) young adults completed DMF treatment in DEFINE/CONFIRM. Median (range) follow-up time in ENDORSE was 6.5 (2.0-10.0) years. Young adults entering ENDORSE who had been treated with DMF in DEFINE/CONFIRM had a model-based Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR; 95% CI) of 0.24 (0.16-0.35) vs. 0.56 (0.35-0.88) in PBO patients. ARR remained low in ENDORSE: 0.07 (0.01-0.47) at years 9-10 (DMF/DMF group). At year 10 of ENDORSE, EDSS scores were low in young adults: DMF/DMF, 1.9 (1.4); PBO/DMF, 2.4 (1.6). At ~ 7 years, the proportion of young adults with no confirmed disability progresion was 81% for DMF/DMF and 72% for PBO/DMF. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (SF-36 and EQ-5D) generally remained stable during ENDORSE. The most common adverse events (AEs) in young adults during ENDORSE were MS relapse (n = 53 [42%]). Most AEs were mild (n = 20 [23.3%], n = 7 [17.9%]) to moderate (n = 45 [52.3%], n = 23 [59.0%]) in the DMF/DMF and PBO/DMF groups, respectively. The most common serious AE (SAE) was MS relapse (n = 19 [15%]).

CONCLUSION

The data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of DMF in young adults, as evidenced by well-characterized safety, sustained efficacy, and stable PROs.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

Clinical trials.gov, DEFINE (NCT00420212), CONFIRM (NCT00451451), and ENDORSE (NCT00835770).

Safety and Monitoring of the Treatment with Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

BACKGROUND

Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are widely used given their proven efficacy in the relapsing form of the disease, while recently, Siponimod and Ocrelizumab have been approved for the progressive forms of the disease. Currently, 22 diseasemodifying drugs are approved by the FDA, while in 2012, only nine were present in the market. From March 2019 until August 2020, six new drugs were approved. This rapid development of new DMTs highlighted the need to update our knowledge about their short and long-term safety.

OBJECTIVE

This review summarizes the available safety data for all the Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis and presents the monitoring plan before and during the treatment.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PUBMED and COCHRANE databases. Key journals and abstracts from major annual meetings of Neurology, references of relevant reviews, and relative articles were also manually searched. We prioritized systematic reviews, large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, and other observational studies. Special attention was paid to guidelines and papers focusing on the safety and monitoring of DMTs.

CONCLUSION

Data for oral (Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, Fumarates, Teriflunomide, Cladribine), injectables (Interferons, Glatiramer acetate, Ofatumumab), and infusion therapies (Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, Alemtuzumab) are presented.

'That would have been the perfect thing after diagnosis': development of a digital lifestyle management application in multiple sclerosis

Background

A multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis urges decision-making on immunotherapies, while persons with MS (PwMS) need to develop a coping concept in parallel. At this stage, PwMS ask how they themselves may contribute to controlling the disease. Evidence suggests that maintaining a healthy lifestyle (e.g. physical activity and stress management) is a key factor for healthy aging and preserving activity, while data on MS are complex.

Objectives

Following the Medical Research Council framework, this study aimed to develop and investigate the feasibility of a new digital health application that conveys evidence-based patient information about lifestyle factors in MS and engages PwMS in relevant behaviour change techniques.

Methods

Based on a digital health application promoting lifestyle management in breast cancer survivors, an MS-specific adaptation ('levidex') was developed. Feasibility was tested with 15 PwMS and eight MS experts. Subsequently, a six-week pilot study with eight PwMS was conducted. All participants provided feedback on practicability and acceptability via a questionnaire and took part in a semi-structured telephone interview. Levidex was revised after each test phase.

Results

The final levidex tool includes 16 modules, 177 references and several other functions. Feasibility results showed that PwMS and MS experts perceived levidex as understandable (14 out of 15; 6 out of 8), trustworthy (15 out of 15; 8 out of 8), and relevant (10 out of 15; 8 out of 8). Interviews revealed potential for improvement regarding the length and complexity of some content. Piloting of the revised version confirmed good feasibility and high acceptance. Most participants felt inspired to initiate (7 out of 8) or had already implemented (5 out of 8) lifestyle changes after working with levidex.

Conclusion

Results suggest that levidex is feasible and well-accepted by PwMS and MS experts. It might be a useful tool to support PwMS in adapting to their diagnosis and initiating health-promoting lifestyle changes.

Time to first treatment and risk of disability pension in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Background Initiation of disease-modifying therapy early in the disease course of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has demonstrated beneficial effects on clinical outcomes, but socioeconomic outcomes remain largely unexplored. Objective To investigate the association between the delay from disease onset to first treatment and the hazard of disability pension. Methods We performed a population-based cohort study with data from the nationwide Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry and Danish nationwide registries. Patients with a disease onset between 1 January 1996 to 5 April 2016 were followed until disability pension or a competing risk/censoring event. 7859 patients were assessed for eligibility of which 5208 were included in the final cohort. Key inclusion criteria were: a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting phenotype, treatment in history, age 18-65 years and an Expanded Disability Status Scale≤4. Patients were categorised according to time from onset to first treatment: within 1 year (early), between 1 and 4 years (intermediate) and from 4 to 8 years (late). Results Of the 5208 patients, 1922 were early, 2126 were intermediate and 1160 were late. Baseline clinical and socioeconomic variables were well balanced. The hazard of receiving disability pension increased with increasing delay of treatment initiation compared with the early group. Cox regression estimates adjusted for clinical and socioeconomic confounders: intermediate (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.68) and late (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.55 to 2.51). Conclusion Early treatment initiation is associated with a reduced risk of disability pension in patients with RRMS. This finding underlines the importance of early diagnosis and treatment on a patient-centred, socioeconomic disability milestone.

Changes in prognosis of the Danish multiple sclerosis population over time

BACKGROUND

The course of multiple sclerosis (MS) appears to be milder in recent decades.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how time from onset to disability milestones and how demographic and clinical characteristics have changed through subsequent onset cohorts of patients with MS.

METHODS

In the nationwide Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, we have registered all 13,562 Danish patients with onset of MS or clinically isolated syndrome from 1996 through 2020. For the analyses of prognosis, we used all cases with relapsing onset (N = 11,669). After stratification into 5-year onset cohorts, we computed the hazard ratios for disability endpoints for all cohorts having at least 10 years of follow-up and the oldest 1996-2000 onset cohort as reference.

RESULTS

Patients in more recent MS onset cohorts have a shorter diagnostic delay and more of them start disease-modifying treatment within 1 year since diagnosis. The prognosis was better for later onset cohorts. For the 2001-2005 cohort, the hazard ratio for confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 4 was 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-0.95) and for confirmed EDSS 6: 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65-0.88). For the more recent 2006-2010 cohort, the corresponding hazard ratios were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50-0.71).

CONCLUSION

We observed a considerable improvement of the prognosis in recent onset cohorts of relapsing-onset MS.

Therapeutic Advances in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system that causes significant disability and healthcare burden. The treatment of MS has evolved over the past three decades with development of new, high efficacy disease modifying therapies targeting various mechanisms including immune modulation, immune cell suppression or depletion and enhanced immune cell sequestration. Emerging therapies include CNS-penetrant Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as well as therapies aimed at remyelination or neuroprotection. Therapy development for progressive MS has been more challenging with limited efficacy of current approved agents for inactive disease and older patients with MS. The aim of this review is to provide a broad overview of the current therapeutic landscape for MS.

Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Patients using Early First-line Treatments

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic management of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has evolved towards early treatment. The objective was to assess the impact of early treatment initiation on disability progression among RRMS first-line treated patients.

METHODS

This study included all incident RRMS cases starting interferon or glatiramer acetate for the first time from 1996/01/01 to 2012/31/12 (N=5,279) from ten MS expert OFSEP centers (Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques). The delay from treatment start to attain an irreversible Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.0 were compared between "Early" group (N= 1,882; treated within 12 months following MS clinical onset) and "Later" group using propensity score weighted Kaplan-Meier methods, overall and stratified by age.

RESULTS

Overall, the restricted mean time before reaching EDSS 3.0 (RMST) from treatment start was 11 years and two months for patients treated within the year following MS clinical onset and 10 years and seven months for patients treated later. Thus, early treated patients gained 7 months (95% CI: [4-11] months) in the time to reach EDSS 3.0 compared to patients treated later (treatment start delayed by 28 months). The difference in RMST was respectively six months (95% CI: [1-10] months) and 14 months (95% CI: [4-24] months) in the "≤40 years" age group and in the ">40 years" age group, in favour of early group. .

CONCLUSIONS

Early treatment initiation resulted in a significant reduction of disability progression among patients with RRMS, and also among older patients.

Prognostic Markers of Ocrelizumab Effectiveness in Multiple Sclerosis: A Real World Observational Multicenter Study

Pivotal trials showed the effectiveness of the monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab in relapsing and progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). However, data on everyday practice in MS patients and markers of treatment effectiveness are scarce. We aimed to collect real-world data from ocrelizumab-treated MS patients, relapsing-remitting (RR) and progressive MS patients (PMS), including active secondary progressive MS (aSPMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) patients, and to explore potential prognostic factors of clinical outcome. Patients were enrolled at MS centres in the Campania region, Italy. We collected clinic-demographic features retrospectively one year before ocrelizumab start (T−1), at ocrelizumab start (T0), and after one year from ocrelizumab start (T1). We explored possible clinical markers of treatment effectiveness in those patients receiving ocrelizumab treatment for at least one year using multilevel-mixed models. We included a total of 383 MS patients (89 RRMS and 294 PMS; 205 females, mean age: 45.8 ± 11.2, disease duration: 12.7 ± 11.6 years). Patients had a mean follow-up of 12.4 ± 8.2 months, and 217 patients completed one-year ocrelizumab treatment. Overall, EDSS increased from T−1 to T0 (coeff. = 0.30, 95% coefficient interval [CI] = 0.19−0.41, p < 0.001) without a further change between T0 and T1 (p = 0.61). RRMS patients did not show an EDSS change between T−1 and T0 nor between T0 and T1. Conversely, PMS patients showed EDSS increase from T−1 to T0 (coeff. = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.22−0.45, p < 0.001) without a further change between T0 and T1 (p = 0.21). PMS patients with a time from conversion shorter than 2 years showed increased EDSS from T−1 to T0 (coeff. = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.18−1.08, p = 0.006) without a further change between T0 and T1 (p = 0.94), whereas PMS patients with a time from conversion longer than 2 years showed increased EDSS from T0 to T1 (coeff. = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.11−0.49, p = 0.002). Naïve patients showed an EDSS decrease between T0 and T1 (coeff. = −0.30, 95% CI = −0.50−−0.09, p = 0.004). In conclusion, our study highlighted that early ocrelizumab treatment is effective in modifying the disability accrual in MS patients.

Hormone therapy and disease activity in Danish women with multiple sclerosis - a population-based cohort study

Background and purpose

Sex differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence and disease course are thought to be driven by hormones. Exogenous exposure to estrogens may affect MS disease course. Thus, our aim was to investigate the association between hormone therapy (HT) and disease activity and disability accrual among women with MS.

Methods

A register‐based cohort study was conducted with prospectively enrolled cases from the Danish MS registry. Information on hormone exposure was retrieved from the National Prescription Registry. Outcomes were relapse rate, relapse rate ratio, recurrent relapses, 6‐month confirmed and sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) milestones 4 and 6, and recurrent EDSS worsening.

Results

In all, 3325 women were eligible for analyses, of whom 333 (10%) were ever on HT at some time during follow‐up. We found no association between HT and disability accrual, although a trend for increasing risk with increasing length of use was seen. The risk of reaching 6‐month confirmed and sustained EDSS 4 among users was 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3–1.2) after <1 year of use and 1.4 (95% CI = 0.9–2.2) after >5 years of HT compared to never use. The risk of recurrent relapse was increased by 20% (95% CI = 1.0–1.4) among current users of HT compared to nonusers. However, the risk of recurrent relapses was driven by the first calendar period (1996–2005) before the introduction of high‐efficacy disease‐modifying therapy.

Conclusions

Our findings from this nationwide MS population suggest that HT does not affect disability accrual in women with MS, especially if used for <5 years.

From Diagnosis to Satisfaction in Multiple Sclerosis: A Swiss Patient Survey Highlighting the Importance of the First Diagnostic Consultation

Background: An early treatment start with disease modifying therapies (DMT) and long-term adherence is crucial in the treatment of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) to prevent future disability. Objectives: To gain information on the diagnostic process, decision making, treatment start and adherence with regard to DMT as well as satisfaction in PwMS in Switzerland to optimize management of PwMS. Methods: A survey was conducted between June 2017 and March 2018 in six hospital-based MS centres and eight private practices in Switzerland. PwMS according to the 2010 McDonald criteria, aged 18–60 years, having a clinical isolated syndrome, relapsing remitting MS, or secondary progressive MS were eligible. The survey contained 40 questions, covering participants’ background and circumstances, treatment decisions, therapy start, treatment adherence, and satisfaction (EKNZ Req-2016-00701). Results: 212 questionnaires were returned for analysis. Of these, 125 (59.0%) were answered by patients treated by practice-based neurologists and 85 (40.1%) by patients treated in hospitals. That PwMS were satisfied overall with current medical care, that they were free of relapses and disease progression, and that they were able to live independently were the main goals of patients. Satisfaction was reflected by an early therapy start and a high adherence to DMT in our cohort. The treating neurologist played a major role in this regard. Furthermore, a satisfactory first diagnostic consultation (FDC) was crucial for successful long-term patient care positively influencing an early treatment start, longer duration of the initial therapy, as well as adherence to treatments and general satisfaction. Conclusion: The treating neurologist and especially a satisfactory FDC play a major role for the successful long-term treatment of PwMS. Detailed information on various aspects of the disease and time with the treating neurologist seems to be of major importance.

Brain Volume Loss Can Occur at the Rate of Normal Aging in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Who Are Free from Disease Activity

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating and degenerative disorder of the central nervous system. Accelerated brain volume loss (BVL) has emerged as a promising magnetic resonance imaging marker (MRI) of neurodegeneration, correlating with present and future clinical disability. We have systematically selected MS patients fulfilling ‘no evidence of disease activity-3′ (NEDA-3) criteria under high-efficacy disease-modifying treatment (DMT) from the database of two Belgian MS centers. BVL between both MRI scans demarcating the NEDA-3 period was assessed and compared with a group of prospectively recruited healthy volunteers who were matched for age and gender. Annualized whole brain volume percentage change was similar between 29 MS patients achieving NEDA-3 and 24 healthy controls (−0.25 ± 0.49 versus −0.24 ± 0.20, p = 0.9992; median follow-up 21 versus 33 months; respectively). In contrast, we found a mean BVL increase of 72%, as compared with the former, in a second control group of MS patients (n = 21) whom had been excluded from the NEDA-3 group due to disease activity (p = 0.1371). Our results suggest that neurodegeneration in MS can slow down to the rate of normal aging once inflammatory disease activity has been extinguished and advocate for an early introduction of high-efficacy DMT to reduce the risk of future clinical disability.

Apparent changes in the epidemiology and severity of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immunological disease that causes acute inflammatory lesions and chronic inflammation in the CNS, leading to tissue damage and disability. As awareness of MS has increased and options for therapy have come into use, a large amount of epidemiological data have been collected, enabling studies of changes in incidence and disease course over time. Overall, these data seem to indicate that the incidence of MS has increased, but the course of the disease has become milder, particularly in the 25 years since the first disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) became available. A clear understanding of these trends and the reasons for them is important for understanding the factors that influence the development and progression of MS, and for clinical management with respect to prevention and treatment decisions. In this Review, we consider the evidence for changes in the epidemiology of MS, focusing on trends in the incidence of the disease over time and trends in the disease severity. In addition, we discuss the factors influencing these trends, including refinement of diagnostic criteria and improvements in health-care systems that have increased diagnosis in people with mild disease, and the introduction and improvement of DMT.

Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group (MSTCG): position statement on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (white paper)

Multiple sclerosis is a complex, autoimmune-mediated disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammatory demyelination and axonal/neuronal damage. The approval of various disease-modifying therapies and our increased understanding of disease mechanisms and evolution in recent years have significantly changed the prognosis and course of the disease. This update of the Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group treatment recommendation focuses on the most important recommendations for disease-modifying therapies of multiple sclerosis in 2021. Our recommendations are based on current scientific evidence and apply to those medications approved in wide parts of Europe, particularly German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland).

Treatment Escalation vs Immediate Initiation of Highly Effective Treatment for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Data From 2 Different National Strategies

Importance

Treatment strategies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) vary markedly between Denmark and Sweden. The difference in the association of these national strategies with clinical outcomes is unknown.

Objective

To investigate the association of national differences in disease-modifying treatment (DMT) strategies for RRMS with disability outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used data on 4861 patients from the Danish and Swedish national multiple sclerosis (MS) registries from the date of index DMT initiation (between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016) until the last recorded visit at time of data extraction (October 2, 2019).

Exposures

All MS-specific DMTs initiated during the observation period were included in the analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary study outcome was time to 24-week confirmed disability worsening. Secondary outcomes were 24-week confirmed disability improvement, milestone Expanded Disability Status Scale scores of 3 and 4, annualized relapse rate, time to first relapse, and treatment switching. Data were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting-based models using a propensity score to weight and correct the comparison for the imbalance of confounders observed at baseline between the 2 countries.

Results

A total of 2700 patients from the Swedish MS registry (1867 women [69.2%]; mean [SD] age, 36.1 [9.5] years) and 2161 patients from the Danish MS registry (1472 women [68.1%]; mean [SD] age, 37.3 [9.4 years]) started a first DMT between 2013 and 2016, were included in the analysis, and were observed for a mean (SD) of 4.1 (1.5) years. A total of 1994 Danish patients (92.3%) initiated a low to moderately effective DMT (teriflunomide, 907 [42.0%]) and 165 (7.6%) initiated a highly effective DMT, whereas a total of 1769 Swedish patients (65.5%) initiated a low to moderately effective DMT (teriflunomide, 64 [2.4%]) and 931 (34.5%) initiated a highly effective DMT. The Swedish treatment strategy was associated with a 29% reduction in the rate of postbaseline 24-week confirmed disability worsening relative to the Danish treatment strategy (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90; P = .004). The Swedish treatment strategy was also associated with a 24% reduction in the rate of reaching an expanded disability status scale score of 3 (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.97; P = .03) and a 25% reduction in the rate of reaching an expanded disability status scale score of 4 (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96; P = .01) relative to Danish patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that there is an association between differences in treatment strategies for RRMS and disability outcomes at a national level. Escalation of treatment efficacy was inferior to using more efficacious DMT as initial treatment.

Complications of COVID-19 Pneumonia and Multiple Sclerosis Exacerbation

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common autoimmune disease in the United States, in which demyelination of the brain and spinal cord disrupts the transmission of signals throughout the body. With an average life expectancy of 30 years from the start of the disease, treatment relies on symptom management through steroids and disease-modifying agents, as there is no cure. While MS patients have not been shown to be at increased risk for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) infection, prolonged hospitalizations and severe COVID-19 sequelae have been linked to various MS subgroups. Limited studies, however, have reported on the role of COVID-19 in precipitating MS exacerbations, as flare-ups often occur during times of stress or immunological insult. Here we present a 45-year-old patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis whose neurological symptoms worsened sharply in the weeks following an inpatient admission for COVID-19 pneumonia.

[Multiple sclerosis treatment consensus group (MSTCG): position paper on disease-modifying treatment of multiple sclerosis 2021 (white paper)]

Die Multiple Sklerose ist eine komplexe, autoimmun vermittelte Erkrankung des zentralen Nervensystems, charakterisiert durch inflammatorische Demyelinisierung sowie axonalen/neuronalen Schaden. Die Zulassung verschiedener verlaufsmodifizierender Therapien und unser verbessertes Verständnis der Krankheitsmechanismen und -entwicklung in den letzten Jahren haben die Prognose und den Verlauf der Erkrankung deutlich verändert. Diese Aktualisierung der Behandlungsempfehlung der Multiple Sklerose Therapie Konsensus Gruppe konzentriert sich auf die wichtigsten Empfehlungen für verlaufsmodifizierende Therapien der Multiplen Sklerose im Jahr 2021. Unsere Empfehlungen basieren auf aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen und gelten für diejenigen Medikamente, die in weiten Teilen Europas, insbesondere in den deutschsprachigen Ländern (Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz), zugelassen sind.

Made to Measure: Patient-Tailored Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Using Cell-Based Therapies

Currently, there is still no cure for multiple sclerosis (MS), which is an autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Treatment options predominantly consist of drugs that affect adaptive immunity and lead to a reduction of the inflammatory disease activity. A broad range of possible cell-based therapeutic options are being explored in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, including MS. This review aims to provide an overview of recent and future advances in the development of cell-based treatment options for the induction of tolerance in MS. Here, we will focus on haematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stromal cells, regulatory T cells and dendritic cells. We will also focus on less familiar cell types that are used in cell therapy, including B cells, natural killer cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We will address key issues regarding the depicted therapies and highlight the major challenges that lie ahead to successfully reverse autoimmune diseases, such as MS, while minimising the side effects. Although cell-based therapies are well known and used in the treatment of several cancers, cell-based treatment options hold promise for the future treatment of autoimmune diseases in general, and MS in particular.