Awakening to sleep disorders in Europe: Survey on education, knowledge and treatment competence of European residents and neurologists

The Many Faces of REM Sleep Behavior Disorder. Providing Evidence for a New Lexicon

BACKGROUND

People with idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) are highly heterogeneous, showing mild motor, cognitive, and dysautonomia symptoms. The aim of this study is to unveil the clinical heterogeneity of iRBD with a specific reference to overlapping features with prodromal Parkinson's disease (pPD) and prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies (pDLB) labels.

METHODS

People with a polysomnography-confirmed diagnosis of iRBD were enrolled and followed over time. At baseline, pPD and pDLB criteria were assessed.

RESULTS

Among the 285 iRBD people (68.2 ± 7.6 years, 81% males), due to additional signs or symptoms, 49.8% fulfilled pPD criteria only, 5.6% pDLB criteria only, and 14.4% subjects fulfilled both pPD and pDLB criteria. Conversely, about one third of iRBD people (30.2%) did not meet either pPD or pDLB criteria. At follow-up (40.6 ± 43.6 months), 28.8% subjects phenoconverted, developing PD (56.1%), DLB (39%), or multiple system atrophy (4.9%). Subjects with iRBD fulfilling either pPD or pDLB criteria, or both, have an increased risk of phenoconversion (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 2.34, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.24-4.41). On the opposite, subjects not fulfilling prodromal criteria have a significantly reduced short-term phenoconversion likelihood (aHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.81). Notably, pPD and pDLB criteria did not predict PD and DLB diagnoses, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

People with iRBD are highly heterogeneous, and the presence of other concomitant signs and symptoms is frequent, leading to faster phenoconversion. Thus, the terms idiopathic and isolated may be poorly appropriate and possibly even confounding. These results pave the way to a more appropriate new lexicon for people with RBD.

Autonomic nervous system education in Europe: EAN/EFAS/INUS survey on curricula and skills in autonomic medicine of European neurology residents and consultants

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Centers for training in autonomic nervous system (ANS) disorders are not widely available and the recent coronavirus 2019 pandemic temporarily reduced training opportunities in autonomic medicine across European countries. Here we evaluated the current state of education, clinical skills and postgraduate educational preferences on ANS disorders of European neurology residents and consultants.

METHODS

A 23-item questionnaire was developed and distributed online amongst European neurology residents and consultants via mailing lists of the European Academy of Neurology. The questions assessed demographics, current training opportunities and learning preferences in ANS disorders. Six multiple-choice questions were used to self-evaluate knowledge of ANS disorders.

RESULTS

In all, 285 individuals answered the survey (60% female, mostly 25-34 years of age). All respondents considered clinical autonomic skills necessary for good clinical neurological practice, and 92% would like to increase their ANS knowledge. Female respondents and those who trained in Southern/Eastern/Greater Europe more frequently judged ANS skills important for clinical practice than male respondents (p = 0.012) and respondents from Northern/Western Europe (p = 0.011). Female and younger respondents felt less confident in managing ANS disorders (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Respondents below 45 years of age (p < 0.001) and those with lower confidence in managing ANS disorders (p = 0.004) were more likely to recommend that ANS education is embedded in the residency curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

Most European neurology residents and consultants reported a need for more autonomic education, with additional gender, age and regional differences. These findings underscore the importance of increasing the educational content on autonomic medicine in European medical and postgraduate curricula.

Connecting clinicians and patients: The language of narcolepsy

Narcolepsy is a rare lifelong sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness with variable expression of cataplexy, sleep paralysis, sleep-related hallucinations and disrupted nocturnal sleep. Affected individuals also experience additional impairing symptoms, including (but not limited to) difficulties with attention, memory and concentration, brain fog, mood instability and fatigue, with a substantial impact on everyday life. Diagnostic delays of up to 10 years are common, primarily due to the substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation of narcolepsy symptoms and presence of significant comorbidities. The disconnect in language used by clinicians and patients could be a factor contributing to diagnostic delays, but it has not been much studied. We followed a two-part approach to investigate the impact of this possible mismatch in language use. Firstly, a comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify publications reporting discrepancies in language relating to narcolepsy symptoms used by clinicians and patients. As a gap in the literature was anticipated, we supplemented the search results with practical strategies based on our clinical experience to facilitate dialog between clinicians and people living with narcolepsy, as well as proposing future research ideas. The findings of the narrative review, complemented by expert clinical opinion, are intended to help clinicians recognize narcolepsy symptoms and to refer patients with suspected narcolepsy, when appropriate. Although it is unknown to what extent a disconnect in language may contribute to diagnostic delays, we hope that better recognition of the varied clinical presentations of narcolepsy will lead to timelier diagnosis and help improve patient outcomes.

Sleep education for medical students: A study exploring gaps and opportunities

PURPOSE

To explore final-year medical students' perceptions of sleep education during medical school to inform the development of a sleep curriculum.

METHODS

Year 6 medical students on their final general practice placement in 2020 were invited to complete an online survey including questions regarding sleep education recalled during the medical programme.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 51/71 (72 %) students. Main learning topics recalled by participants were sleep apnoea (83 %), sleep physiology (71 %), and snoring (69 %). Education in other topics was reported by <65 % of students. Priority topics for students were treating common sleep disorders, taking a sleep history, and navigating shift work.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst the majority of students recalled education on specific topics, many had little awareness of education relating to sleep assessment, insomnia, or shift work. Sleep education in the curriculum needs more emphasis and reinforcement given sleep's relevance across many domains of health and morbidity. We propose that an identifiable sleep curriculum is required to ensure medical students have the necessary core education regarding sleep and sleep disorders both for patients and themselves. Further, we believe this is possible to achieve in a short timeframe within the constraints of an existing curriculum and propose some creative solutions.

Sleep Education: A Narrative Review on Barriers and Opportunities to Grow a Diverse Sleep Team

The increased recognition of sleep-wake disorders and their effects, along with the anticipated shortage of sleep medicine specialists, heralds a concomitant need to have more health care providers with dedicated training in the evaluation and management of sleep disorders across the life span. A narrative review of published literature on sleep education was conducted and identified factors related to diversity within the sleep team, barriers to implementation of sleep education, and strides in sleep education. Implementation of novel sleep education strategies will require creative navigation of barriers such as allocation of curricular time, availability of teaching faculty, and funding to train more members of the sleep team. Deliberate coordination within and across health professions programs, with efforts to share resources and leverage technology, will be instrumental to guide the next phase of growth in sleep education.

The 2022 European postgraduate (residency) programme in neurology in a historical and international perspective

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neurology residency programmes, which were first established at the beginning of the 20th century, have become mandatory all over Europe in the last 40-50 years. The first European Training Requirements in Neurology (ETRN) were published in 2005 and first updated in 2016. This paper reports the most recent revisions of the ETRN.

METHODS

Members of the EAN board performed an in depth revision of the ETNR 2016-version, which was reviewed by members of the European Board and Section of Neurology of the UEMS, the Education and Scientific Panels, the Resident and Research Fellow Section and the Board of the EAN, as well as the presidents of the 47 European National Societies.

RESULTS

The new (2022) ETRN suggest a 5-year training subdivided in three phases: a first phase (2 years) of general neurology training, a second phase (2 years) of training in neurophysiology/neurological subspecialties and a third phase (1 year) to expand clinical training (e.g., in other neurodisciplines) or for research (path for clinical neuroscientist). The necessary theoretical and clinical competences as well as learning objectives in diagnostic tests have been updated, are newly organized in four levels and include 19 neurological subspecialties. Finally, the new ETRN require, in addition to a programme director, a team of clinician-educators who regularly review the resident's progress. The 2022 update of the ETRN reflects emerging requirements for the practice of neurology and contributes to the international standardization of training necessary for the increasing needs of residents and specialists across Europe.

Diagnosis, management and impact on patients' lives of cancer-related neuropathic pain (CRNP): A European survey

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the impact of cancer-related neuropathic pain (CRNP) on patients and the importance of the patient-healthcare professional (HCP) relationship in diagnosis and management.

METHODS

A quantitative online survey was conducted involving adult patients from 13 European countries who had been diagnosed with treatable cancer and experienced symptoms of peripheral neuropathy.

RESULTS

Of 24,733 screened respondents, 549 eligible persons met the inclusion criteria and completed the questionnaire. Among individuals still experiencing pain, 75% rated it as 'severe' or 'moderate'. In addition, 61% reported a negative impact on day-to-day activities, and 30% said they had stopped working as a result. A third of respondents had received no diagnosis of CRNP despite reporting painful symptoms to an HCP. HCPs spending enough time discussing pain and understanding the impact on patients' lives were each associated with an increased likelihood of a formal CRNP diagnosis. Compared with individuals currently in active cancer treatment, cancer survivors were less likely to have a diagnosis of CRNP or regular pain conversations with HCPs.

CONCLUSION

CRNP remains under-recognised despite its substantial impact on patients' lives. Clinical practice may be improved by strengthening patient-HCP relationships around pain discussions and increasing the focus on pain management among cancer survivors.

NeuroTec Sitem-Insel Bern: Closing the Last Mile in Neurology

Neurology is focused on a model where patients receive their care through repeated visits to clinics and doctor’s offices. Diagnostic tests often require expensive and specialized equipment that are only available in clinics. However, this current model has significant drawbacks. First, diagnostic tests, such as daytime EEG and sleep studies, occur under artificial conditions in the clinic, which may mask or wrongly emphasize clinically important features. Second, early detection and high-quality management of chronic neurological disorders require repeat measurements to accurately capture the dynamics of the disease process, which is impractical to execute in the clinic for economical and logistical reasons. Third, clinic visits remain inaccessible to many patients due to geographical and economical circumstances. Fourth, global disruptions to daily life, such as the one caused by COVID-19, can seriously harm patients if access to in-person clinical visits for diagnostic and treatment purposes is throttled. Thus, translating diagnostic and treatment procedures to patients’ homes will convey multiple substantial benefits and has the potential to substantially improve clinical outcomes while reducing cost. NeuroTec was founded to accelerate the re-imagining of neurology and to promote the convergence of technological, scientific, medical and societal processes. The goal is to identify and validate new digital biomarkers that can close the last mile in neurology by enabling the translation of personalized diagnostics and therapeutic interventions from the clinic to the patient’s home.